Program Initiatives

Whole Health Oncology—Just Do It: Making Whole Person Cancer Care Routine and Regular at the Dayton VA Medical Center (DVAMC)


 

Background

VA Whole Health (WH) is an approach that empowers and equips people to take charge of their health and well-being. In 2020, 18 WH Flagship sites demonstrated reduced opiate use and smaller increases in pharmacy costs as well as favorable veteran self-reported measures. VA mandated WH integration into mental health and primary care. Purose: To incorporate WH within Dayton VA cancer care, using the Personal Health Inventory (PHI) as an intake tool, a tumor-agnostic WH oncology clinic was established.

Methods

Led by an oncologist, a referral-based clinic opened in 2021. Pre-work included EHR items (stop codes/templates), staff training and leverage of mental health integration. VA’s generic PHI was utilized until an oncology-specific PHI was developed by leaders in the field.(3-5) Clinic data was tracked.

Results

170 visits offered (June 2021-May 2024). 32 referrals received (one without cancer; deaths: two pre-intake/five post-intake); 70 appointments occurred among 30 veterans (30 intake/40 follow-up) for 41% fill rate (up 5% from 1st six months). 96% PHI completion rate. Referral sources: fellows (43%), attendings (17%), PCP (3%), Survivorship Clinic (3%), self-referral (33%)--40% of these from cancer support group members. Cancer types (one dual-diagnosis; total >100%): 24% breast, 17% prostate, 17% NSCLC, 10% NHL, 10% pancreatic, 7% Head/Neck, 7% SCLC, 3% each colon/esophageal/kidney. Cancer Stages represented: I (10%), II (20%), III (23%) and IV (47%). Participant info: Age range (36-85); 69% male and 31% female with 86% on active cancer therapy (hormonal, immune-, chemo- or chemoradiation). Supplements were discussed at 26% of visits and referrals ordered at 27% (4-massage therapy, 1-acupuncture, 1-chiropractic, 2-health coaching, 1-cardiology, 1-lymphedema therapy, 1-social work, 1-survivorship clinic, 1-yoga, 1-diabetes education, 1-ENT, 1-nutrition, 1-pathology, 1-pulmonary, 1-prosthetics).

Conclusions

WH within cancer care is feasible for veterans on active treatment (all types/stages) and at a non-Flagship/unfunded site. Veterans gain introduction to WH through the PHI and Complementary-Integrative Health referrals (VA Directive 1137). Cancer support group attendance prompts WH clinic self-referrals. Next steps at DVAMC are to offer mind-body approaches such as virtual reality experiences in the infusion room and VA CALM sessions via asynchronous online delivery; funding would support WH evolution in oncology.

Recommended Reading

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Presenting as Priapism: A Rare and Acute Initial Presentation in a Young Male
Federal Practitioner
Male Patient With a History of Monoclonal B Cell Lymphocytosis Presenting with Breast Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Federal Practitioner
RVD With Weekly Bortezomib Has a Favorable Toxicity and Effectiveness Profile in a Large Cohort of US Veterans With Multiple Myeloma
Federal Practitioner
Influence of Patient Demographics and Facility Type on Overall Survival in Sezary Syndrome
Federal Practitioner
Preleukemic Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report and Literature Review
Federal Practitioner
“It Takes a Village”: Benefits and Challenges of Navigating Cancer Care with the Pacific Community and the Veterans Health Administration
Federal Practitioner
Five Key Measures to Ensure a Quality Colonoscopy
Federal Practitioner
A Time to Heal for Veterans With Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Optimization of Hematology/ Oncology E-Consult Ordering Process
Federal Practitioner
Neuroendocrine Tumor of Ampulla of Vater: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature
Federal Practitioner