Hitting a Nerve

Time Wasted to Avoid Penalties


 

Depression is a serious issue. I want to say that off the top, because nothing below is intended to minimize it.

But does everyone need to be tested for it?

A lot of general practices test for it with every patient and every visit. After all, mandates say you have to or you’ll get penalized a few bucks. Since no one wants to leave any money on the table in the razor-thin margins of running a medical practice, they ask these questions (I don’t blame them for that).

I can see where this might be useful, but does it really do much? Or is it just a mandatory waste of time?

Good question.

Dr. Allan M. Block, a neurologist in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Dr. Allan M. Block

A recent review by the American College of Physicians found it was mostly a waste of time (which surprises no one). Only one of the eight measures involved in depression screening (suicide risk assessment) turned out to be useful. So, basically, 88% of the time spent on these questions contributed absolutely nothing of clinical relevance.

Of course, this isn’t unique to family medicine. Every time I see a Medicare or Medicare Advantage patient I have to document whether they’ve had flu and pneumonia vaccines. While there are occasional cases where asking about recent vaccines is critical to the history, for most it’s not. But I do it so I don’t get penalized, even though the answer changes nothing. It’s not like I give vaccines in my practice.

A fair number of people come to me for hospital follow-ups, so I go into the system and review the chart. The notes inevitably contain questions of sexual activity, fear of violence, fear of domestic abuse, food security, recent travel patterns, and so on. Some of them are useful in certain situations, but not in all, or even most. All they do is increase the length of the note until anything of relevance is obscured, and allow someone in coding to check the boxes to raise the billing level. Realistically, the ER staff involved probably didn’t ask any of them, and just clicked “no.”

Once this probably seemed like a good idea, but clearly most of it is now a waste of time. These “quality measures” have turned the art of taking a good history into a session of mouse and box clicking.

Does that really improve care?

Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Recommended Reading

Esketamine bests quetiapine for severe depression in head-to-head trial
Federal Practitioner
Antidepressants ‘don’t blunt’ semaglutide and weight loss
Federal Practitioner
Specialized care may curb suicide risk in veterans with disabilities
Federal Practitioner
Ketamine no better for depression than placebo?
Federal Practitioner
MDMA therapy for loneliness? Researchers say it could work
Federal Practitioner
What Causes One of Stroke’s Most Common Complications?
Federal Practitioner
African Psychedelic Tied to ‘Remarkable’ Improvement in TBI-Related Psych Symptoms, Functional Disability
Federal Practitioner
Psilocybin-Assisted Group Therapy Promising for Depression in Cancer Patients
Federal Practitioner
What Do Sex Therapists Do? (Hint: It’s Not What You Think)
Federal Practitioner
Why We Need to Know About Our Patients’ History of Trauma
Federal Practitioner