Quality Improvement

How to Make Keeping Up With the Drugs as Easy as Keeping Up With the Kardashians: Implementing a Local Oncology Drug Review Committee


 

Background

From 2000-2022 there were over 200 new drug and over 500 indication approvals specific to oncology. The rate of approvals has increased exponentially, making it difficult to maintain an up-to-date, standardized practice. Nationally, Veterans Affairs (VA) formulary decisions can take time given a lengthy approval process. Locally, the need was identified to incorporate new drugs and data into practice more rapidly. When bringing requests to the facility Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Committee, it was recognized that the membership consisting of non-oncology practitioners did not allow for meaningful discussion of utilization. In 2017, a dedicated oncology drug review committee (DRC) comprised of oncology practitioners and a facility formulary representative was created as a P&T workgroup. Purpose: Evaluate and describe the utility of forming a local oncology DRC to incorporate new drugs and data into practice.

Methods

DRC minutes from December 2017 to May 2023 were reviewed. Discussion items were categorized into type of review. Date of local review was compared to national formulary criteria for use publication dates, and date of FDA approval for new drugs or publication date for new data, where applicable. Items were excluded if crucial information was missing from minutes. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results

Over 65 months, 38 meetings were held. Thirty total members include: pharmacists, physicians, fellows, and advanced practice providers. Items reviewed included: 36 new drugs (ND), 36 new indications/data (NI), 14 institutional preferences, 10 new dosage form/biosimilars, 4 drug shortages and 2 others. The median time from ND approval to discussion was 3 months (n= 36, IQR 3-6) and NI from publication was 3 months (n=30, IQR 1-8). Nearly all (34/36, 94%) ND were reviewed prior to national review. Local review was a median of 7 months before national, with 11 drugs currently having no published national criteria for use (n=25, IQR 2-12).

Conclusions

DRC formation has enabled faster incorporation of new drugs/indications into practice. It has also created an appropriate forum for in-depth utilization discussions, pharmacoeconomic stewardship, and sharing of formulary and medication related information. VA Health Systems could consider implementing similar committees to review and implement up-to-date oncology practices.

Recommended Reading

Whole Health Oncology—Just Do It: Making Whole Person Cancer Care Routine and Regular at the Dayton VA Medical Center (DVAMC)
Federal Practitioner
Mortality Risk From Early-Onset CRC Higher in Rural, Poor Areas
Federal Practitioner
Developing a Cancer Rehabilitation Program—Improving Access to Ancillary Services to Mitigate the Impact of Cancer and its Treatments for Veterans Diagnosed With Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Implementing a Prospective Surveillance Physical Therapy Program for Those Affected by Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Variation in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Status in Patients Receiving Oral Anti-Cancer Therapies: A Focus on Equity throughout VISN (Veteran Integrated Service Network) 12
Federal Practitioner
Anchors Aweigh, Clinical Trial Navigation at the VA!
Federal Practitioner
Cholangioblastic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Rare Case of an Inhibin-Positive Variant Mimicking Neuroendocrine Tumors
Federal Practitioner
Rare Gems: Navigating Goblet Cell Appendiceal Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Barriers from Detection to Treatment in Lung Cancer: A Single Veteran Affair Institution Review
Federal Practitioner
PHASER Testing Initiative for Patients Newly Diagnosed With a GI Malignancy
Federal Practitioner