Research

Impact of Stewardship Assistance Pilot Program for Veterans on Adherence and Persistence to Oral mCRPC Therapies


 

Background

Given the poor prognosis of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), interventions aimed at increasing adherence to oral treatments have the potential to improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a patient stewardship assistance pilot program (stewardship program) on the adherence and persistence to oral treatments among patients with mCRPC at VA medical centers (VAMCs).

Methods

A non-randomized controlled study design and data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse were used. The study included patients treated with an oral mCRPC therapy (i.e., abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) between 08/2018 and 12/2019. Patients participating in the stewardship program formed the intervention arm and patients not participating the controls. Control patients were selected and matched 1:3 based on age, race and index year. The index date was the date of initiation of abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Outcomes included persistence (no gap >60 days of supply) and adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥80%) to oral mCRPC treatment post-index. Persistence and adherence were compared between the two arms using a Cox proportional hazard model and logistic regression model, respectively, adjusted for baseline characteristics.

Results

The study included 108 intervention patients (mean age: 74.6, 19.4% Black or African American, 44.4% from South, mean Quan-CCI: 6.7) and 324 control patients (mean age: 74.6, 19.4% Black or African American, 31.5% from South, mean Quan-CCI: 6.2). There was no statistically significant difference in persistence between the intervention and control arms (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.84 [0.66-1.10], p-value: 0.211), with respective median times to discontinuation of 18 and 19 months. Over the first 12 months post-index, the proportion of adherent patients was not significantly different between the intervention arm and the control arm (50.6% vs. 50.9%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.05 [0.80-1.38], p-value: 0.729).

Conclusions

In this racially diverse study of patients treated at VAMCs, high levels of persistence and adherence to oral mCRPC therapy were observed. The absence of any significant difference in adherence and persistence from the study intervention suggests that a stewardship assistance program aimed at improving adherence and persistence of patients with mCRPC may not be required at VAMCs.

Recommended Reading

FIT Screening Cuts Colorectal Cancer Mortality by One Third
Federal Practitioner
Few Severe Toxicities After SBRT in Oligometastatic Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Clinical Controversy: Watch-and-Wait or Surgery in Rectal Cancer Near Complete Responders?
Federal Practitioner
Liver Transplant Delays Progression in Colorectal Metastasis
Federal Practitioner
Cold Snare Resection Safe for Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps
Federal Practitioner
Closing the Gap: Priority Zones Identified for CRC Screening in Hispanic/Latino Populations
Federal Practitioner
Aspirin for CRC Prevention May Work Best in Adults With Unhealthy Lifestyles
Federal Practitioner
Telehealth Research and Innovation for Veterans With Cancer (THRIVE): Understanding Experiences of National TeleOncology Service Providers
Federal Practitioner
Registered Dietitian Staffing and Nutrition Practices in High-Risk Cancer Patients Across the Veterans Health Administration
Federal Practitioner
Unexpected Findings: A Rare Case of Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinoma in the Small Intestine
Federal Practitioner