Research

Do We Need More Screen Time? Patterns of Telehealth Utilization for Patients With Prostate Cancer in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)


 

Background

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the VHA. Telehealth use has increased and has the potential to improve access for patients. We examined patterns of care for VHA patients with prostate cancer, including whether visits were in person, by telephone or by video.

Methods

Using the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse, we extracted data on all incident cases of prostate cancer from 1/1/2016-1/31/2023 with sufficient information (Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], and tumor stage) to categorize into National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk strata. We excluded patients who died within 1 year of diagnosis and those with no evidence of PSA testing, prostate biopsy or treatment within 2 years. We categorized all outpatient visits related to a person’s Urology- and Medical Oncology based care – including the visit modality – based on administrative visit stop codes. We defined ‘during COVID’ as visits after 3/11/2020. We calculated the percent of visits performed by modality in each year after diagnosis.

Results

Among the 60,381 men with prostate cancer, 61% were White, 33% Black; 5% Hispanic; 32% rural. For NCCN category, 30% had high risk prostate cancer, which increased with age, 50% had intermediate risk and 20% had low risk. Prior to COVID, for visits to Urology within the first year after diagnosis, 79% were in person, 20% were by telephone and 0.1% were by video. Visits to Oncology within the first year after diagnosis were similar—82% in person, 16% by phone and 0.3% by video.

Discussion

During the COVID period, video visits increased significantly but remained a small proportion, accounting for only 2% of visits for both Urology and Oncology. Video visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic but remained rare. Across many diseases and conditions, the quality of care for video visits has been at least as good as for in-person care.

Conclusions

There is a missed opportunity to provide care by video within VHA for patients with prostate cancer, particularly given that about 1/3 of patients are from rural areas. Future analyses will examine barriers to video telehealth and the impact of video visits on quality and equity of prostate cancer care.

Recommended Reading

Creating a Urology Prostate Cancer Note, a National Oncology and Surgery Office Collaboration for Prostate Cancer Clinical Pathway Utilization
Federal Practitioner
National Tele-Oncology High-Risk Breast Clinic Program
Federal Practitioner
Multimodal Treatment Approaches for Basaloid Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx
Federal Practitioner
ENT Multidisciplinary Workgroup
Federal Practitioner
Beyond Borders: Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Intriguing Liver Metastasis
Federal Practitioner
Diet Rich in Processed Foods Linked to Elevated Risk for Colorectal Cancer
Federal Practitioner
In Colorectal Cancer, Donating Half a Liver Could Save Lives
Federal Practitioner
Metastatic Prostate Cancer Presenting as Pleural and Pericardial Metastases: A Case Report and Literature Review
Federal Practitioner
Study Indicates Skin Cancer Risk Elevated Among Veterans
Federal Practitioner
Asynchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer in a Male Patient
Federal Practitioner