Original Research

Audit and Feedback: A Quality Improvement Study to Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship

Author and Disclosure Information

Purpose: Many antibiotics prescribed in an outpatient setting may be inappropriate, and by some estimates, half of the antibiotic prescriptions for acute bronchitis may be inappropriate. This quality improvement study aimed to decrease the rate of potentially inappropriate (not guideline concordant) antibiotic prescribing in acute bronchitis.

Methods: This program used an audit and feedback approach. Clinicians received education coupled with audit and feedback, which are components of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention framework for an effective antimicrobial stewardship program. Antibiotic prescribing rates in patients with acute bronchitis without underlying chronic lung disease or evidence of bacterial infection were compared over two 9-month periods. The baseline period was October 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 and the posteducation period was October 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019.

Results: Potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing dropped from 75% (160/213) at baseline to 60% (107/177) posteducation (95% CI 0.05, 0.24; P < .01, 2-sample binomial test). Rates were lower for 7 health care providers (HCPs), unchanged for 1 HCP, and slightly increased for 1 HCP between study periods ( P = .02, Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired data).

Conclusions: Study findings show a decline in potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and a resulting improvement in clinic antimicrobial stewardship efforts.


 

References

Antibiotics are commonly overused for several viral respiratory conditions where antibiotic treatment is not clinically indicated. For example, a 2016 study by Fleming-Dutra and colleagues showed that at least 30% of all antibiotics prescribed in an outpatient setting were inappropriate and for acute bronchitis, antibiotic prescriptions were inappropriate in 50% of cases.1 Acute bronchitis is predominantly a viral illness where antibiotics should be rarely used.2-8 The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set has measured the avoidance of antibiotic treatment in adults with acute bronchitis since 2006. The National Committee for Quality Assurance reported in 2018 that about 75% of adults received antibiotics for acute bronchitis.9 Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance, resulting in the increase of morbidity and mortality of treatable infections.10 Reducing inappropriate antibiotic use in outpatient settings is a high-priority public health issue and is a Healthy People 2030 objective.11

Antimicrobial Stewardship

Antimicrobial stewardship programs measure and track how antibiotics are prescribed by health care providers (HCPs) and used by patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) created a framework for outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs by outlining 4 core elements: (1) commitment from every person involved in patient care to act as an antibiotic steward; (2) policies and interventions to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing practices; (3) antibiotic prescription tracking and reporting; and (4) appropriate antibiotic use education.12

Audit and feedback (A&F) is a form of antibiotic prescription tracking and reporting that involves measuring and comparing a HCP’s performance (ie, antibiotic prescribing) with a standard, and the results of this audit are shared with the HCP. This strategy is based on the belief that a HCP is motivated to modify practice habits when given feedback showing that his or her performance is inconsistent with targeted expectations. A&F is most effective when feedback is provided by a supervisor or respected peer, presented more than once, individualized, delivered in both verbal and written formats, and includes explicit targets and an action plan.13,14

This study focuses on an antimicrobial stewardship program implemented in an outpatient Indian Health Service ambulatory care clinic in the Pacific Northwest. The clinic was staffed by 9 HCPs serving about 12,000 American Indian and Alaskan Native patients. The clinic includes a full-service pharmacy where nearly all prescriptions issued by in-house HCPs are filled. The clinic’s antibiotic prescribing rate for adult patients with acute bronchitis was similar to the national mean in 2018 (75%).9 The study objective was to reduce the rate of potentially inappropriate (not guideline-concordant) antibiotic prescribing in patients with acute bronchitis without underlying chronic lung disease or evidence of bacterial infection through A&F.

Methods

The antimicrobial stewardship program was implemented by 3 pharmacists, including a pharmacy resident. HCPs received education by pharmacy staff on evidence-based prescribing for adult acute bronchitis and quarterly feedback on antibiotic prescribing rates. All prescribing and dispensing records necessary for the program were available in the clinic electronic health record. The rate of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was calculated as the proportion of eligible bronchitis cases who received antibiotics.

Treatment Guidelines for Acute Bronchitis

In October 2018, a 60-minute educational session was provided by 2 pharmacists to HCPs. The material covered an overview of acute bronchitis presentation, diagnosis, treatment (Table 1), and a comparison of national and local prescribing data (baseline audit).2-4 The educational session concluded with prescription strategies to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, including but not limited to: delayed prescriptions, patient and caregiver education, use of nonantibiotic medications to control symptoms, and use of A&F reports.5-8 At the conclusion of the session, HCPs committed to engage in the antimicrobial stewardship program.

Audit

To determine the total number of eligible bronchitis cases (denominator), a visit report was generated by a pharmacist for a primary diagnosis of acute bronchitis using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD 10) codes (J20.3 - J20.9) for the review period. Only adults aged ≥ 18 years were included. Patients with a chronic lung disease (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma) and those who had a concomitant bacterial infection (eg, urinary tract infection, cellulitis) were excluded. A visit for acute bronchitis that included additional ICD 10 codes indicating the patient had a chronic lung disease or concomitant bacterial infection were used to determine exclusion. The remaining patients who received a potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescription (numerator) were those who were prescribed or dispensed antibiotics on the date of service.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Can Using an Intensive Management Program Improve Primary Care Staff Experiences With Caring for High-Risk Patients?
Federal Practitioner
Management of Do Not Resuscitate Orders Before Invasive Procedures
Federal Practitioner
Glucosuria Is Not Always Due to Diabetes
Federal Practitioner
Physician Responsiveness to Positive Blood Culture Results at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Hospital—Is Anyone Paying Attention?
Federal Practitioner
VA Academic Affiliations Matter in the Era of Community Care: A Model From California
Federal Practitioner
Implementation of a Pharmacist-Managed Transitions of Care Tool
Federal Practitioner
Photographic Confirmation of Biopsy Sites Saves Lives
Federal Practitioner
Risk Factors and Antipsychotic Usage Patterns Associated With Terminal Delirium in a Veteran Long-Term Care Hospice Population
Federal Practitioner
Albuterol, Acidosis, and Aneurysms
Federal Practitioner
High Rate of Inappropriate Fecal Immunochemical Testing at a Large Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles