Conference Coverage

How Long Should it Take to Get a Pathology Diagnosis?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Justification: A diagnosis of malignancy is of great relevance to the patient and sets in motion numerous activities. How long is it reasonable to wait for a pathologic diagnosis on a biopsy obtained for suspected cancer?

Methods: To address this question, we analyzed our turn-around-time (TAT) for biopsies and cytologies obtained for initial diagnosis of malignancy and compared it to relevant literature. Another goal was to evaluate the influence of special stains on TAT. We obtained from VISTA TAT on surgical pathology and cytopathology specimens in which an initial diagnosis of malignancy was made (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, GYN, and urine cytologies) between January 2016 and August 2018. We analyzed the impact of histochemical and immunohistochemical stains performed on TAT.

Results and Discussion : During this period, 2014 new malignancies were diagnosed among 31,407 biopsies (6.41%). Average TAT for all biopsies was 1.48 days; average TAT for biopsies with initial diagnosis of malignancy was 2.2 days. 149 new diagnoses of malignancy were made by cytology, with an average TAT of 1.49 days, compared with 1.63 days TAT for all cytologies. Performance of special stains had no statistical impact on TAT when compared with cases with no special stains.

Remarkably, no guidelines have been promulgated by institutions or accrediting bodies for TAT on specimens obtained for initial diagnosis of malignancy. Likewise, such data is not available in the literature; it is unclear how many institutions monitor this. The College of American Pathologists indicates that 90% of routine biopsies should be nalized within 2 working days; the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology indicates that at least 80% of routine biopsies should be nalized in 3 days. However, guidelines for specimens obtained for initial diagnosis of malignancy, which frequently require special handling/ancillary testing (deeper sections, histo/immunohistochemistry, molecular studies, consultation) are not available.

Recommendations: Institutions should develop practices that prioritize study of specimens obtained to rule out malignancy and should monitor their TAT. All institutions and accrediting bodies (CAP, Commission on Cancer, etc.) should develop guidelines for TAT for initial diagnosis of malignancy and audit this information.

Recommended Reading

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Urothelial Cancer: An Update on New Therapies (FULL)
AVAHO
Researchers share Nobel Prize for cancer immunotherapy discoveries
AVAHO
2018: A banner year for hematology drug approvals
AVAHO
Improving VTE Risk Prediction for Patients With Multiple Myeloma
AVAHO
What I learned from Navy SEALs about resilience
AVAHO
How to review scientific literature
AVAHO
Treating lymphoma in patients with HIV
AVAHO
Use of Mobile Messaging System for Self-Management of Chemotherapy Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer (FULL)
AVAHO
Treatment Facility: An Important Prognostic Factor for Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Survival (FULL)
AVAHO
Nivolumab-Induced Hypothyoidism With Consequent Hypothyroid Related Myopathy
AVAHO