Latest News

Should CRC Surveillance Extend Beyond 5 Years Post Surgery?


 

TOPLINE:

In patients with stages I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) who are cancer-free 5 years after surgery, the incidence of late recurrence or metachronous disease after 5 years is low and has decreased over time, new data showed.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Recent treatment advances in CRC have reduced the likelihood that patients with nonmetastatic disease will recur or develop a second primary cancer more than 6 months after the first. Although late recurrences and metachronous CRC remain infrequent, it’s not clear if patients might benefit from longer term surveillance.
  • To investigate whether extending surveillance beyond the recommended 5 years is beneficial, researchers assessed the incidence of late recurrence, metachronous CRC, and second primary cancers 5 years after surgical resection with curative intent.
  • The researchers identified patients with stages I-III CRC, under age 80 years, from Danish healthcare registries who underwent surgical resection between January 2004 and December 2013.
  • A total of 8883 patients were followed from 5 years after primary surgery until the date of recurrence, metachronous CRC, or second non-CRC primary cancer.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Between 5 and 10 years after surgery, 370 survivors developed late recurrence (4.16%), 270 developed metachronous disease (3.0%), and 635 were diagnosed with a second primary cancer (7.15%).
  • During 2009-2013 and 2004-2008, the risk for late recurrence decreased by 48% (5.6% vs 2.9%; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.52) and the risk for metachronous disease decreased by 50% (4.1% vs 2.1%; sHR, 0.50).
  • During the same timeframe, the risk for second non-CRC primary cancer remained unchanged (7.1% vs 7.1%; sHR, 0.98).
  • Compared with patients diagnosed with late recurrences (46%), 5-year overall survival was higher for patients with metachronous CRC (72%; adjusted HR, 0.37) and slightly higher for those with second primary cancers (48%; adjusted HR, 0.78).

IN PRACTICE:

Because the incidences of late recurrence and metachronous CRC are low and decreased between 2004 and 2013, the data do not support extending CRC-specific surveillance beyond 5 years, the authors concluded. “Symptoms or suspicion of a cancer occurring 5-10 years from primary CRC treatment, is more likely to represent a non-CRC cancer (7.1%).”

SOURCE:

This study, led by Jesper Nors from Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, was published on February 7, 2024, in the International Journal of Cancer.

LIMITATIONS:

Misclassification of a late recurrence or metachronous CRC could have affected the findings.

DISCLOSURES:

This work was funded by Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Innovation Fund Denmark, and the Danish Cancer Society. The authors reported no conflict of interests.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Standard Therapy Beats Out Primary Surgery in Rectal Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Radiation Oncologists Fight for Payment Reform Amid Cuts
Federal Practitioner
No Compelling Evidence of Pancreatic Cancer Risk With GLP-1s
Federal Practitioner
Immunotherapy Combo Wins Big on PFS in First-Line Mets CRC
Federal Practitioner
Targeted Colorectal Cancer Combo Improves QoL
Federal Practitioner
The Case for Biomarker Testing in Gastroesophageal Cancer
Federal Practitioner
Bladder Cancer: Is Active Surveillance the Way Forward?
Federal Practitioner
Dana-Farber Moves to Retract, Correct Dozens of Cancer Papers Amid Allegations
Federal Practitioner
Treatment Sequence May Impact Pancreatic Cancer Survival
Federal Practitioner
Do Multivitamin Supplements Lower Mortality Risk in CRC?
Federal Practitioner