User login
In a meta-analysis of 83 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that included more than 5000 patients, exposure to adversity was associated with higher amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity across a range of task domains.
The altered responses were only observed in studies including adult participants and were clearest in participants who had been exposed to severe threat and trauma. Children and adolescents did not show significant adversity-related differences in brain function.
“By integrating the results from 83 previous brain imaging studies, we were able to provide what is arguably the clearest evidence to date that adults who have been exposed to early life trauma have different brain responses to psychological challenges,” senior author Marco Leyton, PhD, professor of psychiatry and director of the Temperament Adversity Biology Lab at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, said in a press release. “This includes exaggerated responses in a region that processes emotionally intense information (the amygdala) and reduced responses in a region that helps people regulate emotions and associated behaviors (the frontal cortex).”
The findings were published in JAMA Network Open.
Changes in Reactivity
“One big issue we have in psychology, and especially in neuroscience, is that single-study results are often not reproducible,” lead author Niki Hosseini-Kamkar, PhD, neuroimaging research associate at Atlas Institute for Veterans and Families at Royal Ottawa Hospital, said in an interview.
“It was very important to me to use a meta-analysis to get an overall picture of what brain regions are consistently reported across all these different studies. That is what we did here,” she added. Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar conducted this analysis while she was a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University in Montreal.
She and her group examined adversity exposure and brain function in the following four domains of task-based fMRI: emotion processing, memory processing, inhibitory control, and reward processing. Their study included 5242 participants. The researchers used multilevel kernel density analyses (MKDA) to analyze the data more accurately.
Adversity exposure was associated with higher amygdala reactivity (P < .001) and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity (P < .001), compared with controls with no adversity exposure.
Threat types of adversity were associated with greater blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the superior temporal gyrus and lower prefrontal cortex activity in participants exposed to threat, compared with controls.
Analysis of studies of inhibitory control tasks found greater activity in the claustrum, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula in the adversity-exposed participants, compared with controls.
In addition, studies that administered emotion processing tasks showed greater amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortex (superior frontal gyrus) reactivity in the adversity exposure group, compared with controls.
“The main takeaway is that there’s an exaggerated activity in the amygdala, and diminished prefrontal cortex activity, and together, this might point to a mechanism for how a history of adversity diminishes the ability to cope with later stressors and can therefore heighten susceptibility to mental illness,” said Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar.
‘Important Next Step’
“Overall, the meta-analysis by Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar and colleagues represents an important next step in understanding associations of adversity exposure with brain function while highlighting the importance of considering the role of development,” wrote Dylan G. Gee, PhD, associate professor of psychology at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and Alexis Brieant, PhD, assistant professor of research or creative works at the University of Vermont in Burlington, in an accompanying commentary.
They also applauded the authors for their use of MKDA. They noted that the technique “allows inferences about the consistency and specificity of brain activation across studies and is thought to be more robust to small sample sizes than activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis.”
Dr. Gee and Dr. Brieant also observed that a recent ALE meta-analysis failed to find a link between adversity and brain function. “Although it is important to note that the file drawer problem — by which researchers are less likely to publish null results — presents challenges to the inferences that can be drawn in the current work, the current study may provide complementary information to prior ALE meta-analyses.”
Epigenetic Changes?
Commenting on the findings for this article, Victor Fornari, MD, director of child and adolescent psychiatry at Northwell Health in Glen Oaks, New York, said, “Historically, when someone went through a traumatic event, they were told to just get over it, because somehow trauma doesn’t have a lasting impact on the brain.” Dr. Fornari was not involved in the research.
“We have certainly learned so much more over the past decade about early adversity and that it does have a profound impact on the brain and probably even epigenetic changes in our genes,” Dr. Fornari said.
“This is a very important avenue of investigation. People are really trying to understand if there are biological markers that we can actually measure in the brain that will offer us a window to better understand the consequence of adversity, as well as possible avenues of treatment.”
No funding source for this study was reported. Dr. Leyton, Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar, and Dr. Fornari report no relevant financial relationships. Gee reports receiving grants from the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr. Brieant reports receiving grants from the National Institute of Mental Health outside the submitted work.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
In a meta-analysis of 83 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that included more than 5000 patients, exposure to adversity was associated with higher amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity across a range of task domains.
The altered responses were only observed in studies including adult participants and were clearest in participants who had been exposed to severe threat and trauma. Children and adolescents did not show significant adversity-related differences in brain function.
“By integrating the results from 83 previous brain imaging studies, we were able to provide what is arguably the clearest evidence to date that adults who have been exposed to early life trauma have different brain responses to psychological challenges,” senior author Marco Leyton, PhD, professor of psychiatry and director of the Temperament Adversity Biology Lab at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, said in a press release. “This includes exaggerated responses in a region that processes emotionally intense information (the amygdala) and reduced responses in a region that helps people regulate emotions and associated behaviors (the frontal cortex).”
The findings were published in JAMA Network Open.
Changes in Reactivity
“One big issue we have in psychology, and especially in neuroscience, is that single-study results are often not reproducible,” lead author Niki Hosseini-Kamkar, PhD, neuroimaging research associate at Atlas Institute for Veterans and Families at Royal Ottawa Hospital, said in an interview.
“It was very important to me to use a meta-analysis to get an overall picture of what brain regions are consistently reported across all these different studies. That is what we did here,” she added. Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar conducted this analysis while she was a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University in Montreal.
She and her group examined adversity exposure and brain function in the following four domains of task-based fMRI: emotion processing, memory processing, inhibitory control, and reward processing. Their study included 5242 participants. The researchers used multilevel kernel density analyses (MKDA) to analyze the data more accurately.
Adversity exposure was associated with higher amygdala reactivity (P < .001) and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity (P < .001), compared with controls with no adversity exposure.
Threat types of adversity were associated with greater blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the superior temporal gyrus and lower prefrontal cortex activity in participants exposed to threat, compared with controls.
Analysis of studies of inhibitory control tasks found greater activity in the claustrum, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula in the adversity-exposed participants, compared with controls.
In addition, studies that administered emotion processing tasks showed greater amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortex (superior frontal gyrus) reactivity in the adversity exposure group, compared with controls.
“The main takeaway is that there’s an exaggerated activity in the amygdala, and diminished prefrontal cortex activity, and together, this might point to a mechanism for how a history of adversity diminishes the ability to cope with later stressors and can therefore heighten susceptibility to mental illness,” said Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar.
‘Important Next Step’
“Overall, the meta-analysis by Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar and colleagues represents an important next step in understanding associations of adversity exposure with brain function while highlighting the importance of considering the role of development,” wrote Dylan G. Gee, PhD, associate professor of psychology at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and Alexis Brieant, PhD, assistant professor of research or creative works at the University of Vermont in Burlington, in an accompanying commentary.
They also applauded the authors for their use of MKDA. They noted that the technique “allows inferences about the consistency and specificity of brain activation across studies and is thought to be more robust to small sample sizes than activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis.”
Dr. Gee and Dr. Brieant also observed that a recent ALE meta-analysis failed to find a link between adversity and brain function. “Although it is important to note that the file drawer problem — by which researchers are less likely to publish null results — presents challenges to the inferences that can be drawn in the current work, the current study may provide complementary information to prior ALE meta-analyses.”
Epigenetic Changes?
Commenting on the findings for this article, Victor Fornari, MD, director of child and adolescent psychiatry at Northwell Health in Glen Oaks, New York, said, “Historically, when someone went through a traumatic event, they were told to just get over it, because somehow trauma doesn’t have a lasting impact on the brain.” Dr. Fornari was not involved in the research.
“We have certainly learned so much more over the past decade about early adversity and that it does have a profound impact on the brain and probably even epigenetic changes in our genes,” Dr. Fornari said.
“This is a very important avenue of investigation. People are really trying to understand if there are biological markers that we can actually measure in the brain that will offer us a window to better understand the consequence of adversity, as well as possible avenues of treatment.”
No funding source for this study was reported. Dr. Leyton, Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar, and Dr. Fornari report no relevant financial relationships. Gee reports receiving grants from the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr. Brieant reports receiving grants from the National Institute of Mental Health outside the submitted work.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
In a meta-analysis of 83 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that included more than 5000 patients, exposure to adversity was associated with higher amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity across a range of task domains.
The altered responses were only observed in studies including adult participants and were clearest in participants who had been exposed to severe threat and trauma. Children and adolescents did not show significant adversity-related differences in brain function.
“By integrating the results from 83 previous brain imaging studies, we were able to provide what is arguably the clearest evidence to date that adults who have been exposed to early life trauma have different brain responses to psychological challenges,” senior author Marco Leyton, PhD, professor of psychiatry and director of the Temperament Adversity Biology Lab at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, said in a press release. “This includes exaggerated responses in a region that processes emotionally intense information (the amygdala) and reduced responses in a region that helps people regulate emotions and associated behaviors (the frontal cortex).”
The findings were published in JAMA Network Open.
Changes in Reactivity
“One big issue we have in psychology, and especially in neuroscience, is that single-study results are often not reproducible,” lead author Niki Hosseini-Kamkar, PhD, neuroimaging research associate at Atlas Institute for Veterans and Families at Royal Ottawa Hospital, said in an interview.
“It was very important to me to use a meta-analysis to get an overall picture of what brain regions are consistently reported across all these different studies. That is what we did here,” she added. Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar conducted this analysis while she was a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University in Montreal.
She and her group examined adversity exposure and brain function in the following four domains of task-based fMRI: emotion processing, memory processing, inhibitory control, and reward processing. Their study included 5242 participants. The researchers used multilevel kernel density analyses (MKDA) to analyze the data more accurately.
Adversity exposure was associated with higher amygdala reactivity (P < .001) and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity (P < .001), compared with controls with no adversity exposure.
Threat types of adversity were associated with greater blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the superior temporal gyrus and lower prefrontal cortex activity in participants exposed to threat, compared with controls.
Analysis of studies of inhibitory control tasks found greater activity in the claustrum, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula in the adversity-exposed participants, compared with controls.
In addition, studies that administered emotion processing tasks showed greater amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortex (superior frontal gyrus) reactivity in the adversity exposure group, compared with controls.
“The main takeaway is that there’s an exaggerated activity in the amygdala, and diminished prefrontal cortex activity, and together, this might point to a mechanism for how a history of adversity diminishes the ability to cope with later stressors and can therefore heighten susceptibility to mental illness,” said Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar.
‘Important Next Step’
“Overall, the meta-analysis by Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar and colleagues represents an important next step in understanding associations of adversity exposure with brain function while highlighting the importance of considering the role of development,” wrote Dylan G. Gee, PhD, associate professor of psychology at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and Alexis Brieant, PhD, assistant professor of research or creative works at the University of Vermont in Burlington, in an accompanying commentary.
They also applauded the authors for their use of MKDA. They noted that the technique “allows inferences about the consistency and specificity of brain activation across studies and is thought to be more robust to small sample sizes than activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis.”
Dr. Gee and Dr. Brieant also observed that a recent ALE meta-analysis failed to find a link between adversity and brain function. “Although it is important to note that the file drawer problem — by which researchers are less likely to publish null results — presents challenges to the inferences that can be drawn in the current work, the current study may provide complementary information to prior ALE meta-analyses.”
Epigenetic Changes?
Commenting on the findings for this article, Victor Fornari, MD, director of child and adolescent psychiatry at Northwell Health in Glen Oaks, New York, said, “Historically, when someone went through a traumatic event, they were told to just get over it, because somehow trauma doesn’t have a lasting impact on the brain.” Dr. Fornari was not involved in the research.
“We have certainly learned so much more over the past decade about early adversity and that it does have a profound impact on the brain and probably even epigenetic changes in our genes,” Dr. Fornari said.
“This is a very important avenue of investigation. People are really trying to understand if there are biological markers that we can actually measure in the brain that will offer us a window to better understand the consequence of adversity, as well as possible avenues of treatment.”
No funding source for this study was reported. Dr. Leyton, Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar, and Dr. Fornari report no relevant financial relationships. Gee reports receiving grants from the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr. Brieant reports receiving grants from the National Institute of Mental Health outside the submitted work.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>166246</fileName> <TBEID>0C04DA0A.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>MD_0C04DA0A</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>News</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>2</articleType> <TBLocation>QC Done-All Pubs</TBLocation> <QCDate>20231208T123751</QCDate> <firstPublished>20231208T123854</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20231208T123854</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20231208T123854</CMSDate> <articleSource>FROM JAMA NETWORK OPEN</articleSource> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>Fran Lowry</byline> <bylineText>FRAN LOWRY</bylineText> <bylineFull>FRAN LOWRY</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:imng"> <name>IMNG Medical Media</name> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name>Frontline Medical News</name> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice>Copyright (c) 2015 Frontline Medical News, a Frontline Medical Communications Inc. company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, copied, or otherwise reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</copyrightNotice> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Early childhood trauma alters brain function in adults, according to new research.</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <teaser>“We have certainly learned so much more over the past decade about early adversity and that it does have a profound impact on the brain and probably even epigenetic changes in our genes.”</teaser> <title>Adverse Events in Childhood Alter Brain Function</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear/> <pubPubdateMonth/> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume/> <pubNumber/> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs/> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>cpn</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>fp</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>im</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>nr</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> <journalTitle>Neurology Reviews</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Neurology Reviews</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>2018 Frontline Medical Communications Inc.,</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">9</term> <term>15</term> <term>21</term> <term>22</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">27970</term> <term>39313</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">271</term> <term>248</term> <term>308</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Adverse Events in Childhood Alter Brain Function</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p> <span class="tag metaDescription">Early childhood trauma alters brain function in adults, according to new research.</span> </p> <p>In a meta-analysis of 83 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that included more than 5000 patients, exposure to adversity was associated with higher amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity across a range of task domains. <br/><br/>The altered responses were only observed in studies including adult participants and were clearest in participants who had been exposed to severe threat and trauma. Children and adolescents did not show significant adversity-related differences in brain function.<br/><br/>“By integrating the results from 83 previous brain imaging studies, we were able to provide what is arguably the clearest evidence to date that adults who have been exposed to early life trauma have different brain responses to psychological challenges,” senior author Marco Leyton, PhD, professor of psychiatry and director of the Temperament Adversity Biology Lab at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, said in a press release. “This includes exaggerated responses in a region that processes emotionally intense information (the amygdala) and reduced responses in a region that helps people regulate emotions and associated behaviors (the frontal cortex).”<br/><br/>The findings <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2811174?resultClick=1">were published</a></span> in <em>JAMA Network Open</em>.<br/><br/></p> <h2>Changes in Reactivity </h2> <p>“One big issue we have in psychology, and especially in neuroscience, is that single-study results are often not reproducible,” lead author Niki Hosseini-Kamkar, PhD, neuroimaging research associate at Atlas Institute for Veterans and Families at Royal Ottawa Hospital, said in an interview.<br/><br/>“It was very important to me to use a meta-analysis to get an overall picture of what brain regions are consistently reported across all these different studies. That is what we did here,” she added. Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar conducted this analysis while she was a postdoctoral research fellow at McGill University in Montreal.<br/><br/>She and her group examined adversity exposure and brain function in the following four domains of task-based fMRI: emotion processing, memory processing, inhibitory control, and reward processing. Their study included 5242 participants. The researchers used multilevel kernel density analyses (MKDA) to analyze the data more accurately. <br/><br/>Adversity exposure was associated with higher amygdala reactivity (P < .001) and lower prefrontal cortical reactivity (P < .001), compared with controls with no adversity exposure.<br/><br/>Threat types of adversity were associated with greater blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses in the superior temporal gyrus and lower prefrontal cortex activity in participants exposed to threat, compared with controls. <br/><br/>Analysis of studies of inhibitory control tasks found greater activity in the claustrum, anterior cingulate cortex, and insula in the adversity-exposed participants, compared with controls.<br/><br/>In addition, studies that administered emotion processing tasks showed greater amygdala reactivity and lower prefrontal cortex (superior frontal gyrus) reactivity in the adversity exposure group, compared with controls.<br/><br/>“The main takeaway is that there’s an exaggerated activity in the amygdala, and diminished prefrontal cortex activity, and together, this might point to a mechanism for how a history of adversity diminishes the ability to cope with later stressors and can therefore heighten susceptibility to mental illness,” said Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar.<br/><br/></p> <h2>‘Important Next Step’ </h2> <p>“Overall, the meta-analysis by Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar and colleagues represents an important next step in understanding associations of adversity exposure with brain function while highlighting the importance of considering the role of development,” wrote Dylan G. Gee, PhD, associate professor of psychology at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and Alexis Brieant, PhD, assistant professor of research or creative works at the University of Vermont in Burlington, in <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2811176?resultClick=1">an accompanying commentary</a></span>. <br/><br/>They also applauded the authors for their use of MKDA. They noted that the technique “allows inferences about the consistency and specificity of brain activation across studies and is thought to be more robust to small sample sizes than activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis.” <br/><br/>Dr. Gee and Dr. Brieant also observed that <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149763419309066?via%3Dihub">a recent ALE meta-analysis</a></span> failed to find a link between adversity and brain function. “Although it is important to note that the file drawer problem — by which researchers are less likely to publish null results — presents challenges to the inferences that can be drawn in the current work, the current study may provide complementary information to prior ALE meta-analyses.” <br/><br/></p> <h2>Epigenetic Changes? </h2> <p>Commenting on the findings for this article, Victor Fornari, MD, director of child and adolescent psychiatry at Northwell Health in Glen Oaks, New York, said, “Historically, when someone went through a traumatic event, they were told to just get over it, because somehow trauma doesn’t have a lasting impact on the brain.” Dr. Fornari was not involved in the research.<br/><br/>“We have certainly learned so much more over the past decade about early adversity and that it does have a profound impact on the brain and probably even epigenetic changes in our genes,” Dr. Fornari said.<br/><br/>“This is a very important avenue of investigation. People are really trying to understand if there are biological markers that we can actually measure in the brain that will offer us a window to better understand the consequence of adversity, as well as possible avenues of treatment.” <br/><br/>No funding source for this study was reported. Dr. Leyton, Dr. Hosseini-Kamkar, and Dr. Fornari report no relevant financial relationships. Gee reports receiving grants from the National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health outside the submitted work. Dr. Brieant reports receiving grants from the National Institute of Mental Health outside the submitted work.<span class="end"/> </p> <p> <em>A version of this article appeared on <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/adverse-events-childhood-alter-brain-function-2023a1000uhx?src=">Medscape.com</a></span>.</em> </p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>teaser</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
FROM JAMA NETWORK OPEN