Conference Coverage

How to choose between highly effective HBV therapies


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM GUILD 2018

“This [TAF] is a very good drug, a nice one to have at our disposal,” according to Dr. Terrault. “The primary reason we wanted it has to do with its safety profile.”

Its potential benefit in this regard was illustrated in a pair of multinational phase 3 clinical trials totaling nearly 1,300 patients with chronic HBV presented at the 2017 meeting of American Association for the Study of Liver Disease. After completing 96 weeks of double-blind treatment with TAF or TDF, everyone was switched to open-label TAF.

“There was a nice rebound in creatinine clearance and bone density when the switch was made from TDF to TAF,” she observed. “This is encouraging data for us, in that if you have a patient on TDF and you are concerned about renal or bone safety, you can do the switch to TAF and very quickly see some recovery in those abnormalities.”

Dr. Terrault offered the following guidance in selecting HBV therapy: For most patients with no comorbidities, monotherapy with either TAF, TDF, or entecavir is an excellent approach.

Pages

Recommended Reading

HCV screening, care inadequate for young adults who use opioids nonmedically
Federal Practitioner
Inflammatory markers predict vaccine response in HCV, HIV
Federal Practitioner
HCV infection tied to premature ovarian senescence and a high miscarriage rate
Federal Practitioner
HIV diagnosis at home and same-day ART start tied to better outcomes
Federal Practitioner
Hospital urine screening reduces TB deaths in HIV+ adults
Federal Practitioner
Some non-AIDS conditions hint at HIV infection in adults
Federal Practitioner
HIV+ dialysis patients: Differential survival by race compared with HIV/HCV coinfection
Federal Practitioner
MicroRNAs flag liver damage in HIV-, HCV-infected persons
Federal Practitioner
HIV infection linked to higher risk of non-melanoma skin cancer
Federal Practitioner
Most HIV patients need treatment for acute HCV
Federal Practitioner