Commentary

The Other Pandemic: Addiction

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

These data reinforce a well-known maxim in the addiction community that “addiction is a disease of isolation.” 6-8 The burden of the lockdown falls harder on many of the patients we treat in the federal health care system whose other mental and physical health conditions, including chronic pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder already placed them at elevated risk of SUDs. 9 Director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse Nora Volkow, MD, recently traced the well-known arc from isolation to increased use of drugs and alcohol. 10 Isolation is stressful and amplifies negative thoughts, dysphoria, and fearful emotions, which are recognized triggers for the use of substances of abuse. The usually available means of coping with craving, and in many cases withdrawal, such as prescribed medications, visits to therapists, participation in support groups are either not available or much more difficult to access. 10 Nor are those without a current or even historical SUD immune to the psychosocial pressures of the pandemic: Isolation also constitutes a risk for the development of de novo addiction particularly among already marginalized groups, such as the elderly and disabled.

The federal government has initiated several important measures to reduce the adverse impact of isolation on persons with SUDs. The Drug Enforcement Administration is exempting qualified practitioners of medication-assisted treatment from the in-person evaluation that is usually required for the prescription of controlled substances, including buprenorphine. This exemption applies to both established patient prescriptions for buprenorphine and new buprenorphine patient prescriptions. 11 These and other administrative contingencies at the federal government level can assist persons with OUD to continue to receive medicationassisted treatment.

As individual clinicians in federal practice, we alone cannot engineer such major policy accommodations in response to COVID-19, yet we can still make a difference in the lives of our patients. We can focus a few minutes of our telehealth interactions on checking in with patients who have a history or a current SUD. We can remember to use evidence-based screens for these patients and those with other risk factors to detect drug or alcohol use before it becomes a disorder. And we can identify and refer not only patients but also our beleaguered colleagues who feel alone at sea—to the many lifelines our agencies have cast into what other commentators have referred to as a Perfect Storm of COVID-19 and the opioid crisis (Table). 12

Pages

Recommended Reading

A doctor conquers his demons
Federal Practitioner
Exploring cannabis use by older adults
Federal Practitioner
Deaths, despair tied to drug dependence are accelerating amid COVID-19
Federal Practitioner
Fecal transplant shows promise in reducing alcohol craving
Federal Practitioner
Reworked OxyContin fails to cut overall opioid abuse, FDA panel says
Federal Practitioner
New acute pain guidelines from the ACP and AAFP have limitations
Federal Practitioner
‘Overwhelming evidence’ FDA’s opioid approval process is shoddy
Federal Practitioner
Use of e-cigarettes may be linked to sleep deprivation
Federal Practitioner
Children’s opioid harms vary by race, location
Federal Practitioner
Substance use tied to increased COVID-19 risk
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles