Most Doctors Face a Malpractice Claim by Age 65

Although physicians in high-risk specialties face a near certainty of a malpractice claim at some point in their careers, only a small minority will end up making an indemnity payment to a patient.

The probability of facing a malpractice claim increases with length of time in practice, based on data from 1991 through 2005 from a large national malpractice carrier insuring more than 40,000 physicians in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Among physicians in high-risk specialties such as neurosurgery, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology, an estimated 88% were projected to face their first claim by age 45 and an estimated 99% by age 65. In low-risk specialties such as family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry, 36% of physicians were projected to face their first claim by age 45 years and 75% by age 65 years, Dr. Anupam Jena of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues wrote.

In contrast, the projected rates of indemnity claims paid to plaintiffs were lower. By age 45, 33% of physicians in high-risk specialties were projected to have had a claim paid, rising to 71% by age 65. For physicians in low-risk specialties, 5% were projected to have had a claim paid by age 45, rising to 19% by age 65 years (N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:629–36).

“If you've hit 65 and you haven't had a claim, that's rare; that's almost impossible in our data,” Dr. Jena said in an interview, adding that high-risk specialties often come with higher salaries, which could be what balances out the risk factor for physicians.

Overall, 7.4% of physicians were sued for malpractice each year of the study, with 1.6% having an indemnity payment made each year.

Dr. Jena and colleagues also found that specialties in which physicians were more likely to face a malpractice claim were not the ones where indemnity payments were most prevalent.

For example, although neurosurgeons had a higher yearly risk of being sued than did pediatricians (19.1% vs. 3.1%), the average indemnity payment for neurosurgeons was $344,811, lower than the average of $520,924 for pediatricians. Neurologists' yearly risk of being sued was about 8%, with an average indemnity payment of about $240,000.

Among all specialties, thoracic-cardiovascular surgery had the second highest yearly risk of being sued (18.9%), followed by general surgery (15.3%). Specialties with the lowest yearly risk of being sued included psychiatry (2.6%), pediatrics (3.1%), and family medicine (5.2%). The average payment for all specialties was $273,887.

While few claims resulted in payment, researchers said they were surprised by how many physicians face malpractice claims every year.

“A lot of those claims do not resolve in a payment to the patient, but they still involve significant monetary costs to both the physician and the insurer,” Dr. Jena said. “The physician has loss of productivity because they're not able to see patients as they defend cases … and then there are all sorts of nonmonetary costs that we simply cannot measure,” Dr. Jena said in an interview.

Some lawmakers and health care organizations have advocated for national medical malpractice reform, or tort reform, as a means of lowering health care costs; California and Texas already have $250,000 caps noneconomic damages. However, there's little evidence that proves these measures are lowering health care costs. Even without tort reform, Dr. Jena said that he believes the best solution is one that roots out frivolous claims.

View on the News

Malpractice Caps: The Texas Experience

While the results of this study may not be surprising, Texas has found one solution to the issue. Since Texas instituted a $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages in 2003, nuisance suits have been significantly reduced. The wasteful process of a medical liability trial has also been reduced, as true cases of malpractice are typically resolved through a settlement. Also, legitimate cases of malpractice can still be awarded the compensation they deserve. In addition to the $250,000 maximum payment for pain and suffering (per physician, hospital, and/or third party, equaling up to $750,000), patients can also be compensated for past and future medical expenses. In addition, trial lawyers seeking a large payoff can no longer afford to litigate cases with very few damages. Therefore, nuisance cases are reduced to complaints before the Texas Medical Board where they can be handled responsibly in a more cost-effective manner.

Without the concerns of facing a nuisance suit, hospitals in Texas can now redirect those funds to improving care, like funding safety systems or electronic medical records. Physicians can invest in their practices too, improving patient care. They can provide more charity care as well. The change has also brought thousands of doctors to Texas and improved access to quality care. As family practitioners face high overhead costs and low reimbursement rates, just saving on medical liability has allowed some doctors to continue their work where otherwise they may not have been able to.

BRUCE MALONE, M.D., is the president of the Texas Medical Association. He is also a practicing orthopedic surgeon at the Austin Bone and Joint Clinic in Austin, Tex.

Although physicians in high-risk specialties face a near certainty of a malpractice claim at some point in their careers, only a small minority will end up making an indemnity payment to a patient.

The probability of facing a malpractice claim increases with length of time in practice, based on data from 1991 through 2005 from a large national malpractice carrier insuring more than 40,000 physicians in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Among physicians in high-risk specialties such as neurosurgery, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology, an estimated 88% were projected to face their first claim by age 45 and an estimated 99% by age 65. In low-risk specialties such as family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry, 36% of physicians were projected to face their first claim by age 45 years and 75% by age 65 years, Dr. Anupam Jena of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues wrote.

In contrast, the projected rates of indemnity claims paid to plaintiffs were lower. By age 45, 33% of physicians in high-risk specialties were projected to have had a claim paid, rising to 71% by age 65. For physicians in low-risk specialties, 5% were projected to have had a claim paid by age 45, rising to 19% by age 65 years (N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:629–36).

“If you've hit 65 and you haven't had a claim, that's rare; that's almost impossible in our data,” Dr. Jena said in an interview, adding that high-risk specialties often come with higher salaries, which could be what balances out the risk factor for physicians.

Overall, 7.4% of physicians were sued for malpractice each year of the study, with 1.6% having an indemnity payment made each year.

Dr. Jena and colleagues also found that specialties in which physicians were more likely to face a malpractice claim were not the ones where indemnity payments were most prevalent.

For example, although neurosurgeons had a higher yearly risk of being sued than did pediatricians (19.1% vs. 3.1%), the average indemnity payment for neurosurgeons was $344,811, lower than the average of $520,924 for pediatricians. Neurologists' yearly risk of being sued was about 8%, with an average indemnity payment of about $240,000.

Among all specialties, thoracic-cardiovascular surgery had the second highest yearly risk of being sued (18.9%), followed by general surgery (15.3%). Specialties with the lowest yearly risk of being sued included psychiatry (2.6%), pediatrics (3.1%), and family medicine (5.2%). The average payment for all specialties was $273,887.

While few claims resulted in payment, researchers said they were surprised by how many physicians face malpractice claims every year.

“A lot of those claims do not resolve in a payment to the patient, but they still involve significant monetary costs to both the physician and the insurer,” Dr. Jena said. “The physician has loss of productivity because they're not able to see patients as they defend cases … and then there are all sorts of nonmonetary costs that we simply cannot measure,” Dr. Jena said in an interview.

Some lawmakers and health care organizations have advocated for national medical malpractice reform, or tort reform, as a means of lowering health care costs; California and Texas already have $250,000 caps noneconomic damages. However, there's little evidence that proves these measures are lowering health care costs. Even without tort reform, Dr. Jena said that he believes the best solution is one that roots out frivolous claims.

View on the News

Malpractice Caps: The Texas Experience

While the results of this study may not be surprising, Texas has found one solution to the issue. Since Texas instituted a $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages in 2003, nuisance suits have been significantly reduced. The wasteful process of a medical liability trial has also been reduced, as true cases of malpractice are typically resolved through a settlement. Also, legitimate cases of malpractice can still be awarded the compensation they deserve. In addition to the $250,000 maximum payment for pain and suffering (per physician, hospital, and/or third party, equaling up to $750,000), patients can also be compensated for past and future medical expenses. In addition, trial lawyers seeking a large payoff can no longer afford to litigate cases with very few damages. Therefore, nuisance cases are reduced to complaints before the Texas Medical Board where they can be handled responsibly in a more cost-effective manner.

Without the concerns of facing a nuisance suit, hospitals in Texas can now redirect those funds to improving care, like funding safety systems or electronic medical records. Physicians can invest in their practices too, improving patient care. They can provide more charity care as well. The change has also brought thousands of doctors to Texas and improved access to quality care. As family practitioners face high overhead costs and low reimbursement rates, just saving on medical liability has allowed some doctors to continue their work where otherwise they may not have been able to.

BRUCE MALONE, M.D., is the president of the Texas Medical Association. He is also a practicing orthopedic surgeon at the Austin Bone and Joint Clinic in Austin, Tex.

Although physicians in high-risk specialties face a near certainty of a malpractice claim at some point in their careers, only a small minority will end up making an indemnity payment to a patient.

The probability of facing a malpractice claim increases with length of time in practice, based on data from 1991 through 2005 from a large national malpractice carrier insuring more than 40,000 physicians in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Among physicians in high-risk specialties such as neurosurgery, general surgery, and obstetrics/gynecology, an estimated 88% were projected to face their first claim by age 45 and an estimated 99% by age 65. In low-risk specialties such as family medicine, pediatrics, and psychiatry, 36% of physicians were projected to face their first claim by age 45 years and 75% by age 65 years, Dr. Anupam Jena of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues wrote.

In contrast, the projected rates of indemnity claims paid to plaintiffs were lower. By age 45, 33% of physicians in high-risk specialties were projected to have had a claim paid, rising to 71% by age 65. For physicians in low-risk specialties, 5% were projected to have had a claim paid by age 45, rising to 19% by age 65 years (N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:629–36).

“If you've hit 65 and you haven't had a claim, that's rare; that's almost impossible in our data,” Dr. Jena said in an interview, adding that high-risk specialties often come with higher salaries, which could be what balances out the risk factor for physicians.

Overall, 7.4% of physicians were sued for malpractice each year of the study, with 1.6% having an indemnity payment made each year.

Dr. Jena and colleagues also found that specialties in which physicians were more likely to face a malpractice claim were not the ones where indemnity payments were most prevalent.

For example, although neurosurgeons had a higher yearly risk of being sued than did pediatricians (19.1% vs. 3.1%), the average indemnity payment for neurosurgeons was $344,811, lower than the average of $520,924 for pediatricians. Neurologists' yearly risk of being sued was about 8%, with an average indemnity payment of about $240,000.

Among all specialties, thoracic-cardiovascular surgery had the second highest yearly risk of being sued (18.9%), followed by general surgery (15.3%). Specialties with the lowest yearly risk of being sued included psychiatry (2.6%), pediatrics (3.1%), and family medicine (5.2%). The average payment for all specialties was $273,887.

While few claims resulted in payment, researchers said they were surprised by how many physicians face malpractice claims every year.

“A lot of those claims do not resolve in a payment to the patient, but they still involve significant monetary costs to both the physician and the insurer,” Dr. Jena said. “The physician has loss of productivity because they're not able to see patients as they defend cases … and then there are all sorts of nonmonetary costs that we simply cannot measure,” Dr. Jena said in an interview.

Some lawmakers and health care organizations have advocated for national medical malpractice reform, or tort reform, as a means of lowering health care costs; California and Texas already have $250,000 caps noneconomic damages. However, there's little evidence that proves these measures are lowering health care costs. Even without tort reform, Dr. Jena said that he believes the best solution is one that roots out frivolous claims.

View on the News

Malpractice Caps: The Texas Experience

While the results of this study may not be surprising, Texas has found one solution to the issue. Since Texas instituted a $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages in 2003, nuisance suits have been significantly reduced. The wasteful process of a medical liability trial has also been reduced, as true cases of malpractice are typically resolved through a settlement. Also, legitimate cases of malpractice can still be awarded the compensation they deserve. In addition to the $250,000 maximum payment for pain and suffering (per physician, hospital, and/or third party, equaling up to $750,000), patients can also be compensated for past and future medical expenses. In addition, trial lawyers seeking a large payoff can no longer afford to litigate cases with very few damages. Therefore, nuisance cases are reduced to complaints before the Texas Medical Board where they can be handled responsibly in a more cost-effective manner.

Without the concerns of facing a nuisance suit, hospitals in Texas can now redirect those funds to improving care, like funding safety systems or electronic medical records. Physicians can invest in their practices too, improving patient care. They can provide more charity care as well. The change has also brought thousands of doctors to Texas and improved access to quality care. As family practitioners face high overhead costs and low reimbursement rates, just saving on medical liability has allowed some doctors to continue their work where otherwise they may not have been able to.

BRUCE MALONE, M.D., is the president of the Texas Medical Association. He is also a practicing orthopedic surgeon at the Austin Bone and Joint Clinic in Austin, Tex.