Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:48

 

HOUSTON – Over the past 5 years there has been no growth in bilateral internal mammary artery use among Medicare beneficiaries, and the frequency of bilateral internal mammary artery use during coronary artery bypass grafting remained low, according to a large observational analysis.

“Despite a growing evidence base supporting bilateral internal mammary artery use with regard to long-term survival and freedom from repeat revascularization, rates of bilateral internal mammary artery [BIMA] use remain low, with no evidence of growth,” Alexander Iribarne, MD, said during an interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. “Therefore, there is significant opportunity for adoption of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in the United States.”

The most recent report of CABG trends in the United States published from the STS database showed that in 2009, fewer than 5% of patients who underwent CABG received a BIMA (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143[2]:273-81). In an effort to characterize the adoption rate and regional variation of BIMA use in the United States, Dr. Iribarne, director of cardiac surgical research in the section of cardiac surgery at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and his associates examined records from nearly 150 million Medicare beneficiaries from 2009-2014. “This work is unique in that we not only looked at trends in rates of usage but also how this varied by geographic location,” he said.

Dr. Alexander Iribarne of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
Dr. Alexander Iribarne
The researchers found that the absolute national rate of BIMA use fell from 0.216 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries in 2009 to 0.143 in 2014 (P less than .001). However, when indexed with CABG use, the use of BIMA remained constant over time (P = .02). When Dr. Iribarne and his associates aggregated single internal mammary artery (SIMA) use by hospital referral region, which is a validated unit for quantifying regional variation in health care, it ranged from 1.3 to 8.5 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries, while BIMA use ranged from 0 to 1.5 (P less than .001). They also observed a significant correlation between volume of SIMA use and likelihood of BIMA use as reflected in a correlation coefficient of 0.673 (P less than .001).

“I was surprised to find that despite the growing literature supporting BIMA use, there was no growth in rates of usage over the 5-year study period, with rates remaining low,” Dr. Iribarne said. “I was also surprised to see that there was significant regional variation in use that appeared to correlate, in part, with overall CABG volume, although the moderate correlation coefficient indicates that additional factors beyond CABG volume are involved.”

A key limitation of the study, he said, was that its patients were aged 65 and older. Dr. Iribarne disclosed that he receives grant funding from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Graham Foundation and the Dartmouth SYNERGY Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

HOUSTON – Over the past 5 years there has been no growth in bilateral internal mammary artery use among Medicare beneficiaries, and the frequency of bilateral internal mammary artery use during coronary artery bypass grafting remained low, according to a large observational analysis.

“Despite a growing evidence base supporting bilateral internal mammary artery use with regard to long-term survival and freedom from repeat revascularization, rates of bilateral internal mammary artery [BIMA] use remain low, with no evidence of growth,” Alexander Iribarne, MD, said during an interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. “Therefore, there is significant opportunity for adoption of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in the United States.”

The most recent report of CABG trends in the United States published from the STS database showed that in 2009, fewer than 5% of patients who underwent CABG received a BIMA (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143[2]:273-81). In an effort to characterize the adoption rate and regional variation of BIMA use in the United States, Dr. Iribarne, director of cardiac surgical research in the section of cardiac surgery at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and his associates examined records from nearly 150 million Medicare beneficiaries from 2009-2014. “This work is unique in that we not only looked at trends in rates of usage but also how this varied by geographic location,” he said.

Dr. Alexander Iribarne of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
Dr. Alexander Iribarne
The researchers found that the absolute national rate of BIMA use fell from 0.216 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries in 2009 to 0.143 in 2014 (P less than .001). However, when indexed with CABG use, the use of BIMA remained constant over time (P = .02). When Dr. Iribarne and his associates aggregated single internal mammary artery (SIMA) use by hospital referral region, which is a validated unit for quantifying regional variation in health care, it ranged from 1.3 to 8.5 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries, while BIMA use ranged from 0 to 1.5 (P less than .001). They also observed a significant correlation between volume of SIMA use and likelihood of BIMA use as reflected in a correlation coefficient of 0.673 (P less than .001).

“I was surprised to find that despite the growing literature supporting BIMA use, there was no growth in rates of usage over the 5-year study period, with rates remaining low,” Dr. Iribarne said. “I was also surprised to see that there was significant regional variation in use that appeared to correlate, in part, with overall CABG volume, although the moderate correlation coefficient indicates that additional factors beyond CABG volume are involved.”

A key limitation of the study, he said, was that its patients were aged 65 and older. Dr. Iribarne disclosed that he receives grant funding from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Graham Foundation and the Dartmouth SYNERGY Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

 

HOUSTON – Over the past 5 years there has been no growth in bilateral internal mammary artery use among Medicare beneficiaries, and the frequency of bilateral internal mammary artery use during coronary artery bypass grafting remained low, according to a large observational analysis.

“Despite a growing evidence base supporting bilateral internal mammary artery use with regard to long-term survival and freedom from repeat revascularization, rates of bilateral internal mammary artery [BIMA] use remain low, with no evidence of growth,” Alexander Iribarne, MD, said during an interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. “Therefore, there is significant opportunity for adoption of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in the United States.”

The most recent report of CABG trends in the United States published from the STS database showed that in 2009, fewer than 5% of patients who underwent CABG received a BIMA (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143[2]:273-81). In an effort to characterize the adoption rate and regional variation of BIMA use in the United States, Dr. Iribarne, director of cardiac surgical research in the section of cardiac surgery at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and his associates examined records from nearly 150 million Medicare beneficiaries from 2009-2014. “This work is unique in that we not only looked at trends in rates of usage but also how this varied by geographic location,” he said.

Dr. Alexander Iribarne of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
Dr. Alexander Iribarne
The researchers found that the absolute national rate of BIMA use fell from 0.216 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries in 2009 to 0.143 in 2014 (P less than .001). However, when indexed with CABG use, the use of BIMA remained constant over time (P = .02). When Dr. Iribarne and his associates aggregated single internal mammary artery (SIMA) use by hospital referral region, which is a validated unit for quantifying regional variation in health care, it ranged from 1.3 to 8.5 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries, while BIMA use ranged from 0 to 1.5 (P less than .001). They also observed a significant correlation between volume of SIMA use and likelihood of BIMA use as reflected in a correlation coefficient of 0.673 (P less than .001).

“I was surprised to find that despite the growing literature supporting BIMA use, there was no growth in rates of usage over the 5-year study period, with rates remaining low,” Dr. Iribarne said. “I was also surprised to see that there was significant regional variation in use that appeared to correlate, in part, with overall CABG volume, although the moderate correlation coefficient indicates that additional factors beyond CABG volume are involved.”

A key limitation of the study, he said, was that its patients were aged 65 and older. Dr. Iribarne disclosed that he receives grant funding from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Graham Foundation and the Dartmouth SYNERGY Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT THE STS ANNUAL MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Over the past 5 years, there was no growth in BIMA use among Medicare beneficiaries.

Major finding: The absolute national rate of BIMA use fell from 0.216 claims per 1,000 beneficiaries in 2009 to 0.143 in 2014 (P less than .001).

Data source: An analysis of medical records from nearly 150 million Medicare beneficiaries during 2009-2014.

Disclosures: Dr. Iribarne disclosed that he receives grant funding from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Graham Foundation and the Dartmouth SYNERGY Clinical and Translational Science Institute.