User login
To the Editor: We thank Drs. Venkatachalam and Rimmerman1 for their Clinical Picture article, “Electrocardiography in aortic regurgitation: It’s in the details,” in the August 2011 issue. This was very interesting, as usual for the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.
The maxim that “a negative U wave is never normal,” first noted about 50 years ago, still holds true. However, the authors’ statement on page 506—ie, that a negative U wave indicates structural heart disease—is too restrictive, since ischemia is not always due to a structural problem. Functional ischemia from excess demand, such as from tachycardia, sepsis, or gastrointestinal bleeding, can also cause negative U waves.2,3 The broader comment in the “sidebar” on page 505 could be considered to include demand ischemia, but for clarity, it would be helpful to state this explicitly.
- Venkatachalam S, Rimmerman CM. Electrocardiography in aortic regurgitation: It’s in the details. Cleve Clin J Med 2011; 78:505–506.
- Sovari AA, Farokhi F, Kocheril AG. Inverted U wave, a specific electrocardiographic sign of cardiac ischemia. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25:235–237.
- Correale E, Battista R, Ricciardiello V, Martone A. The negative U wave: a pathogenetic enigma but a useful, often overlooked bedside diagnostic and prognostic clue in ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 2004; 27:674–677.
To the Editor: We thank Drs. Venkatachalam and Rimmerman1 for their Clinical Picture article, “Electrocardiography in aortic regurgitation: It’s in the details,” in the August 2011 issue. This was very interesting, as usual for the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.
The maxim that “a negative U wave is never normal,” first noted about 50 years ago, still holds true. However, the authors’ statement on page 506—ie, that a negative U wave indicates structural heart disease—is too restrictive, since ischemia is not always due to a structural problem. Functional ischemia from excess demand, such as from tachycardia, sepsis, or gastrointestinal bleeding, can also cause negative U waves.2,3 The broader comment in the “sidebar” on page 505 could be considered to include demand ischemia, but for clarity, it would be helpful to state this explicitly.
To the Editor: We thank Drs. Venkatachalam and Rimmerman1 for their Clinical Picture article, “Electrocardiography in aortic regurgitation: It’s in the details,” in the August 2011 issue. This was very interesting, as usual for the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.
The maxim that “a negative U wave is never normal,” first noted about 50 years ago, still holds true. However, the authors’ statement on page 506—ie, that a negative U wave indicates structural heart disease—is too restrictive, since ischemia is not always due to a structural problem. Functional ischemia from excess demand, such as from tachycardia, sepsis, or gastrointestinal bleeding, can also cause negative U waves.2,3 The broader comment in the “sidebar” on page 505 could be considered to include demand ischemia, but for clarity, it would be helpful to state this explicitly.
- Venkatachalam S, Rimmerman CM. Electrocardiography in aortic regurgitation: It’s in the details. Cleve Clin J Med 2011; 78:505–506.
- Sovari AA, Farokhi F, Kocheril AG. Inverted U wave, a specific electrocardiographic sign of cardiac ischemia. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25:235–237.
- Correale E, Battista R, Ricciardiello V, Martone A. The negative U wave: a pathogenetic enigma but a useful, often overlooked bedside diagnostic and prognostic clue in ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 2004; 27:674–677.
- Venkatachalam S, Rimmerman CM. Electrocardiography in aortic regurgitation: It’s in the details. Cleve Clin J Med 2011; 78:505–506.
- Sovari AA, Farokhi F, Kocheril AG. Inverted U wave, a specific electrocardiographic sign of cardiac ischemia. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25:235–237.
- Correale E, Battista R, Ricciardiello V, Martone A. The negative U wave: a pathogenetic enigma but a useful, often overlooked bedside diagnostic and prognostic clue in ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 2004; 27:674–677.