Conference Coverage

Gender-specific biomarker thresholds urged in MI diagnosis

View on the News

Better capture rate, better care

The under-recognition of heart disease and differences in clinical presentation in women lead to less aggressive treatment strategies and a lower representation of women in clinical trials. Thus, as seen in this study, an improvement in the diagnosis of MI in women using the more sensitive cardiac troponin assay and different gender-based cutoffs can have a meaningful impact in outcomes in our female patients.

Dr. Hiren Shah

In a recent large meta-analysis of 11 randomized ACS trials it was shown that sex-based differences in 30-day mortality among patients with various manifestations of ACS are largely explained by clinical differences at presentation and the severity of angiographically documented disease (JAMA. 2009;302:874-82.). Thus, new assays that account for gender-based differences may lead to an earlier identification of heart disease in women to address some component of this mortality disparity.

The second phase of this study using these new thresholds will shed light on if this increased capture rate of MI for women leads to improved long term cardiac outcomes, as one hopes that the increased sensitivity seen in the first phase of the study is also balanced with an improvement in specificity. If the results of this and future studies are conclusive, gender-based interpretation of diagnostic tests will lead to earlier diagnosis and improved therapeutic strategies in women.

Dr. Hiren Shah is an assistant professor of medicine in the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, and a medical director of the Medicine and Cardiac Telemetry Hospitalist Unit at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago. He is on the advisory board of Hospitalist News.


 

AT THE ESC CONGRESS 2013

"If improved sensitivity does not impinge on specificity in diagnosis, then clinical outcomes will improve through better targeting of therapies for coronary heart disease. But if increased sensitivity leads to poorer specificity, then misdiagnosis and use of inappropriate therapies may lead to detrimental clinical outcomes," Dr. Mills explained.

Discussant Dr. Eva Swahn of Linkoping (Sweden) University commented that if the results of this High-STEACS substudy showing the value of gender-specific biomarker thresholds hold up, the implications regarding diagnosis and management of MI in women could be great. But elevations in cardiac troponins can be caused by other conditions besides acute MI, including stable angina, renal failure, diabetes, and heart failure, and the substudy design leaves her unconvinced that troponin I elevations in the 17- to 49-ng/L range were necessarily due to MI.

"If you don’t have an MI you shouldn’t be treated as though you do. The management will be completely wrong, and maybe the outcome will be worse," she cautioned.

High-STEACS is funded by the British Heart Foundation. Abbott Diagnostics is supplying the cardiac troponin assay materials. Dr. Mills and Dr. Swahn reported having no financial conflicts.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Pages

Next Article:

Advisers support FDA approval of wireless HF monitoring device

Related Articles