Latest News

Oregon Physician Assistants Get Name Change


 

On April 4, Oregon’s Governor Tina Kotek signed a bill into law that officially changed the title of “physician assistants” to “physician associates” in the state. The switch is the first of its kind in the United States and comes on the heels of a decision from 2021 by the American Academy of Physician Associates (AAPA) to change the meaning of “PA” to “physician associate” from “physician assistant.”

In the Medscape Physician Assistant Career Satisfaction Report 2023, a diverse range of opinions on the title switch was reflected. Only 40% of PAs favored the name change at the time, 45% neither opposed nor favored it, and 15% opposed the name change, reflecting the complexity of the issue.

According to the AAPA, the change came about to better reflect the work PAs do in not just “assisting” physicians but in working independently with patients. Some also felt that the word “assistant” implies dependence. However, despite associate’s more accurate reflection of the job, PAs mostly remain split on whether they want the new moniker.

Many say that the name change will be confusing for the public and their patients, while others say that physician assistant was already not well understood, as patients often thought of the profession as a doctor’s helper or an assistant, like a medical assistant.

Yet many long-time PAs say that they prefer the title they’ve always had and that explaining to patients the new associate title will be equally confusing. Some mentioned patients may think they’re a business associate of the physician.

Oregon PAs won’t immediately switch to the new name. The new law takes effect on June 6, 2024. The Oregon Medical Board will establish regulations and guidance before PAs adopt the new name in their practices.

The law only changes the name of PAs in Oregon, not in other states. In fact, prematurely using the title of physician associate could subject a PA to regulatory challenges or disciplinary actions.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

New Quality Measure Improves Follow-Up for CRC Screening
Federal Practitioner
EHR Copy and Paste Can Get Physicians Into Trouble
Federal Practitioner
Oncologists Voice Ethical Concerns Over AI in Cancer Care
Federal Practitioner
Are You Ready for AI to Be a Better Doctor Than You?
Federal Practitioner
No Routine Cancer Screening Option? New MCED Tests May Help
Federal Practitioner
‘Difficult Patient’: Stigmatizing Words and Medical Error
Federal Practitioner
Most Targeted Cancer Drugs Lack Substantial Clinical Benefit
Federal Practitioner
What’s Driving the Higher Breast Cancer Death Rate in Black Women?
Federal Practitioner
Weighing the Benefits of Integrating AI-based Clinical Notes Into Your Practice
Federal Practitioner
CRC Screening in Primary Care: The Blood Test Option
Federal Practitioner