Why Can’t We Answer Our Questions?

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 11:08
Display Headline
Why Can’t We Answer Our Questions?

As physicians we do not have our act together on some things. Our medical records are often illegible, disorganized, or lost . Our medical errors are treated like sporadic embarrassments rather than events to be studied and prevented.1 And we do a terrible job of answering our clinic al questions. Most of our questions are never answered, sometimes because the answers do not exist, but more often because they are not pursued.2,3 As busy physicians we quickly learn that being aware of our knowledge gaps and trying to fill those gaps does not lead to efficient patient flow. Better to do the best we can with our current knowledge. But this is not really better, because it stifles lifelong learning and professional growth and may adversely affect patient care. The trick is to get fast and accurate answers from immediately available resources.

Two studies in this issue of JFP aim to help physicians answer their questions, but use different approaches. Alper and colleagues4 started with real questions and looked for the computer databases most likely to answer them. Rosser and coworkers5 started with answers in the form of guidelines and designed a rigorous method for picking the best ones. Both groups recognized the time pressures faced by practicing physicians. Alper and colleagues concluded that although most questions could be answered by using computer databases, the process often took too long to be practical in a busy office. Computers have tremendous potential to provide needed information, and this potential will be realized when enthusiastic programmers understand the importance of speed and usability. Rosser and coworkers recognized the value of writing short summaries of lengthy guidelines. These summaries distill multiple bits of evidence into statements that can be used by clinicians. Unfortunately, guidelines often answer questions that do not occur in practice and fail to address those that do. For example, physicians who ask how to screen for prostate cancer might consult the recommended prostate cancer guideline on the Guideline Advisory Committee Web site (www.gacguidelines.ca). This guideline states that the existing evidence is inadequate to recommend for or against prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing—which makes it a guideline that provides no guidance. Counseling patients about the pros and cons of PSA screening sounds good on paper; it is not so easy when you are behind schedule, and the nurse is pointing to your full waiting room. The clinicia n still must decide what to do. It is much faster to just say, “I think we should get a PSA today.” Everyone is happier at least in the shor t term, because the schedule does not fall apart, and the patient is not burdened with your uncertainties. The practical advantages of opinion-based medicine can be complling.

Physicians should ask good questions, and authors should write good answers. For example: “How should you work up a newborn with a 2-vessel umbilical cord whose physical examination is otherwise normal?” Is this a good question? It does not fit the PICO (Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) model.6 But I think physicians should ask what they want to know, rather than transforming their questions to fit the available evidence. The physician could have asked “What is the prevalence of serious malformations in babies with 2-vessel cords?” but that is not the information that is needed. The question is what to do with this baby. I could not find a clear answer to this question using the guidelines from Rosser and coworkers (or any other guidelines) or by using the databases of Alper and colleagues (after an hour of searching). I have my own answer but would not dare write it here, because it is based on opinion rather than evidence.

Physicians are overwhelmed with medical information, yet they cannot answer their patient care questions. We need not be discouraged by the impossible job of keeping up with new information, because most of it is irrelevant to our practices. Instead, we should focus on our questions because they will guide us toward more efficient lifelong learning. Finding good answers to our questions can be time consuming and difficult work that is often done at the end of the day while our suppers get cold. Someday we will get our act together by systematically recording real questions and organizing them in a large database; the Family Practice Inquiries Network (www.fpin.org) and others are moving toward that goal. Authors could search this database for questions related to their topics and include the answers in review articles, textbooks, and Web sites. Instead of blindly adding to an overwhelming body of available information, we need to document our information needs so that those needs can be met.

References

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

2. Gorman PN, Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making 1995;15:113-19.

3. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ 1999;319:358-61.

4. Alper BS, Stevermer JJ, White DS, Ewigman BG. Answering family physicians’ clinical questions using electronic medical databases. J Fam Pract 2001;50:960-65.

5. Rosser WW, Davis D, Gilbart E. Assessing guidelines to facilitate their use in family practice. J Fam Pract 2001;50:969-73.

6. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Hayes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1997.

Author and Disclosure Information

John W. Ely, MD, MSPH
Iowa City, Iowa

All correspondence should be addressed to John W. Ely, MD, MSPH, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01291-D PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: john-ely@uiowa.edu.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 50(11)
Publications
Page Number
974-975
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

John W. Ely, MD, MSPH
Iowa City, Iowa

All correspondence should be addressed to John W. Ely, MD, MSPH, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01291-D PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: john-ely@uiowa.edu.

Author and Disclosure Information

John W. Ely, MD, MSPH
Iowa City, Iowa

All correspondence should be addressed to John W. Ely, MD, MSPH, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, 01291-D PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail: john-ely@uiowa.edu.

As physicians we do not have our act together on some things. Our medical records are often illegible, disorganized, or lost . Our medical errors are treated like sporadic embarrassments rather than events to be studied and prevented.1 And we do a terrible job of answering our clinic al questions. Most of our questions are never answered, sometimes because the answers do not exist, but more often because they are not pursued.2,3 As busy physicians we quickly learn that being aware of our knowledge gaps and trying to fill those gaps does not lead to efficient patient flow. Better to do the best we can with our current knowledge. But this is not really better, because it stifles lifelong learning and professional growth and may adversely affect patient care. The trick is to get fast and accurate answers from immediately available resources.

Two studies in this issue of JFP aim to help physicians answer their questions, but use different approaches. Alper and colleagues4 started with real questions and looked for the computer databases most likely to answer them. Rosser and coworkers5 started with answers in the form of guidelines and designed a rigorous method for picking the best ones. Both groups recognized the time pressures faced by practicing physicians. Alper and colleagues concluded that although most questions could be answered by using computer databases, the process often took too long to be practical in a busy office. Computers have tremendous potential to provide needed information, and this potential will be realized when enthusiastic programmers understand the importance of speed and usability. Rosser and coworkers recognized the value of writing short summaries of lengthy guidelines. These summaries distill multiple bits of evidence into statements that can be used by clinicians. Unfortunately, guidelines often answer questions that do not occur in practice and fail to address those that do. For example, physicians who ask how to screen for prostate cancer might consult the recommended prostate cancer guideline on the Guideline Advisory Committee Web site (www.gacguidelines.ca). This guideline states that the existing evidence is inadequate to recommend for or against prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing—which makes it a guideline that provides no guidance. Counseling patients about the pros and cons of PSA screening sounds good on paper; it is not so easy when you are behind schedule, and the nurse is pointing to your full waiting room. The clinicia n still must decide what to do. It is much faster to just say, “I think we should get a PSA today.” Everyone is happier at least in the shor t term, because the schedule does not fall apart, and the patient is not burdened with your uncertainties. The practical advantages of opinion-based medicine can be complling.

Physicians should ask good questions, and authors should write good answers. For example: “How should you work up a newborn with a 2-vessel umbilical cord whose physical examination is otherwise normal?” Is this a good question? It does not fit the PICO (Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) model.6 But I think physicians should ask what they want to know, rather than transforming their questions to fit the available evidence. The physician could have asked “What is the prevalence of serious malformations in babies with 2-vessel cords?” but that is not the information that is needed. The question is what to do with this baby. I could not find a clear answer to this question using the guidelines from Rosser and coworkers (or any other guidelines) or by using the databases of Alper and colleagues (after an hour of searching). I have my own answer but would not dare write it here, because it is based on opinion rather than evidence.

Physicians are overwhelmed with medical information, yet they cannot answer their patient care questions. We need not be discouraged by the impossible job of keeping up with new information, because most of it is irrelevant to our practices. Instead, we should focus on our questions because they will guide us toward more efficient lifelong learning. Finding good answers to our questions can be time consuming and difficult work that is often done at the end of the day while our suppers get cold. Someday we will get our act together by systematically recording real questions and organizing them in a large database; the Family Practice Inquiries Network (www.fpin.org) and others are moving toward that goal. Authors could search this database for questions related to their topics and include the answers in review articles, textbooks, and Web sites. Instead of blindly adding to an overwhelming body of available information, we need to document our information needs so that those needs can be met.

As physicians we do not have our act together on some things. Our medical records are often illegible, disorganized, or lost . Our medical errors are treated like sporadic embarrassments rather than events to be studied and prevented.1 And we do a terrible job of answering our clinic al questions. Most of our questions are never answered, sometimes because the answers do not exist, but more often because they are not pursued.2,3 As busy physicians we quickly learn that being aware of our knowledge gaps and trying to fill those gaps does not lead to efficient patient flow. Better to do the best we can with our current knowledge. But this is not really better, because it stifles lifelong learning and professional growth and may adversely affect patient care. The trick is to get fast and accurate answers from immediately available resources.

Two studies in this issue of JFP aim to help physicians answer their questions, but use different approaches. Alper and colleagues4 started with real questions and looked for the computer databases most likely to answer them. Rosser and coworkers5 started with answers in the form of guidelines and designed a rigorous method for picking the best ones. Both groups recognized the time pressures faced by practicing physicians. Alper and colleagues concluded that although most questions could be answered by using computer databases, the process often took too long to be practical in a busy office. Computers have tremendous potential to provide needed information, and this potential will be realized when enthusiastic programmers understand the importance of speed and usability. Rosser and coworkers recognized the value of writing short summaries of lengthy guidelines. These summaries distill multiple bits of evidence into statements that can be used by clinicians. Unfortunately, guidelines often answer questions that do not occur in practice and fail to address those that do. For example, physicians who ask how to screen for prostate cancer might consult the recommended prostate cancer guideline on the Guideline Advisory Committee Web site (www.gacguidelines.ca). This guideline states that the existing evidence is inadequate to recommend for or against prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing—which makes it a guideline that provides no guidance. Counseling patients about the pros and cons of PSA screening sounds good on paper; it is not so easy when you are behind schedule, and the nurse is pointing to your full waiting room. The clinicia n still must decide what to do. It is much faster to just say, “I think we should get a PSA today.” Everyone is happier at least in the shor t term, because the schedule does not fall apart, and the patient is not burdened with your uncertainties. The practical advantages of opinion-based medicine can be complling.

Physicians should ask good questions, and authors should write good answers. For example: “How should you work up a newborn with a 2-vessel umbilical cord whose physical examination is otherwise normal?” Is this a good question? It does not fit the PICO (Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) model.6 But I think physicians should ask what they want to know, rather than transforming their questions to fit the available evidence. The physician could have asked “What is the prevalence of serious malformations in babies with 2-vessel cords?” but that is not the information that is needed. The question is what to do with this baby. I could not find a clear answer to this question using the guidelines from Rosser and coworkers (or any other guidelines) or by using the databases of Alper and colleagues (after an hour of searching). I have my own answer but would not dare write it here, because it is based on opinion rather than evidence.

Physicians are overwhelmed with medical information, yet they cannot answer their patient care questions. We need not be discouraged by the impossible job of keeping up with new information, because most of it is irrelevant to our practices. Instead, we should focus on our questions because they will guide us toward more efficient lifelong learning. Finding good answers to our questions can be time consuming and difficult work that is often done at the end of the day while our suppers get cold. Someday we will get our act together by systematically recording real questions and organizing them in a large database; the Family Practice Inquiries Network (www.fpin.org) and others are moving toward that goal. Authors could search this database for questions related to their topics and include the answers in review articles, textbooks, and Web sites. Instead of blindly adding to an overwhelming body of available information, we need to document our information needs so that those needs can be met.

References

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

2. Gorman PN, Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making 1995;15:113-19.

3. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ 1999;319:358-61.

4. Alper BS, Stevermer JJ, White DS, Ewigman BG. Answering family physicians’ clinical questions using electronic medical databases. J Fam Pract 2001;50:960-65.

5. Rosser WW, Davis D, Gilbart E. Assessing guidelines to facilitate their use in family practice. J Fam Pract 2001;50:969-73.

6. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Hayes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1997.

References

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

2. Gorman PN, Helfand M. Information seeking in primary care: how physicians choose which clinical questions to pursue and which to leave unanswered. Med Decis Making 1995;15:113-19.

3. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ 1999;319:358-61.

4. Alper BS, Stevermer JJ, White DS, Ewigman BG. Answering family physicians’ clinical questions using electronic medical databases. J Fam Pract 2001;50:960-65.

5. Rosser WW, Davis D, Gilbart E. Assessing guidelines to facilitate their use in family practice. J Fam Pract 2001;50:969-73.

6. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Hayes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 1997.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 50(11)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 50(11)
Page Number
974-975
Page Number
974-975
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Why Can’t We Answer Our Questions?
Display Headline
Why Can’t We Answer Our Questions?
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians’ Offices

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:38
Display Headline
What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians’ Offices
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(2)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(2)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(2)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians’ Offices
Display Headline
What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians’ Offices
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians' Offices

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:40
Display Headline
What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians' Offices?
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(2)
Publications
Page Number
135-139
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(2)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(2)
Page Number
135-139
Page Number
135-139
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians' Offices?
Display Headline
What Clinical Information Resources Are Available in Family Physicians' Offices?
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians - Are the Best Doctors Sued More

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:37
Display Headline
Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians: Are the Best Doctors Sued More?
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(1)
Publications
Page Number
23-30
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(1)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(1)
Page Number
23-30
Page Number
23-30
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians: Are the Best Doctors Sued More?
Display Headline
Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians: Are the Best Doctors Sued More?
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians Are the Best Doctors Sued More

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:37
Display Headline
Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians Are the Best Doctors Sued More
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(1)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(1)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 48(1)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians Are the Best Doctors Sued More
Display Headline
Malpractice Claims Against Family Physicians Are the Best Doctors Sued More
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital When to Transport, When to Keep

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 09:10
Display Headline
Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital When to Transport, When to Keep
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 46(4)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 46(4)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 46(4)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital When to Transport, When to Keep
Display Headline
Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital When to Transport, When to Keep
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital - When to Transport, When to Keep

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 09:08
Display Headline
Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital - When to Transport, When to Keep
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 46(4)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 46(4)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 46(4)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital - When to Transport, When to Keep
Display Headline
Neonatal Respiratory Distress in the Community Hospital - When to Transport, When to Keep
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Lifelong Self-directed Learning Using a Computer Database of Clinical Questions

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 09:19
Display Headline
Lifelong Self-directed Learning Using a Computer Database of Clinical Questions
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 45(5)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 45(5)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 45(5)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Lifelong Self-directed Learning Using a Computer Database of Clinical Questions
Display Headline
Lifelong Self-directed Learning Using a Computer Database of Clinical Questions
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Practice Patterns During the Third Stage of Labor - The Effect of Physician Age and Specialty

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:41
Display Headline
Practice Patterns During the Third Stage of Labor - The Effect of Physician Age and Specialty
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 43(6)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 43(6)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 43(6)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Practice Patterns During the Third Stage of Labor - The Effect of Physician Age and Specialty
Display Headline
Practice Patterns During the Third Stage of Labor - The Effect of Physician Age and Specialty
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Diagnosing Left Lower Lobe Pneumonia Usefulness of the 'Spine Sign' on Lateral Chest Radiographs

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:41
Display Headline
Diagnosing Left Lower Lobe Pneumonia Usefulness of the 'Spine Sign' on Lateral Chest Radiographs
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 43(3)
Publications
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 43(3)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 43(3)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Diagnosing Left Lower Lobe Pneumonia Usefulness of the 'Spine Sign' on Lateral Chest Radiographs
Display Headline
Diagnosing Left Lower Lobe Pneumonia Usefulness of the 'Spine Sign' on Lateral Chest Radiographs
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media