Quality Improvement

Reducing Financial Toxicity Associated With Cancer Treatment New Mexico VAHCS Fisher House at its Finest!


 

PURPOSE

Reduce financial toxicity of housing costs associated with cancer treatment for rural Veterans.

BACKGROUND

Veterans diagnosed with cancer experience financial burdens associated with treatments: financial toxicities (FT). New Mexico (NM) an underserved and socioeconomically challenged state has one VA facility. Veterans commonly experience increased FT in the form of financial burdens related to travel distance, housing, and time off from work for caregivers as required to seek specialized care and cancer treatments. Travel pay and the Mission Act does little to alleviate this burden, and many still experience financial hardships.

METHODS

NMVAHCS Fisher House is reserved for families seeking housing accommodations during their loved one’s hospitalization. Surgical Service coordinated an additional plan to provide services for rural Veterans requiring 4-6 weeks of daily radiation therapy. Special accommodations were granted. Each case is reviewed via consult. Veteran requires an accompanying caregiver. Prior available Veteran discounted hotel rates averaged $96 per night. A 6-week course of shelter during radiation therapy could be $4,032.00, before taxes. No discounts or vouchers were available for meals, or other expenses.

RESULTS

Since FY23, 38 families seeking oncology care were welcomed into the Fisher House, reflecting a potential Veteran cost savings of $153,216.00 related to housing alone. Veterans also experienced cost saving related to food, as most meals were provided through community donations. Veteran satisfaction was improved, evidenced by Fisher House journal for families. Entries were heartwarming, with an outpouring of gratitude to the staff and VA for providing care and hospitality in a difficult time. Several Veterans stated they would not have been able to complete treatment without the Fisher House.

IMPLICATIONS

Although most Veterans have manageable associated out of pocket expenses with cancer treatments, many have associated extensive financial burdens related to receiving treatments. Even with the Mission Act, many live 4-6 hours from the closest oncology center providing radiation therapy, making a round trip for daily treatment up to 12 hours. Consideration in the reduction of travel time and housing expenses, can mean the difference of Veterans accepting treatments resulting in improved overall quality of life and survival outcomes.

Recommended Reading

Delivering Complex Oncologic Care to the Veteran’s “Front Door”: A Case Report of Leveraging Nationwide VA Expertise
Federal Practitioner
Survival and Treatment in Older Patients With Ewing Sarcoma
Federal Practitioner
Enhancing Usability of Health Information Technology: Comparative Evaluation of Workflow Support Tools
Federal Practitioner
Implementation and Evaluation of a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner-Led Pharmacogenomics Service in a Veterans Affairs Hematology and Oncology Clinic
Federal Practitioner
Differential Overall Survival and Treatment in Patients With Small Intestine Adenocarcinoma Based on Insurance Status: A National Perspective
Federal Practitioner
A Novel Prostate Cancer Tracker Program
Federal Practitioner
Detection of Prostate Cancer in the Transitional Zone by Using a UroNav Biopsy
Federal Practitioner
Real-World Evidence of Safety Trends Using Rituximab-PVVR in Clinic Infusions
Federal Practitioner
Optimizing Health Literacy to Improve Veteran Satisfaction and Overall Surgical Outcomes
Federal Practitioner
Enhancing Health Psychology Services in Oncology
Federal Practitioner