Original Research

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Acutely Ill Veterans With Respiratory Disease

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Conclusions

Overall, about one-third of patients did not receive potentially indicated pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis on the medical wards. Use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in medical CCU patients was robust (80%). Doses and dosing intervals were appropriate for > 90% of patients, and therapy clearly was started early and continued for much of the at-risk period, as the VTE protected time period exceeded 80%. Although computerized tools were limited, the authors feel their modest pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis rate is related to the facility’s teaching hospital affiliation or the provider mix, because TVHS is one of the largest VA cardiology centers in the U.S.7,8,13

As it was challenging and time consuming to locate eligible subjects, it may also prove difficult for the admitting physician to have the same luxury of time to look for specific at-risk diagnoses in the medical record and evaluate for exclusions to therapy. If electronic alerts and reminder tools were included in clinical pharmacy inpatient templates, the authors believe the frequency of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis would further improve in the facility. Also, the authors encourage VHA researchers to further evaluate VTE prophylaxis RAM, the role of daily electronic reminders, and tools to calculate VTE and bleeding risk.

Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to James Minnis, PharmD, BCPS, and April Ungar, PharmD, BCPS, for their contributions to the study design. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Epoprostenol's Effect on Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Federal Practitioner
Silent Pulmonary Embolism: Measuring the Real Risk
Federal Practitioner
Higher Risk of Venous Thromboembolism with Bevacizumab
Federal Practitioner
A Leg Up on Deep Vein Thrombosis
Federal Practitioner
Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Pulmonary Embolism
Federal Practitioner
The Missed Pulmonary Embolism
Federal Practitioner
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Joint Replacement: Rivaroxaban Update
Federal Practitioner
The Changing Landscape of VTE Treatment
Federal Practitioner
Pulmonary Vein Thrombosis Associated With Metastatic Carcinoma
Federal Practitioner
Trends in Venous Thromboembolism
Federal Practitioner

Related Articles