User login
WASHINGTON – in a pair of controlled pilot studies with a total of 87 patients.
In the more recent study, the 32 patients who received this “teachable moment brief intervention” (TMBI) plus usual care tallied an overall satisfaction score of 3.88 on a 1-4 scale and showed a trend to higher motivation scores than patients managed with usual care alone, Stephen S. O’Connor, PhD, said at the annual conference of the American Association of Suicidology.
The TMBI was designed to help suicide-attempt survivors “wrap their head around what happened in a nonshaming way at a sensitive time. We try to help the patient understand what was the purpose of their attempt and what moving forward will look like,” Dr. O’Connor said in an interview.
The TMBI usually lasts about 30-45 minutes, and Dr. O’Connor described the general outline of the conversation: After the therapist establishes a rapport with the patient, the discussion moves to a functional analysis of what drove the patient to this action and why the suicide attempt seemed to make sense at the time. The therapist asks the patient what he or she sees as having been gained and lost by the event, and what the patient has gleaned from the experience. The goal is to help the patient understand what happened and its purpose, and also to discuss issues that need to be addressed going forward. “In a respectful, nonshaming way we get the patient to talk about what happened and how they got there,” he said.
The TMBI is a “drop in the ocean” of talk therapy that the patient will eventually receive, he said, but it is “all about the context.” In usual care, although the suicide attempter in the ICU may see a therapist, the conversation is generally about risk management and discharge planning.
In the initial test of the efficacy of this approach, Dr. O’Connor randomized 30 suicide survivors in the ICU to usual care or usual care plus the TMBI. The results showed a high level of patient satisfaction with the intervention and statistically significant improvements in readiness to change and in reasons for living, compared with controls (Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Sept-Oct;37[5]:427-33).
In a second pilot study that has not yet been published, Dr. O’Connor and his associates at Vanderbilt University in Nashville treated 32 patients with the TMBI and usual care and 25 with usual care only, with the study primarily designed to assess feasibility and acceptability to patients. Once again, patients who received the TMBI reported a high level of satisfaction with the encounter, including an average 3.96 rating (1-4 scale) of how likely they were to return to the service for future needs. Patients who received the extra intervention also showed trends toward a higher level of motivation after 3 months and less suicide ideation.
Further small-scale studies of the TMBI are now underway at two U.S. centers, and Dr. O’Connor said that a larger-scale test of the approach is now appropriate. One of the current limiting factors in dissemination is the training needed to perform a TMBI. One way to better leverage trained therapists might be to have the intervention occur remotely through telemedicine, with the patient encounter happening on a hand-held device.
The evidence collected so far on the TMBI has not yet proven its efficacy, Dr. O’Connor stressed. “We need to see to what degree this makes a difference. But there is clearly need for more engagement” with patients when they are in the ICU immediately after a suicide attempt. “Maybe it’s not the intervention, but just having someone being kind to the patient and sitting with them,” he suggested.
SOURCE: O’Connor S et al. American Association of Suicidology annual conference.
WASHINGTON – in a pair of controlled pilot studies with a total of 87 patients.
In the more recent study, the 32 patients who received this “teachable moment brief intervention” (TMBI) plus usual care tallied an overall satisfaction score of 3.88 on a 1-4 scale and showed a trend to higher motivation scores than patients managed with usual care alone, Stephen S. O’Connor, PhD, said at the annual conference of the American Association of Suicidology.
The TMBI was designed to help suicide-attempt survivors “wrap their head around what happened in a nonshaming way at a sensitive time. We try to help the patient understand what was the purpose of their attempt and what moving forward will look like,” Dr. O’Connor said in an interview.
The TMBI usually lasts about 30-45 minutes, and Dr. O’Connor described the general outline of the conversation: After the therapist establishes a rapport with the patient, the discussion moves to a functional analysis of what drove the patient to this action and why the suicide attempt seemed to make sense at the time. The therapist asks the patient what he or she sees as having been gained and lost by the event, and what the patient has gleaned from the experience. The goal is to help the patient understand what happened and its purpose, and also to discuss issues that need to be addressed going forward. “In a respectful, nonshaming way we get the patient to talk about what happened and how they got there,” he said.
The TMBI is a “drop in the ocean” of talk therapy that the patient will eventually receive, he said, but it is “all about the context.” In usual care, although the suicide attempter in the ICU may see a therapist, the conversation is generally about risk management and discharge planning.
In the initial test of the efficacy of this approach, Dr. O’Connor randomized 30 suicide survivors in the ICU to usual care or usual care plus the TMBI. The results showed a high level of patient satisfaction with the intervention and statistically significant improvements in readiness to change and in reasons for living, compared with controls (Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Sept-Oct;37[5]:427-33).
In a second pilot study that has not yet been published, Dr. O’Connor and his associates at Vanderbilt University in Nashville treated 32 patients with the TMBI and usual care and 25 with usual care only, with the study primarily designed to assess feasibility and acceptability to patients. Once again, patients who received the TMBI reported a high level of satisfaction with the encounter, including an average 3.96 rating (1-4 scale) of how likely they were to return to the service for future needs. Patients who received the extra intervention also showed trends toward a higher level of motivation after 3 months and less suicide ideation.
Further small-scale studies of the TMBI are now underway at two U.S. centers, and Dr. O’Connor said that a larger-scale test of the approach is now appropriate. One of the current limiting factors in dissemination is the training needed to perform a TMBI. One way to better leverage trained therapists might be to have the intervention occur remotely through telemedicine, with the patient encounter happening on a hand-held device.
The evidence collected so far on the TMBI has not yet proven its efficacy, Dr. O’Connor stressed. “We need to see to what degree this makes a difference. But there is clearly need for more engagement” with patients when they are in the ICU immediately after a suicide attempt. “Maybe it’s not the intervention, but just having someone being kind to the patient and sitting with them,” he suggested.
SOURCE: O’Connor S et al. American Association of Suicidology annual conference.
WASHINGTON – in a pair of controlled pilot studies with a total of 87 patients.
In the more recent study, the 32 patients who received this “teachable moment brief intervention” (TMBI) plus usual care tallied an overall satisfaction score of 3.88 on a 1-4 scale and showed a trend to higher motivation scores than patients managed with usual care alone, Stephen S. O’Connor, PhD, said at the annual conference of the American Association of Suicidology.
The TMBI was designed to help suicide-attempt survivors “wrap their head around what happened in a nonshaming way at a sensitive time. We try to help the patient understand what was the purpose of their attempt and what moving forward will look like,” Dr. O’Connor said in an interview.
The TMBI usually lasts about 30-45 minutes, and Dr. O’Connor described the general outline of the conversation: After the therapist establishes a rapport with the patient, the discussion moves to a functional analysis of what drove the patient to this action and why the suicide attempt seemed to make sense at the time. The therapist asks the patient what he or she sees as having been gained and lost by the event, and what the patient has gleaned from the experience. The goal is to help the patient understand what happened and its purpose, and also to discuss issues that need to be addressed going forward. “In a respectful, nonshaming way we get the patient to talk about what happened and how they got there,” he said.
The TMBI is a “drop in the ocean” of talk therapy that the patient will eventually receive, he said, but it is “all about the context.” In usual care, although the suicide attempter in the ICU may see a therapist, the conversation is generally about risk management and discharge planning.
In the initial test of the efficacy of this approach, Dr. O’Connor randomized 30 suicide survivors in the ICU to usual care or usual care plus the TMBI. The results showed a high level of patient satisfaction with the intervention and statistically significant improvements in readiness to change and in reasons for living, compared with controls (Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Sept-Oct;37[5]:427-33).
In a second pilot study that has not yet been published, Dr. O’Connor and his associates at Vanderbilt University in Nashville treated 32 patients with the TMBI and usual care and 25 with usual care only, with the study primarily designed to assess feasibility and acceptability to patients. Once again, patients who received the TMBI reported a high level of satisfaction with the encounter, including an average 3.96 rating (1-4 scale) of how likely they were to return to the service for future needs. Patients who received the extra intervention also showed trends toward a higher level of motivation after 3 months and less suicide ideation.
Further small-scale studies of the TMBI are now underway at two U.S. centers, and Dr. O’Connor said that a larger-scale test of the approach is now appropriate. One of the current limiting factors in dissemination is the training needed to perform a TMBI. One way to better leverage trained therapists might be to have the intervention occur remotely through telemedicine, with the patient encounter happening on a hand-held device.
The evidence collected so far on the TMBI has not yet proven its efficacy, Dr. O’Connor stressed. “We need to see to what degree this makes a difference. But there is clearly need for more engagement” with patients when they are in the ICU immediately after a suicide attempt. “Maybe it’s not the intervention, but just having someone being kind to the patient and sitting with them,” he suggested.
SOURCE: O’Connor S et al. American Association of Suicidology annual conference.
REPORTING FROM THE AAS ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Key clinical point: A 30- to 45-minute conversation was feasible and acceptable to suicide-attempt survivors in the ICU.
Major finding: Overall patient satisfaction with the intervention was rated 3.88 on a 1-4 scale.
Study details: Single-center randomized study with 57 patients.
Disclosures: Dr. O’Connor had no disclosures.
Source: O’Connor S et al. American Association of Suicidology annual conference.