PROGRAM PROFILE

Occupational Hazard: Disruptive Behavior in Patients

Accurate reporting of disruptive behavior enables the development of strategies that provide for the safe delivery of health care to patients.

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

While private or other public health care organizations can refuse to care for patients who have displayed disruptive behavior (DB), the VA Response to Disruptive Behavior of Patients law (38 CFR §17.107) prohibits the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from refusing care to veterans who display DB.1 The VHA defines DB as any behavior that is intimidating, threatening, or dangerous or that has, or could, jeopardize the health or safety of patients, VHA staff, or others.2

VA Response to DB Law

The VA Response to Disruptive Behavior of Patients requires the VHA to provide alternative care options that minimize risk while ensuring services; for example, providing care at a different location and/or time when additional staff are available to assist and monitor the patient. This can provide a unique opportunity to capture data on DB and the results of alternative forms of caring for this population. DB may represent a symptom of a health problem. Further, patients who are refused care because of DB may pose a threat to the community if their medical conditions are not treated or managed properly.

The reason public health care organizations refuse care to persons who display DB is clear: DBs hinder business operations, are financially taxing, and put health care workers at risk.3-10 “In 2009, the VHA spent close to $5.5 million on workers’ compensation and medical expenditures for 425 incidents–or about $130,000 per DB incident (Hodgson M, Drummond D, Van Male L. Unpublished data, 2010).” In another study, 106 of 762 nurses in 1 hospital system reported an assault by a patient, and 30 required medical attention, which resulted in a total cost of $94,156.8 From 2002 to 2013, incidents of serious workplace violence requiring days off for an injured worker to recover on average were 4 times more common in health care than in other industries.6-11 Incidents of patient violence and aggression toward staff transcend specialization; however, hospital nurses and staff from the emergency, rehabilitation and gerontology departments, psychiatric unit, and home-based services are more susceptible and vulnerable to DB incidents than are other types of employees.8,10-19

Data reported by health care staff suggest that patients rather than staff members or visitors initiate > 70% of serious physical attacks against health care workers.9,13,20-23 A 2015 study of VHA health care providers (HCPs) found that > 60% had experienced some form of DB, verbal abuse being the most prevalent, followed by sexual abuse and physical abuse.20 Of 72,000 VHA staff responding to a nationwide survey, 13% experienced, on average, ≥ 1 assault by a veteran (eg, something was thrown at them; they were pushed, kicked, slapped; or were threatened or injured by a weapon).8,21Although 13% may seem small, the incidents may have lasting financial and emotional distress. Risk factors associated with DB include medication nonadherence, history of drug and alcohol use, disappointment with care, history of violence, and untreated mental health concerns.19,24,25 Also, unmarried and young patients are more likely to display violence against health care workers.26

To meet its legal obligations and deliver empathetic care, the VHA documents and analyzes data on all patients who exhibit DB. A local DB Committee (DBC) reviews the data, whether it occurs in an inpatient or outpatient setting, such as community-based outpatient clinics. Once a DB incident is reported, the DBC begins an evidence-based risk evaluation, including the option of contacting the persons who displayed or experienced the DB. Goals are to (1) prevent future DB incidents; (2) detect vulnerabilities in the environment; and (3) collaborate with HCPs and patients to provide optimal care while improving the patient/provider interactions.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Current State of Hepatitis C Care in the VA
Federal Practitioner
Integrating Care for Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Cannabis use, potency linked to psychotic disorder risk
Federal Practitioner
FDA approves brexanolone for postpartum depression
Federal Practitioner
Patients with OCD/hoarding differ from those with OCD/nonhoarding
Federal Practitioner
BP control slowed brain damage in elderly hypertensives
Federal Practitioner
Atypical used in Parkinson’s lifts hallucinations, delusions in refractory schizophrenia
Federal Practitioner
Report calls for focus on ‘subpopulations’ to fight opioid epidemic
Federal Practitioner
Revering Furry Valor
Federal Practitioner
Brexanolone approval ‘marks an important milestone’
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles