Original Research

Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Fingerstick Monitoring for Hemoglobin A1c Control in Veterans

Author and Disclosure Information

Background: Patients with diabetes have traditionally been required to use fingerstick testing to self-monitor their glucose levels. However, continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) collect glucose readings throughout the day and display daily trends, which allow clinicians to individualize treatment to achieve hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goals and simplify medication regimens. While studies have shown that CGMs improve HbA1c levels compared to fingerstick testing, this research has focused on type 1 diabetes and excluded veterans and patients on insulin therapy.

Methods: This retrospective chart review used a crossover, selfcontrolled design conducted at the Veterans Affairs Sioux Falls Health Care System. Veterans with an active CGM prescription were included. The primary endpoint compared the change in HbA1c before and after initiation of a CGM.

Results: The mean baseline HbA1c for the 150 veterans included in this study was 8.6%. The change in HbA1c before CGM use was 0.003 and change in HbA1c after CGM use was -0.971. The primary endpoint of difference in HbA1c associated with CGM use was -0.969 (P = .0001). The overall mean change in total daily doses of insulin was -22 units. Subgroup analysis of change in HbA1c after CGM use by prescriber type was -0.97 for endocrinology, -0.7 for pharmacy, and -1.23 for primary care practitioners. The overall average HbA1c post-CGM use was similar across all prescriber types at 7.64%.

Conclusions: This study found veterans with type 2 diabetes and on insulin therapy demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c with CGM use compared with their baseline fingerstick monitoring. Use of a CGM may be beneficial in patients who require a reduction in HbA1c by allowing more precise adjustments to medications to optimize therapy.


 

References

In the United States, 1 in 4 veterans lives with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), double the rate of the general population. 1 Medications are important for the treatment of T2DM and preventing complications that may develop if not properly managed. Common classes of medications for diabetes include biguanides, sodiumglucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin. The selection of treatment depends on patient-specific factors including hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c) goal, potential effects on weight, risk of hypoglycemia, and comorbidities such as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease. 2

HbA1c level reflects the mean blood glucose over the previous 3 months and serves as an indication of diabetes control. In patients with diabetes, it is recommended that HbA 1c is checked ≥ 2 times annually for those meeting treatment goals, or more often if the patient needs to adjust medications to reach their HbA 1c goal. The goal HbA 1c level for most adults with diabetes is < 7%. 3 This target can be adjusted based on age, comorbidities, or other patient factors. It is generally recommended that frequent glucose monitoring is not needed for patients with T2DM who are only taking oral agents and/or noninsulin injectables. However, for those on insulin regimens, it is advised to monitor glucose closely, with even more frequent testing for those with an intensive insulin regimen. 3

Most patients with diabetes use fingerstick testing to self-monitor their blood glucose. However, continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are becoming widely available and offer a solution to those who do not have the ability to check their glucose multiple times a day and throughout the night. The American Diabetes Association recommends that the frequency and timing of blood glucose monitoring, or the consideration of CGM use, should be based on the specific needs and goals of each patient. 3 Guidelines also encourage those on intensive insulin regimens to check glucose levels when fasting, before and after meals, prior to exercise, and when hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia is suspected. Frequent testing can become a burden for patients, whereas once a CGM sensor is placed, it can be worn for 10 to 14 days. CGMs are also capable of transmitting glucose readings every 1 to 15 minutes to a receiver or mobile phone, allowing for further adaptability to a patient’s lifestyle. 3

CGMs work by measuring the interstitial glucose with a small filament sensor and have demonstrated accuracy when compared to blood glucose readings. The ability of a CGM to accurately reflect HbA 1c levels is a potential benefit, reducing the need for frequent testing to determine whether patients have achieved glycemic control. 4 Another benefit of a CGM is the ease of sharing data; patient accounts can be linked with a health care site, allowing clinicians to access glucose data even if the patient is not able to be seen in clinic. This allows health care practitioners (HCPs) to more efficiently tailor medications and optimize regimens based on patient-specific data that was not available by fingerstick testing alone.

Pages

Recommended Reading

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Which Drug for Which Patient?
Federal Practitioner
Do People With Diabetes Need to Fast Longer Before Surgery?
Federal Practitioner
‘Don’t Screen’ for Vitamin D: New Endo Society Guideline
Federal Practitioner
Federal Health Care Data Trends 2024
Federal Practitioner
Whether GLP-1 RAs Significantly Delay Gastric Emptying Called into Question
Federal Practitioner
Uproar Over Vitamin D Disease-Prevention Guideline
Federal Practitioner
Data Trends 2024: Diabetes
Federal Practitioner
Two Diets Linked to Improved Cognition, Slowed Brain Aging
Federal Practitioner
Signal of Suicide Ideation With GLP-1 RA Semaglutide, but Experts Urge Caution
Federal Practitioner
Genitourinary Symptoms in Men: Canaries in the Coal Mine for Underlying Chronic Disease
Federal Practitioner