Primary vs secondary: A review of pneumothorax management

THORACIC ONCOLOGY AND CHEST PROCEDURES NETWORK

Pleural Disease Section

Dr. Cristina Salmon

Optimal management of primary spontaneous (PSP) and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) remains an area of ongoing debate, with both CHEST and the British Thoracic Society (BTS) offering guidelines to address management decisions.

The consensus for treatment of PSP depends on the size of the pneumothorax; if smaller than 2-3 cm, the patient can be observed for 3-6 hours and if radiographically stable, can discharge home with close (within 48 hours) follow-up and repeat chest radiograph (CXR).^1,2 If symptomatic or large, an intervention is recommended or home discharge with a Heimlich valve and close follow up (48 hours) with interval CXR.¹ For the management of SSP, it is recommended that the patient remain hospitalized, with a lower threshold to intervene with chest tube placement.^1,2

Dr. Praneet Iyer

Both the 2001 CHEST guidelines and 2010 BTS guidelines recommend the use of a small bore pigtail catheter (<14 Fr) for management of PSP.^1,2 Expert consensus and retrospective studies recommend the use of a large bore chest tube (>28 French) in patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax and concomitant hemothorax, empyema, large air leaks, or mechanical ventilation.^3,4

For patients requiring pleurodesis, talc slurry is frequently used due to it being widely available and inexpensive.⁵ However, talc is associated with impurities and has been associated with severe pain, fever, dyspnea, and pneumonitis.^6,7 Other agents such as doxycycline have been studied but overall data is lacking. One study comparing doxycycline solution with talc slurry showed less recurrence of pneumothorax with talc as compared with doxycycline with no difference in side effects.⁸

Dr. John Shumar

– Praneet Iyer, MD

Member-at-Large

– Cristina Salmon, MD

Fellow-in-Training

– John N. Shumar, DO

Member-at-Large

References

1. Baumann MH, AACP Pneumothorax Consensus Group, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. CHEST. 2001;119:590-602. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.2.590

2. Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65:ii32-ii40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994

3. Lin YC, Tu CY, Liang SJ, et al. Pigtail catheter for the management of pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(4):466-471. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.033. Epub 2010 Jan 28. PMID: 20466227.4. Baumann MH. Pleural Disease: An International Textbook. London: Arnold Publishers; 2003.

5. How CH, Hsu HH, Chen JS. Chemical pleurodesis for spontaneous pneumothorax. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:749-755. 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.10.016

6. Rehse DH, Aye RW, Florence MG. Respiratory failure following talc pleurodesis. Am J Surg. 1999;177:437-440. Doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00075-6

7. Ferrer J, Villarino MA, Tura JM, et al. Talc preparations used for pleurodesis vary markedly from one preparation to another. CHEST. 2001;119:1901-1905. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.6.1901

8. Park EH, Kim JH, Yee J, et al. Comparisons of doxycycline solution with talc slurry for chemical pleurodesis and risk factors for recurrence in South Korean patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019;26(5):275-279. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001465. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PMID: 31656615; PMCID: PMC6788261.