Erik C. von Rosenvinge, MDa,b; Stacie A. Vela, MDc,d; Elizabeth R. Paine, MDe,f; Michael F. Chang, MDg,h; Brian J. Hanson, MDi,j; Tamar Taddei, MDk,l; Walter E. Smalley, MDm,n; Kerry B. Dunbar, MD, PhDo,p; Nabeel H. Khan, MDq,r; Lyn Sue Kahng, MDs,t; Jennifer Anwar, MHAu; Robert Zing, RNv; Andrew Gawron, MDw,x; Jason A. Dominitz, MDv,y; Gyorgy Baffy, MD, PhDz,aa
Correspondence: Erik von Rosenvinge (erik.vonrosenvinge@va.gov)
Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore
bUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
cPhoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Arizona
dUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix
eG.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
fUniversity of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson
gPortland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oregon
hOregon Health Sciences School of Medicine, Portland
iMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minnesota
jUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
kWest Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Connecticut
lYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
mNashville Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee
nVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
oVeterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas
pUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas
qVeterans Affairs Philadelphia Healthcare System, Pennsylvania
rUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia
sVeterans Affairs Chicago Healthcare System, Illinois
tUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago
uVeterans Affairs Long Beach Healthcare System, California
vVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
wVeterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Utah
xUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
yUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
zVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts
aaHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Author disclosures
Brian Hanson served as a consultant for Motus GI. The other authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.
Ethics and consent
This internal Department of Veterans Affairs quality improvement project was not designed to develop orcontribute to generalizable knowledge. As such, it does not meet the definition of human subjects research according to the US Code of Federal Regulations (45 CFR 46, Sec §46.102) and institutional review board approval was not required.
The survey responses from VA gastroenterology section chiefs help identify potential impediments to the successful recruitment and retention in the specialty. Noncompetitive salary was the most significant barrier to the successful recruitment of gastroenterologists, identified by 46 of 55 respondents. According to a 2022 Medical Group Management Association report, the median annual salary for US gastroenterologists was $561,375.7 According to internal VA WMC data, the median 2022 VA gastroenterologist salary ranged between $287,976 and $346,435, depending on facility complexity level, excluding recruitment, retention, or relocation bonuses; performance pay; or cash awards. The current aggregate salary cap of $400,000 indicates that the VHA will likely be increasingly noncompetitive in the coming years unless novel pay authorizations are implemented.
Suboptimal human resources were the second most commonly cited impediment to recruiting gastroenterologists. Many section chiefs expressed frustration with the inefficient and slow administrative process of onboarding new gastroenterologists, which may take many months and not infrequently results in losing candidates to competing entities. While this issue is specific to recruitment, recurring and long-standing vacancies can increase work burdens, complicate logistics for remaining faculty, and may also negatively impact retention. One potential opportunity to improve VHA competitiveness is to streamline the administrative component of recruitment and optimize human resources support. The use of a third-party hiring company also should be considered.
Survey responses also indicated that administrative burden and insufficient support staff were significant retention challenges. Several respondents described a lack of efficient endoscopy workflow and delegation of simple administrative tasks to gastroenterologists as more likely in units without proper task distribution. Importantly, these shortcomings occur at the expense of workload-generating activities and career-enhancing opportunities.
While burnout rates among VA gastroenterologists have not been documented systematically, they likely correlate with workplace frustration and jeopardizegastroenterologist retention. Successful retention of gastroenterologists as highly trained medical professionals is more likely in workplaces that are vertically organized, efficient, and use physicians at the top of their skill level.
Conclusions
The VA offers the opportunity for a rewarding lifelong career in gastroenterology. The fulfillment of serving veterans, teaching future health care leaders, performing impactful research, and having job security is invaluable. Despite the tremendous benefits, this survey supports improving VA recruitment and retention strategies for the high-demand gastroenterology specialty. Improved salary parity is needed for workforce maintenance and recruitment, as is improved administrative and clinical support to maintain the high level of care our veterans deserve.