Sniegowski A

Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. The American Cancer Society estimated about 164,690 new cases of prostate cancer in 2018. Since opening its doors in 1932, the New Mexico VA Healthcare System (NMVAHCS) had not held a prostate cancer support group. A review of the literature suggests that older prostate cancer patients benefit from the continuous social support in face-toface support groups. In light of the American Cancer Society estimates and the predominately male population served at the NMVAHCS, of which nearly 1300 of these veterans are living with prostate cancer, the need for a support group warranted investigation.

Methods: A needs assessment was completed with 50 veterans diagnosed with prostate and receiving care in the Urology Section of the New Mexico VA Healthcare System. This assessment included a 3 question survey aimed at determining veteran awareness of the Albuquerque community prostate cancer support group, attendance at this support group and lastly if they would attend a veteran centered prostate cancer support group on the NMVAHCS campus.

Results: Of the 50 veterans surveyed, 40% were aware of the community based prostate cancer support group while 12% had actually attended a meeting. 60% of the respondents stated that they would attend a veterans-centered prostate cancer support group on the NMVAHCS campus. 50% of those who responded that they would not attend a meeting stated that they lived too far away from the main campus but would attend via a telehealth meeting at their local community based outpatient clinic (CBOC).

Conclusion: Based on the survey findings, the decision was made to launch a Veteran Center Prostate Cancer Support Group. Men Talking to Men about Prostate Cancer held its inaugural meeting June 6, 2018 and has continued to meet bi-monthly. Sessions are facilitated by the New Mexico Prostate Cancer Support Association and include a multidisciplinary presentation of issues common to the veteran prostate cancer patient as well as a physician led question and answer session.

Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. The American Cancer Society estimated about 164,690 new cases of prostate cancer in 2018. Since opening its doors in 1932, the New Mexico VA Healthcare System (NMVAHCS) had not held a prostate cancer support group. A review of the literature suggests that older prostate cancer patients benefit from the continuous social support in face-toface support groups. In light of the American Cancer Society estimates and the predominately male population served at the NMVAHCS, of which nearly 1300 of these veterans are living with prostate cancer, the need for a support group warranted investigation.

Methods: A needs assessment was completed with 50 veterans diagnosed with prostate and receiving care in the Urology Section of the New Mexico VA Healthcare System. This assessment included a 3 question survey aimed at determining veteran awareness of the Albuquerque community prostate cancer support group, attendance at this support group and lastly if they would attend a veteran centered prostate cancer support group on the NMVAHCS campus.

Results: Of the 50 veterans surveyed, 40% were aware of the community based prostate cancer support group while 12% had actually attended a meeting. 60% of the respondents stated that they would attend a veterans-centered prostate cancer support group on the NMVAHCS campus. 50% of those who responded that they would not attend a meeting stated that they lived too far away from the main campus but would attend via a telehealth meeting at their local community based outpatient clinic (CBOC).

Conclusion: Based on the survey findings, the decision was made to launch a Veteran Center Prostate Cancer Support Group. Men Talking to Men about Prostate Cancer held its inaugural meeting June 6, 2018 and has continued to meet bi-monthly. Sessions are facilitated by the New Mexico Prostate Cancer Support Association and include a multidisciplinary presentation of issues common to the veteran prostate cancer patient as well as a physician led question and answer session.

Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men. The American Cancer Society estimated about 164,690 new cases of prostate cancer in 2018. Since opening its doors in 1932, the New Mexico VA Healthcare System (NMVAHCS) had not held a prostate cancer support group. A review of the literature suggests that older prostate cancer patients benefit from the continuous social support in face-toface support groups. In light of the American Cancer Society estimates and the predominately male population served at the NMVAHCS, of which nearly 1300 of these veterans are living with prostate cancer, the need for a support group warranted investigation.

Methods: A needs assessment was completed with 50 veterans diagnosed with prostate and receiving care in the Urology Section of the New Mexico VA Healthcare System. This assessment included a 3 question survey aimed at determining veteran awareness of the Albuquerque community prostate cancer support group, attendance at this support group and lastly if they would attend a veteran centered prostate cancer support group on the NMVAHCS campus.

Results: Of the 50 veterans surveyed, 40% were aware of the community based prostate cancer support group while 12% had actually attended a meeting. 60% of the respondents stated that they would attend a veterans-centered prostate cancer support group on the NMVAHCS campus. 50% of those who responded that they would not attend a meeting stated that they lived too far away from the main campus but would attend via a telehealth meeting at their local community based outpatient clinic (CBOC).

Conclusion: Based on the survey findings, the decision was made to launch a Veteran Center Prostate Cancer Support Group. Men Talking to Men about Prostate Cancer held its inaugural meeting June 6, 2018 and has continued to meet bi-monthly. Sessions are facilitated by the New Mexico Prostate Cancer Support Association and include a multidisciplinary presentation of issues common to the veteran prostate cancer patient as well as a physician led question and answer session.

Introduction: The Commission on Cancer (COC), the New Mexico VA Health Care System (NMVAHCS) accrediting body for cancer care, mandates 25% of nurses maintain oncology nurse certification (OCN) to validate competency. However, the NMVAHCS remains deficient: threatening facility ability to maintain accreditation. Per the Oncology Nursing Certification Corporation, Albuquerque maintains 160 OCNs. However, 50% have retired and the remaining 50% are over 52. Leaving approximately 40 OCN nurses in a population of 500,000. This problem was not only a NMVAHCS problem, but a community problem: affecting quality of oncology care.

Problem: Not only is certification required for COC accredited facilities, it represents validation of expertise and skill set. Validation serves to build trust of Veterans, enables superior clinical judgment, and contributes to improved outcomes. With the Choice Program, many Veterans can leave the VAHCS. Certification serves to build necessary confidence required to keep Veterans within the VAHCS.

Methods: Barriers prohibiting certification were identified through survey of oncology nurses. Nurses reported fear related to failure, study material costs, exam fees, lack of mentors, and lack of internal leadership encouragement and support as barriers of certification. Funding was sought to provide a review course for 40 nurses, study guides, reimbursement of course and exam fees and held June 2017 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. A second review course, held during the 2017 AVAHO meeting, was conducted for another 24 nurses. The courses aimed to build confidence and decrease barriers. Both exceeded capacity.

Results: As a result of the Albuquerque course, VISN 22 and non-VA nurses attended from several states. Each received
a 30% reduction in exam fees and were eligible for exam reimbursement after passing: 50% of attendees are now OCNs.

The AVAHO course, to date, has resulted in an additional 2 OCNs, 2 certification renewals, and an additional 5 are registered for the exam. Those not taking the exam cite lack of leadership support and encouragement as the main
barrier.

Implications: Certification validates care provided and builds Veterans trust: necessary with Choice. Facilities that retain a strong foundation of OCNs, mentor staff, and maintain leadership support remain more apt to produce and sustain certified nurses. Therefore, leadership buy-in remains essential.

Introduction: The Commission on Cancer (COC), the New Mexico VA Health Care System (NMVAHCS) accrediting body for cancer care, mandates 25% of nurses maintain oncology nurse certification (OCN) to validate competency. However, the NMVAHCS remains deficient: threatening facility ability to maintain accreditation. Per the Oncology Nursing Certification Corporation, Albuquerque maintains 160 OCNs. However, 50% have retired and the remaining 50% are over 52. Leaving approximately 40 OCN nurses in a population of 500,000. This problem was not only a NMVAHCS problem, but a community problem: affecting quality of oncology care.

Problem: Not only is certification required for COC accredited facilities, it represents validation of expertise and skill set. Validation serves to build trust of Veterans, enables superior clinical judgment, and contributes to improved outcomes. With the Choice Program, many Veterans can leave the VAHCS. Certification serves to build necessary confidence required to keep Veterans within the VAHCS.

Methods: Barriers prohibiting certification were identified through survey of oncology nurses. Nurses reported fear related to failure, study material costs, exam fees, lack of mentors, and lack of internal leadership encouragement and support as barriers of certification. Funding was sought to provide a review course for 40 nurses, study guides, reimbursement of course and exam fees and held June 2017 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. A second review course, held during the 2017 AVAHO meeting, was conducted for another 24 nurses. The courses aimed to build confidence and decrease barriers. Both exceeded capacity.

Results: As a result of the Albuquerque course, VISN 22 and non-VA nurses attended from several states. Each received
a 30% reduction in exam fees and were eligible for exam reimbursement after passing: 50% of attendees are now OCNs.

The AVAHO course, to date, has resulted in an additional 2 OCNs, 2 certification renewals, and an additional 5 are registered for the exam. Those not taking the exam cite lack of leadership support and encouragement as the main
barrier.

Implications: Certification validates care provided and builds Veterans trust: necessary with Choice. Facilities that retain a strong foundation of OCNs, mentor staff, and maintain leadership support remain more apt to produce and sustain certified nurses. Therefore, leadership buy-in remains essential.

Introduction: The Commission on Cancer (COC), the New Mexico VA Health Care System (NMVAHCS) accrediting body for cancer care, mandates 25% of nurses maintain oncology nurse certification (OCN) to validate competency. However, the NMVAHCS remains deficient: threatening facility ability to maintain accreditation. Per the Oncology Nursing Certification Corporation, Albuquerque maintains 160 OCNs. However, 50% have retired and the remaining 50% are over 52. Leaving approximately 40 OCN nurses in a population of 500,000. This problem was not only a NMVAHCS problem, but a community problem: affecting quality of oncology care.

Problem: Not only is certification required for COC accredited facilities, it represents validation of expertise and skill set. Validation serves to build trust of Veterans, enables superior clinical judgment, and contributes to improved outcomes. With the Choice Program, many Veterans can leave the VAHCS. Certification serves to build necessary confidence required to keep Veterans within the VAHCS.

Methods: Barriers prohibiting certification were identified through survey of oncology nurses. Nurses reported fear related to failure, study material costs, exam fees, lack of mentors, and lack of internal leadership encouragement and support as barriers of certification. Funding was sought to provide a review course for 40 nurses, study guides, reimbursement of course and exam fees and held June 2017 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. A second review course, held during the 2017 AVAHO meeting, was conducted for another 24 nurses. The courses aimed to build confidence and decrease barriers. Both exceeded capacity.

Results: As a result of the Albuquerque course, VISN 22 and non-VA nurses attended from several states. Each received
a 30% reduction in exam fees and were eligible for exam reimbursement after passing: 50% of attendees are now OCNs.

The AVAHO course, to date, has resulted in an additional 2 OCNs, 2 certification renewals, and an additional 5 are registered for the exam. Those not taking the exam cite lack of leadership support and encouragement as the main
barrier.

Implications: Certification validates care provided and builds Veterans trust: necessary with Choice. Facilities that retain a strong foundation of OCNs, mentor staff, and maintain leadership support remain more apt to produce and sustain certified nurses. Therefore, leadership buy-in remains essential.