News

Short-course TB therapy fails in three international trials

View on the News

True understanding remains elusive

Although the studies described here have established the capacity for large, multicenter trials across disease-endemic countries, the design and selection of future experimental regimens will need to incorporate a triage process that can mitigate risks while enabling the accelerated development of much-needed treatment-shortening therapies. The disconnect between the phase II data that motivated these trials and the phase III results reinforces the idea that small sample sizes limit the utility of short trials in predicting the success of treatment-shortening regimens.

As these three trials have confirmed, our understanding of the science underlying positive clinical outcomes remains rudimentary. It’s time to go back to basics.

Digby F. Warner, Ph.D., and Valerie Mizrahi, Ph.D., are in the molecular mycobacteriology research unit at the Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Cape Town and in the department of clinical laboratory sciences at the University of Cape Town, both in South Africa. Dr. Warner reported receiving funding from the South African Medical Research Council, Medical Research Foundation South Africa, and Wellcome Trust. Dr. Mizrahi reported funding from the European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and USAID. Dr. Mizrahi also serves on the scientific advisory committee of the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, which supported Dr. Gillespie’s study. This comment is excerpted from an editorial by Dr. Warner and Dr. Mizrahi that accompanied the three reports (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1410977]).


 

References

Three different short-course treatment regimens for tuberculosis failed to show noninferiority to the standard 6-month course in separate phase III randomized clinical trials, even though the experimental regimens produced a more rapid decline in bacterial load, as expected, according to reports published online Oct. 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The main reason that the short-course (4-month) approaches failed to measure up to standard treatment was that, despite their greater bactericidal activity, the rate of relapse was excessive after treatment was completed.

Three potential short-course treatment regimens for tuberculosis failed to show noninferiority to the standard 6-month course. Photo Credit: Janice Carr, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Three potential short-course treatment regimens for tuberculosis failed to show noninferiority to the standard 6-month course.

Researchers undertook these large international trials because the data from several phase II and murine studies had been so promising: replacing either the isoniazid or the ethambutol in the standard anti-TB regimen with a fluoroquinolone appeared to permit shortening of the treatment period without sacrificing efficacy. But the consistently negative results from these phase III studies clearly demonstrate that this approach is not effective.

The first trial involved 1,931 adults with newly diagnosed and untreated Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection who were treated in South Africa, India, Tanzania, Kenya, Thailand, Malaysia, Zambia, China, and Mexico. These patients were randomly assigned to receive the standard regimen of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for 8 weeks, followed by 18 weeks of isoniazid plus rifampin (control group, 640 participants); or an experimental regimen in which ethambutol was replaced by moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (655 participants); or an experimental regimen in which isoniazid was replaced by moxifloxacin in the same way (636 participants), said Dr. Stephen H. Gillespie of the University of St. Andrews (England) and University College London and his associates.

Patients in the two experimental groups converted to culture-negative status more rapidly than did those in the control group. However, in a per-protocol analysis, 92% of the control group achieved a favorable final outcome, compared with only 85% and 80% of the experimental groups, respectively. Results of a modified intention-to-treat analysis and of more than 20 sensitivity analyses showed the same pattern. At the end of active treatment, only 12 patients in the control group had a relapse of TB infection, compared with 64 patients and 46 patients, respectively, in the experimental groups, Dr. Gillespie and his colleagues said (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 23 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1407426]).

The second trial was an open-label noninferiority study involving 1,836 patients in Benin, Guinea, Kenya, Senegal, and South Africa. They were randomly assigned to standard 6-month treatment (919 control subjects) or an experimental treatment in which gatifloxacin was substituted for ethambutol and the course of therapy was shortened to 4 months (917 patients), said Dr. Corinne S. Merle of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and her associates.

Pages

Next Article:

Clinical trial begins for new Ebola vaccine