User login
These findings confirm earlier data and support the accepted practice of avoiding the prescription of valproate for women of reproductive potential, if at all possible. They do not support the possibility that a judicious dose or careful timing during pregnancy increases the safety of this drug in regard to autism. Although its absolute risk is less than 5%, autism may be associated with severe, lifelong disability. Therefore, I recommend that providers make every attempt to avoid giving valproate to women during preconception and pregnancy.
In utero exposure to valproate (VPA) is associated with a 6% to 10% risk of major congenital malformations, including spina bifida and hypospadias.1 These risks are linked to first-trimester exposure and are dose-dependent, with daily doses below 750 mg carrying a 4% risk of malformation, and daily doses above 2,000 mg carrying a risk of about 20%.2
Cognitive teratogenesis in offspring exposed to VPA in utero also has been described,3 and an association between VPA and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been suspected, but convincing data have not been published until now. This population-based, retrospective study using Danish national medical registers identified children with ASD or childhood autism and determined the independent risk of these disorders associated with in utero exposure to VPA.
The issue of cognitive teratogenesis in VPA-exposed children has evolved since the initial recognition, in 2001, that these offspring have increased educational needs.4 An association between in utero exposure to VPA and ASD was first described in 2008 by Bromley and colleagues, who reported that 6.3% (4/64) of VPA-exposed children developed the disorder—a sevenfold increase in the expected rate of autistic features.5
Details of the study
Christensen and colleagues reviewed the records of all live births in Denmark from 1996 to 2006, using national registers to identify children who were exposed to VPA in utero and later given a diagnosis of ASD or childhood autism. These children were followed from birth until the diagnosis of ASD or childhood autism, death, emigration, or December 31, 2010, whichever came first.
Investigators adjusted for potential confounders:
- maternal age at conception
- paternal age at conception
- parental psychiatric history
- gestational age
- birth weight
- sex
- congenital malformations
- parity.
Other important variables evaluated by the investigators include maternal epilepsy, use of other antiepileptic drugs, and antiepileptic drug polytherapy.
Among VPA-exposed children (n = 508), the absolute risk of ASD was 4.42%, and the absolute risk of childhood autism was 2.95%. By comparison, in the overall population (n = 655,107), the absolute risks of ASD and childhood autism were 1.53% and 0.48%, respectively.
No other antiepileptic drugs were associated with an increased risk of these disorders, and maternal epilepsy itself did not increase their risk significantly.
In contrast to the risk of structural teratogenesis, which varies by the trimester of exposure and the dose of VPA, investigators found no association with trimester of exposure or dose in regard to ASD and childhood autism. In other words, there is no safe time in pregnancy to stop or start valproate and no safe dose of valproate in pregnancy to mitigate the risk of autism.
Strengths and limitations
This is a convincing and impressively performed study. The only limitations are its retrospective nature (although the investigators adjusted for the increase in the expected background occurrence of autism during the study period) and the issues inherent in a population based study:
- Is the national database entry accurate?
- Is this population the same as the population I am interested in?
We are presuming that the answer to both questions is “Yes.”
WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
These findings confirm earlier data and support the accepted practice of avoiding the prescription of valproate for women of reproductive potential, if at all possible. They do not support the possibility that a judicious dose or careful timing during pregnancy increases the safety of this drug in regard to autism. Although its absolute risk is less than 5%, autism may be associated with severe, lifelong disability. Therefore, I recommend that providers make every attempt to avoid giving valproate to women during preconception and pregnancy.
Cynthia L. Harden, MD
- Harden CL, Meador KJ, Pennell PB, et al; American Academy of Neurology; American Epilepsy Society. Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy—focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neuroloy and American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2009;73(2):133–141.
- Vajda FJ, Graham J, Roten A, Lander CM, O’Brien TJ, Eadie M. Teratogenicity of the newer antiepileptic drugs—the Australian experience. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(1):57–59.
- Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, et al; NEAD Study Group. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(3):244–252.
- Adab N, Jacoby A, Smith D, Chadwick D. Additional educational needs in children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(1):15–21.
- Bromley RL, Mawer G, Clayton-Smith J, Baker GA; Liverpool and Manchester Neurodevelopment Group. Autism spectrum disorders following in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs. Neurology. 2008;71(23):1923–1924.
These findings confirm earlier data and support the accepted practice of avoiding the prescription of valproate for women of reproductive potential, if at all possible. They do not support the possibility that a judicious dose or careful timing during pregnancy increases the safety of this drug in regard to autism. Although its absolute risk is less than 5%, autism may be associated with severe, lifelong disability. Therefore, I recommend that providers make every attempt to avoid giving valproate to women during preconception and pregnancy.
In utero exposure to valproate (VPA) is associated with a 6% to 10% risk of major congenital malformations, including spina bifida and hypospadias.1 These risks are linked to first-trimester exposure and are dose-dependent, with daily doses below 750 mg carrying a 4% risk of malformation, and daily doses above 2,000 mg carrying a risk of about 20%.2
Cognitive teratogenesis in offspring exposed to VPA in utero also has been described,3 and an association between VPA and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been suspected, but convincing data have not been published until now. This population-based, retrospective study using Danish national medical registers identified children with ASD or childhood autism and determined the independent risk of these disorders associated with in utero exposure to VPA.
The issue of cognitive teratogenesis in VPA-exposed children has evolved since the initial recognition, in 2001, that these offspring have increased educational needs.4 An association between in utero exposure to VPA and ASD was first described in 2008 by Bromley and colleagues, who reported that 6.3% (4/64) of VPA-exposed children developed the disorder—a sevenfold increase in the expected rate of autistic features.5
Details of the study
Christensen and colleagues reviewed the records of all live births in Denmark from 1996 to 2006, using national registers to identify children who were exposed to VPA in utero and later given a diagnosis of ASD or childhood autism. These children were followed from birth until the diagnosis of ASD or childhood autism, death, emigration, or December 31, 2010, whichever came first.
Investigators adjusted for potential confounders:
- maternal age at conception
- paternal age at conception
- parental psychiatric history
- gestational age
- birth weight
- sex
- congenital malformations
- parity.
Other important variables evaluated by the investigators include maternal epilepsy, use of other antiepileptic drugs, and antiepileptic drug polytherapy.
Among VPA-exposed children (n = 508), the absolute risk of ASD was 4.42%, and the absolute risk of childhood autism was 2.95%. By comparison, in the overall population (n = 655,107), the absolute risks of ASD and childhood autism were 1.53% and 0.48%, respectively.
No other antiepileptic drugs were associated with an increased risk of these disorders, and maternal epilepsy itself did not increase their risk significantly.
In contrast to the risk of structural teratogenesis, which varies by the trimester of exposure and the dose of VPA, investigators found no association with trimester of exposure or dose in regard to ASD and childhood autism. In other words, there is no safe time in pregnancy to stop or start valproate and no safe dose of valproate in pregnancy to mitigate the risk of autism.
Strengths and limitations
This is a convincing and impressively performed study. The only limitations are its retrospective nature (although the investigators adjusted for the increase in the expected background occurrence of autism during the study period) and the issues inherent in a population based study:
- Is the national database entry accurate?
- Is this population the same as the population I am interested in?
We are presuming that the answer to both questions is “Yes.”
WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
These findings confirm earlier data and support the accepted practice of avoiding the prescription of valproate for women of reproductive potential, if at all possible. They do not support the possibility that a judicious dose or careful timing during pregnancy increases the safety of this drug in regard to autism. Although its absolute risk is less than 5%, autism may be associated with severe, lifelong disability. Therefore, I recommend that providers make every attempt to avoid giving valproate to women during preconception and pregnancy.
Cynthia L. Harden, MD
These findings confirm earlier data and support the accepted practice of avoiding the prescription of valproate for women of reproductive potential, if at all possible. They do not support the possibility that a judicious dose or careful timing during pregnancy increases the safety of this drug in regard to autism. Although its absolute risk is less than 5%, autism may be associated with severe, lifelong disability. Therefore, I recommend that providers make every attempt to avoid giving valproate to women during preconception and pregnancy.
In utero exposure to valproate (VPA) is associated with a 6% to 10% risk of major congenital malformations, including spina bifida and hypospadias.1 These risks are linked to first-trimester exposure and are dose-dependent, with daily doses below 750 mg carrying a 4% risk of malformation, and daily doses above 2,000 mg carrying a risk of about 20%.2
Cognitive teratogenesis in offspring exposed to VPA in utero also has been described,3 and an association between VPA and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been suspected, but convincing data have not been published until now. This population-based, retrospective study using Danish national medical registers identified children with ASD or childhood autism and determined the independent risk of these disorders associated with in utero exposure to VPA.
The issue of cognitive teratogenesis in VPA-exposed children has evolved since the initial recognition, in 2001, that these offspring have increased educational needs.4 An association between in utero exposure to VPA and ASD was first described in 2008 by Bromley and colleagues, who reported that 6.3% (4/64) of VPA-exposed children developed the disorder—a sevenfold increase in the expected rate of autistic features.5
Details of the study
Christensen and colleagues reviewed the records of all live births in Denmark from 1996 to 2006, using national registers to identify children who were exposed to VPA in utero and later given a diagnosis of ASD or childhood autism. These children were followed from birth until the diagnosis of ASD or childhood autism, death, emigration, or December 31, 2010, whichever came first.
Investigators adjusted for potential confounders:
- maternal age at conception
- paternal age at conception
- parental psychiatric history
- gestational age
- birth weight
- sex
- congenital malformations
- parity.
Other important variables evaluated by the investigators include maternal epilepsy, use of other antiepileptic drugs, and antiepileptic drug polytherapy.
Among VPA-exposed children (n = 508), the absolute risk of ASD was 4.42%, and the absolute risk of childhood autism was 2.95%. By comparison, in the overall population (n = 655,107), the absolute risks of ASD and childhood autism were 1.53% and 0.48%, respectively.
No other antiepileptic drugs were associated with an increased risk of these disorders, and maternal epilepsy itself did not increase their risk significantly.
In contrast to the risk of structural teratogenesis, which varies by the trimester of exposure and the dose of VPA, investigators found no association with trimester of exposure or dose in regard to ASD and childhood autism. In other words, there is no safe time in pregnancy to stop or start valproate and no safe dose of valproate in pregnancy to mitigate the risk of autism.
Strengths and limitations
This is a convincing and impressively performed study. The only limitations are its retrospective nature (although the investigators adjusted for the increase in the expected background occurrence of autism during the study period) and the issues inherent in a population based study:
- Is the national database entry accurate?
- Is this population the same as the population I am interested in?
We are presuming that the answer to both questions is “Yes.”
WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
These findings confirm earlier data and support the accepted practice of avoiding the prescription of valproate for women of reproductive potential, if at all possible. They do not support the possibility that a judicious dose or careful timing during pregnancy increases the safety of this drug in regard to autism. Although its absolute risk is less than 5%, autism may be associated with severe, lifelong disability. Therefore, I recommend that providers make every attempt to avoid giving valproate to women during preconception and pregnancy.
Cynthia L. Harden, MD
- Harden CL, Meador KJ, Pennell PB, et al; American Academy of Neurology; American Epilepsy Society. Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy—focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neuroloy and American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2009;73(2):133–141.
- Vajda FJ, Graham J, Roten A, Lander CM, O’Brien TJ, Eadie M. Teratogenicity of the newer antiepileptic drugs—the Australian experience. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(1):57–59.
- Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, et al; NEAD Study Group. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(3):244–252.
- Adab N, Jacoby A, Smith D, Chadwick D. Additional educational needs in children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(1):15–21.
- Bromley RL, Mawer G, Clayton-Smith J, Baker GA; Liverpool and Manchester Neurodevelopment Group. Autism spectrum disorders following in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs. Neurology. 2008;71(23):1923–1924.
- Harden CL, Meador KJ, Pennell PB, et al; American Academy of Neurology; American Epilepsy Society. Practice parameter update: management issues for women with epilepsy—focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neuroloy and American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2009;73(2):133–141.
- Vajda FJ, Graham J, Roten A, Lander CM, O’Brien TJ, Eadie M. Teratogenicity of the newer antiepileptic drugs—the Australian experience. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(1):57–59.
- Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, et al; NEAD Study Group. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(3):244–252.
- Adab N, Jacoby A, Smith D, Chadwick D. Additional educational needs in children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(1):15–21.
- Bromley RL, Mawer G, Clayton-Smith J, Baker GA; Liverpool and Manchester Neurodevelopment Group. Autism spectrum disorders following in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs. Neurology. 2008;71(23):1923–1924.
