Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/19/2019 - 13:40
Display Headline
Commentary to "5 Points on Total Ankle Arthroplasty"

There are considerable differences in the design and implantation technique of the current total ankle implants available in the United States, eg, mobile vs. fixed bearing, intramedullary vs. extramedullary guidance, anterior vs. lateral surgical approach, flat vs. curved bone cuts, natural articular design with minimal bone resection (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle; Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) vs. larger implant construct with more bone resection (Inbone II; Figure 2). There is no evidence that one implant design is superior, and, as the authors conclude, “Direct comparisons between TAA [total ankle arthroplasty] implant systems are needed to determine what clinical benefits are achieved with each design and what contributes to these differences.”

Hsu AR, Anderson RB, Cohen BE. Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2014;43(10):451-457.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Glenn B. Pfeffer, MD

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 43(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
457
Legacy Keywords
american journal of orthopedics, AJO, commentary, total ankle arthroplasty, arthroplasty, TAA, ankle, Pfeffer, implants
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Glenn B. Pfeffer, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Glenn B. Pfeffer, MD

There are considerable differences in the design and implantation technique of the current total ankle implants available in the United States, eg, mobile vs. fixed bearing, intramedullary vs. extramedullary guidance, anterior vs. lateral surgical approach, flat vs. curved bone cuts, natural articular design with minimal bone resection (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle; Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) vs. larger implant construct with more bone resection (Inbone II; Figure 2). There is no evidence that one implant design is superior, and, as the authors conclude, “Direct comparisons between TAA [total ankle arthroplasty] implant systems are needed to determine what clinical benefits are achieved with each design and what contributes to these differences.”

Hsu AR, Anderson RB, Cohen BE. Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2014;43(10):451-457.

There are considerable differences in the design and implantation technique of the current total ankle implants available in the United States, eg, mobile vs. fixed bearing, intramedullary vs. extramedullary guidance, anterior vs. lateral surgical approach, flat vs. curved bone cuts, natural articular design with minimal bone resection (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle; Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) vs. larger implant construct with more bone resection (Inbone II; Figure 2). There is no evidence that one implant design is superior, and, as the authors conclude, “Direct comparisons between TAA [total ankle arthroplasty] implant systems are needed to determine what clinical benefits are achieved with each design and what contributes to these differences.”

Hsu AR, Anderson RB, Cohen BE. Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2014;43(10):451-457.

References

References

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 43(10)
Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 43(10)
Page Number
457
Page Number
457
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Commentary to "5 Points on Total Ankle Arthroplasty"
Display Headline
Commentary to "5 Points on Total Ankle Arthroplasty"
Legacy Keywords
american journal of orthopedics, AJO, commentary, total ankle arthroplasty, arthroplasty, TAA, ankle, Pfeffer, implants
Legacy Keywords
american journal of orthopedics, AJO, commentary, total ankle arthroplasty, arthroplasty, TAA, ankle, Pfeffer, implants
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article