Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:05
Display Headline
Are the implant and IUD effective beyond 3 and 5 years?

The etonogestrel contraceptive implant and the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) remain highly effective for an additional year beyond the FDA-approved intervals of 3 and 5 years, respectively, according to a newly published prospective study.1

In the study, implant users (n = 237) contributed 229.4 women-years of follow-up, with 123 women using the implant for 4 years and 34 using it for 5 years. No pregnancies were documented—a failure rate of 0 (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0–1.61) per 100 women-years.

Of 263 LNG-IUS users, 197.7 women-years of follow-up found only one pregnancy—a failure rate of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.01–2.82) per 100 women-years.

Among implant users with serum etonogestrel levels assessed, the median at 3 years of use was 188.8 pg/mL (range, 63.8–802.6 pg/mL). At 4 years, the median etonogestrel level was 177.0 pg/mL (range, 67,9–470.5 pg/mL). Etonogestrel levels did not vary by body mass index at either 3 years (P = .79) or 4 years (P = .47). These serum levels indicate that the implant contains adequate hormone for ovulation suppression at the end of both 3 and 4 years of use.

References

Reference

1. McNicholas C, Maddipati R, Zhao Q; Swor E, Peipert JF. Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the US Food and Drug Administration-approved duration. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 February 4. Published ahead of print. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000690.

Author and Disclosure Information

Deborah Reale, Managing Editor

Issue
OBG Management - 27(2)
Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
etonogestrel,contraceptive,implant,levonorgestrel intrauterine,ovulation suppression
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Deborah Reale, Managing Editor

Author and Disclosure Information

Deborah Reale, Managing Editor

Related Articles

The etonogestrel contraceptive implant and the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) remain highly effective for an additional year beyond the FDA-approved intervals of 3 and 5 years, respectively, according to a newly published prospective study.1

In the study, implant users (n = 237) contributed 229.4 women-years of follow-up, with 123 women using the implant for 4 years and 34 using it for 5 years. No pregnancies were documented—a failure rate of 0 (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0–1.61) per 100 women-years.

Of 263 LNG-IUS users, 197.7 women-years of follow-up found only one pregnancy—a failure rate of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.01–2.82) per 100 women-years.

Among implant users with serum etonogestrel levels assessed, the median at 3 years of use was 188.8 pg/mL (range, 63.8–802.6 pg/mL). At 4 years, the median etonogestrel level was 177.0 pg/mL (range, 67,9–470.5 pg/mL). Etonogestrel levels did not vary by body mass index at either 3 years (P = .79) or 4 years (P = .47). These serum levels indicate that the implant contains adequate hormone for ovulation suppression at the end of both 3 and 4 years of use.

The etonogestrel contraceptive implant and the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) remain highly effective for an additional year beyond the FDA-approved intervals of 3 and 5 years, respectively, according to a newly published prospective study.1

In the study, implant users (n = 237) contributed 229.4 women-years of follow-up, with 123 women using the implant for 4 years and 34 using it for 5 years. No pregnancies were documented—a failure rate of 0 (one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0–1.61) per 100 women-years.

Of 263 LNG-IUS users, 197.7 women-years of follow-up found only one pregnancy—a failure rate of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.01–2.82) per 100 women-years.

Among implant users with serum etonogestrel levels assessed, the median at 3 years of use was 188.8 pg/mL (range, 63.8–802.6 pg/mL). At 4 years, the median etonogestrel level was 177.0 pg/mL (range, 67,9–470.5 pg/mL). Etonogestrel levels did not vary by body mass index at either 3 years (P = .79) or 4 years (P = .47). These serum levels indicate that the implant contains adequate hormone for ovulation suppression at the end of both 3 and 4 years of use.

References

Reference

1. McNicholas C, Maddipati R, Zhao Q; Swor E, Peipert JF. Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the US Food and Drug Administration-approved duration. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 February 4. Published ahead of print. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000690.

References

Reference

1. McNicholas C, Maddipati R, Zhao Q; Swor E, Peipert JF. Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the US Food and Drug Administration-approved duration. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 February 4. Published ahead of print. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000690.

Issue
OBG Management - 27(2)
Issue
OBG Management - 27(2)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Are the implant and IUD effective beyond 3 and 5 years?
Display Headline
Are the implant and IUD effective beyond 3 and 5 years?
Legacy Keywords
etonogestrel,contraceptive,implant,levonorgestrel intrauterine,ovulation suppression
Legacy Keywords
etonogestrel,contraceptive,implant,levonorgestrel intrauterine,ovulation suppression
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article