Meta-analyses are tricky
Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/06/2018 - 17:54
Display Headline
Acute viral bronchiolitis hospital stay not shortened by hypertonic saline

The results of two previously published meta-analyses supporting a shortening of hospital length of stay following the use of hypertonic saline in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis are unreliable, according to a study published in JAMA Pediatrics.

Hypertonic saline should not be expected to shorten the length of hospital stay for those with acute viral bronchiolitis in typical hospital settings in the United States, Dr. Corinne G. Brooks of the Leadership in Preventive Medicine and Pediatrics Residencies at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., and her associates concluded.

The investigators reached this conclusion after reanalyzing data from the 18 randomized clinical trials using hypertonic saline in infants with bronchiolitis reporting hospital length of stay as an outcome measure in the two previously published meta-analyses, after finding no additional data sources through a literature search. The studies included 2,063 infants (63% male), with a mean age of 4.2 months and a mean length of stay of 3.6 days (JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Apr 18. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0079).

Dr. Brooks explained the rationale behind the study by pointing out that the previously published analyses failed to address and account for the large amount of study heterogeneity in the assessed cohort of studies, necessitating a reanalysis of the full data set to investigate factors with the potential to introduce such heterogeneity.

The reanalysis produced two significant findings, which collectively accounted for all of the heterogeneity between the assessed studies. First, one of the study populations was determined to be a significant outlier with very different criteria for discharge and substantially longer expected hospital length of stay. Because the statistical significance of the weighted mean difference in hospital length of stay attributable to the use of hypertonic saline was sensitive to the removal of this study population, heterogeneity was found to resolve to moderate to acceptable levels. Second, an important baseline difference between the treatment arms in day of illness at study enrollment was found. Patients presenting later in their illness were more likely to be allocated to the hypertonic saline treatment arm in 6 of the 18 studies assessed, most of which were small positive studies. Therefore, this difference accounted for a systematic bias favoring treatment groups.

Based on their reanalysis of the available data, Dr. Brooks and her associates said that the appearance of a meaningful reduction in the length of hospital stay for infants with acute viral bronchiolitis was a direct result of the inappropriate combination of studies with clinically significant differences in outcome definitions, and the previously unnoticed systematic bias in treatment group allocation.

No external funding was provided. None of the authors reported any conflicts of interest.

References

Body

When infants below 1 year of age experience viral bronchiolitis, usually from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), they sometimes get admitted to hospital for supportive care. In hospital, the main goals are to reduce the work of breathing and tachypnea and increase oxygen saturation in the blood. In addition to supplemental oxygen, the use of hypertonic saline nebulizations has been proposed, studied, and endorsed by some investigators based on randomized trials.

Dr. Michael Pichichero

In this paper from a group at Dartmouth Medical Center, we learn that a recent conclusion of benefit from hypertonic saline nebulizations on hospital length of stay likely was incorrect. The authors correctly point out that meta-analysis is a tricky business because it relies on a reasonable homogeneity among the populations included in the individual studies. If there is heterogeneity, this can complicate interpretation, although there are statistical maneuvers that can help determine if the heterogeneity that is inherent in meta-analyses has a major impact on conclusions, as appears to have occurred here.

When we must hospitalize an infant with bronchiolitis for hypoxemia, it creates a lot of stress for the family. As physicians, we seek to do anything that might help get the child home sooner – thus the 18 studies published on trying hypertonic saline, with varied results. I suspect that this paper from the Dartmouth group will not end the debate or deter future research into treatments that might help these babies.

Michael E. Pichichero, M.D., a specialist in pediatric infectious diseases, is director of the Research Institute, Rochester (N.Y.) General Hospital. He is also a pediatrician at Legacy Pediatrics in Rochester. Dr. Pichichero commented in an interview. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Acute viral bronchiolitis, hospital stay, not shortened, hypertonic saline
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

When infants below 1 year of age experience viral bronchiolitis, usually from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), they sometimes get admitted to hospital for supportive care. In hospital, the main goals are to reduce the work of breathing and tachypnea and increase oxygen saturation in the blood. In addition to supplemental oxygen, the use of hypertonic saline nebulizations has been proposed, studied, and endorsed by some investigators based on randomized trials.

Dr. Michael Pichichero

In this paper from a group at Dartmouth Medical Center, we learn that a recent conclusion of benefit from hypertonic saline nebulizations on hospital length of stay likely was incorrect. The authors correctly point out that meta-analysis is a tricky business because it relies on a reasonable homogeneity among the populations included in the individual studies. If there is heterogeneity, this can complicate interpretation, although there are statistical maneuvers that can help determine if the heterogeneity that is inherent in meta-analyses has a major impact on conclusions, as appears to have occurred here.

When we must hospitalize an infant with bronchiolitis for hypoxemia, it creates a lot of stress for the family. As physicians, we seek to do anything that might help get the child home sooner – thus the 18 studies published on trying hypertonic saline, with varied results. I suspect that this paper from the Dartmouth group will not end the debate or deter future research into treatments that might help these babies.

Michael E. Pichichero, M.D., a specialist in pediatric infectious diseases, is director of the Research Institute, Rochester (N.Y.) General Hospital. He is also a pediatrician at Legacy Pediatrics in Rochester. Dr. Pichichero commented in an interview. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Body

When infants below 1 year of age experience viral bronchiolitis, usually from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), they sometimes get admitted to hospital for supportive care. In hospital, the main goals are to reduce the work of breathing and tachypnea and increase oxygen saturation in the blood. In addition to supplemental oxygen, the use of hypertonic saline nebulizations has been proposed, studied, and endorsed by some investigators based on randomized trials.

Dr. Michael Pichichero

In this paper from a group at Dartmouth Medical Center, we learn that a recent conclusion of benefit from hypertonic saline nebulizations on hospital length of stay likely was incorrect. The authors correctly point out that meta-analysis is a tricky business because it relies on a reasonable homogeneity among the populations included in the individual studies. If there is heterogeneity, this can complicate interpretation, although there are statistical maneuvers that can help determine if the heterogeneity that is inherent in meta-analyses has a major impact on conclusions, as appears to have occurred here.

When we must hospitalize an infant with bronchiolitis for hypoxemia, it creates a lot of stress for the family. As physicians, we seek to do anything that might help get the child home sooner – thus the 18 studies published on trying hypertonic saline, with varied results. I suspect that this paper from the Dartmouth group will not end the debate or deter future research into treatments that might help these babies.

Michael E. Pichichero, M.D., a specialist in pediatric infectious diseases, is director of the Research Institute, Rochester (N.Y.) General Hospital. He is also a pediatrician at Legacy Pediatrics in Rochester. Dr. Pichichero commented in an interview. He said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Title
Meta-analyses are tricky
Meta-analyses are tricky

The results of two previously published meta-analyses supporting a shortening of hospital length of stay following the use of hypertonic saline in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis are unreliable, according to a study published in JAMA Pediatrics.

Hypertonic saline should not be expected to shorten the length of hospital stay for those with acute viral bronchiolitis in typical hospital settings in the United States, Dr. Corinne G. Brooks of the Leadership in Preventive Medicine and Pediatrics Residencies at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., and her associates concluded.

The investigators reached this conclusion after reanalyzing data from the 18 randomized clinical trials using hypertonic saline in infants with bronchiolitis reporting hospital length of stay as an outcome measure in the two previously published meta-analyses, after finding no additional data sources through a literature search. The studies included 2,063 infants (63% male), with a mean age of 4.2 months and a mean length of stay of 3.6 days (JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Apr 18. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0079).

Dr. Brooks explained the rationale behind the study by pointing out that the previously published analyses failed to address and account for the large amount of study heterogeneity in the assessed cohort of studies, necessitating a reanalysis of the full data set to investigate factors with the potential to introduce such heterogeneity.

The reanalysis produced two significant findings, which collectively accounted for all of the heterogeneity between the assessed studies. First, one of the study populations was determined to be a significant outlier with very different criteria for discharge and substantially longer expected hospital length of stay. Because the statistical significance of the weighted mean difference in hospital length of stay attributable to the use of hypertonic saline was sensitive to the removal of this study population, heterogeneity was found to resolve to moderate to acceptable levels. Second, an important baseline difference between the treatment arms in day of illness at study enrollment was found. Patients presenting later in their illness were more likely to be allocated to the hypertonic saline treatment arm in 6 of the 18 studies assessed, most of which were small positive studies. Therefore, this difference accounted for a systematic bias favoring treatment groups.

Based on their reanalysis of the available data, Dr. Brooks and her associates said that the appearance of a meaningful reduction in the length of hospital stay for infants with acute viral bronchiolitis was a direct result of the inappropriate combination of studies with clinically significant differences in outcome definitions, and the previously unnoticed systematic bias in treatment group allocation.

No external funding was provided. None of the authors reported any conflicts of interest.

The results of two previously published meta-analyses supporting a shortening of hospital length of stay following the use of hypertonic saline in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis are unreliable, according to a study published in JAMA Pediatrics.

Hypertonic saline should not be expected to shorten the length of hospital stay for those with acute viral bronchiolitis in typical hospital settings in the United States, Dr. Corinne G. Brooks of the Leadership in Preventive Medicine and Pediatrics Residencies at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., and her associates concluded.

The investigators reached this conclusion after reanalyzing data from the 18 randomized clinical trials using hypertonic saline in infants with bronchiolitis reporting hospital length of stay as an outcome measure in the two previously published meta-analyses, after finding no additional data sources through a literature search. The studies included 2,063 infants (63% male), with a mean age of 4.2 months and a mean length of stay of 3.6 days (JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Apr 18. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0079).

Dr. Brooks explained the rationale behind the study by pointing out that the previously published analyses failed to address and account for the large amount of study heterogeneity in the assessed cohort of studies, necessitating a reanalysis of the full data set to investigate factors with the potential to introduce such heterogeneity.

The reanalysis produced two significant findings, which collectively accounted for all of the heterogeneity between the assessed studies. First, one of the study populations was determined to be a significant outlier with very different criteria for discharge and substantially longer expected hospital length of stay. Because the statistical significance of the weighted mean difference in hospital length of stay attributable to the use of hypertonic saline was sensitive to the removal of this study population, heterogeneity was found to resolve to moderate to acceptable levels. Second, an important baseline difference between the treatment arms in day of illness at study enrollment was found. Patients presenting later in their illness were more likely to be allocated to the hypertonic saline treatment arm in 6 of the 18 studies assessed, most of which were small positive studies. Therefore, this difference accounted for a systematic bias favoring treatment groups.

Based on their reanalysis of the available data, Dr. Brooks and her associates said that the appearance of a meaningful reduction in the length of hospital stay for infants with acute viral bronchiolitis was a direct result of the inappropriate combination of studies with clinically significant differences in outcome definitions, and the previously unnoticed systematic bias in treatment group allocation.

No external funding was provided. None of the authors reported any conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Acute viral bronchiolitis hospital stay not shortened by hypertonic saline
Display Headline
Acute viral bronchiolitis hospital stay not shortened by hypertonic saline
Legacy Keywords
Acute viral bronchiolitis, hospital stay, not shortened, hypertonic saline
Legacy Keywords
Acute viral bronchiolitis, hospital stay, not shortened, hypertonic saline
Article Source

FROM JAMA PEDIATRICS

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Physicians should not expect hypertonic saline to shorten hospital length of stay for those with acute viral bronchiolitis.

Major finding: Removal of heterogeneity from recent meta-analyses refutes the utility of hypertonic saline in reducing hospital length of stay for acute viral bronchiolitis.

Data sources: Two previously published meta-analyses pertaining to the use of hypertonic saline and hospital length of stay for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants.

Disclosures: No external funding was provided. None of the authors reported any conflicts of interest.