Article

Equal Access Makes A Difference in Surviving Prostate Cancer

Researchers examined whether African American men with prostate cancer who were treated in the VA had similar outcomes to white patients with prostate cancer.


 

In the general US population, African American men are more than twice as likely as non-Hispanic white men to die of prostate cancer. Researchers from the University of California at San Diego, though, speculated that disparities in access to care and not racial differences might be driving the differing outcomes. They turned to the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with its “equal-access medical system” to find out.

Using data from a longitudinal database of > 20 million veterans, the researchers followed 18,201 black and 41,834 white patients with prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 and received care through the VA. The results of the study were published in Cancer.

African American men at diagnosis were younger (median age, 63 vs 66 years), more likely to smoke, and had more general health problems than did white men. Black patients also had higher prostate-specific antigen levels (median, 6.7 ng/mL vs 6.2 ng/mL) but were less likely to have Gleason score 8 to 10 disease, a clinical T classification ≥ 3, or distant metastatic disease.

There was no difference between the groups in time from diagnosis to treatment. The 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rate was actually slightly lower for African American men: 4.4%, compared with 5.1% for white men.

Thus, the researchers concluded that because African American men who receive VA healthcare do not appear to present with more advanced disease, or experience worse outcomes than do white men—in contrast to national trends. Therefore, they determined that access to care may be an important determinant of racial equity.

“Prior outcomes for African Americans with prostate cancer don’t have to be a foregone conclusion,” the senior author, Brent Rose, MD, told The New York Times . “They are at least partly due to policy decisions we make about access to care.”

Recommended Reading

Prostate Cancer Surveillance After Radiation Therapy in a National Delivery System (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Prostate Cancer Who Receive Standard vs Extended-Interval Bisphosphonate Dosing (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Primary Urethral Carcinoma With Nodal Metastasis (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Sociodemographic disadvantage confers poorer survival in young adults with CRC
Federal Practitioner
RCT confirms CT scan screening catches lung cancer early
Federal Practitioner
Lenvatinib/pembrolizumab has good activity in advanced RCC, other solid tumors
Federal Practitioner
Walk test may predict complications after lung cancer surgery
Federal Practitioner
U.S. cancer centers embroiled in Chinese research thefts
Federal Practitioner
World Cancer Day survey exposes ‘glaring inequities’
Federal Practitioner
Mailed fecal testing may catch more cancer than endoscopic screening
Federal Practitioner