Conference Coverage

The Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism/Adverse Drug Events in VA Loma Linda Oncology Patients on Warfarin vs Low Molecular Weight Heparin

Song GH, Tavakoli H, Howe B, Moreno T, Khan N

Abstract 55: 2015 AVAHO Meeting


 

References

Background: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the standard treatment for long-term management and second-ary prophylaxis of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. However, evidence-based guidance for anticoagulation (AC) management in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy remains unavailable. We assessed reports of adverse drug events (ADEs) in VA Loma Linda (VALL) oncology patients who received warfarin vs enoxaparin during their cancer treatment in the oncology clinic.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all oncology patients who received warfarin or LMWH during chemotherapy treatment at the VALL medical oncology clinic from January 1, 2009, to April 10, 2015.

Results: We screened 400 patients receiving chemotherapy while also on AC treatment; 18 subjects met inclusion criteria. At baseline: mean (+SD) age was 64.66 (+9) years; 78% were male; a mean dose of 38.72 (+16.5) mg/week of warfarin had been used during chemotherapy. Nine subjects were on warfarin, and 9 subjects were on LMWH. More ADEs occurred (supra-therapeutic international normalized ratio [INR] and bleeding) with patients on warfarin. Approximately 67% of patients on warfarin experienced an ADE com-pared with 22% of the patients on enoxaparin. No incidences of VTE were found in patients on warfarin; 1 patient experienced a deep vein thrombosis while on enoxaparin. Patients receiving chemotherapy and warfarin had their INR monitored at a mean of 3.78 (+3.67) times over 2.69 (+1.75) months compared with those on enoxaparin, which doesn’t require any monitoring.

Conclusions: We found there is a marginal association between oncology patients on warfarin and ADEs; more ADEs were associated with oncology patients on warfarin than with those on enoxaparin. This is evident by the chi-square test: X2 (1) = 3.6, n = 18, P = .058 (P > .05). Therefore, the association can be interpreted that oncology patients on warfarin have an increased risk of unstable INR results and bleeding.

Recommended Reading

Best Practices: Utilization of Oncology Pharmacists in the VA
AVAHO
Prevalence of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Informed Consent Among Veteran Males Aged 55 to 69 Years
AVAHO
Making Distress Screening Useful for Nursing and Social Work
AVAHO
PSA Response Rates Far Exceeded Expectations in Treating Asymptomatic, Androgen-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone
AVAHO
Comparison of Initial Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between VA and Nonveteran Populations
AVAHO
A Retrospective Evaluation of Outcomes in Veteran Patients With Agent Orange Exposure and Prostate Cancer
AVAHO
Incident Chronic Kidney Disease Following Kidney Cancer Surgery
AVAHO
The Efficacy of Abiraterone Pre-and Postdocetaxel and Sequential Use of Enzalutamide After Abiraterone in Veteran Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma
AVAHO
Improving the Accuracy of Ordering and Reporting for Send-Out Laboratory Studies
AVAHO
Did the FDA Black Box Warning Have Any Effect on Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Use?
AVAHO