Commentary

Has the VA Fulfilled its Commitment to Trust and Healing?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

A second systematic review looked specifically at similar key areas of quality, safety, access, patient experience, and comparative cost-efficiency for surgical treatment delivered in the VA and the community from 2015 to 2021. Only 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, but as the authors argued:

Based on limited data, these findings suggest that expanding eligibility for veterans to get care in the community may not provide benefits in terms of increasing access to surgical procedures, will not result in better quality, and may result in worse quality of care, but may reduce inpatient length of stay and perhaps cost less.9

At this juncture, the faultfinder may become frustrated and resort to a new tactic, challenging the very assumption that is the subject of the debate and demanding proof that there is any connection between veterans’ trust in the VA and their health and well-being. “Fair enough,” the VA side would reply, “here is some research that bolsters that connection.” Kopacz and colleagues examined the relationship between trust and healing at 6 sites and included 427 veterans and active-duty service members with combat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. The researchers found that trust and lack thereof are related to several significant mental, social, and physical health outcomes. The authors indicate the need for more research to better understand the importance and impact of trust and healing, but they show it is significant.10 Finally, veterans recognize the crucial link between trust in the unique expertise of VA practitioners in the treatment of PTSD. In a 2019 study, a majority expressed a preference to receive their PTSD treatment at the VA compared to a smaller group choosing care in the community.11

You be the judge of who won the debate, but knowing the dedication of my fellow federal practitioners, many of you will endorse my sentiment that we all need to stop talking and get back to doing our best to enhance veteran trust and healing; doing our essential part to keep fulfilling our commitment.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Bridging the Gap Between Inpatient and Outpatient Care
Federal Practitioner
The Challenges of Delivering Allergen Immunotherapy in the Military Health System
Federal Practitioner
Overuse of Hematocrit Testing After Elective General Surgery at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Federal Practitioner
One Patient Changed This Oncologist’s View of Hope. Here’s How.
Federal Practitioner
Fit for Promotion: Navy Changes the Policy
Federal Practitioner
Suspected Orbital Compartment Syndrome Leading to Visual Loss After Pterional Craniotomy
Federal Practitioner
Study Estimates Global Prevalence of Seborrheic Dermatitis
Federal Practitioner
Impact of VA Hematology/Oncology Clinical Pharmacy Practitioners in the Review of Community Prescriptions for Specialty Medications
Federal Practitioner
Prognostication in Hospice Care: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Importance of Functional Status
Federal Practitioner
Acquired Factor VIII Deficiency Presenting as Compartment Syndrome
Federal Practitioner