Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:49
Display Headline
Estradiol gel: A new option in hormone replacement therapy

KEY POINTS

  • Percutaneous estradiol gel can be prescribed at low doses.
  • Relief of menopausal symptoms can begin as early as 2 weeks after starting treatment.
  • Treatment with estradiol gel maintains or increases bone mineral density.
  • No large randomized, controlled trials have explored the effect of estradiol gel on coronary artery disease. It appears to have metabolic effects similar to those of oral estradiol.
  • Because percutaneous estradiol stimulates the endometrium, women with an intact uterus should also take a progestogen.

Although the Women’s Health Initiative1 discouraged many menopausal women from using oral estrogen, it failed to address the risks of treatment with other dosages or forms of estrogen and progestin.

Nor has any other trial of similar size and complexity taken up the issue. However, numerous smaller studies have been published.

This article summarizes findings on percutaneous delivery of estradiol gel (EstroGel), the most recently FDA-approved estrogen option for treatment of menopausal symptoms.

It describes the overall safety of estradiol gel, as well as its effectson:

  • menopausal symptoms,
  • bone,
  • metabolism, and
  • endometrium.

(In this article, “percutaneous delivery” refers to estradiol gel applied to the skin, and “transdermal estradiol” indicates delivery via a transdermal reservoir or matrix system, otherwise known as “the patch.” I have used an arbitrary definition to distinguish the gel from other methods of delivering estradiol across the skin. For example, Estrasorb is a liposomal formulation that is applied to the skin of the thigh. Although it is a percutaneous estradiol similar to the gel, this article focuses only on the latter option.)

Easy to apply, few skin reactions

Percutaneous estradiol gel formulations have been available for almost 30 years in Europe, where they are utilized by a majority of women on hormone therapy. In the United States, the hydroalcoholic gel is packaged in a pump that delivers 64 standardized 1.25-g doses, which contain 0.75 mg of 17ß-estradiol. Once it is applied, the gel is absorbed into an intradermal reservoir (FIGURE) and dries in 2 to 5 minutes, leaving no residue.

Patient selection. Estradiol gel is well-suited for patients who are concerned about the risks of oral estrogen (as portrayed in the mainstream press following the Women’s Health Initiative) and want to avoid that route of administration, as well as women who dislike or have difficulty swallowing pills. Percutaneous administration also is appropriate for physically active women who may have adhesion problems or skin irritation with the transdermal patch, or those who have had reactions to local adhesives in the past. The patient should be motivated to apply the gel on a daily basis.

Indications are moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women, and moderate to severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, although topical vaginal products should also be considered for the latter indication.

Contraindications are undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding; history of breast cancer, other estrogen-dependent malignancy, stroke, heart attack, or liver disease or dysfunction; active thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorders (or a history of these); and known or suspected pregnancy.

Common side effects include headache, breast pain, irregular vaginal bleeding or spotting, stomach cramps or bloating, nausea and vomiting, and hair loss.

  • Skin reactions are infrequent, but should be taken into account when discussing per-cutaneous or transdermal delivery of any drug. However, estradiol gel appears to cause fewer skin reactions than the patch. In a study over more than 5 years, 0 of 157 women treated with percutaneous estradiol reported skin irritation.2 Other comparisons found similar outcomes.3,4
After the gel dries, other lotions or per-fumes can be applied to the site, if desired, and the woman can cover the site with clothing.

Onset of action is rapid, as it is with the transdermal patch.5 Dose variability is minimized when the gel is applied at the same time every day to a large area of skin, preferably the arm, although all application sites appear to produce similar results: abdomen, shoulders, arms, and inner thigh.6 The gel should not be applied to the breast or vagina.

Diminished effect with skin washing. In 1 trial, site washing 1/2 hour after application significantly decreased bioavailability and time to reach peak plasma concentrations.7 For this reason, the gel should be not applied before a bath, shower, or sauna.

Dosing options. The initial dose is 1.25 mg of gel, which is 1 pump of the bottle. The gel is collected in the palm of 1 hand and applied to the skin of the opposite arm from the wrist to the shoulder. The dose can be titrated by adding a second pump of the gel and applying it to the opposite arm. The dose can be lowered by using less than a full depression of the pump.

 

 

Stable, physiologic estrogen levels

Estradiol gel produces relatively stable serum estradiol levels, and therapeutic estradiol levels similar to those seen with other formulations, routes of administration, and dosages.

Percutaneous administration produces serum estrone to estradiol ratios close to 1, in contrast to higher ratios (5:1) with oral administration.8-11 The lower ratio approximates levels during the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. (TABLE 1 gives estradiol and estrone levels from different studies following administration of estradiol as a gel, oral formulation, and transdermal patch.)

The percutaneous route also allows for delivery directly to the systemic circulation, avoiding gastrointestinal and first-pass hepatic metabolism and elimination. In contrast, oral micronized estradiol causes large fluctuations in serum estradiol and estrone levels due to absorption and metabolism.8

More stable serum levels than with the patch. One study12 comparing percutaneous and transdermal estradiol found similar interindividual variability but less stable serum levels in women using the transdermal system. A separate study13 also reported greater fluctuation of serum estradiol levels in women using a transdermal system than in those using the gel.

TABLE 1

Serum estradiol and estrone levels for various routes of estradiol

AUTHORTHERAPYESTRADIOL LEVEL (PG/ML)ESTRONE LEVEL (PG/ML)
Scott et al8E2gel 3 mg/day102.9±39.9120.0±50.5
E2gel 1.5 mg/day68.1±27.490.6±45.7
Transdermal estradiol 50 μg/day41.1±13.545.0±15.9
Oral micronized estradiol 2 mg/day114.0±65.2575.2±279.9
Palacios et al10E2gel 1.5 mg/day75.7±1.058.5±2.9
Oral conjugated estrogen 0.625 mg/day39.6±4.6126.0±7.6
Basdevant et al11E2gel 3 mg/day221.0±35.0146.0±19.0
Oral micronized estradiol 2 mg/day121.0±27.0811.0±370.0
Archer15E2gel 0.75 mg/day33.5*49.0*
E2gel 1.5 mg/day65.0*58.0*
Placebo5.0*23.0*
*Median value
E2gel = percutaneous estradiol gel

Studies compared relief of menopausal symptoms

Estradiol gel effectively relieved meno-pausal symptoms in randomized, double-blind studies, open label comparisons, and observational trials in postmenopausal women, with and without the addition of various progestins.

Symptom relief in comparison with baseline values is statistically significant as early as 2 weeks after initiating treatment. Relief of up to 2 years’ duration has been reported.3,14

Several studies have compared symptom relief achieved with estradiol gel, oral estrogen, transdermal delivery systems, and placebo3,9,14-18; findings are summarized in TABLE 2.

Same efficacy when progestogen is added. The following studies, and other studies,14 demonstrated that estradiol gel relieves menopausal symptoms whether it is administered alone or in combination with a progestogen, with efficacy similar to other estrogen formulations:

Climacteric symptoms decreased to the same extent when estradiol gel was combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, oral micronized progesterone, or vaginal micronized progesterone.19

A study20 that added lynestrenol decreased the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats more than in women using estradiol gel alone. However, negative mood symptoms were more pronounced in the progestin-treated group.

Estradiol gel 1 mg/day in combination with monthly or quarterly oral medroxyprog-esterone acetate reduced the severity of hot flushes, sweating, and vaginal dryness, according to a 12-month trial.21

Symptoms decreased the same whether a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD or oral or vaginal progesterone was added.

Bone mineral density maintained or increased

Several randomized, controlled trials have documented the effects of estradiol gel on bone mineral density (BMD) and various markers of bone metabolism. In these studies, BMD remained steady22,23 or increased10,24,25 following treatment, and estradiol gel remained effective for up to 4 years.25 Estradiol gel maintained or increased BMD with or without addition of progestins.22,23,26

These investigations involved measurement of BMD at the lumbar spine, forearms, or hip, as well as biologic markers of bone turnover such as urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio, serum alkaline phosphatase, and serum osteocalcin.

Serum estradiol and skeletal uptake of a bone-seeking agent also were determined. Estradiol gel regimens ranged from 0.75 mg/day to 3 mg/day, and populations included both surgical and natural menopausal subjects in several countries.

Effects comparable to oral estrogen. Compared with oral conjugated estrogen, which increased BMD at the lumbar spine by 4.3% (±3.2%), estradiol gel produced increases of 5.6% (±2.9%) at 24 months and 4.7% (±3.2%) at 36 months.10

Proper patient selection leads to good compliance and relief

The case. A 52-year-old woman with no menses for 8 months presents for management complaining of disabling hot flushes. Although she is moderately obese, with a body mass index of 29, she is normotensive without any other significant medical history except for hysterectomy at age 44 for excessive bleeding.

Counseling. During her 20s, the patient tried to use oral contraceptives on 3 separate occasions, but was unable to continue them because of nausea. Although she is interested in estrogen therapy for her vasomotor symptoms, she is concerned about the possibility of experiencing nausea again. You explain that one of the benefits of percutaneous estradiol is that it avoids the gastrointestinal tract.

Physical findings. Her physical examination is within normal limits, and gynecologic examination confirms no uterus and finds no palpable adnexal masses.

Outcome. After weighing the pros and cons, she elects to use estradiol gel. At her 3-month follow-up, she reports effective relief and good compliance.

 

 

Minimum level of protection achieved. Following a comparison of oral and percutaneous estradiol, Reginster et al27 suggested that a minimum estradiol level of 60 pg/mL is necessary to prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Mean serum estradiol levels in women receiving 1.5 mg/day estradiol gel were 75.7 pg/mL and 78.4 pg/mL at 24 and 36 months, respectively, in a study by Palacios et al,10 and 85.8 pg/mL in a study by Devogelaer and colleagues.24 In these trials, BMD increased, and it remained steady in other investigations.28,29

More recent trials suggest that lower serum estradiol levels secondary to smaller estrogen doses have the capacity to maintain BMD.30,31 A 1.9% mean increase of BMD at the lumbar spine was reported in women with a mean serum concentration of 17 pg/mL in a 2-year study30 of a transdermal estradiol delivery system. The percutaneous route does not appear to limit these beneficial effects.

How are metabolic factors affected?

In general, oral estrogens produce beneficial changes in lipid metabolism, particularly higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, they also elevate triglyceride and glucose levels. How this plays out clinically is unclear. Both the Women’s Health Initiative and the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) found no cardioprotective effects of oral estrogen despite increases in HDL and decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels.1,32

Oral versus percutaneous estradiol. No long-term studies of this magnitude have investigated the effect of percutaneous estradiol on coronary artery disease, although numerous clinical trials have shown that the route of estrogen delivery affects many of the metabolic variables used to estimate the risk of negative cardiac outcomes. It remains to be determined whether percutaneous estradiol affects these metabolic factors in ways that influence morbidity and mortality.

In 1 trial,33 oral conjugated estrogen led to the following significant changes in lipids:

  • increase in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol,
  • decrease in LDL cholesterol (but not the LDL apoprotein B),
  • increase in HDL and apoprotein A1, and
  • significant increase in HDL2 cholesterol.
In contrast, percutaneous administration increased only HDL2 and the triglyceride and cholesterol content of the whole HDL fraction.

In a separate study,9 oral conjugated estrogen had a 2.5-fold increase in serum angiotensin, and percutaneous estradiol gel, no effect.

Same effects when progestin is added. Beneficial effects were not diminished when oral micronized progesterone was added to percutaneous estradiol.34 Estradiol gel significantly reduced total serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the first year of treatment, compared with placebo.

Coagulation effects. Percutaneous estradiol has fewer negative effects on coagulation factors than its oral counterpart. One study35 investigating combination therapy with micronized progesterone compared the effects of percutaneous estradiol and oral estradiol valerate. The group receiving percutaneous estradiol gel/micronized progesterone had no significant changes in plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue-type plasminogen concentration, and global fibrinolytic capacity. The other group had a significant decrease in mean tissue-type plasminogen concentration and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity and a significant rise in global fibrinolytic capacity.

The oral estradiol—but not the percutaneous formulation—significantly increased the mean value of prothrombin activation peptide and decreased mean antithrombin activity compared with no treatment.

Poor glycemic control may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, but oral and percutaneous estradiol appear to have similar glycemic effects. A comparative trial36 of oral estradiol valerate 2 mg/day and percutaneous estradiol 1 mg/day found no differences in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels (declined in both groups) or in fasting and 2-hour post-prandial blood glucose levels (constant in both groups) or insulin sensitivity.

Treatment duration may also influence how percutaneous estradiol affects metabolic factors. An open-label longitudinal prospective study37 of 30 women receiving estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day for 6 months found a significant decrease in lipoprotein (a), apoprotein A-I, apoprotein B, HDL cholesterol, and HDL3 cholesterol. At 1 year, however, these changes were not significant.

No association with venous thromboembolism. Transdermal estradiol administered as a patch or percutaneous gel had no effect on the risk of venous thromboembolism in a multicenter case-control investigation.38

In contrast, a recent retrospective study found a risk of venous thromboembolism that was at least 4 times greater with oral estrogen than with transdermal estradiol.38

Use a progestogen to prevent endometrial hyperplasia

Like other forms of estrogen, percutaneous estradiol stimulates the endometrium. For this reason, women who have an intact uterus should use a progestogen in an adequate dose to prevent hyperplastic changes.39 Although numerous regimens appear to be effective, the optimal route, dose, and duration of progestin in women using percutaneous estrogen remain to be determined.

Percutaneous estradiol versus other routes of administration. Endometrial thickness and amenorrhea rates over 6 months were not statistically different among 54 women treated with estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day, transdermal estradiol 50 μg/day, or oral estradiol valerate 2 mg/day—all in combination with nomegestrol acetate 2.5 mg/day.40 The overall rates of no bleeding or spotting over 6 cycles of treatment were 78% in the percutaneous estradiol group, 48% in the transdermal group, and 60% in the oral group.

 

 

Although the percutaneous estradiol group had a lower overall incidence of no bleeding or spotting than the other groups, the difference was not significant. Nor were there significant differences in the variation of endometrial thickness from baseline: A mean increase of 1.5 mm (±0.4 mm) was reported in the percutaneous group, compared with 1.5 mm (±0.7 mm) and 1.7 mm (±0.6 mm) in the transdermal and oral estrogen groups, respectively.

Estrogenic and progestogenic effects were similar for transdermal and percutaneous estradiol (with dydrogesterone 10 mg/day for days 1 to 12) after a baseline atropic endometrium was identified.3

Estradiol gel produces stable, physiologic serum estradiol levels and has a serum estrone to estradiol ratio close to 1.

The most effective progestogen dosage and duration are unknown, although many regimens have been studied:

  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day for the first 24 days of the month in combination with nomegestrol acetate 5 mg/day for days 11 to 24: Over 6 months, researchers found a secretory pattern in the majority of women and no evidence of hyperplasia.18
  • Percutaneous estradiol 3 mg/day for 3 of every 4 weeks in combination with nomegestrol acetate 5 mg/day for 10 days: No reduction in estrogenic endometrial effects.41,42
  • Estradiol gel 3 mg/day for 3 of every 4 weeks in combination with 200 mg or 300 mg oral micronized progesterone for the last 10 days of treatment: Dose was too low or treatment too short to produce a complete secretory transformation of the endometrium.43 However, the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial44 found no increased occurrence of hyperplasia in women using micronized progesterone 200 mg for 12 days of each cycle for more than 3 years in combination with oral conjugated estrogen 0.625 mg.
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day combined with micronized progesterone 100 mg daily (orally or vaginally) for the first 25 days of the month: Fully inhibited mitoses and induced amenorrhea in most of the women studied, with amenorrhea rates of 93.3% at 3 months and 91.6% at 6 months.45
  • Estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day with 100 mg vaginal micronized progesterone for 21 days per cycle: Stable endometrial thickness and no endometrial hyperplasia over 12 months.46 However, breakthrough bleeding was reported in up to 30% of subjects, principally in the second 3 months of treatment.
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1 mg/day for 3 months with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg/day for the last 14 days, followed by a 7-day free interval: No reports of endometrial hyperplasia or suspect changes at 12 and 24 months.17
  • Estradiol gel 2 mg/day for 21 days with 10 mg oral medroxyprogesterone acetate for the last 14 days, followed by a 7-day free interval: No endometrial hyperplasia or suspect changes at 12 and 24 months.17
  • Estradiol gel 1 mg/day with medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg on days 1-12 every month or every 3 months: Endometrial hyperplasia was found in 1 woman (0.3%) in the group receiving the progestogen every 3 months. Endometrial histology did not differ between women taking medroxyprogesterone monthly and those taking it every 3 months.21
  • Estradiol gel 3 mg/day with oral micronized progesterone 200 mg for 12 days of each cycle: Regular withdrawal bleeding in 70% of women.34
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day in combination with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 80% of women were amenorrheic at 1 year, with a mean endometrial thickness 3 mm; at 5 years, 100% of women had epithelial atrophy.47
  • Estradiol gel 1.5 mg for 21 days with 200 mg oral progesterone for 14 days (126 women); 3 mg percutaneous estradiol for 21 days with 300 mg oral progesterone for 10 days (23 women); 1.5 mg estradiol gel with 300 mg oral progesterone (3 women); or 3 mg estradiol gel for 28 days with 200 mg progesterone for 14 days (5 women): No evidence of hyperplasia after 5 years of treatment.2
Dr. Archer is a consultant to Solvay, and has had grant support from Solvay for clinical trials.
References

1. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.

2. Moyer DL, de Lignieres B, Driguez P, et al. Prevention of endometrial hyperplasia by progesterone during long-term estradiol replacement: influence of bleeding pattern and secretory changes. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:992-997.

3. Hirvonen E, Cacciatore B, Wahlström T, et al. Effects of transdermal oestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparative study of an oestradiol gel and an oestradiol delivering patch. BJOG. 1997;104(Suppl 16):26-31.

4. Travassos de Figueiredo Alves S, et al. Comparison of gel and patch estradiol replacement in Brazil, a tropical country. Maturitas. 2000;36:69-74.

5. Henzl MR, Loomba PK. Transdermal delivery of sex steroids for hormone replacement therapy and contraception. A review of principles and practice. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:525-540.

6. Holst J, et al. Serum estrogen levels after topic application of estradiol-17 beta on two different cutaneous areas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;662:151-152.

7. Jarvinen A, Granander M, Nykanen S, Laine T, Geurts P, Viitanen A. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of oestradiol gel in post-menopausal women: effects of application area and washing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(Suppl 16):14-18.

8. Scott RT, Ross B, Anderson C, Archer DF. Pharmacokinetics of percutaneous estradiol: a crossover study using a gel and a transdermal system in comparison with oral micronized estradiol. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:758-764.

9. Dupont A, Dupont P, Cusan M, et al. Comparative endocrinological and clinical effects of percutaneous estradiol and oral conjugated estrogens as replacement therapy in menopausal women. Maturitas. 1991;13:297-311.

10. Palacios S, Menéndez C, Jurado AR, Vargas JC. Effects of percutaneous oestradiol versus oral oestrogens on bone density. Maturitas. 1995;20:209-213.

11. Basdevant A, de Lignieres B, Simon P, et al. Hepatic lipase activity during oral and parenteral 17ß-estradiol replacement therapy: high-density lipoprotein increase may not be antiatherogenic. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:1112-1117.

12. Simon JA, et al. Are there significant differences between patch and gel cutaneous estradiol therapy? In: Genazzani AR, Petraglia F, Volpe A, Facchinetti F, eds. Recent Research on Gynecological Endocrinology. Casterton Hall, Carnforth, Lancashire, UK: Parthenon Publishing, Casterton Hall; 1998;317-324.

13. Paoletti AM, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of 17ß-estradiol gel 0.6mg/g (Gelestra) with a transdermal delivery system (Estraderm TTS 50) in postmenopausal women at steady state. Maturitas. 2001;40:203-209.

14. Jensen PB, Jensen J, Riis BJ, et al. Climacteric symptoms after oral and percutaneous hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1987;9:207-215.

15. Archer DF. for the EstroGel Study Group. Percutaneous 17ß-estradiol gel for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2003;10:516-521.

16. Kornafel KL, March CM. Estradiol gel in the treatment of menopausal symptoms: a placebo-controlled double-blind case study of efficacy and safety. South Med J. 1992;85:270-273.

17. Hirvonen E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Lankinen KS, Geurts P, Wilén-Rosenqvist G. Transdermal oestradiol gel in the treatment of the climacterium: a comparison with oral therapy. BJOG. 1997;104(Suppl 16):19-25.

18. Foidart JM, Béliard A, Hedon B, et al. Impact of percutaneous oestradiol gels in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on clinical symptoms and endometrium. BJOG. 1997;104:305-310.

19. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Sundström H, Penttinen J, et al. Percutaneous estradiol gel with an intrauterine levonorgestrel releasing device or natural progesterone in hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1997;26:211-17.

20. Holst J, et al. Progestogen addition during oestrogen replacement therapy—effects on vasomotor symptoms and mood. Maturitas. 1989;11:13-20.

21. Hirvonen E, et al. Effect of an estradiol gel with monthly or quarterly progestogen on menopausal symptoms and bleeding. Climacteric. 2000;3:262-270.

22. Ng HT, Chang SP, Yang TS, Cho MP, Wei TC. Estradiol administered in a percutaneous gel for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;19(2):115-119.

23. Riis B, Thomsen K, et al. Does calcium supplementation prevent postmenopausal bone loss? A double blind, controlled clinical study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:173-177.

24. Devogelaer JP, Lecart C, Dupret P, De Nayer P, Nagant De Deuxchaisnes C. Long-term effects of percutaneous estradiol on bone loss and bone metabolism in post-menopausal hysterectomized women. Maturitas. 1998;28:243-249.

25. Wimalawansa SJ. Combined therapy with estrogen and etidronate has an additive effect on bone mineral density in the hip and vertebrae: four year randomized study. Am J Med. 1995;99:36-42.

26. Sun A, Lin S, Yu W, et al. Percutaneous estrogen in prevention of early post-menopausal bone loss in Chinese women. Chin Med J. 2002;115:1790-1795.

27. Reginster JY, Sarlet N, Deroisy R, et al. Minimum levels of serum estradiol prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;51:340-343.

28. Cicinelli E, Cantatore FP, Galantino P, et al. Effects of continuous percutaneous estradiol administration on skeletal turnover in postmenopausal women: a 1-year prospective controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;69(2):109-113.

29. Riis B, et al. The effect of percutaneous estradiol and natural progesterone on post-menopausal bone loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:61-65.

30. Notelvitz M, John VA, Good WR. Effectiveness of Alora estradiol matrix transdermal delivery system in improving lumbar bone mineral density in healthy, post-menopausal women. Menopause. 2002;9:343-353.

31. Prestwood KM, Kenny AM, Kleppinger A, Kulldorff M. Ultralow-dose micronized 17ß-estradiol and bone density and bone metabolism in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1042-1048.

32. Hully S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605-613.

33. Moorjani S, Dupont A, Labrie F, et al. Changes in plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein composition in relation to oral versus percutaneous administration of estrogen alone or in cyclic association with Utrogestan in menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:373-379.

34. Jensen J, Riis BJ, Strøm V, Nilas L, Christiansen C. Long-term effects of percutaneous estrogens and oral progesterone on serum lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gyencol. 1987;156:66-71.

35. Scarabin PY, Alhenc-Gelas M, Plu-Bureau G, Taisne P, Agher R, Aiach M. Effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women. A randomized controlled trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3071-3078.

36. Karjalainen A, Paassilta M, Heikkinen J, et al. Effects of peroral and transdermal oestrogen replacement therapy on glucose and insulin metabolism. Clin Endocrin. 2001;54:165-173.

37. Haines CJ, Chung TKH, Masarei JRL, Tomlinson B, Lau JTF. The effect of per-cutaneous oestrogen replacement therapy on Lp(a) and other lipoproteins. Maturitas. 1995;22:219-225.

38. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. EStrogen and THromboEmbolism Risk (ESTHER) Study Group. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003;362:428-432.

39. Archer DF. The effect of the duration of progestin use on the occurrence of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2001;8:245-251.

40. Blanc B, Cravello L, Micheletti MC, et al. Continuous hormone replacement therapy for menopause combining nomegestrol acetate and gel, patch, or oral estrogen: a comparison of amenorrhea rates. Clin Therap. 1998;20(5):901-912.

41. Holst J. Percutaneous estrogen therapy. Endometrial response and metabolic effects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1983;115:1-30

42. Holst J, Cajander S, von Schoultz B. Cellular morphometric analysis of the post-menopausal endometrium during treatment with percutaneous estradiol-17ß with and without oral gestagen. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62:267-270.

43. Holst J, Cajander S, von Schoultz B. Endometrial response in post-menopausal women during treatment with percutaneous 17ß-oestradiol opposed by oral progesterone. Maturitas. 1986;8:201-207.

44. Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on endometrial histology in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. JAMA. 1996;275:370-375.

45. Gillet JY, Andre G, Faguer B, et al. Induction of amenorrhea during hormone replacement therapy: optimized micronized progesterone dose. A multicenter study. Maturitas. 1994;19:103-115.

46. Vilodre LC, et al. Endometrial response to a cyclic regimen of percutaneous 17ß-estradiol and low-dose vaginal micronized progesterone in women with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003;17:323-328.

47. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Kauppila A. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in menopausal hormone replacement therapy: five-year experience. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:161-163.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

DAVID F. ARCHER, MD
Dr. Archer is professor, obstetrics and gynecology, and director, CONRAD Clinical Research Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Va.

Issue
OBG Management - 16(09)
Publications
Page Number
46-66
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

DAVID F. ARCHER, MD
Dr. Archer is professor, obstetrics and gynecology, and director, CONRAD Clinical Research Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Va.

Author and Disclosure Information

DAVID F. ARCHER, MD
Dr. Archer is professor, obstetrics and gynecology, and director, CONRAD Clinical Research Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Va.

Article PDF
Article PDF

KEY POINTS

  • Percutaneous estradiol gel can be prescribed at low doses.
  • Relief of menopausal symptoms can begin as early as 2 weeks after starting treatment.
  • Treatment with estradiol gel maintains or increases bone mineral density.
  • No large randomized, controlled trials have explored the effect of estradiol gel on coronary artery disease. It appears to have metabolic effects similar to those of oral estradiol.
  • Because percutaneous estradiol stimulates the endometrium, women with an intact uterus should also take a progestogen.

Although the Women’s Health Initiative1 discouraged many menopausal women from using oral estrogen, it failed to address the risks of treatment with other dosages or forms of estrogen and progestin.

Nor has any other trial of similar size and complexity taken up the issue. However, numerous smaller studies have been published.

This article summarizes findings on percutaneous delivery of estradiol gel (EstroGel), the most recently FDA-approved estrogen option for treatment of menopausal symptoms.

It describes the overall safety of estradiol gel, as well as its effectson:

  • menopausal symptoms,
  • bone,
  • metabolism, and
  • endometrium.

(In this article, “percutaneous delivery” refers to estradiol gel applied to the skin, and “transdermal estradiol” indicates delivery via a transdermal reservoir or matrix system, otherwise known as “the patch.” I have used an arbitrary definition to distinguish the gel from other methods of delivering estradiol across the skin. For example, Estrasorb is a liposomal formulation that is applied to the skin of the thigh. Although it is a percutaneous estradiol similar to the gel, this article focuses only on the latter option.)

Easy to apply, few skin reactions

Percutaneous estradiol gel formulations have been available for almost 30 years in Europe, where they are utilized by a majority of women on hormone therapy. In the United States, the hydroalcoholic gel is packaged in a pump that delivers 64 standardized 1.25-g doses, which contain 0.75 mg of 17ß-estradiol. Once it is applied, the gel is absorbed into an intradermal reservoir (FIGURE) and dries in 2 to 5 minutes, leaving no residue.

Patient selection. Estradiol gel is well-suited for patients who are concerned about the risks of oral estrogen (as portrayed in the mainstream press following the Women’s Health Initiative) and want to avoid that route of administration, as well as women who dislike or have difficulty swallowing pills. Percutaneous administration also is appropriate for physically active women who may have adhesion problems or skin irritation with the transdermal patch, or those who have had reactions to local adhesives in the past. The patient should be motivated to apply the gel on a daily basis.

Indications are moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women, and moderate to severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, although topical vaginal products should also be considered for the latter indication.

Contraindications are undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding; history of breast cancer, other estrogen-dependent malignancy, stroke, heart attack, or liver disease or dysfunction; active thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorders (or a history of these); and known or suspected pregnancy.

Common side effects include headache, breast pain, irregular vaginal bleeding or spotting, stomach cramps or bloating, nausea and vomiting, and hair loss.

  • Skin reactions are infrequent, but should be taken into account when discussing per-cutaneous or transdermal delivery of any drug. However, estradiol gel appears to cause fewer skin reactions than the patch. In a study over more than 5 years, 0 of 157 women treated with percutaneous estradiol reported skin irritation.2 Other comparisons found similar outcomes.3,4
After the gel dries, other lotions or per-fumes can be applied to the site, if desired, and the woman can cover the site with clothing.

Onset of action is rapid, as it is with the transdermal patch.5 Dose variability is minimized when the gel is applied at the same time every day to a large area of skin, preferably the arm, although all application sites appear to produce similar results: abdomen, shoulders, arms, and inner thigh.6 The gel should not be applied to the breast or vagina.

Diminished effect with skin washing. In 1 trial, site washing 1/2 hour after application significantly decreased bioavailability and time to reach peak plasma concentrations.7 For this reason, the gel should be not applied before a bath, shower, or sauna.

Dosing options. The initial dose is 1.25 mg of gel, which is 1 pump of the bottle. The gel is collected in the palm of 1 hand and applied to the skin of the opposite arm from the wrist to the shoulder. The dose can be titrated by adding a second pump of the gel and applying it to the opposite arm. The dose can be lowered by using less than a full depression of the pump.

 

 

Stable, physiologic estrogen levels

Estradiol gel produces relatively stable serum estradiol levels, and therapeutic estradiol levels similar to those seen with other formulations, routes of administration, and dosages.

Percutaneous administration produces serum estrone to estradiol ratios close to 1, in contrast to higher ratios (5:1) with oral administration.8-11 The lower ratio approximates levels during the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. (TABLE 1 gives estradiol and estrone levels from different studies following administration of estradiol as a gel, oral formulation, and transdermal patch.)

The percutaneous route also allows for delivery directly to the systemic circulation, avoiding gastrointestinal and first-pass hepatic metabolism and elimination. In contrast, oral micronized estradiol causes large fluctuations in serum estradiol and estrone levels due to absorption and metabolism.8

More stable serum levels than with the patch. One study12 comparing percutaneous and transdermal estradiol found similar interindividual variability but less stable serum levels in women using the transdermal system. A separate study13 also reported greater fluctuation of serum estradiol levels in women using a transdermal system than in those using the gel.

TABLE 1

Serum estradiol and estrone levels for various routes of estradiol

AUTHORTHERAPYESTRADIOL LEVEL (PG/ML)ESTRONE LEVEL (PG/ML)
Scott et al8E2gel 3 mg/day102.9±39.9120.0±50.5
E2gel 1.5 mg/day68.1±27.490.6±45.7
Transdermal estradiol 50 μg/day41.1±13.545.0±15.9
Oral micronized estradiol 2 mg/day114.0±65.2575.2±279.9
Palacios et al10E2gel 1.5 mg/day75.7±1.058.5±2.9
Oral conjugated estrogen 0.625 mg/day39.6±4.6126.0±7.6
Basdevant et al11E2gel 3 mg/day221.0±35.0146.0±19.0
Oral micronized estradiol 2 mg/day121.0±27.0811.0±370.0
Archer15E2gel 0.75 mg/day33.5*49.0*
E2gel 1.5 mg/day65.0*58.0*
Placebo5.0*23.0*
*Median value
E2gel = percutaneous estradiol gel

Studies compared relief of menopausal symptoms

Estradiol gel effectively relieved meno-pausal symptoms in randomized, double-blind studies, open label comparisons, and observational trials in postmenopausal women, with and without the addition of various progestins.

Symptom relief in comparison with baseline values is statistically significant as early as 2 weeks after initiating treatment. Relief of up to 2 years’ duration has been reported.3,14

Several studies have compared symptom relief achieved with estradiol gel, oral estrogen, transdermal delivery systems, and placebo3,9,14-18; findings are summarized in TABLE 2.

Same efficacy when progestogen is added. The following studies, and other studies,14 demonstrated that estradiol gel relieves menopausal symptoms whether it is administered alone or in combination with a progestogen, with efficacy similar to other estrogen formulations:

Climacteric symptoms decreased to the same extent when estradiol gel was combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, oral micronized progesterone, or vaginal micronized progesterone.19

A study20 that added lynestrenol decreased the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats more than in women using estradiol gel alone. However, negative mood symptoms were more pronounced in the progestin-treated group.

Estradiol gel 1 mg/day in combination with monthly or quarterly oral medroxyprog-esterone acetate reduced the severity of hot flushes, sweating, and vaginal dryness, according to a 12-month trial.21

Symptoms decreased the same whether a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD or oral or vaginal progesterone was added.

Bone mineral density maintained or increased

Several randomized, controlled trials have documented the effects of estradiol gel on bone mineral density (BMD) and various markers of bone metabolism. In these studies, BMD remained steady22,23 or increased10,24,25 following treatment, and estradiol gel remained effective for up to 4 years.25 Estradiol gel maintained or increased BMD with or without addition of progestins.22,23,26

These investigations involved measurement of BMD at the lumbar spine, forearms, or hip, as well as biologic markers of bone turnover such as urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio, serum alkaline phosphatase, and serum osteocalcin.

Serum estradiol and skeletal uptake of a bone-seeking agent also were determined. Estradiol gel regimens ranged from 0.75 mg/day to 3 mg/day, and populations included both surgical and natural menopausal subjects in several countries.

Effects comparable to oral estrogen. Compared with oral conjugated estrogen, which increased BMD at the lumbar spine by 4.3% (±3.2%), estradiol gel produced increases of 5.6% (±2.9%) at 24 months and 4.7% (±3.2%) at 36 months.10

Proper patient selection leads to good compliance and relief

The case. A 52-year-old woman with no menses for 8 months presents for management complaining of disabling hot flushes. Although she is moderately obese, with a body mass index of 29, she is normotensive without any other significant medical history except for hysterectomy at age 44 for excessive bleeding.

Counseling. During her 20s, the patient tried to use oral contraceptives on 3 separate occasions, but was unable to continue them because of nausea. Although she is interested in estrogen therapy for her vasomotor symptoms, she is concerned about the possibility of experiencing nausea again. You explain that one of the benefits of percutaneous estradiol is that it avoids the gastrointestinal tract.

Physical findings. Her physical examination is within normal limits, and gynecologic examination confirms no uterus and finds no palpable adnexal masses.

Outcome. After weighing the pros and cons, she elects to use estradiol gel. At her 3-month follow-up, she reports effective relief and good compliance.

 

 

Minimum level of protection achieved. Following a comparison of oral and percutaneous estradiol, Reginster et al27 suggested that a minimum estradiol level of 60 pg/mL is necessary to prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Mean serum estradiol levels in women receiving 1.5 mg/day estradiol gel were 75.7 pg/mL and 78.4 pg/mL at 24 and 36 months, respectively, in a study by Palacios et al,10 and 85.8 pg/mL in a study by Devogelaer and colleagues.24 In these trials, BMD increased, and it remained steady in other investigations.28,29

More recent trials suggest that lower serum estradiol levels secondary to smaller estrogen doses have the capacity to maintain BMD.30,31 A 1.9% mean increase of BMD at the lumbar spine was reported in women with a mean serum concentration of 17 pg/mL in a 2-year study30 of a transdermal estradiol delivery system. The percutaneous route does not appear to limit these beneficial effects.

How are metabolic factors affected?

In general, oral estrogens produce beneficial changes in lipid metabolism, particularly higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, they also elevate triglyceride and glucose levels. How this plays out clinically is unclear. Both the Women’s Health Initiative and the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) found no cardioprotective effects of oral estrogen despite increases in HDL and decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels.1,32

Oral versus percutaneous estradiol. No long-term studies of this magnitude have investigated the effect of percutaneous estradiol on coronary artery disease, although numerous clinical trials have shown that the route of estrogen delivery affects many of the metabolic variables used to estimate the risk of negative cardiac outcomes. It remains to be determined whether percutaneous estradiol affects these metabolic factors in ways that influence morbidity and mortality.

In 1 trial,33 oral conjugated estrogen led to the following significant changes in lipids:

  • increase in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol,
  • decrease in LDL cholesterol (but not the LDL apoprotein B),
  • increase in HDL and apoprotein A1, and
  • significant increase in HDL2 cholesterol.
In contrast, percutaneous administration increased only HDL2 and the triglyceride and cholesterol content of the whole HDL fraction.

In a separate study,9 oral conjugated estrogen had a 2.5-fold increase in serum angiotensin, and percutaneous estradiol gel, no effect.

Same effects when progestin is added. Beneficial effects were not diminished when oral micronized progesterone was added to percutaneous estradiol.34 Estradiol gel significantly reduced total serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the first year of treatment, compared with placebo.

Coagulation effects. Percutaneous estradiol has fewer negative effects on coagulation factors than its oral counterpart. One study35 investigating combination therapy with micronized progesterone compared the effects of percutaneous estradiol and oral estradiol valerate. The group receiving percutaneous estradiol gel/micronized progesterone had no significant changes in plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue-type plasminogen concentration, and global fibrinolytic capacity. The other group had a significant decrease in mean tissue-type plasminogen concentration and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity and a significant rise in global fibrinolytic capacity.

The oral estradiol—but not the percutaneous formulation—significantly increased the mean value of prothrombin activation peptide and decreased mean antithrombin activity compared with no treatment.

Poor glycemic control may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, but oral and percutaneous estradiol appear to have similar glycemic effects. A comparative trial36 of oral estradiol valerate 2 mg/day and percutaneous estradiol 1 mg/day found no differences in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels (declined in both groups) or in fasting and 2-hour post-prandial blood glucose levels (constant in both groups) or insulin sensitivity.

Treatment duration may also influence how percutaneous estradiol affects metabolic factors. An open-label longitudinal prospective study37 of 30 women receiving estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day for 6 months found a significant decrease in lipoprotein (a), apoprotein A-I, apoprotein B, HDL cholesterol, and HDL3 cholesterol. At 1 year, however, these changes were not significant.

No association with venous thromboembolism. Transdermal estradiol administered as a patch or percutaneous gel had no effect on the risk of venous thromboembolism in a multicenter case-control investigation.38

In contrast, a recent retrospective study found a risk of venous thromboembolism that was at least 4 times greater with oral estrogen than with transdermal estradiol.38

Use a progestogen to prevent endometrial hyperplasia

Like other forms of estrogen, percutaneous estradiol stimulates the endometrium. For this reason, women who have an intact uterus should use a progestogen in an adequate dose to prevent hyperplastic changes.39 Although numerous regimens appear to be effective, the optimal route, dose, and duration of progestin in women using percutaneous estrogen remain to be determined.

Percutaneous estradiol versus other routes of administration. Endometrial thickness and amenorrhea rates over 6 months were not statistically different among 54 women treated with estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day, transdermal estradiol 50 μg/day, or oral estradiol valerate 2 mg/day—all in combination with nomegestrol acetate 2.5 mg/day.40 The overall rates of no bleeding or spotting over 6 cycles of treatment were 78% in the percutaneous estradiol group, 48% in the transdermal group, and 60% in the oral group.

 

 

Although the percutaneous estradiol group had a lower overall incidence of no bleeding or spotting than the other groups, the difference was not significant. Nor were there significant differences in the variation of endometrial thickness from baseline: A mean increase of 1.5 mm (±0.4 mm) was reported in the percutaneous group, compared with 1.5 mm (±0.7 mm) and 1.7 mm (±0.6 mm) in the transdermal and oral estrogen groups, respectively.

Estrogenic and progestogenic effects were similar for transdermal and percutaneous estradiol (with dydrogesterone 10 mg/day for days 1 to 12) after a baseline atropic endometrium was identified.3

Estradiol gel produces stable, physiologic serum estradiol levels and has a serum estrone to estradiol ratio close to 1.

The most effective progestogen dosage and duration are unknown, although many regimens have been studied:

  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day for the first 24 days of the month in combination with nomegestrol acetate 5 mg/day for days 11 to 24: Over 6 months, researchers found a secretory pattern in the majority of women and no evidence of hyperplasia.18
  • Percutaneous estradiol 3 mg/day for 3 of every 4 weeks in combination with nomegestrol acetate 5 mg/day for 10 days: No reduction in estrogenic endometrial effects.41,42
  • Estradiol gel 3 mg/day for 3 of every 4 weeks in combination with 200 mg or 300 mg oral micronized progesterone for the last 10 days of treatment: Dose was too low or treatment too short to produce a complete secretory transformation of the endometrium.43 However, the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial44 found no increased occurrence of hyperplasia in women using micronized progesterone 200 mg for 12 days of each cycle for more than 3 years in combination with oral conjugated estrogen 0.625 mg.
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day combined with micronized progesterone 100 mg daily (orally or vaginally) for the first 25 days of the month: Fully inhibited mitoses and induced amenorrhea in most of the women studied, with amenorrhea rates of 93.3% at 3 months and 91.6% at 6 months.45
  • Estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day with 100 mg vaginal micronized progesterone for 21 days per cycle: Stable endometrial thickness and no endometrial hyperplasia over 12 months.46 However, breakthrough bleeding was reported in up to 30% of subjects, principally in the second 3 months of treatment.
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1 mg/day for 3 months with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg/day for the last 14 days, followed by a 7-day free interval: No reports of endometrial hyperplasia or suspect changes at 12 and 24 months.17
  • Estradiol gel 2 mg/day for 21 days with 10 mg oral medroxyprogesterone acetate for the last 14 days, followed by a 7-day free interval: No endometrial hyperplasia or suspect changes at 12 and 24 months.17
  • Estradiol gel 1 mg/day with medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg on days 1-12 every month or every 3 months: Endometrial hyperplasia was found in 1 woman (0.3%) in the group receiving the progestogen every 3 months. Endometrial histology did not differ between women taking medroxyprogesterone monthly and those taking it every 3 months.21
  • Estradiol gel 3 mg/day with oral micronized progesterone 200 mg for 12 days of each cycle: Regular withdrawal bleeding in 70% of women.34
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day in combination with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 80% of women were amenorrheic at 1 year, with a mean endometrial thickness 3 mm; at 5 years, 100% of women had epithelial atrophy.47
  • Estradiol gel 1.5 mg for 21 days with 200 mg oral progesterone for 14 days (126 women); 3 mg percutaneous estradiol for 21 days with 300 mg oral progesterone for 10 days (23 women); 1.5 mg estradiol gel with 300 mg oral progesterone (3 women); or 3 mg estradiol gel for 28 days with 200 mg progesterone for 14 days (5 women): No evidence of hyperplasia after 5 years of treatment.2
Dr. Archer is a consultant to Solvay, and has had grant support from Solvay for clinical trials.

KEY POINTS

  • Percutaneous estradiol gel can be prescribed at low doses.
  • Relief of menopausal symptoms can begin as early as 2 weeks after starting treatment.
  • Treatment with estradiol gel maintains or increases bone mineral density.
  • No large randomized, controlled trials have explored the effect of estradiol gel on coronary artery disease. It appears to have metabolic effects similar to those of oral estradiol.
  • Because percutaneous estradiol stimulates the endometrium, women with an intact uterus should also take a progestogen.

Although the Women’s Health Initiative1 discouraged many menopausal women from using oral estrogen, it failed to address the risks of treatment with other dosages or forms of estrogen and progestin.

Nor has any other trial of similar size and complexity taken up the issue. However, numerous smaller studies have been published.

This article summarizes findings on percutaneous delivery of estradiol gel (EstroGel), the most recently FDA-approved estrogen option for treatment of menopausal symptoms.

It describes the overall safety of estradiol gel, as well as its effectson:

  • menopausal symptoms,
  • bone,
  • metabolism, and
  • endometrium.

(In this article, “percutaneous delivery” refers to estradiol gel applied to the skin, and “transdermal estradiol” indicates delivery via a transdermal reservoir or matrix system, otherwise known as “the patch.” I have used an arbitrary definition to distinguish the gel from other methods of delivering estradiol across the skin. For example, Estrasorb is a liposomal formulation that is applied to the skin of the thigh. Although it is a percutaneous estradiol similar to the gel, this article focuses only on the latter option.)

Easy to apply, few skin reactions

Percutaneous estradiol gel formulations have been available for almost 30 years in Europe, where they are utilized by a majority of women on hormone therapy. In the United States, the hydroalcoholic gel is packaged in a pump that delivers 64 standardized 1.25-g doses, which contain 0.75 mg of 17ß-estradiol. Once it is applied, the gel is absorbed into an intradermal reservoir (FIGURE) and dries in 2 to 5 minutes, leaving no residue.

Patient selection. Estradiol gel is well-suited for patients who are concerned about the risks of oral estrogen (as portrayed in the mainstream press following the Women’s Health Initiative) and want to avoid that route of administration, as well as women who dislike or have difficulty swallowing pills. Percutaneous administration also is appropriate for physically active women who may have adhesion problems or skin irritation with the transdermal patch, or those who have had reactions to local adhesives in the past. The patient should be motivated to apply the gel on a daily basis.

Indications are moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women, and moderate to severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy, although topical vaginal products should also be considered for the latter indication.

Contraindications are undiagnosed abnormal vaginal bleeding; history of breast cancer, other estrogen-dependent malignancy, stroke, heart attack, or liver disease or dysfunction; active thrombophlebitis or thromboembolic disorders (or a history of these); and known or suspected pregnancy.

Common side effects include headache, breast pain, irregular vaginal bleeding or spotting, stomach cramps or bloating, nausea and vomiting, and hair loss.

  • Skin reactions are infrequent, but should be taken into account when discussing per-cutaneous or transdermal delivery of any drug. However, estradiol gel appears to cause fewer skin reactions than the patch. In a study over more than 5 years, 0 of 157 women treated with percutaneous estradiol reported skin irritation.2 Other comparisons found similar outcomes.3,4
After the gel dries, other lotions or per-fumes can be applied to the site, if desired, and the woman can cover the site with clothing.

Onset of action is rapid, as it is with the transdermal patch.5 Dose variability is minimized when the gel is applied at the same time every day to a large area of skin, preferably the arm, although all application sites appear to produce similar results: abdomen, shoulders, arms, and inner thigh.6 The gel should not be applied to the breast or vagina.

Diminished effect with skin washing. In 1 trial, site washing 1/2 hour after application significantly decreased bioavailability and time to reach peak plasma concentrations.7 For this reason, the gel should be not applied before a bath, shower, or sauna.

Dosing options. The initial dose is 1.25 mg of gel, which is 1 pump of the bottle. The gel is collected in the palm of 1 hand and applied to the skin of the opposite arm from the wrist to the shoulder. The dose can be titrated by adding a second pump of the gel and applying it to the opposite arm. The dose can be lowered by using less than a full depression of the pump.

 

 

Stable, physiologic estrogen levels

Estradiol gel produces relatively stable serum estradiol levels, and therapeutic estradiol levels similar to those seen with other formulations, routes of administration, and dosages.

Percutaneous administration produces serum estrone to estradiol ratios close to 1, in contrast to higher ratios (5:1) with oral administration.8-11 The lower ratio approximates levels during the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. (TABLE 1 gives estradiol and estrone levels from different studies following administration of estradiol as a gel, oral formulation, and transdermal patch.)

The percutaneous route also allows for delivery directly to the systemic circulation, avoiding gastrointestinal and first-pass hepatic metabolism and elimination. In contrast, oral micronized estradiol causes large fluctuations in serum estradiol and estrone levels due to absorption and metabolism.8

More stable serum levels than with the patch. One study12 comparing percutaneous and transdermal estradiol found similar interindividual variability but less stable serum levels in women using the transdermal system. A separate study13 also reported greater fluctuation of serum estradiol levels in women using a transdermal system than in those using the gel.

TABLE 1

Serum estradiol and estrone levels for various routes of estradiol

AUTHORTHERAPYESTRADIOL LEVEL (PG/ML)ESTRONE LEVEL (PG/ML)
Scott et al8E2gel 3 mg/day102.9±39.9120.0±50.5
E2gel 1.5 mg/day68.1±27.490.6±45.7
Transdermal estradiol 50 μg/day41.1±13.545.0±15.9
Oral micronized estradiol 2 mg/day114.0±65.2575.2±279.9
Palacios et al10E2gel 1.5 mg/day75.7±1.058.5±2.9
Oral conjugated estrogen 0.625 mg/day39.6±4.6126.0±7.6
Basdevant et al11E2gel 3 mg/day221.0±35.0146.0±19.0
Oral micronized estradiol 2 mg/day121.0±27.0811.0±370.0
Archer15E2gel 0.75 mg/day33.5*49.0*
E2gel 1.5 mg/day65.0*58.0*
Placebo5.0*23.0*
*Median value
E2gel = percutaneous estradiol gel

Studies compared relief of menopausal symptoms

Estradiol gel effectively relieved meno-pausal symptoms in randomized, double-blind studies, open label comparisons, and observational trials in postmenopausal women, with and without the addition of various progestins.

Symptom relief in comparison with baseline values is statistically significant as early as 2 weeks after initiating treatment. Relief of up to 2 years’ duration has been reported.3,14

Several studies have compared symptom relief achieved with estradiol gel, oral estrogen, transdermal delivery systems, and placebo3,9,14-18; findings are summarized in TABLE 2.

Same efficacy when progestogen is added. The following studies, and other studies,14 demonstrated that estradiol gel relieves menopausal symptoms whether it is administered alone or in combination with a progestogen, with efficacy similar to other estrogen formulations:

Climacteric symptoms decreased to the same extent when estradiol gel was combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, oral micronized progesterone, or vaginal micronized progesterone.19

A study20 that added lynestrenol decreased the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats more than in women using estradiol gel alone. However, negative mood symptoms were more pronounced in the progestin-treated group.

Estradiol gel 1 mg/day in combination with monthly or quarterly oral medroxyprog-esterone acetate reduced the severity of hot flushes, sweating, and vaginal dryness, according to a 12-month trial.21

Symptoms decreased the same whether a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD or oral or vaginal progesterone was added.

Bone mineral density maintained or increased

Several randomized, controlled trials have documented the effects of estradiol gel on bone mineral density (BMD) and various markers of bone metabolism. In these studies, BMD remained steady22,23 or increased10,24,25 following treatment, and estradiol gel remained effective for up to 4 years.25 Estradiol gel maintained or increased BMD with or without addition of progestins.22,23,26

These investigations involved measurement of BMD at the lumbar spine, forearms, or hip, as well as biologic markers of bone turnover such as urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio, serum alkaline phosphatase, and serum osteocalcin.

Serum estradiol and skeletal uptake of a bone-seeking agent also were determined. Estradiol gel regimens ranged from 0.75 mg/day to 3 mg/day, and populations included both surgical and natural menopausal subjects in several countries.

Effects comparable to oral estrogen. Compared with oral conjugated estrogen, which increased BMD at the lumbar spine by 4.3% (±3.2%), estradiol gel produced increases of 5.6% (±2.9%) at 24 months and 4.7% (±3.2%) at 36 months.10

Proper patient selection leads to good compliance and relief

The case. A 52-year-old woman with no menses for 8 months presents for management complaining of disabling hot flushes. Although she is moderately obese, with a body mass index of 29, she is normotensive without any other significant medical history except for hysterectomy at age 44 for excessive bleeding.

Counseling. During her 20s, the patient tried to use oral contraceptives on 3 separate occasions, but was unable to continue them because of nausea. Although she is interested in estrogen therapy for her vasomotor symptoms, she is concerned about the possibility of experiencing nausea again. You explain that one of the benefits of percutaneous estradiol is that it avoids the gastrointestinal tract.

Physical findings. Her physical examination is within normal limits, and gynecologic examination confirms no uterus and finds no palpable adnexal masses.

Outcome. After weighing the pros and cons, she elects to use estradiol gel. At her 3-month follow-up, she reports effective relief and good compliance.

 

 

Minimum level of protection achieved. Following a comparison of oral and percutaneous estradiol, Reginster et al27 suggested that a minimum estradiol level of 60 pg/mL is necessary to prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Mean serum estradiol levels in women receiving 1.5 mg/day estradiol gel were 75.7 pg/mL and 78.4 pg/mL at 24 and 36 months, respectively, in a study by Palacios et al,10 and 85.8 pg/mL in a study by Devogelaer and colleagues.24 In these trials, BMD increased, and it remained steady in other investigations.28,29

More recent trials suggest that lower serum estradiol levels secondary to smaller estrogen doses have the capacity to maintain BMD.30,31 A 1.9% mean increase of BMD at the lumbar spine was reported in women with a mean serum concentration of 17 pg/mL in a 2-year study30 of a transdermal estradiol delivery system. The percutaneous route does not appear to limit these beneficial effects.

How are metabolic factors affected?

In general, oral estrogens produce beneficial changes in lipid metabolism, particularly higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, they also elevate triglyceride and glucose levels. How this plays out clinically is unclear. Both the Women’s Health Initiative and the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) found no cardioprotective effects of oral estrogen despite increases in HDL and decreases in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels.1,32

Oral versus percutaneous estradiol. No long-term studies of this magnitude have investigated the effect of percutaneous estradiol on coronary artery disease, although numerous clinical trials have shown that the route of estrogen delivery affects many of the metabolic variables used to estimate the risk of negative cardiac outcomes. It remains to be determined whether percutaneous estradiol affects these metabolic factors in ways that influence morbidity and mortality.

In 1 trial,33 oral conjugated estrogen led to the following significant changes in lipids:

  • increase in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol,
  • decrease in LDL cholesterol (but not the LDL apoprotein B),
  • increase in HDL and apoprotein A1, and
  • significant increase in HDL2 cholesterol.
In contrast, percutaneous administration increased only HDL2 and the triglyceride and cholesterol content of the whole HDL fraction.

In a separate study,9 oral conjugated estrogen had a 2.5-fold increase in serum angiotensin, and percutaneous estradiol gel, no effect.

Same effects when progestin is added. Beneficial effects were not diminished when oral micronized progesterone was added to percutaneous estradiol.34 Estradiol gel significantly reduced total serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in the first year of treatment, compared with placebo.

Coagulation effects. Percutaneous estradiol has fewer negative effects on coagulation factors than its oral counterpart. One study35 investigating combination therapy with micronized progesterone compared the effects of percutaneous estradiol and oral estradiol valerate. The group receiving percutaneous estradiol gel/micronized progesterone had no significant changes in plasminogen activator inhibitor, tissue-type plasminogen concentration, and global fibrinolytic capacity. The other group had a significant decrease in mean tissue-type plasminogen concentration and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity and a significant rise in global fibrinolytic capacity.

The oral estradiol—but not the percutaneous formulation—significantly increased the mean value of prothrombin activation peptide and decreased mean antithrombin activity compared with no treatment.

Poor glycemic control may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, but oral and percutaneous estradiol appear to have similar glycemic effects. A comparative trial36 of oral estradiol valerate 2 mg/day and percutaneous estradiol 1 mg/day found no differences in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels (declined in both groups) or in fasting and 2-hour post-prandial blood glucose levels (constant in both groups) or insulin sensitivity.

Treatment duration may also influence how percutaneous estradiol affects metabolic factors. An open-label longitudinal prospective study37 of 30 women receiving estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day for 6 months found a significant decrease in lipoprotein (a), apoprotein A-I, apoprotein B, HDL cholesterol, and HDL3 cholesterol. At 1 year, however, these changes were not significant.

No association with venous thromboembolism. Transdermal estradiol administered as a patch or percutaneous gel had no effect on the risk of venous thromboembolism in a multicenter case-control investigation.38

In contrast, a recent retrospective study found a risk of venous thromboembolism that was at least 4 times greater with oral estrogen than with transdermal estradiol.38

Use a progestogen to prevent endometrial hyperplasia

Like other forms of estrogen, percutaneous estradiol stimulates the endometrium. For this reason, women who have an intact uterus should use a progestogen in an adequate dose to prevent hyperplastic changes.39 Although numerous regimens appear to be effective, the optimal route, dose, and duration of progestin in women using percutaneous estrogen remain to be determined.

Percutaneous estradiol versus other routes of administration. Endometrial thickness and amenorrhea rates over 6 months were not statistically different among 54 women treated with estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day, transdermal estradiol 50 μg/day, or oral estradiol valerate 2 mg/day—all in combination with nomegestrol acetate 2.5 mg/day.40 The overall rates of no bleeding or spotting over 6 cycles of treatment were 78% in the percutaneous estradiol group, 48% in the transdermal group, and 60% in the oral group.

 

 

Although the percutaneous estradiol group had a lower overall incidence of no bleeding or spotting than the other groups, the difference was not significant. Nor were there significant differences in the variation of endometrial thickness from baseline: A mean increase of 1.5 mm (±0.4 mm) was reported in the percutaneous group, compared with 1.5 mm (±0.7 mm) and 1.7 mm (±0.6 mm) in the transdermal and oral estrogen groups, respectively.

Estrogenic and progestogenic effects were similar for transdermal and percutaneous estradiol (with dydrogesterone 10 mg/day for days 1 to 12) after a baseline atropic endometrium was identified.3

Estradiol gel produces stable, physiologic serum estradiol levels and has a serum estrone to estradiol ratio close to 1.

The most effective progestogen dosage and duration are unknown, although many regimens have been studied:

  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day for the first 24 days of the month in combination with nomegestrol acetate 5 mg/day for days 11 to 24: Over 6 months, researchers found a secretory pattern in the majority of women and no evidence of hyperplasia.18
  • Percutaneous estradiol 3 mg/day for 3 of every 4 weeks in combination with nomegestrol acetate 5 mg/day for 10 days: No reduction in estrogenic endometrial effects.41,42
  • Estradiol gel 3 mg/day for 3 of every 4 weeks in combination with 200 mg or 300 mg oral micronized progesterone for the last 10 days of treatment: Dose was too low or treatment too short to produce a complete secretory transformation of the endometrium.43 However, the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial44 found no increased occurrence of hyperplasia in women using micronized progesterone 200 mg for 12 days of each cycle for more than 3 years in combination with oral conjugated estrogen 0.625 mg.
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day combined with micronized progesterone 100 mg daily (orally or vaginally) for the first 25 days of the month: Fully inhibited mitoses and induced amenorrhea in most of the women studied, with amenorrhea rates of 93.3% at 3 months and 91.6% at 6 months.45
  • Estradiol gel 1.5 mg/day with 100 mg vaginal micronized progesterone for 21 days per cycle: Stable endometrial thickness and no endometrial hyperplasia over 12 months.46 However, breakthrough bleeding was reported in up to 30% of subjects, principally in the second 3 months of treatment.
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1 mg/day for 3 months with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg/day for the last 14 days, followed by a 7-day free interval: No reports of endometrial hyperplasia or suspect changes at 12 and 24 months.17
  • Estradiol gel 2 mg/day for 21 days with 10 mg oral medroxyprogesterone acetate for the last 14 days, followed by a 7-day free interval: No endometrial hyperplasia or suspect changes at 12 and 24 months.17
  • Estradiol gel 1 mg/day with medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg on days 1-12 every month or every 3 months: Endometrial hyperplasia was found in 1 woman (0.3%) in the group receiving the progestogen every 3 months. Endometrial histology did not differ between women taking medroxyprogesterone monthly and those taking it every 3 months.21
  • Estradiol gel 3 mg/day with oral micronized progesterone 200 mg for 12 days of each cycle: Regular withdrawal bleeding in 70% of women.34
  • Percutaneous estradiol 1.5 mg/day in combination with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 80% of women were amenorrheic at 1 year, with a mean endometrial thickness 3 mm; at 5 years, 100% of women had epithelial atrophy.47
  • Estradiol gel 1.5 mg for 21 days with 200 mg oral progesterone for 14 days (126 women); 3 mg percutaneous estradiol for 21 days with 300 mg oral progesterone for 10 days (23 women); 1.5 mg estradiol gel with 300 mg oral progesterone (3 women); or 3 mg estradiol gel for 28 days with 200 mg progesterone for 14 days (5 women): No evidence of hyperplasia after 5 years of treatment.2
Dr. Archer is a consultant to Solvay, and has had grant support from Solvay for clinical trials.
References

1. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.

2. Moyer DL, de Lignieres B, Driguez P, et al. Prevention of endometrial hyperplasia by progesterone during long-term estradiol replacement: influence of bleeding pattern and secretory changes. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:992-997.

3. Hirvonen E, Cacciatore B, Wahlström T, et al. Effects of transdermal oestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparative study of an oestradiol gel and an oestradiol delivering patch. BJOG. 1997;104(Suppl 16):26-31.

4. Travassos de Figueiredo Alves S, et al. Comparison of gel and patch estradiol replacement in Brazil, a tropical country. Maturitas. 2000;36:69-74.

5. Henzl MR, Loomba PK. Transdermal delivery of sex steroids for hormone replacement therapy and contraception. A review of principles and practice. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:525-540.

6. Holst J, et al. Serum estrogen levels after topic application of estradiol-17 beta on two different cutaneous areas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;662:151-152.

7. Jarvinen A, Granander M, Nykanen S, Laine T, Geurts P, Viitanen A. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of oestradiol gel in post-menopausal women: effects of application area and washing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(Suppl 16):14-18.

8. Scott RT, Ross B, Anderson C, Archer DF. Pharmacokinetics of percutaneous estradiol: a crossover study using a gel and a transdermal system in comparison with oral micronized estradiol. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:758-764.

9. Dupont A, Dupont P, Cusan M, et al. Comparative endocrinological and clinical effects of percutaneous estradiol and oral conjugated estrogens as replacement therapy in menopausal women. Maturitas. 1991;13:297-311.

10. Palacios S, Menéndez C, Jurado AR, Vargas JC. Effects of percutaneous oestradiol versus oral oestrogens on bone density. Maturitas. 1995;20:209-213.

11. Basdevant A, de Lignieres B, Simon P, et al. Hepatic lipase activity during oral and parenteral 17ß-estradiol replacement therapy: high-density lipoprotein increase may not be antiatherogenic. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:1112-1117.

12. Simon JA, et al. Are there significant differences between patch and gel cutaneous estradiol therapy? In: Genazzani AR, Petraglia F, Volpe A, Facchinetti F, eds. Recent Research on Gynecological Endocrinology. Casterton Hall, Carnforth, Lancashire, UK: Parthenon Publishing, Casterton Hall; 1998;317-324.

13. Paoletti AM, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of 17ß-estradiol gel 0.6mg/g (Gelestra) with a transdermal delivery system (Estraderm TTS 50) in postmenopausal women at steady state. Maturitas. 2001;40:203-209.

14. Jensen PB, Jensen J, Riis BJ, et al. Climacteric symptoms after oral and percutaneous hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1987;9:207-215.

15. Archer DF. for the EstroGel Study Group. Percutaneous 17ß-estradiol gel for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2003;10:516-521.

16. Kornafel KL, March CM. Estradiol gel in the treatment of menopausal symptoms: a placebo-controlled double-blind case study of efficacy and safety. South Med J. 1992;85:270-273.

17. Hirvonen E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Lankinen KS, Geurts P, Wilén-Rosenqvist G. Transdermal oestradiol gel in the treatment of the climacterium: a comparison with oral therapy. BJOG. 1997;104(Suppl 16):19-25.

18. Foidart JM, Béliard A, Hedon B, et al. Impact of percutaneous oestradiol gels in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on clinical symptoms and endometrium. BJOG. 1997;104:305-310.

19. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Sundström H, Penttinen J, et al. Percutaneous estradiol gel with an intrauterine levonorgestrel releasing device or natural progesterone in hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1997;26:211-17.

20. Holst J, et al. Progestogen addition during oestrogen replacement therapy—effects on vasomotor symptoms and mood. Maturitas. 1989;11:13-20.

21. Hirvonen E, et al. Effect of an estradiol gel with monthly or quarterly progestogen on menopausal symptoms and bleeding. Climacteric. 2000;3:262-270.

22. Ng HT, Chang SP, Yang TS, Cho MP, Wei TC. Estradiol administered in a percutaneous gel for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;19(2):115-119.

23. Riis B, Thomsen K, et al. Does calcium supplementation prevent postmenopausal bone loss? A double blind, controlled clinical study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:173-177.

24. Devogelaer JP, Lecart C, Dupret P, De Nayer P, Nagant De Deuxchaisnes C. Long-term effects of percutaneous estradiol on bone loss and bone metabolism in post-menopausal hysterectomized women. Maturitas. 1998;28:243-249.

25. Wimalawansa SJ. Combined therapy with estrogen and etidronate has an additive effect on bone mineral density in the hip and vertebrae: four year randomized study. Am J Med. 1995;99:36-42.

26. Sun A, Lin S, Yu W, et al. Percutaneous estrogen in prevention of early post-menopausal bone loss in Chinese women. Chin Med J. 2002;115:1790-1795.

27. Reginster JY, Sarlet N, Deroisy R, et al. Minimum levels of serum estradiol prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;51:340-343.

28. Cicinelli E, Cantatore FP, Galantino P, et al. Effects of continuous percutaneous estradiol administration on skeletal turnover in postmenopausal women: a 1-year prospective controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;69(2):109-113.

29. Riis B, et al. The effect of percutaneous estradiol and natural progesterone on post-menopausal bone loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:61-65.

30. Notelvitz M, John VA, Good WR. Effectiveness of Alora estradiol matrix transdermal delivery system in improving lumbar bone mineral density in healthy, post-menopausal women. Menopause. 2002;9:343-353.

31. Prestwood KM, Kenny AM, Kleppinger A, Kulldorff M. Ultralow-dose micronized 17ß-estradiol and bone density and bone metabolism in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1042-1048.

32. Hully S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605-613.

33. Moorjani S, Dupont A, Labrie F, et al. Changes in plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein composition in relation to oral versus percutaneous administration of estrogen alone or in cyclic association with Utrogestan in menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:373-379.

34. Jensen J, Riis BJ, Strøm V, Nilas L, Christiansen C. Long-term effects of percutaneous estrogens and oral progesterone on serum lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gyencol. 1987;156:66-71.

35. Scarabin PY, Alhenc-Gelas M, Plu-Bureau G, Taisne P, Agher R, Aiach M. Effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women. A randomized controlled trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3071-3078.

36. Karjalainen A, Paassilta M, Heikkinen J, et al. Effects of peroral and transdermal oestrogen replacement therapy on glucose and insulin metabolism. Clin Endocrin. 2001;54:165-173.

37. Haines CJ, Chung TKH, Masarei JRL, Tomlinson B, Lau JTF. The effect of per-cutaneous oestrogen replacement therapy on Lp(a) and other lipoproteins. Maturitas. 1995;22:219-225.

38. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. EStrogen and THromboEmbolism Risk (ESTHER) Study Group. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003;362:428-432.

39. Archer DF. The effect of the duration of progestin use on the occurrence of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2001;8:245-251.

40. Blanc B, Cravello L, Micheletti MC, et al. Continuous hormone replacement therapy for menopause combining nomegestrol acetate and gel, patch, or oral estrogen: a comparison of amenorrhea rates. Clin Therap. 1998;20(5):901-912.

41. Holst J. Percutaneous estrogen therapy. Endometrial response and metabolic effects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1983;115:1-30

42. Holst J, Cajander S, von Schoultz B. Cellular morphometric analysis of the post-menopausal endometrium during treatment with percutaneous estradiol-17ß with and without oral gestagen. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62:267-270.

43. Holst J, Cajander S, von Schoultz B. Endometrial response in post-menopausal women during treatment with percutaneous 17ß-oestradiol opposed by oral progesterone. Maturitas. 1986;8:201-207.

44. Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on endometrial histology in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. JAMA. 1996;275:370-375.

45. Gillet JY, Andre G, Faguer B, et al. Induction of amenorrhea during hormone replacement therapy: optimized micronized progesterone dose. A multicenter study. Maturitas. 1994;19:103-115.

46. Vilodre LC, et al. Endometrial response to a cyclic regimen of percutaneous 17ß-estradiol and low-dose vaginal micronized progesterone in women with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003;17:323-328.

47. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Kauppila A. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in menopausal hormone replacement therapy: five-year experience. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:161-163.

References

1. Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321-333.

2. Moyer DL, de Lignieres B, Driguez P, et al. Prevention of endometrial hyperplasia by progesterone during long-term estradiol replacement: influence of bleeding pattern and secretory changes. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:992-997.

3. Hirvonen E, Cacciatore B, Wahlström T, et al. Effects of transdermal oestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women: a comparative study of an oestradiol gel and an oestradiol delivering patch. BJOG. 1997;104(Suppl 16):26-31.

4. Travassos de Figueiredo Alves S, et al. Comparison of gel and patch estradiol replacement in Brazil, a tropical country. Maturitas. 2000;36:69-74.

5. Henzl MR, Loomba PK. Transdermal delivery of sex steroids for hormone replacement therapy and contraception. A review of principles and practice. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:525-540.

6. Holst J, et al. Serum estrogen levels after topic application of estradiol-17 beta on two different cutaneous areas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;662:151-152.

7. Jarvinen A, Granander M, Nykanen S, Laine T, Geurts P, Viitanen A. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of oestradiol gel in post-menopausal women: effects of application area and washing. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(Suppl 16):14-18.

8. Scott RT, Ross B, Anderson C, Archer DF. Pharmacokinetics of percutaneous estradiol: a crossover study using a gel and a transdermal system in comparison with oral micronized estradiol. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:758-764.

9. Dupont A, Dupont P, Cusan M, et al. Comparative endocrinological and clinical effects of percutaneous estradiol and oral conjugated estrogens as replacement therapy in menopausal women. Maturitas. 1991;13:297-311.

10. Palacios S, Menéndez C, Jurado AR, Vargas JC. Effects of percutaneous oestradiol versus oral oestrogens on bone density. Maturitas. 1995;20:209-213.

11. Basdevant A, de Lignieres B, Simon P, et al. Hepatic lipase activity during oral and parenteral 17ß-estradiol replacement therapy: high-density lipoprotein increase may not be antiatherogenic. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:1112-1117.

12. Simon JA, et al. Are there significant differences between patch and gel cutaneous estradiol therapy? In: Genazzani AR, Petraglia F, Volpe A, Facchinetti F, eds. Recent Research on Gynecological Endocrinology. Casterton Hall, Carnforth, Lancashire, UK: Parthenon Publishing, Casterton Hall; 1998;317-324.

13. Paoletti AM, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of 17ß-estradiol gel 0.6mg/g (Gelestra) with a transdermal delivery system (Estraderm TTS 50) in postmenopausal women at steady state. Maturitas. 2001;40:203-209.

14. Jensen PB, Jensen J, Riis BJ, et al. Climacteric symptoms after oral and percutaneous hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1987;9:207-215.

15. Archer DF. for the EstroGel Study Group. Percutaneous 17ß-estradiol gel for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2003;10:516-521.

16. Kornafel KL, March CM. Estradiol gel in the treatment of menopausal symptoms: a placebo-controlled double-blind case study of efficacy and safety. South Med J. 1992;85:270-273.

17. Hirvonen E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Lankinen KS, Geurts P, Wilén-Rosenqvist G. Transdermal oestradiol gel in the treatment of the climacterium: a comparison with oral therapy. BJOG. 1997;104(Suppl 16):19-25.

18. Foidart JM, Béliard A, Hedon B, et al. Impact of percutaneous oestradiol gels in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on clinical symptoms and endometrium. BJOG. 1997;104:305-310.

19. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Sundström H, Penttinen J, et al. Percutaneous estradiol gel with an intrauterine levonorgestrel releasing device or natural progesterone in hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1997;26:211-17.

20. Holst J, et al. Progestogen addition during oestrogen replacement therapy—effects on vasomotor symptoms and mood. Maturitas. 1989;11:13-20.

21. Hirvonen E, et al. Effect of an estradiol gel with monthly or quarterly progestogen on menopausal symptoms and bleeding. Climacteric. 2000;3:262-270.

22. Ng HT, Chang SP, Yang TS, Cho MP, Wei TC. Estradiol administered in a percutaneous gel for the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;19(2):115-119.

23. Riis B, Thomsen K, et al. Does calcium supplementation prevent postmenopausal bone loss? A double blind, controlled clinical study. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:173-177.

24. Devogelaer JP, Lecart C, Dupret P, De Nayer P, Nagant De Deuxchaisnes C. Long-term effects of percutaneous estradiol on bone loss and bone metabolism in post-menopausal hysterectomized women. Maturitas. 1998;28:243-249.

25. Wimalawansa SJ. Combined therapy with estrogen and etidronate has an additive effect on bone mineral density in the hip and vertebrae: four year randomized study. Am J Med. 1995;99:36-42.

26. Sun A, Lin S, Yu W, et al. Percutaneous estrogen in prevention of early post-menopausal bone loss in Chinese women. Chin Med J. 2002;115:1790-1795.

27. Reginster JY, Sarlet N, Deroisy R, et al. Minimum levels of serum estradiol prevent postmenopausal bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;51:340-343.

28. Cicinelli E, Cantatore FP, Galantino P, et al. Effects of continuous percutaneous estradiol administration on skeletal turnover in postmenopausal women: a 1-year prospective controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;69(2):109-113.

29. Riis B, et al. The effect of percutaneous estradiol and natural progesterone on post-menopausal bone loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:61-65.

30. Notelvitz M, John VA, Good WR. Effectiveness of Alora estradiol matrix transdermal delivery system in improving lumbar bone mineral density in healthy, post-menopausal women. Menopause. 2002;9:343-353.

31. Prestwood KM, Kenny AM, Kleppinger A, Kulldorff M. Ultralow-dose micronized 17ß-estradiol and bone density and bone metabolism in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1042-1048.

32. Hully S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605-613.

33. Moorjani S, Dupont A, Labrie F, et al. Changes in plasma lipoprotein and apolipoprotein composition in relation to oral versus percutaneous administration of estrogen alone or in cyclic association with Utrogestan in menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;73:373-379.

34. Jensen J, Riis BJ, Strøm V, Nilas L, Christiansen C. Long-term effects of percutaneous estrogens and oral progesterone on serum lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gyencol. 1987;156:66-71.

35. Scarabin PY, Alhenc-Gelas M, Plu-Bureau G, Taisne P, Agher R, Aiach M. Effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women. A randomized controlled trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:3071-3078.

36. Karjalainen A, Paassilta M, Heikkinen J, et al. Effects of peroral and transdermal oestrogen replacement therapy on glucose and insulin metabolism. Clin Endocrin. 2001;54:165-173.

37. Haines CJ, Chung TKH, Masarei JRL, Tomlinson B, Lau JTF. The effect of per-cutaneous oestrogen replacement therapy on Lp(a) and other lipoproteins. Maturitas. 1995;22:219-225.

38. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. EStrogen and THromboEmbolism Risk (ESTHER) Study Group. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003;362:428-432.

39. Archer DF. The effect of the duration of progestin use on the occurrence of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2001;8:245-251.

40. Blanc B, Cravello L, Micheletti MC, et al. Continuous hormone replacement therapy for menopause combining nomegestrol acetate and gel, patch, or oral estrogen: a comparison of amenorrhea rates. Clin Therap. 1998;20(5):901-912.

41. Holst J. Percutaneous estrogen therapy. Endometrial response and metabolic effects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1983;115:1-30

42. Holst J, Cajander S, von Schoultz B. Cellular morphometric analysis of the post-menopausal endometrium during treatment with percutaneous estradiol-17ß with and without oral gestagen. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62:267-270.

43. Holst J, Cajander S, von Schoultz B. Endometrial response in post-menopausal women during treatment with percutaneous 17ß-oestradiol opposed by oral progesterone. Maturitas. 1986;8:201-207.

44. Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on endometrial histology in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. JAMA. 1996;275:370-375.

45. Gillet JY, Andre G, Faguer B, et al. Induction of amenorrhea during hormone replacement therapy: optimized micronized progesterone dose. A multicenter study. Maturitas. 1994;19:103-115.

46. Vilodre LC, et al. Endometrial response to a cyclic regimen of percutaneous 17ß-estradiol and low-dose vaginal micronized progesterone in women with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003;17:323-328.

47. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Kauppila A. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in menopausal hormone replacement therapy: five-year experience. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:161-163.

Issue
OBG Management - 16(09)
Issue
OBG Management - 16(09)
Page Number
46-66
Page Number
46-66
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Estradiol gel: A new option in hormone replacement therapy
Display Headline
Estradiol gel: A new option in hormone replacement therapy
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media