REIMBURSEMENT ADVISER

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:54
Display Headline
REIMBURSEMENT ADVISER

Does breast exam only qualify as screening visit?

Q. I recently saw a 62-year-old Medicare patient for a breast examination only. Here is my documentation of the visit:

  • Patient is a virgin, takes no hormones, and refuses a pelvic exam and Pap smear. Blood pressure is in the normal range. Body mass index is 21. She reports no problems and has no questions.
  • Examination of breasts reveals normal skin and nipples, no masses or tenderness, and no lymph-node swelling.
  • Patient is given a slip for a routine mammogram and instructions on performing breast self-exam, and is instructed to return in 1 year, barring problems or concerns.
My question is: Does this visit qualify for billing Medicare with code G0101 (cervical or vaginal cancer screening; pelvic and clinical breast examination) or should it be billed a low-level problem E/M service instead? We would use the diagnosis code V76.19 (other screening breast examination).

A. You face an interesting situation. This is a preventive service, but a diagnosis of V76.19, although accurate here, will cause code G0101, which requires that a pelvic exam have been performed, to be denied.

If you report this visit as a problem E/M service using only this diagnosis, on the other hand, you are more than likely to be denied by Medicare.

For Medicare to consider this a covered service billed as a problem E/M service, you would also have to list diagnostic codes that indicate a complaint, a history of a breast condition, or a strong family history of breast cancer. Medicare will pay for the screening mammogram, but the screening breast exam by itself may not be considered a covered service.

You have a few options:

  • Contact the Medicare carrier and explain the situation. See if they propose a coding solution that they will accept. Get their answer in writing!
  • Bill Medicare using a low-level E/M code (eg, 99212, problem focused exam with straightforward medical decision making) linked to the diagnosis code V76.19. If you choose this option, have the patient sign a waiver that she is responsible for payment should Medicare deny the service. Add the modifier –GA (waiver of liability statement on file) to the problem E/M code. This will allow you to collect payment from the patient.
  • Submit the unlisted code or preventive services 99429 because you performed an exam—although not one that meets the criteria of age-specific preventive codes. This code is never reimbursed by Medicare, but once you get a denial, you either can collect from the patient or are able to submit the charge to any secondary insurance she might have. A modifier –GY (item or service statutorily excluded or does not meet the definition of any Medicare benefit) would also need to be added to the preventive medicine code.

Fern testing: CLIA-waived but payer might not cover

Q. What is the correct code for fern testing? The codes recommended to us are 89060 or 87210, not Q0114, which isn’t recognized by some of our payers. Can you give us advice?

A. The fern test should never be coded 87210 because that code does not represent how the test is performed. (Fern testing is simply applying vaginal fluid to a slide, which is left to dry, and observing whether a ferning develops when the residue is viewed under a microscope.) The test is performed by the provider, not the laboratory; as such, Q0114 is the correct code.

Code 87210, in addition to requiring addition of saline or potassium chloride, is not a CLIA-waived test. You would not be able to bill for it unless you have an advanced lab certificate.

Code 89060 is assigned when looking for crystals in synovial fluid. It is also not a CLIA-waived or physician-performed microscopy test, so billing using this code would require an advanced lab certificate as well.

The advent of the national code set has meant that your payers are required to recognize all codes, although they can determine whether to cover a service or not. It may be that this test isn’t covered by your payer, rather than the code not being recognized as correct.

Two voiding studies: Bill together but specify parts

Q. Can both the 51795 voiding pressure study and 51797 intra-abdominal voiding pressure study be billed together? When I checked the bundling software, it lists these codes as mutually exclusive, with 51795 having an indicator of “1” and 51797 a “9.” If the codes can be billed together, should I use a modifier -59 (distinct service)?

 

 

A. Voiding pressure studies (51795) measure urinary flow rate and pressure during bladder emptying; intra-abdominal voiding pressure studies (51797) measure how the patient must strain to void. These codes can be billed together because they measure different events. More important, they are not bundled.

The “9” indicator used by Medicare for bundled codes means that the edit was deleted. In this case, it was deleted on the same date it was added. For some reason, Medicare elects not to remove deleted code pairs from the master database. Although you will get paid for both of these codes, the code order is different depending on whether you are using your own equipment (because of differences in relative value units).

If you bill each test with a modifier -26 (professional component only), you do not own the equipment and the place of service is a facility. In that case, list 51797-26 first and 51795-26-51 second. The modifier -51 is used on the second code because this is a multiple procedure. If you are billing both professional and technical components (ie, you are using your equipment, in the office), billing order is reversed: List 51797 first and 51795-51 second. Do not use a modifier -59 with this code combination.

Fetal genetic abnormality inferred from US; code for further study

Q. What diagnosis code should we use for a bilateral choroid plexus cyst found on ultrasonography?

A. Choroid plexus cysts (CPCs) are considered a “soft marker” for a gene abnormality called Edward’s syndrome. Although these markers, taken alone, do the baby no harm, they may be associated with an increased risk of another abnormality, including cardiac defects. The presence of a soft marker is not diagnostic of this other abnormality; it is just a noted association.

At the time of the sonogram, therefore, you can only suspect a problem with the fetal genes; further testing is required. In that case, report 655.13 (known or suspected chromosomal abnormality of the fetus affecting management of mother; antepartum condition or complication) with a secondary diagnosis of 793.99 (other nonspecific abnormal findings on radiological and other examinations of body structure).

Positive ANA—don’t leap to “autoimmune disorder”

Q. One of our obstetric patients had a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test. We‘ll follow her with biophysical profiles and non-stress testing, and track amniotic fluid volume. Because we have not yet diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other specific condition, is it appropriate to use a diagnosis of unspecified autoimmune disorder (279.4) in addition to a pregnancy complication code?

A. Many illnesses and conditions are associated with a positive ANA, including rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, scleroderma, and SLE; infectious diseases such as mononucleosis; and autoimmune thyroid and liver disease. Some medications can cause a positive ANA, and many healthy people have a positive ANA.

Because you have not eliminated the other possibilities for the positive ANA, it is premature to assign the code for an autoimmune condition. Instead, report 648.93 as your primary code (Other current conditions in the mother classifiable elsewhere, complicating pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium; antepartum condition or complication), with the secondary diagnosis code 795.79 (Other and unspecified nonspecific immunological findings).

Coding Zoladex depends on the patient’s condition

Q. We have begun using Zoladex for our patients. How do we best code for administering this agent? We have been told to use chemotherapy codes, but this is not a chemotherapeutic agent.

A. Zoladex (goserelin acetate) is classified as a hormonal antineoplastic. It is used to treat endometriosis before surgery because it thins the lining of the uterus, and to treat breast cancer by inhibiting production of estrogen.

The drug is supplied as tiny pellets, which are injected under the skin of the abdomen using a small, “trocar-like” needle and syringe. The procedure constitutes an injection. If you are treating breast cancer with this drug, the correct code would be 96402 (Chemotherapy administration, subcutaneous or intramuscular; hormonal antineoplastic). The code for the pellets is J9202 (Goserelin acetate implant, per 3.6 mg). If you administer more than 3.6 mg at a time, remember to adjust the quantity you bill for. If you are using this drug to treat endometriosis or fibroids, CPT directs you to report 90772 for the injection because it is then considered a nonantineoplastic hormone injection.

Call a contraceptive a contraceptive when coding

Q. How should we code for Implanon insertions?

A. Code this S0180 (Etonogestrel [contraceptive] implant system, including implants and supplies). For the procedure, I recommend code 11975 (insertion, implantable contraceptive capsules).

Implanon’s manufacturer thinks the correct code is 11981 (Insertion, nonbiodegradable drug delivery implant), but I disagree: This is a contraceptive that is implanted under the skin and, under CPT rules, you must use the code that most closely describes the procedure.

 

 

Note also that, although Implanon involves insertion of one rod (other systems require insertion of several), the code 11981 has greater relative value units than 11975. This payment difference will not be lost on most payers because the diagnostic link for the procedure, whichever code is reported, is V25.5 (insertion of implantable subdermal contraceptive).

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(05)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
104-108
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt RN; Witt
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Does breast exam only qualify as screening visit?

Q. I recently saw a 62-year-old Medicare patient for a breast examination only. Here is my documentation of the visit:

  • Patient is a virgin, takes no hormones, and refuses a pelvic exam and Pap smear. Blood pressure is in the normal range. Body mass index is 21. She reports no problems and has no questions.
  • Examination of breasts reveals normal skin and nipples, no masses or tenderness, and no lymph-node swelling.
  • Patient is given a slip for a routine mammogram and instructions on performing breast self-exam, and is instructed to return in 1 year, barring problems or concerns.
My question is: Does this visit qualify for billing Medicare with code G0101 (cervical or vaginal cancer screening; pelvic and clinical breast examination) or should it be billed a low-level problem E/M service instead? We would use the diagnosis code V76.19 (other screening breast examination).

A. You face an interesting situation. This is a preventive service, but a diagnosis of V76.19, although accurate here, will cause code G0101, which requires that a pelvic exam have been performed, to be denied.

If you report this visit as a problem E/M service using only this diagnosis, on the other hand, you are more than likely to be denied by Medicare.

For Medicare to consider this a covered service billed as a problem E/M service, you would also have to list diagnostic codes that indicate a complaint, a history of a breast condition, or a strong family history of breast cancer. Medicare will pay for the screening mammogram, but the screening breast exam by itself may not be considered a covered service.

You have a few options:

  • Contact the Medicare carrier and explain the situation. See if they propose a coding solution that they will accept. Get their answer in writing!
  • Bill Medicare using a low-level E/M code (eg, 99212, problem focused exam with straightforward medical decision making) linked to the diagnosis code V76.19. If you choose this option, have the patient sign a waiver that she is responsible for payment should Medicare deny the service. Add the modifier –GA (waiver of liability statement on file) to the problem E/M code. This will allow you to collect payment from the patient.
  • Submit the unlisted code or preventive services 99429 because you performed an exam—although not one that meets the criteria of age-specific preventive codes. This code is never reimbursed by Medicare, but once you get a denial, you either can collect from the patient or are able to submit the charge to any secondary insurance she might have. A modifier –GY (item or service statutorily excluded or does not meet the definition of any Medicare benefit) would also need to be added to the preventive medicine code.

Fern testing: CLIA-waived but payer might not cover

Q. What is the correct code for fern testing? The codes recommended to us are 89060 or 87210, not Q0114, which isn’t recognized by some of our payers. Can you give us advice?

A. The fern test should never be coded 87210 because that code does not represent how the test is performed. (Fern testing is simply applying vaginal fluid to a slide, which is left to dry, and observing whether a ferning develops when the residue is viewed under a microscope.) The test is performed by the provider, not the laboratory; as such, Q0114 is the correct code.

Code 87210, in addition to requiring addition of saline or potassium chloride, is not a CLIA-waived test. You would not be able to bill for it unless you have an advanced lab certificate.

Code 89060 is assigned when looking for crystals in synovial fluid. It is also not a CLIA-waived or physician-performed microscopy test, so billing using this code would require an advanced lab certificate as well.

The advent of the national code set has meant that your payers are required to recognize all codes, although they can determine whether to cover a service or not. It may be that this test isn’t covered by your payer, rather than the code not being recognized as correct.

Two voiding studies: Bill together but specify parts

Q. Can both the 51795 voiding pressure study and 51797 intra-abdominal voiding pressure study be billed together? When I checked the bundling software, it lists these codes as mutually exclusive, with 51795 having an indicator of “1” and 51797 a “9.” If the codes can be billed together, should I use a modifier -59 (distinct service)?

 

 

A. Voiding pressure studies (51795) measure urinary flow rate and pressure during bladder emptying; intra-abdominal voiding pressure studies (51797) measure how the patient must strain to void. These codes can be billed together because they measure different events. More important, they are not bundled.

The “9” indicator used by Medicare for bundled codes means that the edit was deleted. In this case, it was deleted on the same date it was added. For some reason, Medicare elects not to remove deleted code pairs from the master database. Although you will get paid for both of these codes, the code order is different depending on whether you are using your own equipment (because of differences in relative value units).

If you bill each test with a modifier -26 (professional component only), you do not own the equipment and the place of service is a facility. In that case, list 51797-26 first and 51795-26-51 second. The modifier -51 is used on the second code because this is a multiple procedure. If you are billing both professional and technical components (ie, you are using your equipment, in the office), billing order is reversed: List 51797 first and 51795-51 second. Do not use a modifier -59 with this code combination.

Fetal genetic abnormality inferred from US; code for further study

Q. What diagnosis code should we use for a bilateral choroid plexus cyst found on ultrasonography?

A. Choroid plexus cysts (CPCs) are considered a “soft marker” for a gene abnormality called Edward’s syndrome. Although these markers, taken alone, do the baby no harm, they may be associated with an increased risk of another abnormality, including cardiac defects. The presence of a soft marker is not diagnostic of this other abnormality; it is just a noted association.

At the time of the sonogram, therefore, you can only suspect a problem with the fetal genes; further testing is required. In that case, report 655.13 (known or suspected chromosomal abnormality of the fetus affecting management of mother; antepartum condition or complication) with a secondary diagnosis of 793.99 (other nonspecific abnormal findings on radiological and other examinations of body structure).

Positive ANA—don’t leap to “autoimmune disorder”

Q. One of our obstetric patients had a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test. We‘ll follow her with biophysical profiles and non-stress testing, and track amniotic fluid volume. Because we have not yet diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other specific condition, is it appropriate to use a diagnosis of unspecified autoimmune disorder (279.4) in addition to a pregnancy complication code?

A. Many illnesses and conditions are associated with a positive ANA, including rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, scleroderma, and SLE; infectious diseases such as mononucleosis; and autoimmune thyroid and liver disease. Some medications can cause a positive ANA, and many healthy people have a positive ANA.

Because you have not eliminated the other possibilities for the positive ANA, it is premature to assign the code for an autoimmune condition. Instead, report 648.93 as your primary code (Other current conditions in the mother classifiable elsewhere, complicating pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium; antepartum condition or complication), with the secondary diagnosis code 795.79 (Other and unspecified nonspecific immunological findings).

Coding Zoladex depends on the patient’s condition

Q. We have begun using Zoladex for our patients. How do we best code for administering this agent? We have been told to use chemotherapy codes, but this is not a chemotherapeutic agent.

A. Zoladex (goserelin acetate) is classified as a hormonal antineoplastic. It is used to treat endometriosis before surgery because it thins the lining of the uterus, and to treat breast cancer by inhibiting production of estrogen.

The drug is supplied as tiny pellets, which are injected under the skin of the abdomen using a small, “trocar-like” needle and syringe. The procedure constitutes an injection. If you are treating breast cancer with this drug, the correct code would be 96402 (Chemotherapy administration, subcutaneous or intramuscular; hormonal antineoplastic). The code for the pellets is J9202 (Goserelin acetate implant, per 3.6 mg). If you administer more than 3.6 mg at a time, remember to adjust the quantity you bill for. If you are using this drug to treat endometriosis or fibroids, CPT directs you to report 90772 for the injection because it is then considered a nonantineoplastic hormone injection.

Call a contraceptive a contraceptive when coding

Q. How should we code for Implanon insertions?

A. Code this S0180 (Etonogestrel [contraceptive] implant system, including implants and supplies). For the procedure, I recommend code 11975 (insertion, implantable contraceptive capsules).

Implanon’s manufacturer thinks the correct code is 11981 (Insertion, nonbiodegradable drug delivery implant), but I disagree: This is a contraceptive that is implanted under the skin and, under CPT rules, you must use the code that most closely describes the procedure.

 

 

Note also that, although Implanon involves insertion of one rod (other systems require insertion of several), the code 11981 has greater relative value units than 11975. This payment difference will not be lost on most payers because the diagnostic link for the procedure, whichever code is reported, is V25.5 (insertion of implantable subdermal contraceptive).

Does breast exam only qualify as screening visit?

Q. I recently saw a 62-year-old Medicare patient for a breast examination only. Here is my documentation of the visit:

  • Patient is a virgin, takes no hormones, and refuses a pelvic exam and Pap smear. Blood pressure is in the normal range. Body mass index is 21. She reports no problems and has no questions.
  • Examination of breasts reveals normal skin and nipples, no masses or tenderness, and no lymph-node swelling.
  • Patient is given a slip for a routine mammogram and instructions on performing breast self-exam, and is instructed to return in 1 year, barring problems or concerns.
My question is: Does this visit qualify for billing Medicare with code G0101 (cervical or vaginal cancer screening; pelvic and clinical breast examination) or should it be billed a low-level problem E/M service instead? We would use the diagnosis code V76.19 (other screening breast examination).

A. You face an interesting situation. This is a preventive service, but a diagnosis of V76.19, although accurate here, will cause code G0101, which requires that a pelvic exam have been performed, to be denied.

If you report this visit as a problem E/M service using only this diagnosis, on the other hand, you are more than likely to be denied by Medicare.

For Medicare to consider this a covered service billed as a problem E/M service, you would also have to list diagnostic codes that indicate a complaint, a history of a breast condition, or a strong family history of breast cancer. Medicare will pay for the screening mammogram, but the screening breast exam by itself may not be considered a covered service.

You have a few options:

  • Contact the Medicare carrier and explain the situation. See if they propose a coding solution that they will accept. Get their answer in writing!
  • Bill Medicare using a low-level E/M code (eg, 99212, problem focused exam with straightforward medical decision making) linked to the diagnosis code V76.19. If you choose this option, have the patient sign a waiver that she is responsible for payment should Medicare deny the service. Add the modifier –GA (waiver of liability statement on file) to the problem E/M code. This will allow you to collect payment from the patient.
  • Submit the unlisted code or preventive services 99429 because you performed an exam—although not one that meets the criteria of age-specific preventive codes. This code is never reimbursed by Medicare, but once you get a denial, you either can collect from the patient or are able to submit the charge to any secondary insurance she might have. A modifier –GY (item or service statutorily excluded or does not meet the definition of any Medicare benefit) would also need to be added to the preventive medicine code.

Fern testing: CLIA-waived but payer might not cover

Q. What is the correct code for fern testing? The codes recommended to us are 89060 or 87210, not Q0114, which isn’t recognized by some of our payers. Can you give us advice?

A. The fern test should never be coded 87210 because that code does not represent how the test is performed. (Fern testing is simply applying vaginal fluid to a slide, which is left to dry, and observing whether a ferning develops when the residue is viewed under a microscope.) The test is performed by the provider, not the laboratory; as such, Q0114 is the correct code.

Code 87210, in addition to requiring addition of saline or potassium chloride, is not a CLIA-waived test. You would not be able to bill for it unless you have an advanced lab certificate.

Code 89060 is assigned when looking for crystals in synovial fluid. It is also not a CLIA-waived or physician-performed microscopy test, so billing using this code would require an advanced lab certificate as well.

The advent of the national code set has meant that your payers are required to recognize all codes, although they can determine whether to cover a service or not. It may be that this test isn’t covered by your payer, rather than the code not being recognized as correct.

Two voiding studies: Bill together but specify parts

Q. Can both the 51795 voiding pressure study and 51797 intra-abdominal voiding pressure study be billed together? When I checked the bundling software, it lists these codes as mutually exclusive, with 51795 having an indicator of “1” and 51797 a “9.” If the codes can be billed together, should I use a modifier -59 (distinct service)?

 

 

A. Voiding pressure studies (51795) measure urinary flow rate and pressure during bladder emptying; intra-abdominal voiding pressure studies (51797) measure how the patient must strain to void. These codes can be billed together because they measure different events. More important, they are not bundled.

The “9” indicator used by Medicare for bundled codes means that the edit was deleted. In this case, it was deleted on the same date it was added. For some reason, Medicare elects not to remove deleted code pairs from the master database. Although you will get paid for both of these codes, the code order is different depending on whether you are using your own equipment (because of differences in relative value units).

If you bill each test with a modifier -26 (professional component only), you do not own the equipment and the place of service is a facility. In that case, list 51797-26 first and 51795-26-51 second. The modifier -51 is used on the second code because this is a multiple procedure. If you are billing both professional and technical components (ie, you are using your equipment, in the office), billing order is reversed: List 51797 first and 51795-51 second. Do not use a modifier -59 with this code combination.

Fetal genetic abnormality inferred from US; code for further study

Q. What diagnosis code should we use for a bilateral choroid plexus cyst found on ultrasonography?

A. Choroid plexus cysts (CPCs) are considered a “soft marker” for a gene abnormality called Edward’s syndrome. Although these markers, taken alone, do the baby no harm, they may be associated with an increased risk of another abnormality, including cardiac defects. The presence of a soft marker is not diagnostic of this other abnormality; it is just a noted association.

At the time of the sonogram, therefore, you can only suspect a problem with the fetal genes; further testing is required. In that case, report 655.13 (known or suspected chromosomal abnormality of the fetus affecting management of mother; antepartum condition or complication) with a secondary diagnosis of 793.99 (other nonspecific abnormal findings on radiological and other examinations of body structure).

Positive ANA—don’t leap to “autoimmune disorder”

Q. One of our obstetric patients had a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test. We‘ll follow her with biophysical profiles and non-stress testing, and track amniotic fluid volume. Because we have not yet diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other specific condition, is it appropriate to use a diagnosis of unspecified autoimmune disorder (279.4) in addition to a pregnancy complication code?

A. Many illnesses and conditions are associated with a positive ANA, including rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, scleroderma, and SLE; infectious diseases such as mononucleosis; and autoimmune thyroid and liver disease. Some medications can cause a positive ANA, and many healthy people have a positive ANA.

Because you have not eliminated the other possibilities for the positive ANA, it is premature to assign the code for an autoimmune condition. Instead, report 648.93 as your primary code (Other current conditions in the mother classifiable elsewhere, complicating pregnancy, childbirth, or the puerperium; antepartum condition or complication), with the secondary diagnosis code 795.79 (Other and unspecified nonspecific immunological findings).

Coding Zoladex depends on the patient’s condition

Q. We have begun using Zoladex for our patients. How do we best code for administering this agent? We have been told to use chemotherapy codes, but this is not a chemotherapeutic agent.

A. Zoladex (goserelin acetate) is classified as a hormonal antineoplastic. It is used to treat endometriosis before surgery because it thins the lining of the uterus, and to treat breast cancer by inhibiting production of estrogen.

The drug is supplied as tiny pellets, which are injected under the skin of the abdomen using a small, “trocar-like” needle and syringe. The procedure constitutes an injection. If you are treating breast cancer with this drug, the correct code would be 96402 (Chemotherapy administration, subcutaneous or intramuscular; hormonal antineoplastic). The code for the pellets is J9202 (Goserelin acetate implant, per 3.6 mg). If you administer more than 3.6 mg at a time, remember to adjust the quantity you bill for. If you are using this drug to treat endometriosis or fibroids, CPT directs you to report 90772 for the injection because it is then considered a nonantineoplastic hormone injection.

Call a contraceptive a contraceptive when coding

Q. How should we code for Implanon insertions?

A. Code this S0180 (Etonogestrel [contraceptive] implant system, including implants and supplies). For the procedure, I recommend code 11975 (insertion, implantable contraceptive capsules).

Implanon’s manufacturer thinks the correct code is 11981 (Insertion, nonbiodegradable drug delivery implant), but I disagree: This is a contraceptive that is implanted under the skin and, under CPT rules, you must use the code that most closely describes the procedure.

 

 

Note also that, although Implanon involves insertion of one rod (other systems require insertion of several), the code 11981 has greater relative value units than 11975. This payment difference will not be lost on most payers because the diagnostic link for the procedure, whichever code is reported, is V25.5 (insertion of implantable subdermal contraceptive).

Issue
OBG Management - 19(05)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(05)
Page Number
104-108
Page Number
104-108
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
REIMBURSEMENT ADVISER
Display Headline
REIMBURSEMENT ADVISER
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt RN; Witt
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt RN; Witt
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Reimbursement Adviser on the Web

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:54
Display Headline
Reimbursement Adviser on the Web

Is injectable contraceptive “medical necessity”?

Q. One of our patients receives Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) injection, 150 mg, for contraception (code J1055) solely because oral contraceptives unduly raise her blood pressure. We assign diagnosis code V25.49 (Surveillance of previously prescribed contraceptive methods, other contraceptive method) for this service. The insurance company is denying the injection, claiming that the diagnosis code is routine.

The insurance company told the patient that it would pay the claim if we used a different diagnosis code. What code should we assign to indicate that Depo-Provera is medically indicated?

A. Only routine contraception management codes can be used in this case; it’s the patient’s desire for contraception, not the hypertension, that is the prime motivator for the Depo-Provera. I would have reported V25.8 (Other specified contraceptive management) because the encounter isn’t really for surveillance.

The real problem here, however, may be that the patient’s insurance policy does not cover contraception. If that’s the case, route of administration won’t affect coverage and she is responsible for paying for injections.

Advise the patient to contact the insurer to resolve the matter of coverage. If the company confirms that contraception is covered but insists that you use a different diagnosis code, try V25.8, as I recommended. Or have the patient ask the insurer to state—in writing—what the correct code is so that you can submit the claim according to their rules.

Retained cerclage suture just part of E/M service

Q. I removed a retained fragment of a cerclage suture from a patient as part of her 6-week postpartum visit. I also cauterized some granulation tissue at the episiotomy site with silver nitrate. Can I bill for this?

A. Because granulation tissue was on the perineum and you applied silver nitrate to cauterize it, you can use a code from the integumentary system to report this service. Code 17250 (Chemical cauterization of granulation tissue [proud flesh, sinus or fistula]) can be billed separately from the postpartum visit. This service, however, is likely to be bundled into the postpartum care for your patient because it is treating a condition related to the episiotomy repair and therefore may fall within the global service.

There is no code for removing the remnant of cerclage suture. In fact, if it was removed without anesthesia by a physician who did not place the cerclage suture, it is just part of an E/M service. If you are providing postpartum care, I assume that you or a member of your group placed the cerclage suture; removal is therefore not billable separately.

Vaginal gush of fluid: How do you select a code?

Q. What diagnosis code can be reported when a patient reports a vaginal gush, or leakage, of fluid?

A. To report this finding, evaluate the patient to determine the likely cause: Leakage or a gush of fluid could signal any of several problems. Options that you can consider, based on your evaluation, include:

  • Vaginal discharge: 623.5 (Leukorrhea, not specified as infective), with V22.2 (Pregnant state, incidental). Because the patient is pregnant, this option would require that you have documented that the condition is either incidental to the pregnancy or not affecting management of the mother, the pregnancy, or the fetus.
  • Other specified complications of pregnancy (646.83)
  • Other specified indications for care or intervention related to labor and delivery (659.8X)
  • No leakage or evidence of fluid was found: V65.5 (Feared condition not demonstrated) with V22.2 (Pregnant state, incidental).

Get reimbursed for counseling absent patient?

Q. What is the consultation code for a mother who schedules an appointment to discuss her minor daughter’s disabilities and contraception, as well as other concerns about the girl? The daughter is my patient but will not be present at the first visit.

A. This situation does not meet criteria under CPT rules for billing a consultation code; in fact, many payers will not reimburse an E/M service unless the patient is present. The diagnosis code would have to be V65.19 (Other person consulting on behalf of another person, but not the patient’s problems) because you are not evaluating the patient at this visit.

If the patient’s treatment for an illness or condition is being discussed, you can report a problem E/M service. Otherwise, this is a preventive counseling service reported by time using 99401–99404 (Preventive medicine counseling and/or risk factor reduction intervention[s] provided to an individual [separate procedure]).

Remember to caution the mother that the visit may not be covered, making her responsible for the bill.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(04)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
e1-e2
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt; Witt
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Is injectable contraceptive “medical necessity”?

Q. One of our patients receives Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) injection, 150 mg, for contraception (code J1055) solely because oral contraceptives unduly raise her blood pressure. We assign diagnosis code V25.49 (Surveillance of previously prescribed contraceptive methods, other contraceptive method) for this service. The insurance company is denying the injection, claiming that the diagnosis code is routine.

The insurance company told the patient that it would pay the claim if we used a different diagnosis code. What code should we assign to indicate that Depo-Provera is medically indicated?

A. Only routine contraception management codes can be used in this case; it’s the patient’s desire for contraception, not the hypertension, that is the prime motivator for the Depo-Provera. I would have reported V25.8 (Other specified contraceptive management) because the encounter isn’t really for surveillance.

The real problem here, however, may be that the patient’s insurance policy does not cover contraception. If that’s the case, route of administration won’t affect coverage and she is responsible for paying for injections.

Advise the patient to contact the insurer to resolve the matter of coverage. If the company confirms that contraception is covered but insists that you use a different diagnosis code, try V25.8, as I recommended. Or have the patient ask the insurer to state—in writing—what the correct code is so that you can submit the claim according to their rules.

Retained cerclage suture just part of E/M service

Q. I removed a retained fragment of a cerclage suture from a patient as part of her 6-week postpartum visit. I also cauterized some granulation tissue at the episiotomy site with silver nitrate. Can I bill for this?

A. Because granulation tissue was on the perineum and you applied silver nitrate to cauterize it, you can use a code from the integumentary system to report this service. Code 17250 (Chemical cauterization of granulation tissue [proud flesh, sinus or fistula]) can be billed separately from the postpartum visit. This service, however, is likely to be bundled into the postpartum care for your patient because it is treating a condition related to the episiotomy repair and therefore may fall within the global service.

There is no code for removing the remnant of cerclage suture. In fact, if it was removed without anesthesia by a physician who did not place the cerclage suture, it is just part of an E/M service. If you are providing postpartum care, I assume that you or a member of your group placed the cerclage suture; removal is therefore not billable separately.

Vaginal gush of fluid: How do you select a code?

Q. What diagnosis code can be reported when a patient reports a vaginal gush, or leakage, of fluid?

A. To report this finding, evaluate the patient to determine the likely cause: Leakage or a gush of fluid could signal any of several problems. Options that you can consider, based on your evaluation, include:

  • Vaginal discharge: 623.5 (Leukorrhea, not specified as infective), with V22.2 (Pregnant state, incidental). Because the patient is pregnant, this option would require that you have documented that the condition is either incidental to the pregnancy or not affecting management of the mother, the pregnancy, or the fetus.
  • Other specified complications of pregnancy (646.83)
  • Other specified indications for care or intervention related to labor and delivery (659.8X)
  • No leakage or evidence of fluid was found: V65.5 (Feared condition not demonstrated) with V22.2 (Pregnant state, incidental).

Get reimbursed for counseling absent patient?

Q. What is the consultation code for a mother who schedules an appointment to discuss her minor daughter’s disabilities and contraception, as well as other concerns about the girl? The daughter is my patient but will not be present at the first visit.

A. This situation does not meet criteria under CPT rules for billing a consultation code; in fact, many payers will not reimburse an E/M service unless the patient is present. The diagnosis code would have to be V65.19 (Other person consulting on behalf of another person, but not the patient’s problems) because you are not evaluating the patient at this visit.

If the patient’s treatment for an illness or condition is being discussed, you can report a problem E/M service. Otherwise, this is a preventive counseling service reported by time using 99401–99404 (Preventive medicine counseling and/or risk factor reduction intervention[s] provided to an individual [separate procedure]).

Remember to caution the mother that the visit may not be covered, making her responsible for the bill.

Is injectable contraceptive “medical necessity”?

Q. One of our patients receives Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate) injection, 150 mg, for contraception (code J1055) solely because oral contraceptives unduly raise her blood pressure. We assign diagnosis code V25.49 (Surveillance of previously prescribed contraceptive methods, other contraceptive method) for this service. The insurance company is denying the injection, claiming that the diagnosis code is routine.

The insurance company told the patient that it would pay the claim if we used a different diagnosis code. What code should we assign to indicate that Depo-Provera is medically indicated?

A. Only routine contraception management codes can be used in this case; it’s the patient’s desire for contraception, not the hypertension, that is the prime motivator for the Depo-Provera. I would have reported V25.8 (Other specified contraceptive management) because the encounter isn’t really for surveillance.

The real problem here, however, may be that the patient’s insurance policy does not cover contraception. If that’s the case, route of administration won’t affect coverage and she is responsible for paying for injections.

Advise the patient to contact the insurer to resolve the matter of coverage. If the company confirms that contraception is covered but insists that you use a different diagnosis code, try V25.8, as I recommended. Or have the patient ask the insurer to state—in writing—what the correct code is so that you can submit the claim according to their rules.

Retained cerclage suture just part of E/M service

Q. I removed a retained fragment of a cerclage suture from a patient as part of her 6-week postpartum visit. I also cauterized some granulation tissue at the episiotomy site with silver nitrate. Can I bill for this?

A. Because granulation tissue was on the perineum and you applied silver nitrate to cauterize it, you can use a code from the integumentary system to report this service. Code 17250 (Chemical cauterization of granulation tissue [proud flesh, sinus or fistula]) can be billed separately from the postpartum visit. This service, however, is likely to be bundled into the postpartum care for your patient because it is treating a condition related to the episiotomy repair and therefore may fall within the global service.

There is no code for removing the remnant of cerclage suture. In fact, if it was removed without anesthesia by a physician who did not place the cerclage suture, it is just part of an E/M service. If you are providing postpartum care, I assume that you or a member of your group placed the cerclage suture; removal is therefore not billable separately.

Vaginal gush of fluid: How do you select a code?

Q. What diagnosis code can be reported when a patient reports a vaginal gush, or leakage, of fluid?

A. To report this finding, evaluate the patient to determine the likely cause: Leakage or a gush of fluid could signal any of several problems. Options that you can consider, based on your evaluation, include:

  • Vaginal discharge: 623.5 (Leukorrhea, not specified as infective), with V22.2 (Pregnant state, incidental). Because the patient is pregnant, this option would require that you have documented that the condition is either incidental to the pregnancy or not affecting management of the mother, the pregnancy, or the fetus.
  • Other specified complications of pregnancy (646.83)
  • Other specified indications for care or intervention related to labor and delivery (659.8X)
  • No leakage or evidence of fluid was found: V65.5 (Feared condition not demonstrated) with V22.2 (Pregnant state, incidental).

Get reimbursed for counseling absent patient?

Q. What is the consultation code for a mother who schedules an appointment to discuss her minor daughter’s disabilities and contraception, as well as other concerns about the girl? The daughter is my patient but will not be present at the first visit.

A. This situation does not meet criteria under CPT rules for billing a consultation code; in fact, many payers will not reimburse an E/M service unless the patient is present. The diagnosis code would have to be V65.19 (Other person consulting on behalf of another person, but not the patient’s problems) because you are not evaluating the patient at this visit.

If the patient’s treatment for an illness or condition is being discussed, you can report a problem E/M service. Otherwise, this is a preventive counseling service reported by time using 99401–99404 (Preventive medicine counseling and/or risk factor reduction intervention[s] provided to an individual [separate procedure]).

Remember to caution the mother that the visit may not be covered, making her responsible for the bill.

Issue
OBG Management - 19(04)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(04)
Page Number
e1-e2
Page Number
e1-e2
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Reimbursement Adviser on the Web
Display Headline
Reimbursement Adviser on the Web
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt; Witt
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt; Witt
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair? ... No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:54
Display Headline
Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair? ... No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation

Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair?

Q. I examined a patient at a routine postop visit and noticed that the surgical wound had split open. I brought her back into surgery the next day to repair the wound. Can I bill the postoperative visit in addition to the surgery if I attach a modifier -57?

A. CPT doesn’t have a hard and fast rule on this situation. But a modifier -57 (Decision for surgery) is generally reserved for more extensive evaluation of a patient whose problem results in a decision to do major surgery that day or the next. (“Major surgery” is any surgery that has a 90-day global period.)

You have 2 code choices. Surgery to repair wound dehiscence (Diagnosis code 998.32, Disruption of external operation wound) would be reported with:

  • code 12020 (Treatment of superficial wound dehiscence; simple closure), which has a global period of 10 days, or
  • code 13160 (Secondary closure of surgical wound or dehiscence; extensive or complicated), which has a 90-day global period.
Because the visit was scheduled as routine—by which I mean it appears that the patient did not realize there was a problem with the wound—it may be that you performed only a simple closure. In that case, it would be inappropriate to use a modifier -57. You should, however, add a modifier -78 (Return to the operating room for a related procedure during the postoperative period) to code 12020.

If, instead, dehiscence involved complex repair and you documented significant evaluation above and beyond normal postoperative care before determining that repair was necessary, you may bill that level of service with a modifier -57.

No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation

Q. Our practice has decided to purchase the new depo-subQ provera 104 (medroxyprogesterone acetate, 104 mg) for injection. Our coding staff can’t find a code for this product. Can you help?

A. Normally, you would report injection using a Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) “J” code, but there is no code for this new product yet. That leaves you with 3 coding options:

  • Report J3490 (Unclassified drug), but also submit the National Drug Code (NDC) number to identify the injection
  • Report 99070 (Supplies and materials [except spectacles], provided by the physician over and above those usually included with the office visit or other services rendered [list drugs, trays, supplies, or materials provided]) and be sure to indicate the NDC number
  • Report the existing code for a noncontraceptive dosage of Depo-Provera (J1051) multiplied by a quantity of 2 (J1051 is for a 50-mg dosage).
I recommend that you use the last option only if the payer insists that you submit a “J” code for injection but will not accept the “J” code for an unclassified drug.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(04)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
78-78
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt; Witt
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair?

Q. I examined a patient at a routine postop visit and noticed that the surgical wound had split open. I brought her back into surgery the next day to repair the wound. Can I bill the postoperative visit in addition to the surgery if I attach a modifier -57?

A. CPT doesn’t have a hard and fast rule on this situation. But a modifier -57 (Decision for surgery) is generally reserved for more extensive evaluation of a patient whose problem results in a decision to do major surgery that day or the next. (“Major surgery” is any surgery that has a 90-day global period.)

You have 2 code choices. Surgery to repair wound dehiscence (Diagnosis code 998.32, Disruption of external operation wound) would be reported with:

  • code 12020 (Treatment of superficial wound dehiscence; simple closure), which has a global period of 10 days, or
  • code 13160 (Secondary closure of surgical wound or dehiscence; extensive or complicated), which has a 90-day global period.
Because the visit was scheduled as routine—by which I mean it appears that the patient did not realize there was a problem with the wound—it may be that you performed only a simple closure. In that case, it would be inappropriate to use a modifier -57. You should, however, add a modifier -78 (Return to the operating room for a related procedure during the postoperative period) to code 12020.

If, instead, dehiscence involved complex repair and you documented significant evaluation above and beyond normal postoperative care before determining that repair was necessary, you may bill that level of service with a modifier -57.

No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation

Q. Our practice has decided to purchase the new depo-subQ provera 104 (medroxyprogesterone acetate, 104 mg) for injection. Our coding staff can’t find a code for this product. Can you help?

A. Normally, you would report injection using a Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) “J” code, but there is no code for this new product yet. That leaves you with 3 coding options:

  • Report J3490 (Unclassified drug), but also submit the National Drug Code (NDC) number to identify the injection
  • Report 99070 (Supplies and materials [except spectacles], provided by the physician over and above those usually included with the office visit or other services rendered [list drugs, trays, supplies, or materials provided]) and be sure to indicate the NDC number
  • Report the existing code for a noncontraceptive dosage of Depo-Provera (J1051) multiplied by a quantity of 2 (J1051 is for a 50-mg dosage).
I recommend that you use the last option only if the payer insists that you submit a “J” code for injection but will not accept the “J” code for an unclassified drug.

Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair?

Q. I examined a patient at a routine postop visit and noticed that the surgical wound had split open. I brought her back into surgery the next day to repair the wound. Can I bill the postoperative visit in addition to the surgery if I attach a modifier -57?

A. CPT doesn’t have a hard and fast rule on this situation. But a modifier -57 (Decision for surgery) is generally reserved for more extensive evaluation of a patient whose problem results in a decision to do major surgery that day or the next. (“Major surgery” is any surgery that has a 90-day global period.)

You have 2 code choices. Surgery to repair wound dehiscence (Diagnosis code 998.32, Disruption of external operation wound) would be reported with:

  • code 12020 (Treatment of superficial wound dehiscence; simple closure), which has a global period of 10 days, or
  • code 13160 (Secondary closure of surgical wound or dehiscence; extensive or complicated), which has a 90-day global period.
Because the visit was scheduled as routine—by which I mean it appears that the patient did not realize there was a problem with the wound—it may be that you performed only a simple closure. In that case, it would be inappropriate to use a modifier -57. You should, however, add a modifier -78 (Return to the operating room for a related procedure during the postoperative period) to code 12020.

If, instead, dehiscence involved complex repair and you documented significant evaluation above and beyond normal postoperative care before determining that repair was necessary, you may bill that level of service with a modifier -57.

No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation

Q. Our practice has decided to purchase the new depo-subQ provera 104 (medroxyprogesterone acetate, 104 mg) for injection. Our coding staff can’t find a code for this product. Can you help?

A. Normally, you would report injection using a Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) “J” code, but there is no code for this new product yet. That leaves you with 3 coding options:

  • Report J3490 (Unclassified drug), but also submit the National Drug Code (NDC) number to identify the injection
  • Report 99070 (Supplies and materials [except spectacles], provided by the physician over and above those usually included with the office visit or other services rendered [list drugs, trays, supplies, or materials provided]) and be sure to indicate the NDC number
  • Report the existing code for a noncontraceptive dosage of Depo-Provera (J1051) multiplied by a quantity of 2 (J1051 is for a 50-mg dosage).
I recommend that you use the last option only if the payer insists that you submit a “J” code for injection but will not accept the “J” code for an unclassified drug.
Issue
OBG Management - 19(04)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(04)
Page Number
78-78
Page Number
78-78
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair? ... No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation
Display Headline
Is it “major” or “minor” dehiscence repair? ... No new code for new Depo-Provera formulation
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt; Witt
Legacy Keywords
coding; reimbursement; practice management; Melanie Witt; Witt
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

EXCLUSIVELY ON THE WEBCo-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier ... Delay doesn't change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:54
Display Headline
EXCLUSIVELY ON THE WEB
Co-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier ... Delay doesn't change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion

Co-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier

Q. I was called in to provide intraoperative consultation for a neighboring general surgeon. He had performed an exploratory laparotomy, and the only finding was a pedunculated fibroid. I performed a myomectomy, assisted by the general surgeon. He had begun the procedure with his physician assistant and finished assisted by the PA after I finished my part. What is the best way to code for this situation?

A. Under CPT guidelines that were clarified in the American Medical Association’s May 1997 “CPT Assistant,” this is a co-surgery case because (1) establishing the operative site and exploration are integral to the procedure and (2) you both performed a distinct part of the procedure. You and the general surgeon would use the same surgical code with a modifier -62 [Two surgeons]. Your code choice for this procedure would be 58140 [Myomectomy, excision of fibroid tumor(s) of uterus, 1 to 4 intramural myoma(s) with total weight of 250 grams or less and/or removal of surface myomas; abdominal approach].

The general surgeon should also bill for the surgical assistant services of the PA by adding a modifier AS [Physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist services for assistant at surgery] to this same surgical code. Some payers might deny an assistant in a co-surgery case, but the documentation in this situation would support the need because the PA assisted only when you were not present.

Delay doesn’t change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion

Q. I recently performed a suction D&C for an incomplete voluntary abortion done 2 months ago that was hemorrhaging and had retained products of conception. Our billing department coded this as 59840, but the payer rejected the claim, stating that they already paid the hospital for 59812, which I thought was reported only for a spontaneous abortion. Should we refile?

A. Yes. At this point, you are removing retained products of conception no matter what the patient intended 2 months ago. This means that you are performing a surgical treatment of an incomplete abortion, coded 59812. Code 59840 implies that you are the one inducing the abortion at this surgical session—not the case.

The diagnosis for bleeding after an abortion performed at a previous surgery is 639.1.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(03)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
e1-e1
Legacy Keywords
coding; documentation; reimbursement; CPT; Melanie Witt;RN; Witt M; Melanie Witt
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Co-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier

Q. I was called in to provide intraoperative consultation for a neighboring general surgeon. He had performed an exploratory laparotomy, and the only finding was a pedunculated fibroid. I performed a myomectomy, assisted by the general surgeon. He had begun the procedure with his physician assistant and finished assisted by the PA after I finished my part. What is the best way to code for this situation?

A. Under CPT guidelines that were clarified in the American Medical Association’s May 1997 “CPT Assistant,” this is a co-surgery case because (1) establishing the operative site and exploration are integral to the procedure and (2) you both performed a distinct part of the procedure. You and the general surgeon would use the same surgical code with a modifier -62 [Two surgeons]. Your code choice for this procedure would be 58140 [Myomectomy, excision of fibroid tumor(s) of uterus, 1 to 4 intramural myoma(s) with total weight of 250 grams or less and/or removal of surface myomas; abdominal approach].

The general surgeon should also bill for the surgical assistant services of the PA by adding a modifier AS [Physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist services for assistant at surgery] to this same surgical code. Some payers might deny an assistant in a co-surgery case, but the documentation in this situation would support the need because the PA assisted only when you were not present.

Delay doesn’t change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion

Q. I recently performed a suction D&C for an incomplete voluntary abortion done 2 months ago that was hemorrhaging and had retained products of conception. Our billing department coded this as 59840, but the payer rejected the claim, stating that they already paid the hospital for 59812, which I thought was reported only for a spontaneous abortion. Should we refile?

A. Yes. At this point, you are removing retained products of conception no matter what the patient intended 2 months ago. This means that you are performing a surgical treatment of an incomplete abortion, coded 59812. Code 59840 implies that you are the one inducing the abortion at this surgical session—not the case.

The diagnosis for bleeding after an abortion performed at a previous surgery is 639.1.

Co-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier

Q. I was called in to provide intraoperative consultation for a neighboring general surgeon. He had performed an exploratory laparotomy, and the only finding was a pedunculated fibroid. I performed a myomectomy, assisted by the general surgeon. He had begun the procedure with his physician assistant and finished assisted by the PA after I finished my part. What is the best way to code for this situation?

A. Under CPT guidelines that were clarified in the American Medical Association’s May 1997 “CPT Assistant,” this is a co-surgery case because (1) establishing the operative site and exploration are integral to the procedure and (2) you both performed a distinct part of the procedure. You and the general surgeon would use the same surgical code with a modifier -62 [Two surgeons]. Your code choice for this procedure would be 58140 [Myomectomy, excision of fibroid tumor(s) of uterus, 1 to 4 intramural myoma(s) with total weight of 250 grams or less and/or removal of surface myomas; abdominal approach].

The general surgeon should also bill for the surgical assistant services of the PA by adding a modifier AS [Physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist services for assistant at surgery] to this same surgical code. Some payers might deny an assistant in a co-surgery case, but the documentation in this situation would support the need because the PA assisted only when you were not present.

Delay doesn’t change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion

Q. I recently performed a suction D&C for an incomplete voluntary abortion done 2 months ago that was hemorrhaging and had retained products of conception. Our billing department coded this as 59840, but the payer rejected the claim, stating that they already paid the hospital for 59812, which I thought was reported only for a spontaneous abortion. Should we refile?

A. Yes. At this point, you are removing retained products of conception no matter what the patient intended 2 months ago. This means that you are performing a surgical treatment of an incomplete abortion, coded 59812. Code 59840 implies that you are the one inducing the abortion at this surgical session—not the case.

The diagnosis for bleeding after an abortion performed at a previous surgery is 639.1.

Issue
OBG Management - 19(03)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(03)
Page Number
e1-e1
Page Number
e1-e1
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
EXCLUSIVELY ON THE WEB
Co-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier ... Delay doesn't change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion
Display Headline
EXCLUSIVELY ON THE WEB
Co-surgery: Both surgeons bill, with modifier ... Delay doesn't change coding for surgical tx of incomplete abortion
Legacy Keywords
coding; documentation; reimbursement; CPT; Melanie Witt;RN; Witt M; Melanie Witt
Legacy Keywords
coding; documentation; reimbursement; CPT; Melanie Witt;RN; Witt M; Melanie Witt
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures ... Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:54
Display Headline
Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures ... Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe

Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures

Q. I have been injecting lidocaine in a grid pattern into the vulvar area of some of my patients to treat vestibulitis. Is there a specific CPT code for this procedure?

A. Although CPT includes codes for injection into nerves [eg, 64430, Injection, anesthetic agent; pudendal nerve], lesions [eg, 11900, Injection, intralesional; up to and including seven lesions], and trigger-point muscles [eg, 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), one or two muscle(s)], it appears that the local anesthetic you are injecting is being placed subcutaneously. This means that code 90772 [Therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic injection (specify substance or drug); subcutaneous or intramuscular] is the correct code.

What may present a problem, however, is that you are administering lidocaine in several areas of the vulva. Many payers have a unit limitation for the number of injections you can bill at one time; if you use the same syringe and needle for injection at multiple sites, the payer may decide to reimburse for only a single injection.

Some practices have been successful in getting fair reimbursement by billing code 58999 [Unlisted procedure, female genital system (nonobstetrical)] for this treatment.

If you will be billing the injection procedure instead, note that the “J” code for lidocaine was deleted in 2006. To bill for lidocaine, report J3490 [Unclassified drugs]. Lidocaine would be included as a supply with code 58999 and therefore not separately billable.

Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe

Q. When a procedure (such as hysteroscopy) has no global days and the decision to perform the surgery was made at a previous visit (perhaps days or weeks before the procedure), can we bill a preoperative visit that is made the week of the surgery? This visit involves talking to the patient to answer any additional questions, taking a history and performing a physical exam, providing preadmission and preoperative instructions, and having her sign the informed consent form.

A. There isn’t any black-and-white answer; the payer determines the coverage. Many payers consider the service that you are describing integral to performing any surgery and therefore included in the billing for the procedure—especially if the visit occurred within 48 hours before planned surgery.

Some payers will reimburse for this visit, however, and you owe it to them to indicate the nature of the visit. This means that you should not provide a diagnosis code for the visit that is the actual reason for doing the surgery; instead, code V72.83 [other specified preop exam] or V72.84 [unspecified preop exam]. This allows the payer to apply its policy on this matter. A payer that includes the preop exam will deny the claim; one that doesn’t, will reimburse you.

There’s more Adviser for you on the Web

One surgery, two surgeons: How do both code to be reimbursed? Find the answer and read more “Reimbursement Adviser” on the Web at www.obgmanagement.com

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(03)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
71-71
Legacy Keywords
coding; documentation; reimbursement; CPT; Melanie Witt;RN; Witt M; Melanie Witt
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures

Q. I have been injecting lidocaine in a grid pattern into the vulvar area of some of my patients to treat vestibulitis. Is there a specific CPT code for this procedure?

A. Although CPT includes codes for injection into nerves [eg, 64430, Injection, anesthetic agent; pudendal nerve], lesions [eg, 11900, Injection, intralesional; up to and including seven lesions], and trigger-point muscles [eg, 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), one or two muscle(s)], it appears that the local anesthetic you are injecting is being placed subcutaneously. This means that code 90772 [Therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic injection (specify substance or drug); subcutaneous or intramuscular] is the correct code.

What may present a problem, however, is that you are administering lidocaine in several areas of the vulva. Many payers have a unit limitation for the number of injections you can bill at one time; if you use the same syringe and needle for injection at multiple sites, the payer may decide to reimburse for only a single injection.

Some practices have been successful in getting fair reimbursement by billing code 58999 [Unlisted procedure, female genital system (nonobstetrical)] for this treatment.

If you will be billing the injection procedure instead, note that the “J” code for lidocaine was deleted in 2006. To bill for lidocaine, report J3490 [Unclassified drugs]. Lidocaine would be included as a supply with code 58999 and therefore not separately billable.

Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe

Q. When a procedure (such as hysteroscopy) has no global days and the decision to perform the surgery was made at a previous visit (perhaps days or weeks before the procedure), can we bill a preoperative visit that is made the week of the surgery? This visit involves talking to the patient to answer any additional questions, taking a history and performing a physical exam, providing preadmission and preoperative instructions, and having her sign the informed consent form.

A. There isn’t any black-and-white answer; the payer determines the coverage. Many payers consider the service that you are describing integral to performing any surgery and therefore included in the billing for the procedure—especially if the visit occurred within 48 hours before planned surgery.

Some payers will reimburse for this visit, however, and you owe it to them to indicate the nature of the visit. This means that you should not provide a diagnosis code for the visit that is the actual reason for doing the surgery; instead, code V72.83 [other specified preop exam] or V72.84 [unspecified preop exam]. This allows the payer to apply its policy on this matter. A payer that includes the preop exam will deny the claim; one that doesn’t, will reimburse you.

There’s more Adviser for you on the Web

One surgery, two surgeons: How do both code to be reimbursed? Find the answer and read more “Reimbursement Adviser” on the Web at www.obgmanagement.com

Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures

Q. I have been injecting lidocaine in a grid pattern into the vulvar area of some of my patients to treat vestibulitis. Is there a specific CPT code for this procedure?

A. Although CPT includes codes for injection into nerves [eg, 64430, Injection, anesthetic agent; pudendal nerve], lesions [eg, 11900, Injection, intralesional; up to and including seven lesions], and trigger-point muscles [eg, 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), one or two muscle(s)], it appears that the local anesthetic you are injecting is being placed subcutaneously. This means that code 90772 [Therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic injection (specify substance or drug); subcutaneous or intramuscular] is the correct code.

What may present a problem, however, is that you are administering lidocaine in several areas of the vulva. Many payers have a unit limitation for the number of injections you can bill at one time; if you use the same syringe and needle for injection at multiple sites, the payer may decide to reimburse for only a single injection.

Some practices have been successful in getting fair reimbursement by billing code 58999 [Unlisted procedure, female genital system (nonobstetrical)] for this treatment.

If you will be billing the injection procedure instead, note that the “J” code for lidocaine was deleted in 2006. To bill for lidocaine, report J3490 [Unclassified drugs]. Lidocaine would be included as a supply with code 58999 and therefore not separately billable.

Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe

Q. When a procedure (such as hysteroscopy) has no global days and the decision to perform the surgery was made at a previous visit (perhaps days or weeks before the procedure), can we bill a preoperative visit that is made the week of the surgery? This visit involves talking to the patient to answer any additional questions, taking a history and performing a physical exam, providing preadmission and preoperative instructions, and having her sign the informed consent form.

A. There isn’t any black-and-white answer; the payer determines the coverage. Many payers consider the service that you are describing integral to performing any surgery and therefore included in the billing for the procedure—especially if the visit occurred within 48 hours before planned surgery.

Some payers will reimburse for this visit, however, and you owe it to them to indicate the nature of the visit. This means that you should not provide a diagnosis code for the visit that is the actual reason for doing the surgery; instead, code V72.83 [other specified preop exam] or V72.84 [unspecified preop exam]. This allows the payer to apply its policy on this matter. A payer that includes the preop exam will deny the claim; one that doesn’t, will reimburse you.

There’s more Adviser for you on the Web

One surgery, two surgeons: How do both code to be reimbursed? Find the answer and read more “Reimbursement Adviser” on the Web at www.obgmanagement.com

Issue
OBG Management - 19(03)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(03)
Page Number
71-71
Page Number
71-71
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures ... Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe
Display Headline
Multisite injection might not be reimbursed as multiple procedures ... Split preop visit from surgery? Maybe
Legacy Keywords
coding; documentation; reimbursement; CPT; Melanie Witt;RN; Witt M; Melanie Witt
Legacy Keywords
coding; documentation; reimbursement; CPT; Melanie Witt;RN; Witt M; Melanie Witt
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty ... Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:53
Display Headline
Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty ... Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified

Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty

Q I performed a McCall culdoplasty following vaginal hysterectomy, but the insurance company denied payment for the culdoplasty, stating that this procedure is included in the hysterectomy. How do I appeal?

ADenial could take place only if the incorrect code combination was billed. For example, if your billing staff itemized the procedures by reporting 58260 for the vaginal hysterectomy and 57268 [Repair of enterocele, vaginal approach (separate procedure)], then the enterocele repair (McCall) would be denied as inclusive, as these two codes are bundled. But they are bundled because there are 4 codes that combine enterocele repair with vaginal hysterectomy, depending on the documented weight of the uterus and whether you took, or left, the tubes and ovaries.

Your code choices are:

58263 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with removal of tube(s), and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele

58270 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with repair of enterocele

58292 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele

58294 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with repair of enterocele

Don’t blame your billing staff if this is what occurred. The term “McCall culdoplasty” appears nowhere in the CPT book, so your billers would need to know that you actually performed an enterocele repair.

Correctly communicating what you did is an important step in getting the claim paid in a timely manner. Refile with the correct code!

Read a description of the technique of McCall culdoplasty.

Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified

Q Regarding ultrasonography (US) codes 76856 and 76857, are these codes for an abdominal or a vaginal approach? Recently, we scanned a patient transvaginally for a complete US study (uterine, ovary, stripe, etc) but could not determine which code to use. My understanding has been that code 76830 is for a limited transvaginal scan.

ACodes 76856 [Ultrasound, pelvic (nonobstetric), B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; complete] and 76857 [Ultrasound…; limited or follow-up (eg, for follicles)] describe a transabdominal approach. If you performed a complete transvaginal scan, the code would be 76830, which is not a limited scan. In fact, the physician work relative value units assigned to these codes are identical, at .69. The only code for a limited gynecologic US would be 76857. If you performed a limited US by a vaginal approach, however, you can bill 76830 with a modifier -52 (reduced services) added to indicate that you did not perform a complete scan.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(02)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
73-73
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty

Q I performed a McCall culdoplasty following vaginal hysterectomy, but the insurance company denied payment for the culdoplasty, stating that this procedure is included in the hysterectomy. How do I appeal?

ADenial could take place only if the incorrect code combination was billed. For example, if your billing staff itemized the procedures by reporting 58260 for the vaginal hysterectomy and 57268 [Repair of enterocele, vaginal approach (separate procedure)], then the enterocele repair (McCall) would be denied as inclusive, as these two codes are bundled. But they are bundled because there are 4 codes that combine enterocele repair with vaginal hysterectomy, depending on the documented weight of the uterus and whether you took, or left, the tubes and ovaries.

Your code choices are:

58263 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with removal of tube(s), and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele

58270 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with repair of enterocele

58292 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele

58294 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with repair of enterocele

Don’t blame your billing staff if this is what occurred. The term “McCall culdoplasty” appears nowhere in the CPT book, so your billers would need to know that you actually performed an enterocele repair.

Correctly communicating what you did is an important step in getting the claim paid in a timely manner. Refile with the correct code!

Read a description of the technique of McCall culdoplasty.

Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified

Q Regarding ultrasonography (US) codes 76856 and 76857, are these codes for an abdominal or a vaginal approach? Recently, we scanned a patient transvaginally for a complete US study (uterine, ovary, stripe, etc) but could not determine which code to use. My understanding has been that code 76830 is for a limited transvaginal scan.

ACodes 76856 [Ultrasound, pelvic (nonobstetric), B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; complete] and 76857 [Ultrasound…; limited or follow-up (eg, for follicles)] describe a transabdominal approach. If you performed a complete transvaginal scan, the code would be 76830, which is not a limited scan. In fact, the physician work relative value units assigned to these codes are identical, at .69. The only code for a limited gynecologic US would be 76857. If you performed a limited US by a vaginal approach, however, you can bill 76830 with a modifier -52 (reduced services) added to indicate that you did not perform a complete scan.

Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty

Q I performed a McCall culdoplasty following vaginal hysterectomy, but the insurance company denied payment for the culdoplasty, stating that this procedure is included in the hysterectomy. How do I appeal?

ADenial could take place only if the incorrect code combination was billed. For example, if your billing staff itemized the procedures by reporting 58260 for the vaginal hysterectomy and 57268 [Repair of enterocele, vaginal approach (separate procedure)], then the enterocele repair (McCall) would be denied as inclusive, as these two codes are bundled. But they are bundled because there are 4 codes that combine enterocele repair with vaginal hysterectomy, depending on the documented weight of the uterus and whether you took, or left, the tubes and ovaries.

Your code choices are:

58263 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with removal of tube(s), and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele

58270 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less; with repair of enterocele

58292 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s), with repair of enterocele

58294 Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with repair of enterocele

Don’t blame your billing staff if this is what occurred. The term “McCall culdoplasty” appears nowhere in the CPT book, so your billers would need to know that you actually performed an enterocele repair.

Correctly communicating what you did is an important step in getting the claim paid in a timely manner. Refile with the correct code!

Read a description of the technique of McCall culdoplasty.

Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified

Q Regarding ultrasonography (US) codes 76856 and 76857, are these codes for an abdominal or a vaginal approach? Recently, we scanned a patient transvaginally for a complete US study (uterine, ovary, stripe, etc) but could not determine which code to use. My understanding has been that code 76830 is for a limited transvaginal scan.

ACodes 76856 [Ultrasound, pelvic (nonobstetric), B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; complete] and 76857 [Ultrasound…; limited or follow-up (eg, for follicles)] describe a transabdominal approach. If you performed a complete transvaginal scan, the code would be 76830, which is not a limited scan. In fact, the physician work relative value units assigned to these codes are identical, at .69. The only code for a limited gynecologic US would be 76857. If you performed a limited US by a vaginal approach, however, you can bill 76830 with a modifier -52 (reduced services) added to indicate that you did not perform a complete scan.

Issue
OBG Management - 19(02)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(02)
Page Number
73-73
Page Number
73-73
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty ... Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified
Display Headline
Avoid confusion over terms when billing McCall culdoplasty ... Complete and transvaginal US scan must be specified
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

CPT 2007: What’s in it for you?

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 11:02
Display Headline
CPT 2007: What’s in it for you?

ObGyns stand to benefit from new Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that capture more of the specifics of procedures such as laparoscopic hysterectomy, and provide codes for newer kinds of services such as prenatal nuchal translucency screening and genetic counseling. A downside for 2007—getting accustomed to the renumbered codes for bone density and breast imaging.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy codes get specific

58541 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less

58542 …with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)

58543 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus greater than
250 g

58544 …with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)

Nuchal translucency: Document the detail

76813 Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, 1st-trimester fetal nuchal translucency measurement, transabdominal or transvaginal approach; single or 1st gestation

76814 …each additional gestation

Reimbursement should become routine for 1st-trimester nuchal translucency ultrasound imaging.

Coding has been a challenge; in fact, ACOG only recommended reporting the unlisted code 76999 (unlisted ultrasound procedure [eg, diagnostic, interventional]), which requires submission of documentation to make the case for payment. The test is normally performed between 11 and 13 weeks’ gestation.

 

When measured correctly, nuchal translucency thickness is a powerful marker in Down syndrome screening in the late first trimester

 
 

Even when the payer does not require it, documentation is important. Nuchal translucency ultrasound documentation should include:


  • the fetal crown–rump length
  • verification of the sagittal view of the fetal spine
  • 3 measurements of the maximum thickness of the subcutaneous translucency between the skin and the soft tissue overlying the cervical spine
  • as with all ultrasound procedures, image documentation and a final written report

Special training is required by the sonographer or physician who performs this measurement. So be aware that the payer may have rules to ensure such training.

Different codes for initial and recurrent cancer

58950 Resection (initial) of ovarian, tubal or primary peritoneal malignancy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and omentectomy

Primary malignancy resections will continue to be reported with the existing code numbers 58950 through 58952. To make the point clear, CPT revised the wording of the base code, 58950, to specify the initial operation.

58957 Resection (tumor debulking) of recurrent ovarian, tubal, primary peritoneal, uterine malignancy (intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal tumors), with omentectomy, if performed

58958 …with pelvic lymphadenectomy

Unlike other codes for malignancy in the female genitourinary section of CPT, the above 2 new codes specify a broader range of cancers to include uterine malignancy.

Previously, code 49200 or code 49201 (excision or destruction, open, intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors or cysts or endometriomas) would have been as reported for recurrent uterine malignancy.

Do not report these codes in addition: 38770 and 38780 (removal of pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodes), 44005 (enterolysis), 49000 (exploratory laparotomy), 49200–49215 (open excision of tumors), 49255 (omentectomy), or 58900–58960 (removal of tubes and ovaries).

New technologies

Uterine artery embolization

37210 Uterine artery embolization

The new code includes vascular access, vessel selection, injection of the material, intraprocedure mapping, and all radiological supervision and interpretation, including image guidance.

Genetic counseling

96040 Medical genetics and genetic counseling services, each 30 minutes face-to-face with patient/family

This code is good news for practices that use the services of a genetic counselor. Need, content, and total time must be documented in the report. However, Medicare has assigned no physician relative value units to this new code because they consider it bundled into any E/M service. Check with your payers about separate reimbursement for this service.

 OLDNEW
BONE DENSITY
CT, bone mineral density study 1 or more sites  
Axial skeleton (eg, hips, pelvis, spine)7606077078
Appendicular skeleton (peripheral) (eg, radius, wrist, heel)7606177079
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bone-density study 1 or more sites  
Axial skeleton7606577080
Appendicular skeleton7606777081
Vertebral fracture assessment7607777082
Radiographic absorptiometry (eg, photodensitometry, radiogrammetry) 1 or more sites7607877083
MAMMOGRAPHY
Unilateral7609077055
Bilateral7609177056
Screening mammography, bilateral (2-view film study of each breast)7609277057
INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND
Ultrasound guidance, intraoperative7698676998

Smoking cessation: Start the meter after 3 minutes

Elizabeth W. Woodcock

Atlanta-based Elizabeth W. Woodcock is a speaker, trainer, and author specializing in practice management. Among her recent books is Mastering Patient Flow.

It’s likely you counsel your patients about smoking cessation at least once a day, if not more. Do you know that you can be reimbursed for this important service? Medicare and Medicaid pay for 8 visits annually in a 12-month period, and other payers are rapidly following suit. In 2005, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added procedure codes for intermediate and intensive smoking cessation visits:

G0375 Smoking and tobacco-use cessation counseling visit; intermediate, greater than 3 minutes up to 10 minutes.

Short descriptor Smoke/tobacco counseling 3-10

G0376 Smoking and tobacco-use cessation visit; intensive, greater than 10 minutes.

Short descriptor Smoke/tobacco counseling greater than 10

G0375 pays approximately $13; G0376 pays approximately $25. The exact payment depends on your geographic practice cost index (GPCI) as determined by CMS.

These codes do not modify coverage for minimal smoking cessation counseling (3 minutes or less in duration), which is considered covered as part of each evaluation and management (E/M) visit, and therefore is not separately billable.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Smoking cessation: Start the meter after 3 minutes

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 19(01)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
66-72
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Smoking cessation: Start the meter after 3 minutes

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Smoking cessation: Start the meter after 3 minutes

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

ObGyns stand to benefit from new Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that capture more of the specifics of procedures such as laparoscopic hysterectomy, and provide codes for newer kinds of services such as prenatal nuchal translucency screening and genetic counseling. A downside for 2007—getting accustomed to the renumbered codes for bone density and breast imaging.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy codes get specific

58541 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less

58542 …with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)

58543 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus greater than
250 g

58544 …with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)

Nuchal translucency: Document the detail

76813 Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, 1st-trimester fetal nuchal translucency measurement, transabdominal or transvaginal approach; single or 1st gestation

76814 …each additional gestation

Reimbursement should become routine for 1st-trimester nuchal translucency ultrasound imaging.

Coding has been a challenge; in fact, ACOG only recommended reporting the unlisted code 76999 (unlisted ultrasound procedure [eg, diagnostic, interventional]), which requires submission of documentation to make the case for payment. The test is normally performed between 11 and 13 weeks’ gestation.

 

When measured correctly, nuchal translucency thickness is a powerful marker in Down syndrome screening in the late first trimester

 
 

Even when the payer does not require it, documentation is important. Nuchal translucency ultrasound documentation should include:


  • the fetal crown–rump length
  • verification of the sagittal view of the fetal spine
  • 3 measurements of the maximum thickness of the subcutaneous translucency between the skin and the soft tissue overlying the cervical spine
  • as with all ultrasound procedures, image documentation and a final written report

Special training is required by the sonographer or physician who performs this measurement. So be aware that the payer may have rules to ensure such training.

Different codes for initial and recurrent cancer

58950 Resection (initial) of ovarian, tubal or primary peritoneal malignancy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and omentectomy

Primary malignancy resections will continue to be reported with the existing code numbers 58950 through 58952. To make the point clear, CPT revised the wording of the base code, 58950, to specify the initial operation.

58957 Resection (tumor debulking) of recurrent ovarian, tubal, primary peritoneal, uterine malignancy (intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal tumors), with omentectomy, if performed

58958 …with pelvic lymphadenectomy

Unlike other codes for malignancy in the female genitourinary section of CPT, the above 2 new codes specify a broader range of cancers to include uterine malignancy.

Previously, code 49200 or code 49201 (excision or destruction, open, intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors or cysts or endometriomas) would have been as reported for recurrent uterine malignancy.

Do not report these codes in addition: 38770 and 38780 (removal of pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodes), 44005 (enterolysis), 49000 (exploratory laparotomy), 49200–49215 (open excision of tumors), 49255 (omentectomy), or 58900–58960 (removal of tubes and ovaries).

New technologies

Uterine artery embolization

37210 Uterine artery embolization

The new code includes vascular access, vessel selection, injection of the material, intraprocedure mapping, and all radiological supervision and interpretation, including image guidance.

Genetic counseling

96040 Medical genetics and genetic counseling services, each 30 minutes face-to-face with patient/family

This code is good news for practices that use the services of a genetic counselor. Need, content, and total time must be documented in the report. However, Medicare has assigned no physician relative value units to this new code because they consider it bundled into any E/M service. Check with your payers about separate reimbursement for this service.

 OLDNEW
BONE DENSITY
CT, bone mineral density study 1 or more sites  
Axial skeleton (eg, hips, pelvis, spine)7606077078
Appendicular skeleton (peripheral) (eg, radius, wrist, heel)7606177079
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bone-density study 1 or more sites  
Axial skeleton7606577080
Appendicular skeleton7606777081
Vertebral fracture assessment7607777082
Radiographic absorptiometry (eg, photodensitometry, radiogrammetry) 1 or more sites7607877083
MAMMOGRAPHY
Unilateral7609077055
Bilateral7609177056
Screening mammography, bilateral (2-view film study of each breast)7609277057
INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND
Ultrasound guidance, intraoperative7698676998

Smoking cessation: Start the meter after 3 minutes

Elizabeth W. Woodcock

Atlanta-based Elizabeth W. Woodcock is a speaker, trainer, and author specializing in practice management. Among her recent books is Mastering Patient Flow.

It’s likely you counsel your patients about smoking cessation at least once a day, if not more. Do you know that you can be reimbursed for this important service? Medicare and Medicaid pay for 8 visits annually in a 12-month period, and other payers are rapidly following suit. In 2005, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added procedure codes for intermediate and intensive smoking cessation visits:

G0375 Smoking and tobacco-use cessation counseling visit; intermediate, greater than 3 minutes up to 10 minutes.

Short descriptor Smoke/tobacco counseling 3-10

G0376 Smoking and tobacco-use cessation visit; intensive, greater than 10 minutes.

Short descriptor Smoke/tobacco counseling greater than 10

G0375 pays approximately $13; G0376 pays approximately $25. The exact payment depends on your geographic practice cost index (GPCI) as determined by CMS.

These codes do not modify coverage for minimal smoking cessation counseling (3 minutes or less in duration), which is considered covered as part of each evaluation and management (E/M) visit, and therefore is not separately billable.

ObGyns stand to benefit from new Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that capture more of the specifics of procedures such as laparoscopic hysterectomy, and provide codes for newer kinds of services such as prenatal nuchal translucency screening and genetic counseling. A downside for 2007—getting accustomed to the renumbered codes for bone density and breast imaging.

Laparoscopic hysterectomy codes get specific

58541 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus 250 g or less

58542 …with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)

58543 Laparoscopy, surgical, supracervical hysterectomy, for uterus greater than
250 g

58544 …with removal of tube(s) and/or ovary(s)

Nuchal translucency: Document the detail

76813 Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, real time with image documentation, 1st-trimester fetal nuchal translucency measurement, transabdominal or transvaginal approach; single or 1st gestation

76814 …each additional gestation

Reimbursement should become routine for 1st-trimester nuchal translucency ultrasound imaging.

Coding has been a challenge; in fact, ACOG only recommended reporting the unlisted code 76999 (unlisted ultrasound procedure [eg, diagnostic, interventional]), which requires submission of documentation to make the case for payment. The test is normally performed between 11 and 13 weeks’ gestation.

 

When measured correctly, nuchal translucency thickness is a powerful marker in Down syndrome screening in the late first trimester

 
 

Even when the payer does not require it, documentation is important. Nuchal translucency ultrasound documentation should include:


  • the fetal crown–rump length
  • verification of the sagittal view of the fetal spine
  • 3 measurements of the maximum thickness of the subcutaneous translucency between the skin and the soft tissue overlying the cervical spine
  • as with all ultrasound procedures, image documentation and a final written report

Special training is required by the sonographer or physician who performs this measurement. So be aware that the payer may have rules to ensure such training.

Different codes for initial and recurrent cancer

58950 Resection (initial) of ovarian, tubal or primary peritoneal malignancy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and omentectomy

Primary malignancy resections will continue to be reported with the existing code numbers 58950 through 58952. To make the point clear, CPT revised the wording of the base code, 58950, to specify the initial operation.

58957 Resection (tumor debulking) of recurrent ovarian, tubal, primary peritoneal, uterine malignancy (intra-abdominal, retroperitoneal tumors), with omentectomy, if performed

58958 …with pelvic lymphadenectomy

Unlike other codes for malignancy in the female genitourinary section of CPT, the above 2 new codes specify a broader range of cancers to include uterine malignancy.

Previously, code 49200 or code 49201 (excision or destruction, open, intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal tumors or cysts or endometriomas) would have been as reported for recurrent uterine malignancy.

Do not report these codes in addition: 38770 and 38780 (removal of pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodes), 44005 (enterolysis), 49000 (exploratory laparotomy), 49200–49215 (open excision of tumors), 49255 (omentectomy), or 58900–58960 (removal of tubes and ovaries).

New technologies

Uterine artery embolization

37210 Uterine artery embolization

The new code includes vascular access, vessel selection, injection of the material, intraprocedure mapping, and all radiological supervision and interpretation, including image guidance.

Genetic counseling

96040 Medical genetics and genetic counseling services, each 30 minutes face-to-face with patient/family

This code is good news for practices that use the services of a genetic counselor. Need, content, and total time must be documented in the report. However, Medicare has assigned no physician relative value units to this new code because they consider it bundled into any E/M service. Check with your payers about separate reimbursement for this service.

 OLDNEW
BONE DENSITY
CT, bone mineral density study 1 or more sites  
Axial skeleton (eg, hips, pelvis, spine)7606077078
Appendicular skeleton (peripheral) (eg, radius, wrist, heel)7606177079
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bone-density study 1 or more sites  
Axial skeleton7606577080
Appendicular skeleton7606777081
Vertebral fracture assessment7607777082
Radiographic absorptiometry (eg, photodensitometry, radiogrammetry) 1 or more sites7607877083
MAMMOGRAPHY
Unilateral7609077055
Bilateral7609177056
Screening mammography, bilateral (2-view film study of each breast)7609277057
INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND
Ultrasound guidance, intraoperative7698676998

Smoking cessation: Start the meter after 3 minutes

Elizabeth W. Woodcock

Atlanta-based Elizabeth W. Woodcock is a speaker, trainer, and author specializing in practice management. Among her recent books is Mastering Patient Flow.

It’s likely you counsel your patients about smoking cessation at least once a day, if not more. Do you know that you can be reimbursed for this important service? Medicare and Medicaid pay for 8 visits annually in a 12-month period, and other payers are rapidly following suit. In 2005, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) added procedure codes for intermediate and intensive smoking cessation visits:

G0375 Smoking and tobacco-use cessation counseling visit; intermediate, greater than 3 minutes up to 10 minutes.

Short descriptor Smoke/tobacco counseling 3-10

G0376 Smoking and tobacco-use cessation visit; intensive, greater than 10 minutes.

Short descriptor Smoke/tobacco counseling greater than 10

G0375 pays approximately $13; G0376 pays approximately $25. The exact payment depends on your geographic practice cost index (GPCI) as determined by CMS.

These codes do not modify coverage for minimal smoking cessation counseling (3 minutes or less in duration), which is considered covered as part of each evaluation and management (E/M) visit, and therefore is not separately billable.

Issue
OBG Management - 19(01)
Issue
OBG Management - 19(01)
Page Number
66-72
Page Number
66-72
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
CPT 2007: What’s in it for you?
Display Headline
CPT 2007: What’s in it for you?
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

2 procedures in 10 days will trigger bundling

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:53
Display Headline
2 procedures in 10 days will trigger bundling

Q Our patient is scheduled for a cesarean delivery, but the surgeon wants to excise a large keloid scar prior to the cesarean. How should this be coded?

A I am not sure by your question of the sequence or timing of events.

If the physician is taking the patient to surgery to do only the keloid excision, you have several codes to select from, depending on the type of closure. The excision of the keloid scar would be reported using 11400–11406 (Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs), where the code selected depends on the documented size of the scar removed.

If it is simple closure, no additional code is reported, but if the closure is either intermediate or complex, you will add a code from the repair section (12031–12037 or 13100–13102). But again the size in centimeters must be documented in order to use these codes.

Also remember that if the surgeon performs the cesarean within 10 days of the keloid excision, he/she will be in the global period for these codes and might have to use a modifier -79 (Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period) on the global OB code you report. If the keloid is excised at the time of the cesarean, it will be included by most payers as part of establishing the operative site and incision closure.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
85-86
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Q Our patient is scheduled for a cesarean delivery, but the surgeon wants to excise a large keloid scar prior to the cesarean. How should this be coded?

A I am not sure by your question of the sequence or timing of events.

If the physician is taking the patient to surgery to do only the keloid excision, you have several codes to select from, depending on the type of closure. The excision of the keloid scar would be reported using 11400–11406 (Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs), where the code selected depends on the documented size of the scar removed.

If it is simple closure, no additional code is reported, but if the closure is either intermediate or complex, you will add a code from the repair section (12031–12037 or 13100–13102). But again the size in centimeters must be documented in order to use these codes.

Also remember that if the surgeon performs the cesarean within 10 days of the keloid excision, he/she will be in the global period for these codes and might have to use a modifier -79 (Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period) on the global OB code you report. If the keloid is excised at the time of the cesarean, it will be included by most payers as part of establishing the operative site and incision closure.

Q Our patient is scheduled for a cesarean delivery, but the surgeon wants to excise a large keloid scar prior to the cesarean. How should this be coded?

A I am not sure by your question of the sequence or timing of events.

If the physician is taking the patient to surgery to do only the keloid excision, you have several codes to select from, depending on the type of closure. The excision of the keloid scar would be reported using 11400–11406 (Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs), where the code selected depends on the documented size of the scar removed.

If it is simple closure, no additional code is reported, but if the closure is either intermediate or complex, you will add a code from the repair section (12031–12037 or 13100–13102). But again the size in centimeters must be documented in order to use these codes.

Also remember that if the surgeon performs the cesarean within 10 days of the keloid excision, he/she will be in the global period for these codes and might have to use a modifier -79 (Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period) on the global OB code you report. If the keloid is excised at the time of the cesarean, it will be included by most payers as part of establishing the operative site and incision closure.

Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Page Number
85-86
Page Number
85-86
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
2 procedures in 10 days will trigger bundling
Display Headline
2 procedures in 10 days will trigger bundling
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Modifier needed to bill for anesthesia

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:53
Display Headline
Modifier needed to bill for anesthesia

Q An external cephalic version was performed on a breech baby as an outpatient procedure. I was told I could bill 01958 (Anesthesia for external cephalic version procedure) for the anesthesia, but have gotten an insurance denial because the “CPT and ICD logic do not match.” We used the diagnostic code 652.2. Are there some rules about anesthesia I should be aware of?

A There may be more than 1 problem here. First, the anesthesia codes are meant to be billed by the anesthesiologist, not the physician who is also performing the procedure. You have not indicated whether this was the case.

If you did perform the version procedure as well as providing the anesthesia to the patient, you would need to indicate this by adding a modifier -47 (Anesthesia by surgeon) to code 59412 (External cephalic version, with or without tocolysis). You would then report a 2nd code for the type of regional anesthesia you administered. For instance, if you used epidural anesthesia, you would report 59412-47, 62311 (Injection, single [not via indwelling catheter], not including neurolytic substances, with or without contrast [for either localization or epidurography], of diagnostic or therapeutic substance[s] [including anesthetic, antispasmodic, opioid, steroid, other solution], epidural or subarachnoid; lumbar, sacral [caudal]).

If you were only providing the anesthesia, then code 01958 is correct, but now the payer is indicating a mismatch between the CPT code and the diagnosis code.

You have indicated that you used code 652.2 (Breech presentation without mention of version). But as you are billing for anesthesia for a version, this code would no longer be correct. In this case, the more correct code would be 652.13 (Breech or other malpresentation successfully converted to cephalic presentation; antepartum condition or complication) if the version was successful or 652.03 (Unstable lie; antepartum condition or complication) if it was not.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
85-86
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Q An external cephalic version was performed on a breech baby as an outpatient procedure. I was told I could bill 01958 (Anesthesia for external cephalic version procedure) for the anesthesia, but have gotten an insurance denial because the “CPT and ICD logic do not match.” We used the diagnostic code 652.2. Are there some rules about anesthesia I should be aware of?

A There may be more than 1 problem here. First, the anesthesia codes are meant to be billed by the anesthesiologist, not the physician who is also performing the procedure. You have not indicated whether this was the case.

If you did perform the version procedure as well as providing the anesthesia to the patient, you would need to indicate this by adding a modifier -47 (Anesthesia by surgeon) to code 59412 (External cephalic version, with or without tocolysis). You would then report a 2nd code for the type of regional anesthesia you administered. For instance, if you used epidural anesthesia, you would report 59412-47, 62311 (Injection, single [not via indwelling catheter], not including neurolytic substances, with or without contrast [for either localization or epidurography], of diagnostic or therapeutic substance[s] [including anesthetic, antispasmodic, opioid, steroid, other solution], epidural or subarachnoid; lumbar, sacral [caudal]).

If you were only providing the anesthesia, then code 01958 is correct, but now the payer is indicating a mismatch between the CPT code and the diagnosis code.

You have indicated that you used code 652.2 (Breech presentation without mention of version). But as you are billing for anesthesia for a version, this code would no longer be correct. In this case, the more correct code would be 652.13 (Breech or other malpresentation successfully converted to cephalic presentation; antepartum condition or complication) if the version was successful or 652.03 (Unstable lie; antepartum condition or complication) if it was not.

Q An external cephalic version was performed on a breech baby as an outpatient procedure. I was told I could bill 01958 (Anesthesia for external cephalic version procedure) for the anesthesia, but have gotten an insurance denial because the “CPT and ICD logic do not match.” We used the diagnostic code 652.2. Are there some rules about anesthesia I should be aware of?

A There may be more than 1 problem here. First, the anesthesia codes are meant to be billed by the anesthesiologist, not the physician who is also performing the procedure. You have not indicated whether this was the case.

If you did perform the version procedure as well as providing the anesthesia to the patient, you would need to indicate this by adding a modifier -47 (Anesthesia by surgeon) to code 59412 (External cephalic version, with or without tocolysis). You would then report a 2nd code for the type of regional anesthesia you administered. For instance, if you used epidural anesthesia, you would report 59412-47, 62311 (Injection, single [not via indwelling catheter], not including neurolytic substances, with or without contrast [for either localization or epidurography], of diagnostic or therapeutic substance[s] [including anesthetic, antispasmodic, opioid, steroid, other solution], epidural or subarachnoid; lumbar, sacral [caudal]).

If you were only providing the anesthesia, then code 01958 is correct, but now the payer is indicating a mismatch between the CPT code and the diagnosis code.

You have indicated that you used code 652.2 (Breech presentation without mention of version). But as you are billing for anesthesia for a version, this code would no longer be correct. In this case, the more correct code would be 652.13 (Breech or other malpresentation successfully converted to cephalic presentation; antepartum condition or complication) if the version was successful or 652.03 (Unstable lie; antepartum condition or complication) if it was not.

Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Page Number
85-86
Page Number
85-86
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Modifier needed to bill for anesthesia
Display Headline
Modifier needed to bill for anesthesia
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Few payers deny unlisted procedures

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 08/28/2018 - 10:53
Display Headline
Few payers deny unlisted procedures

Q We plan to perform a laparoscopic right salpingo-oophorectomy and laparoscopic removal of the cervix. The patient had a previous laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and is now having abnormal bleeding and right lower quadrant pain. I know that the code for the RSO is 58661 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with removal of adnexal structures [partial or total oophorectomy and/or salpingectomy]), but how should we report the removal of the cervix?

A Although there is a CPT code for a trachelectomy (57530, Trachelectomy [cervicectomy], amputation of cervix [separate procedure]), this code cannot be reported because the procedure was performed laparoscopically. CPT rules dictate that correct coding would be an unlisted laparoscopic code.

2 options

This leaves you with 2 coding options. Because the cervix is part of the uterus, the code 58578 (Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, uterus) would be appropriate. If you choose this option, you would report 58661, 58578-51. Alternatively, you could add a modifier -22 (Unusual procedural services) to code 58661. Whichever option you choose, you will need to send documentation with the claim to explain the unlisted procedure or the additional work.

I prefer the first option because it will give you the opportunity to set your fee to account for the actual work performed.

Most payers will not deny unlisted procedures so long as they are not considered investigational or experimental, a concept that should not apply to this surgery.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
85-86
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Author and Disclosure Information

Melanie Witt, RN, CPC-OGS, MA
Independent coding and documentation consultant; former program manager, Department of Coding and Nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Article PDF
Article PDF

Q We plan to perform a laparoscopic right salpingo-oophorectomy and laparoscopic removal of the cervix. The patient had a previous laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and is now having abnormal bleeding and right lower quadrant pain. I know that the code for the RSO is 58661 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with removal of adnexal structures [partial or total oophorectomy and/or salpingectomy]), but how should we report the removal of the cervix?

A Although there is a CPT code for a trachelectomy (57530, Trachelectomy [cervicectomy], amputation of cervix [separate procedure]), this code cannot be reported because the procedure was performed laparoscopically. CPT rules dictate that correct coding would be an unlisted laparoscopic code.

2 options

This leaves you with 2 coding options. Because the cervix is part of the uterus, the code 58578 (Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, uterus) would be appropriate. If you choose this option, you would report 58661, 58578-51. Alternatively, you could add a modifier -22 (Unusual procedural services) to code 58661. Whichever option you choose, you will need to send documentation with the claim to explain the unlisted procedure or the additional work.

I prefer the first option because it will give you the opportunity to set your fee to account for the actual work performed.

Most payers will not deny unlisted procedures so long as they are not considered investigational or experimental, a concept that should not apply to this surgery.

Q We plan to perform a laparoscopic right salpingo-oophorectomy and laparoscopic removal of the cervix. The patient had a previous laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and is now having abnormal bleeding and right lower quadrant pain. I know that the code for the RSO is 58661 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with removal of adnexal structures [partial or total oophorectomy and/or salpingectomy]), but how should we report the removal of the cervix?

A Although there is a CPT code for a trachelectomy (57530, Trachelectomy [cervicectomy], amputation of cervix [separate procedure]), this code cannot be reported because the procedure was performed laparoscopically. CPT rules dictate that correct coding would be an unlisted laparoscopic code.

2 options

This leaves you with 2 coding options. Because the cervix is part of the uterus, the code 58578 (Unlisted laparoscopy procedure, uterus) would be appropriate. If you choose this option, you would report 58661, 58578-51. Alternatively, you could add a modifier -22 (Unusual procedural services) to code 58661. Whichever option you choose, you will need to send documentation with the claim to explain the unlisted procedure or the additional work.

I prefer the first option because it will give you the opportunity to set your fee to account for the actual work performed.

Most payers will not deny unlisted procedures so long as they are not considered investigational or experimental, a concept that should not apply to this surgery.

Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Issue
OBG Management - 18(11)
Page Number
85-86
Page Number
85-86
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Few payers deny unlisted procedures
Display Headline
Few payers deny unlisted procedures
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media