Original Research

Unrelated Death After Colorectal Cancer Screening: Implications for Improving Colonoscopy Referrals

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Limitations

In this study, we examined a cohort of veterans enrolled in CRC screening within a single institution and obtained survival data for a mean follow-up of > 7 years. We also restricted our study to patients undergoing examinations that explicitly listed screening as indication or polyp surveillance for the test. However, inclusion was based on the indication listed in the report, which may differ from the intent of the ordering provider. Reporting systems often come with default settings, which may skew data. Comorbidities for the entire cohort of veterans who died within the time frame of the study were extracted from the chart without controlling for time-dependent changes, which may more appropriately describe the comorbidity burden at the time of the test. Using a case-control design, we addressed this potential caveat and included only illnesses recorded in the encounter linked to the colonoscopy order. Despite these limitations, our results highlight the importance to more effectively define and target appropriate candidates for CRC screening.

Conclusion

This study shows that age is a simple but not sufficiently accurate criterion to define potential candidates for CRC screening. As automated reminders often prompt discussions about and referral to screening examinations, we should develop algorithms that estimate the individual cancer risk and/or integrate an automatically calculated comorbidity index with these alerts or insert such a tool into order-sets. In addition, providers and patients need to be educated about the rationale and need for a more comprehensive approach to CRC screening that considers anticipated life expectancy. On an individual and health system level, our goal should be to reduce overall mortality rather than only cancer-specific death rates.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Open Clinical Trials for Patients With Colorectal Cancer (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
A Nationwide Survey and Needs Assessment of Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Programs
Federal Practitioner
The Effect of Immunonutrition on Veterans Undergoing Major Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Rare Cancer Misdiagnosed As Orchitis
Federal Practitioner
A Veteran With Fibromyalgia Presenting With Dyspnea
Federal Practitioner
Expanding the Scope of Telemedicine in Gastroenterology
Federal Practitioner
How Is the Colorectal Cancer Control Program Doing?
Federal Practitioner
ASCO issues guideline for early detection, management of colorectal cancer
Federal Practitioner
Time to revisit fasting rules for surgery patients
Federal Practitioner
Time to embrace minimally invasive colorectal surgery?
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles