Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/19/2019 - 13:40
Display Headline
The Practice of Medicine: Our Changing Landscape

Gone are the days when, upon completion of training, the newly minted orthopedic surgeon would return to his or her hometown, raise a shingle, and begin a busy practice. Did these halcyon days ever exist? Who knows?

What I do know is that 75% of our shoulder fellowship graduates (my partner, Frances Cuomo, MD, and I offer an ACGME-accredited fellowship in shoulder surgery at Mount Sinai Beth Israel) in the past 10 years have accepted jobs as
employees of HMOs or hospital systems. They prefer the certainty of regular hours and incentive options offered by these institutions to the potential opportunities of greater (or lesser!) rewards as an entrepreneur in private practice.

I also know my local New York metropolitan orthopedic market, where the recent trend is towards consolidation among large medical centers. In September 2013, Mount Sinai Medical Center merged with the hospital where I work (full disclosure: I have been a full-time employee of my hospital since 1996), Continuum Health Partners, a consortium of 3 academic hospitals in Manhattan (Beth Israel Medical Center, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, and New York Eye and Ear Infirmary), to form the Mount Sinai Health System, currently the largest health care system in New York City. Other medical centers in the New York metropolitan region are actively recruiting physicians in private practice to join their respective institutions. Among the institutional goals, in addition to improving the scope, coordination, and efficiency of care, is to appoint as many practitioners as possible to increase the
number of patients treated by the particular medical center in certain geographic areas. Hence, the practice landscape in the New York metropolitan region is changing dramatically and reflects similar changes throughout the country.

While many practitioners of a certain generation, like mine, may lament the loss of those good old days as independent private practitioners, where self-reliance and experience dictated orthopedic practice, the reality is that today the business of medicine is the largest sector of our national economy, currently approaching 20% of the gross domestic product (GDP),1 and that individual practitioners no longer
really control their practices. The number of independent physicians and surgeons is diminishing, and our practice environment is changing drastically. What’s an orthopedic surgeon to do?

Medical reports are abuzz with new terminology: accountable care organizations, population management, value-based care, etc.1 They all reflect a fundamental shift in health care financing away from our current model of fee for services rendered to that of a global payment for groups of patients in which the outcome of treatment, not the number of procedures or interventions, is compensated. How such a bundled payment that covers the health care requirements for a population will be distributed among the various practitioners is extremely complicated and, to date, not widely embraced. However, these changes are coming.

To succeed in the future health care arena, I believe orthopedic surgeons must have 2 prerequisites. First, there must be reliable data that not only report accurate diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes of treatment (risk-adjusted by medical comorbidities and economic status) but also include the financial costs of treatment. Second, orthopedic surgeons must participate in the decision-making process and the development of treatment algorithms that will be ever-increasing elements of medical practice. Who better than practicing orthopedic surgeons should recommend treatment guidelines based on best practice and prudent
economics?

The new landscape of medical practice isn’t coming—it has already arrived. It behooves us practicing orthopedic surgeons to be involved in the decision-making process that will determine musculoskeletal care and to partner with our hospital and insurance administrators to establish the parameters that will deliver efficient and high-quality care to our patients. ◾

Reference
1. Black EM, Warner JJ. 5 points on value in orthopedic surgery. Am J
Orthop
. 2013;42(1):22-25.

References

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Peter D. McCann, MD

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 43(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
446
Legacy Keywords
american journal of orthopedics, ajo, editorial, McCann, editor-in-chief, practice, medicine, landscape, change, training, orthopedic surgeon, surgeon, medical reports, care, patients, practice management
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Peter D. McCann, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Peter D. McCann, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Gone are the days when, upon completion of training, the newly minted orthopedic surgeon would return to his or her hometown, raise a shingle, and begin a busy practice. Did these halcyon days ever exist? Who knows?

What I do know is that 75% of our shoulder fellowship graduates (my partner, Frances Cuomo, MD, and I offer an ACGME-accredited fellowship in shoulder surgery at Mount Sinai Beth Israel) in the past 10 years have accepted jobs as
employees of HMOs or hospital systems. They prefer the certainty of regular hours and incentive options offered by these institutions to the potential opportunities of greater (or lesser!) rewards as an entrepreneur in private practice.

I also know my local New York metropolitan orthopedic market, where the recent trend is towards consolidation among large medical centers. In September 2013, Mount Sinai Medical Center merged with the hospital where I work (full disclosure: I have been a full-time employee of my hospital since 1996), Continuum Health Partners, a consortium of 3 academic hospitals in Manhattan (Beth Israel Medical Center, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, and New York Eye and Ear Infirmary), to form the Mount Sinai Health System, currently the largest health care system in New York City. Other medical centers in the New York metropolitan region are actively recruiting physicians in private practice to join their respective institutions. Among the institutional goals, in addition to improving the scope, coordination, and efficiency of care, is to appoint as many practitioners as possible to increase the
number of patients treated by the particular medical center in certain geographic areas. Hence, the practice landscape in the New York metropolitan region is changing dramatically and reflects similar changes throughout the country.

While many practitioners of a certain generation, like mine, may lament the loss of those good old days as independent private practitioners, where self-reliance and experience dictated orthopedic practice, the reality is that today the business of medicine is the largest sector of our national economy, currently approaching 20% of the gross domestic product (GDP),1 and that individual practitioners no longer
really control their practices. The number of independent physicians and surgeons is diminishing, and our practice environment is changing drastically. What’s an orthopedic surgeon to do?

Medical reports are abuzz with new terminology: accountable care organizations, population management, value-based care, etc.1 They all reflect a fundamental shift in health care financing away from our current model of fee for services rendered to that of a global payment for groups of patients in which the outcome of treatment, not the number of procedures or interventions, is compensated. How such a bundled payment that covers the health care requirements for a population will be distributed among the various practitioners is extremely complicated and, to date, not widely embraced. However, these changes are coming.

To succeed in the future health care arena, I believe orthopedic surgeons must have 2 prerequisites. First, there must be reliable data that not only report accurate diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes of treatment (risk-adjusted by medical comorbidities and economic status) but also include the financial costs of treatment. Second, orthopedic surgeons must participate in the decision-making process and the development of treatment algorithms that will be ever-increasing elements of medical practice. Who better than practicing orthopedic surgeons should recommend treatment guidelines based on best practice and prudent
economics?

The new landscape of medical practice isn’t coming—it has already arrived. It behooves us practicing orthopedic surgeons to be involved in the decision-making process that will determine musculoskeletal care and to partner with our hospital and insurance administrators to establish the parameters that will deliver efficient and high-quality care to our patients. ◾

Reference
1. Black EM, Warner JJ. 5 points on value in orthopedic surgery. Am J
Orthop
. 2013;42(1):22-25.

Gone are the days when, upon completion of training, the newly minted orthopedic surgeon would return to his or her hometown, raise a shingle, and begin a busy practice. Did these halcyon days ever exist? Who knows?

What I do know is that 75% of our shoulder fellowship graduates (my partner, Frances Cuomo, MD, and I offer an ACGME-accredited fellowship in shoulder surgery at Mount Sinai Beth Israel) in the past 10 years have accepted jobs as
employees of HMOs or hospital systems. They prefer the certainty of regular hours and incentive options offered by these institutions to the potential opportunities of greater (or lesser!) rewards as an entrepreneur in private practice.

I also know my local New York metropolitan orthopedic market, where the recent trend is towards consolidation among large medical centers. In September 2013, Mount Sinai Medical Center merged with the hospital where I work (full disclosure: I have been a full-time employee of my hospital since 1996), Continuum Health Partners, a consortium of 3 academic hospitals in Manhattan (Beth Israel Medical Center, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, and New York Eye and Ear Infirmary), to form the Mount Sinai Health System, currently the largest health care system in New York City. Other medical centers in the New York metropolitan region are actively recruiting physicians in private practice to join their respective institutions. Among the institutional goals, in addition to improving the scope, coordination, and efficiency of care, is to appoint as many practitioners as possible to increase the
number of patients treated by the particular medical center in certain geographic areas. Hence, the practice landscape in the New York metropolitan region is changing dramatically and reflects similar changes throughout the country.

While many practitioners of a certain generation, like mine, may lament the loss of those good old days as independent private practitioners, where self-reliance and experience dictated orthopedic practice, the reality is that today the business of medicine is the largest sector of our national economy, currently approaching 20% of the gross domestic product (GDP),1 and that individual practitioners no longer
really control their practices. The number of independent physicians and surgeons is diminishing, and our practice environment is changing drastically. What’s an orthopedic surgeon to do?

Medical reports are abuzz with new terminology: accountable care organizations, population management, value-based care, etc.1 They all reflect a fundamental shift in health care financing away from our current model of fee for services rendered to that of a global payment for groups of patients in which the outcome of treatment, not the number of procedures or interventions, is compensated. How such a bundled payment that covers the health care requirements for a population will be distributed among the various practitioners is extremely complicated and, to date, not widely embraced. However, these changes are coming.

To succeed in the future health care arena, I believe orthopedic surgeons must have 2 prerequisites. First, there must be reliable data that not only report accurate diagnoses, procedures, and outcomes of treatment (risk-adjusted by medical comorbidities and economic status) but also include the financial costs of treatment. Second, orthopedic surgeons must participate in the decision-making process and the development of treatment algorithms that will be ever-increasing elements of medical practice. Who better than practicing orthopedic surgeons should recommend treatment guidelines based on best practice and prudent
economics?

The new landscape of medical practice isn’t coming—it has already arrived. It behooves us practicing orthopedic surgeons to be involved in the decision-making process that will determine musculoskeletal care and to partner with our hospital and insurance administrators to establish the parameters that will deliver efficient and high-quality care to our patients. ◾

Reference
1. Black EM, Warner JJ. 5 points on value in orthopedic surgery. Am J
Orthop
. 2013;42(1):22-25.

References

References

Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 43(10)
Issue
The American Journal of Orthopedics - 43(10)
Page Number
446
Page Number
446
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
The Practice of Medicine: Our Changing Landscape
Display Headline
The Practice of Medicine: Our Changing Landscape
Legacy Keywords
american journal of orthopedics, ajo, editorial, McCann, editor-in-chief, practice, medicine, landscape, change, training, orthopedic surgeon, surgeon, medical reports, care, patients, practice management
Legacy Keywords
american journal of orthopedics, ajo, editorial, McCann, editor-in-chief, practice, medicine, landscape, change, training, orthopedic surgeon, surgeon, medical reports, care, patients, practice management
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media