B-Cell Depletion Shows Promise in CNS-NPSLE

VIENNA — B-cell depletion with rituximab led to significant improvements in patients with CNS neuropsychiatric disability associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, according to a preliminary report presented by C. Michael Neuwelt, M.D., at the annual European congress of rheumatology.

In his investigation, Dr. Neuwelt, of the University of California, San Francisco, and Stanford University, Palo Alto, studied 22 patients who met American College of Rheumatology criteria for CNS-NPSLE disability.

In addition, at baseline, patients met at least one of three criteria: abnormal brain MRI, severe progression of cognitive impairment as shown by neuropsychological testing, or cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis and/or intrathecal elevation of IgG synthesis and/or oligoclonal banding.

Among the participants in the single-center study, 12 were treated with rituximab monotherapy, 7 were treated with a combination of rituximab and IV cyclophosphamide (IV-CYC), and 3 patients received plasmapheresis synchronized with IV-CYC and were maintained on rituximab for prolonged B-cell suppression.

After up to 18 months' follow up, 72% of the 19 patients treated with either rituximab alone or in combination with IV-CYC showed improvement. The three patients on triple therapy did not improve and required new therapy regimens.

In addition to monitoring changes in the objective parameters, patient outcomes were measured using several standard SLE disease activity indices.

Dr. Neuwelt emphasized that in at least one case, the patient actually had a disease flare with worsening brain lesions following a switch from her prestudy regimen of IV-CYC to rituximab monotherapy. In her case, combination IV-CYC and rituximab led to significant improvements over baseline (see MRI images before and after combination therapy).

Further research is needed to identify the best candidates for rituximab monotherapy and which patients will require combination therapy, said Dr. Neuwelt, who is on the advisory board for Genentech Inc., the manufacturer of rituximab (Rituxan). However, he did not receive funding for his study.

Outcomes from his observational study of 22 patients compared well to earlier, published reports of similar patients treated with IV-CYC with and without plasmapheresis, Dr. Neuwelt explained at the meeting, sponsored by the European League Against Rheumatism.

Those previous reports, which defined outcome end points in the same manner as the current study, found a 61% rate of improvement among 31 severe CNS-NPSLE patients treated with IV-CYC (Am. J. Med. 1995;98:32–41). Another study, also conducted by Dr. Neuwelt, found a 74% rate of improvement among 26 severe CNS-NPSLE patients treated with plasmapheresis either alone or synchronized with cyclophosphamide (Ther. Apher. Dial. 2003;7:173–82).

The lack of head-to-head trials comparing rituximab to other therapies is indicative of the challenges facing lupus-therapy investigations. Clinical trials of lupus patients are notoriously difficult to conduct, given the heterogeneity of the patient population. And CNS effects are the most difficult aspect of lupus to pin down, Dr. Neuwelt said in an interview.

“We don't know a lot about the pathogenic mechanisms” that lead to neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. “That's an area that we know the least about,” and yet it takes a considerable toll on quality of life, he said. There are no exact end points to measure changes in this manifestation, which makes it a difficult aspect of SLE to study.

He added that better tools to measure patient-centered outcomes in SLE—specifically, ones targeting neuropsychiatric markers—need to be developed.

The justification for trying rituximab in a CNS-NPSLE population is speculative at this time. However, similarities between lupus of the brain and multiple sclerosis exist. In MS, B cells and antibody-mediated demyelination comes from histopathologic studies of CNS tissue and analysis of CSF. Similar studies need to be done in the CNS tissue and CSF of CNS-NPSLE patients, Dr. Neuwelt said.

The prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders in SLE has been found to range from 37% to 95% in various studies. The most common effects are cognitive dysfunction (55%–80%), headache (24%–72%), mood disorder (14%–57%), cerebrovascular disease (5%–18%), seizures (6%–51%), polyneuropathy (3%–28%), anxiety (7%–24%), and psychosis (0%–8%), according to John Hanly, M.D., head of the rheumatology division at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Dr. Hanly also presented on CNS-NPSLE at the meeting.

A 45-year-old woman was switched from IV CYC to rituximab monotherapy. Shortly after the switch, the patient's disease flared and a brain MRI in April (left) showed progression of her lesions. IV CYC was then added back to her regimen. A follow-up MRI in July showed the number of lesions was reduced on the combination. Photos courtesy Dr. C. Michael Neuwelt

VIENNA — B-cell depletion with rituximab led to significant improvements in patients with CNS neuropsychiatric disability associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, according to a preliminary report presented by C. Michael Neuwelt, M.D., at the annual European congress of rheumatology.

In his investigation, Dr. Neuwelt, of the University of California, San Francisco, and Stanford University, Palo Alto, studied 22 patients who met American College of Rheumatology criteria for CNS-NPSLE disability.

In addition, at baseline, patients met at least one of three criteria: abnormal brain MRI, severe progression of cognitive impairment as shown by neuropsychological testing, or cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis and/or intrathecal elevation of IgG synthesis and/or oligoclonal banding.

Among the participants in the single-center study, 12 were treated with rituximab monotherapy, 7 were treated with a combination of rituximab and IV cyclophosphamide (IV-CYC), and 3 patients received plasmapheresis synchronized with IV-CYC and were maintained on rituximab for prolonged B-cell suppression.

After up to 18 months' follow up, 72% of the 19 patients treated with either rituximab alone or in combination with IV-CYC showed improvement. The three patients on triple therapy did not improve and required new therapy regimens.

In addition to monitoring changes in the objective parameters, patient outcomes were measured using several standard SLE disease activity indices.

Dr. Neuwelt emphasized that in at least one case, the patient actually had a disease flare with worsening brain lesions following a switch from her prestudy regimen of IV-CYC to rituximab monotherapy. In her case, combination IV-CYC and rituximab led to significant improvements over baseline (see MRI images before and after combination therapy).

Further research is needed to identify the best candidates for rituximab monotherapy and which patients will require combination therapy, said Dr. Neuwelt, who is on the advisory board for Genentech Inc., the manufacturer of rituximab (Rituxan). However, he did not receive funding for his study.

Outcomes from his observational study of 22 patients compared well to earlier, published reports of similar patients treated with IV-CYC with and without plasmapheresis, Dr. Neuwelt explained at the meeting, sponsored by the European League Against Rheumatism.

Those previous reports, which defined outcome end points in the same manner as the current study, found a 61% rate of improvement among 31 severe CNS-NPSLE patients treated with IV-CYC (Am. J. Med. 1995;98:32–41). Another study, also conducted by Dr. Neuwelt, found a 74% rate of improvement among 26 severe CNS-NPSLE patients treated with plasmapheresis either alone or synchronized with cyclophosphamide (Ther. Apher. Dial. 2003;7:173–82).

The lack of head-to-head trials comparing rituximab to other therapies is indicative of the challenges facing lupus-therapy investigations. Clinical trials of lupus patients are notoriously difficult to conduct, given the heterogeneity of the patient population. And CNS effects are the most difficult aspect of lupus to pin down, Dr. Neuwelt said in an interview.

“We don't know a lot about the pathogenic mechanisms” that lead to neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. “That's an area that we know the least about,” and yet it takes a considerable toll on quality of life, he said. There are no exact end points to measure changes in this manifestation, which makes it a difficult aspect of SLE to study.

He added that better tools to measure patient-centered outcomes in SLE—specifically, ones targeting neuropsychiatric markers—need to be developed.

The justification for trying rituximab in a CNS-NPSLE population is speculative at this time. However, similarities between lupus of the brain and multiple sclerosis exist. In MS, B cells and antibody-mediated demyelination comes from histopathologic studies of CNS tissue and analysis of CSF. Similar studies need to be done in the CNS tissue and CSF of CNS-NPSLE patients, Dr. Neuwelt said.

The prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders in SLE has been found to range from 37% to 95% in various studies. The most common effects are cognitive dysfunction (55%–80%), headache (24%–72%), mood disorder (14%–57%), cerebrovascular disease (5%–18%), seizures (6%–51%), polyneuropathy (3%–28%), anxiety (7%–24%), and psychosis (0%–8%), according to John Hanly, M.D., head of the rheumatology division at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Dr. Hanly also presented on CNS-NPSLE at the meeting.

A 45-year-old woman was switched from IV CYC to rituximab monotherapy. Shortly after the switch, the patient's disease flared and a brain MRI in April (left) showed progression of her lesions. IV CYC was then added back to her regimen. A follow-up MRI in July showed the number of lesions was reduced on the combination. Photos courtesy Dr. C. Michael Neuwelt

VIENNA — B-cell depletion with rituximab led to significant improvements in patients with CNS neuropsychiatric disability associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, according to a preliminary report presented by C. Michael Neuwelt, M.D., at the annual European congress of rheumatology.

In his investigation, Dr. Neuwelt, of the University of California, San Francisco, and Stanford University, Palo Alto, studied 22 patients who met American College of Rheumatology criteria for CNS-NPSLE disability.

In addition, at baseline, patients met at least one of three criteria: abnormal brain MRI, severe progression of cognitive impairment as shown by neuropsychological testing, or cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis and/or intrathecal elevation of IgG synthesis and/or oligoclonal banding.

Among the participants in the single-center study, 12 were treated with rituximab monotherapy, 7 were treated with a combination of rituximab and IV cyclophosphamide (IV-CYC), and 3 patients received plasmapheresis synchronized with IV-CYC and were maintained on rituximab for prolonged B-cell suppression.

After up to 18 months' follow up, 72% of the 19 patients treated with either rituximab alone or in combination with IV-CYC showed improvement. The three patients on triple therapy did not improve and required new therapy regimens.

In addition to monitoring changes in the objective parameters, patient outcomes were measured using several standard SLE disease activity indices.

Dr. Neuwelt emphasized that in at least one case, the patient actually had a disease flare with worsening brain lesions following a switch from her prestudy regimen of IV-CYC to rituximab monotherapy. In her case, combination IV-CYC and rituximab led to significant improvements over baseline (see MRI images before and after combination therapy).

Further research is needed to identify the best candidates for rituximab monotherapy and which patients will require combination therapy, said Dr. Neuwelt, who is on the advisory board for Genentech Inc., the manufacturer of rituximab (Rituxan). However, he did not receive funding for his study.

Outcomes from his observational study of 22 patients compared well to earlier, published reports of similar patients treated with IV-CYC with and without plasmapheresis, Dr. Neuwelt explained at the meeting, sponsored by the European League Against Rheumatism.

Those previous reports, which defined outcome end points in the same manner as the current study, found a 61% rate of improvement among 31 severe CNS-NPSLE patients treated with IV-CYC (Am. J. Med. 1995;98:32–41). Another study, also conducted by Dr. Neuwelt, found a 74% rate of improvement among 26 severe CNS-NPSLE patients treated with plasmapheresis either alone or synchronized with cyclophosphamide (Ther. Apher. Dial. 2003;7:173–82).

The lack of head-to-head trials comparing rituximab to other therapies is indicative of the challenges facing lupus-therapy investigations. Clinical trials of lupus patients are notoriously difficult to conduct, given the heterogeneity of the patient population. And CNS effects are the most difficult aspect of lupus to pin down, Dr. Neuwelt said in an interview.

“We don't know a lot about the pathogenic mechanisms” that lead to neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. “That's an area that we know the least about,” and yet it takes a considerable toll on quality of life, he said. There are no exact end points to measure changes in this manifestation, which makes it a difficult aspect of SLE to study.

He added that better tools to measure patient-centered outcomes in SLE—specifically, ones targeting neuropsychiatric markers—need to be developed.

The justification for trying rituximab in a CNS-NPSLE population is speculative at this time. However, similarities between lupus of the brain and multiple sclerosis exist. In MS, B cells and antibody-mediated demyelination comes from histopathologic studies of CNS tissue and analysis of CSF. Similar studies need to be done in the CNS tissue and CSF of CNS-NPSLE patients, Dr. Neuwelt said.

The prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders in SLE has been found to range from 37% to 95% in various studies. The most common effects are cognitive dysfunction (55%–80%), headache (24%–72%), mood disorder (14%–57%), cerebrovascular disease (5%–18%), seizures (6%–51%), polyneuropathy (3%–28%), anxiety (7%–24%), and psychosis (0%–8%), according to John Hanly, M.D., head of the rheumatology division at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Dr. Hanly also presented on CNS-NPSLE at the meeting.

A 45-year-old woman was switched from IV CYC to rituximab monotherapy. Shortly after the switch, the patient's disease flared and a brain MRI in April (left) showed progression of her lesions. IV CYC was then added back to her regimen. A follow-up MRI in July showed the number of lesions was reduced on the combination. Photos courtesy Dr. C. Michael Neuwelt