From the Journals

Does diabetes affect colorectal cancer outcomes?


 

TOPLINE:

Among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), those with complicated diabetes were at higher risk of poor survival than their peers without diabetes, while those with uncomplicated diabetes had insignificantly worse cancer outcomes.

METHODOLOGY:

  • This population-based retrospective cohort study used 2007-2015 data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry, which is linked to national insurance and death registry data.
  • The analysis included 59,202 adults with stage I-III CRC who underwent potentially curative surgery: 44,944 without diabetes, 8,864 with uncomplicated diabetes, and 5,394 with complicated diabetes.
  • The association between diabetes severity and CRC survival, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was examined.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Patients with uncomplicated diabetes had insignificantly worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.05), DFS (HR, 1.08), and CSS (HR, 0.98), compared with peers who did not have diabetes.
  • Patients with complicated diabetes were at significantly higher risk of poor OS (HR, 1.85), DFS (HR, 1.75), and CSS (HR, 1.41), compared with those without diabetes.
  • Patients with diabetes were also at higher risk for CRC recurrence than those without diabetes.
  • Except for recurrence risk, the impact of complicated diabetes on CRC survival – that is, OS, DFS, and CSS – was more pronounced among women and those with early-stage cancer.

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings indicate that preventing diabetes complications may help improve survival in patients with CRC, especially [in] female patients and those in the early stages of the disease. Thus, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended for patients with CRC,” the authors conclude.

SOURCE:

The study, with first author Hsin-Yin Hsu, MD, National Taiwan University, Taipei, was published online in the journal Cancer.

LIMITATIONS:

Only patients from Taiwan were included, which limits generalizability, because CRC prognosis may vary in accordance with race or cancer treatment strategy – factors that may differ among countries. Data on glucose levels and diabetes duration were unavailable, potentially leading to misclassification of diabetes status.

DISCLOSURES:

Funding was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health and Welfare. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Liver transplant in CRC: Who might benefit?
AVAHO
Medicare announces 10 drugs targeted for price cuts in 2026
AVAHO
Cancer incidence has increased in patients under age 50
AVAHO
High-risk colon polyps detected at screening colonoscopy linked to liver cancer death
AVAHO
Vegetarian diets tied to lower risk for some GI cancers
AVAHO
Jury out on how tea drinking influences colorectal cancer risk
AVAHO
AI detects hidden, potentially curable pancreatic cancers
AVAHO
Mixed CRC screening messaging. Confusing? Some docs think so
AVAHO
Study reveals potentially unnecessary CRC screening in older adults
AVAHO
Two multitarget stool tests show promise for CRC screening: Studies
AVAHO