Conference Coverage

Development of Templates to Standardize Oncology Documentation and Automate Measurement of Quality of Cancer Care

Abstract 54: 2016 AVAHO Meeting


 

Introduction: The National Oncology Program office seeks to provide tools that can electronically capture data elements that can help VA facilities and programs assess the quality of cancer care being provided to veterans. Manual extraction of standards-of-care data from CPRS is resource intensive and difficult to sustain. This is particularly true for data elements embedded in large text fields such as progress notes.

Methods: Nine reminder dialogs were developed: treatment plan, treatment summary, multidisciplinary conference note (breast, prostate, colorectal), breast cancer, colorectal cancer,
symptom management tool, and an interval note. Each reminder dialogs include data elements that can be used to assess quality indicators (e.g., date of diagnosis, stage, performance status, chemotherapy agents used, radiation therapy sites, start/stop dates, surgery types, and outcomes) that align with the Commission on Cancer guidelines and the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) standards.

To extract the data electronically, distinct health factors are embedded with each of the data elements. Sequential Query Language (SQL) software is used to extract these health factors from the Corporate Data Warehouse. SQL code can be run as a script to update data iteratively (e.g., every 24 hours), thus eliminating manual data extractions.

Results: The reminder dialogs have undergone or will undergo formal usability testing (UT) prior to national release in fall 2016. The UT participants were selected because they are potential end users, and their input is vital to ensuring the dialogs follows current workflow.

Key improvements were made based upon the UT feedback. The breast cancer reminder dialog had additional surgery types added and a section to document why chemotherapy and radiation standards of care were not followed (patient refusal and contraindicated). Every date field in all 9 reminder dialogs was changed to facilitate ease of data entry.

Conclusion: Reminder dialogs provide a standardized documentation tool for QOPI oncology programs. SQL software provides a mechanism for streamlining QOPI data reporting. Both provide a way for VA to monitor cancer quality care in VA.

Recommended Reading

Double-Expressor Lymphoma (DEL) in Veterans at DC VAMC
AVAHO
Hematology/Oncology Ordersets: A VA VISN 09 Wide Initiative
AVAHO
Big Data, Precision Oncology, and Virtual Cancer Centers: The VA’s Initiatives Transforming Cancer Care
AVAHO
Treatment Trends in Stage 3 Prostate Cancer in VA vs Academic Centers
AVAHO
Risk Factors Associated With the Development of Adenoma Multiplicity in a Screening Cohort
AVAHO
Clinical Risk Group at Baseline Is Associated With 10 Year Outcomes in a Screening Cohort: A Longitudinal Analysis of the CSP 380 Cohort
AVAHO
CT-Guided Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy Is a Safe and Feasible Option to Decompress Busy Hematology/Oncology Clinics
AVAHO
VA Precision Oncology Program
AVAHO
Implementation and Utility of the VA Symptom Management Tool (VAST)
AVAHO
One in Four Veterans With Stage IV Colon Cancer Receives No Treatment: VAH Versus Other Certified Hospitals in Providing Treatment
AVAHO