Expert Commentary

Lifting the restrictions on mifepristone during COVID-19: A step in the right direction

Author and Disclosure Information

The FDA’s Elements to Assure Safe Use restrictions mandate in-person distribution of mifepristone at health care facilities. This in-person signature process places women at unnecessary risk during the COVID-19 pandemic.


 

References

Mifepristone is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated medication for managing miscarriage and for medical abortion when combined with misoprostol.1,2 Since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved its use in 2000, more than 4 million women have used this medication.3 The combination of mifepristone with misoprostol was used for 39% of all US abortions in 2017.4 Approximately 10% of all clinically recognized pregnancies end in miscarriages, and many are safely managed with either misoprostol alone or with the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol.5

The issue

The prescription and distribution of mifepristone is highly regulated by the FDA via requirements outlined in the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) drug safety program. The FDA may determine a REMS is necessary for a specific drug to ensure the benefits of a drug outweigh the potential risks. A REMS may include an informative package insert for patients, follow-up communication to prescribers—including letters, safety protocols or recommended laboratory tests, or Elements to Assure Safe Use (ETASU). ETASU are types of REMS that are placed on medications that have significant potential for serious adverse effects, and without such restrictions FDA approval would be rescinded.

Are mifepristone requirements fairly applied?

The 3 ETASU restrictions on the distribution of mifepristone are in-person dispensation, prescriber certification, and patient signatures on special forms.6 The in-person dispensing requirement is applied to only 16 other medications (one of which is Mifeprex, the brand version of mifepristone), and Mifeprex/mifepristone are the only ones deemed safe for self-administration—meaning that patients receive the drug from a clinic but then may take it at a site of their choosing. The prescriber certification requirement places expectations on providers to account for distribution of doses and keep records of serial numbers (in effect, having clinicians act as both physician and pharmacist, as most medications are distributed and recorded in pharmacies). The patient form was recommended for elimination in 2016 due to its duplicative information and burden on patients—a recommendation that was then overruled by the FDA commissioner.7

These 3 requirements placed on mifepristone specifically target dosages for use related to abortions and miscarriages. Mifepristone is used to treat other medical conditions, with much higher doses, without the same restrictions—in fact, the FDA has allowed much higher doses of mifepristone to be mailed directly to a patient when prescribed for different disorders. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has long opposed the burdensome REMS requirements on mifepristone for reproductive health indications.8

Arguments regarding the safety of mifepristone must be understood in the context of how the medication is taken, and the unique difference with other medications that must be administered by physicians or in health care facilities. Mifepristone is self-administered, and the desired effect—evacuation of uterine contents—typically occurs after a patient takes the accompanying medication misoprostol, which is some 24 to 72 hours later. This timeframe makes it highly unlikely that any patient would be in the presence of their provider at the time of medication effect, thus an in-person dispensing requirement has no medical bearing on the outcome of the health of the patient.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Good for profits, good for patients: A new form of medical visits
Covid ICYMI
eConsult Data Shed Light on Care Coordination Decisions During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Covid ICYMI
Telemedicine in primary care
Covid ICYMI
Only 40% of residents said training prepped them for COVID-19
Covid ICYMI
Restructuring health care delivery for the future: What we need to do post–COVID-19
Covid ICYMI
COVID-19: A Dermatologist’s Experience From the US Epicenter
Covid ICYMI
COVID-19 child case count now over 400,000
Covid ICYMI
Patient visits post COVID-19
Covid ICYMI
Hysteroscopy and COVID-19: Have recommended techniques changed due to the pandemic?
Covid ICYMI
COVID-19: New guidance to stem mental health crisis in frontline HCPs
Covid ICYMI