Clinical Review

Implications of Vancomycin Troughs Drawn Earlier Than Current Guidelines

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

A study conducted in Australia demonstrated that pharmacist-led education of vancomycin dosing and monitoring (including when to measure a trough level) among prescribers and nurses led to improved adherence to the current guidelines and a greater number of patients treated within desired therapeutic ranges. 9 In addition, a small study at the Atlanta VAMC in Georgia demonstrated that education of nurses, lab personnel, residents, ward clerks, and pharmacists led to a greater number of appropriately timed vancomycin and aminoglycoside levels. 10 Thus, an interdisciplinary review of the current IDSA guidelines and review on the publication of the anticipated updated vancomycin guidelines should be provided to hospital personnel to aid in adoption of current dosing and monitoring recommendations. 11

Limitations

This study is limited by the 4-year span of time that it encompassed, which may give a skewed depiction of current practices. Another limitation is that patients with fluctuating renal function were included in the analysis. Instead of selecting a random level order, a trough level order was sometimes selected for these patients. This could lead to a lower actual rate of early troughs. A third limitation is that this was a small and unblinded study. Also, the actual trough levels and the resulting changes that were made to specific regimens were not recorded. Thus, these data do not indicate whether the changes that were made reflected guideline recommendations. Finally, some clinical actions were taken after the dosing interval following the trough. This was often a result of off-hours lab results or waiting on attending physician or infectious disease guidance. These data were not included in the analysis.

Conclusion

Vancomycin troughs were often drawn too early and resulted in an increased rate of trough recollection. In an attempt to improve adherence to the current and the upcoming revised version of the IDSA consensus statement, it is recommended to educate and reeducate providers through interdisciplinary-led review sessions.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Shared Medical Appointments and Their Effects on Achieving Diabetes Mellitus Goals in a Veteran Population
Federal Practitioner
Using an Incident Command System Model for Initial Response to an Administrative Crisis at the Phoenix VA Health Care System
Federal Practitioner
The Role of Procalcitonin in the Management of Infectious Diseases
Federal Practitioner
The Social Worker’s Role in Delirium Care for Hospitalized Veterans
Federal Practitioner
Studies Reveal an Increased Risk for Intimate Partner Violence Among Female Veterans
Federal Practitioner
Are Active-Duty Mothers Receiving Enough Breast-Feeding Support?
Federal Practitioner
Reducing Obesity Among Native American Populations
Federal Practitioner
One CPR Method Has Better Results
Federal Practitioner
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs Gibson Defends VA Discipline Guidelines
Federal Practitioner
Art That Heals
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles