User login
Palliative care (PC) focuses on relieving distressing symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, fatigue, and depression; providing psychological, social, emotional, and spiritual support; and helping patients choose treatments consistent with their values.[1] Palliative care consultation services (PCSs) increase patient and family satisfaction,[2, 3] improve quality of life,[4] reduce resource utilization,[5] and decrease hospital expenditure.[2, 6] Hospitals that fund a PCS typically realize a sizable return on investment and good value, as these services provide better care at lower cost.[7] These benefits provide a strong rationale for all hospitals to establish a PCS. However, only 53% of acute care hospitals in California offer PC services, and only 37% have a hospital‐based PCS.[7] To increase access for patients with serious illness, it is necessary to understand the barriers that hinder the development of PCS. In this study, we asked leaders from hospitals without a PCS to describe these barriers and identify strategies that could overcome them and promote PCSs.
METHODS
In 2011, we surveyed all acute care hospitals in California to assess the prevalence of PCSs in the state. We defined a PCS as an interdisciplinary team that sees patients, identifies needs, makes treatment recommendations, facilitates patient and/or family decision making, and/or directly provides palliative care for patients with life‐threatening illness and their families. Hospitals that did not have a PCS were asked questions regarding plans to establish one (Is there an effort underway to establish a palliative care program in your hospital?), perceived barriers to starting one (What are 3 significant barriers or circumstances that have prevented your hospital from creating a palliative care program?), and ideas for overcoming barriers (What resources, training, policy changes would be most helpful in overcoming those barriers?). Questions that allowed for open‐ended responses were analyzed using a thematic approach.[8] Themes were initially reviewed by 1 researcher (C.J.B.), then refined and confirmed at each stage using an iterative process with other research team members (D.L.O., S.Z.P.) to reduce potential biases. Questions assessing hospital characteristics and status toward establishing a PCS provided a list of possible answers. Frequencies to these responses are reported accordingly.
RESULTS
Surveys were distributed to 376 acute care hospitals in California, of which 360 responded to the survey, resulting in a 96% response rate. Of the 360 hospitals surveyed, 46% (n=166) reported not offering any PCS. Out of the 166 that did not have PCS, 7 stated they had a PCS at some point in the last 5 years, but the program was discontinued. Hospitals without a PCS were largely for profit (75%, n=125), small with <150 beds (72%, n=120), and not affiliated with a system (63%, n=105). Overall, 34% (43/128) of hospitals reported that they had efforts underway to establish one, with 21% (9/43) expecting to start seeing patients within a year. Seventy‐two hospitals (56%, 72/128) reported that providers from local hospices aided them in providing their patients with PC, and that this approach met the needs of their patients. A total of 93 hospitals identified multiple barriers (n=186) to establishing a PCS, of which 162 responses could be categorized into 5 meaningful themes. Regarding strategies to overcome these barriers, 65 hospitals provided 72 responses that could be categorized into 5 meaningful themes (Table 1).
Barriers and Strategies | Responses, % (n) |
---|---|
| |
Main barriers to establishing a PCS | 93 hospitals provided 186 barriers |
Insufficient funding and/or resources | 31 (58) |
Insufficient staff to support a PCS | 20 (37) |
Perceived lack of need for a PCS | 14 (27) |
Lack of support among nonpalliative care physicians | 13 (25) |
Competing priorities | 8 (15) |
Don't know/unsure | 14 (24) |
Main strategies to overcome barriers to establishing a PCS | 65 hospitals provided 72 strategies |
Reroute funding to establish a PCS | 28 (20) |
Explain benefits of PCS to staff and community | 24 (17) |
Provide a framework for how to establish a PCS | 21 (15) |
Staff for a PCS | 18 (13) |
Physician support | 10 (7) |
DISCUSSION
Despite citing obstacles to providing PCSs, one‐third of hospitals surveyed report that they are planning to establish a program. As an alternative, many hospitals without a PCS reported that they provide their patients with PC through partnerships with local hospice services. This approach may provide some hospitals with a practical alternative to having a PCS, especially in smaller institutions where budgets and the need for PC are proportionally small. Future surveys should account for this approach to providing PCS to patients. Sharing the strong evidence of return on investment from PCS[6, 7] with hospital leaders could help overcome the perceived barrier of cost and garner financial support. Training programs and technical assistance provided by the Palliative Care Leadership Center initiative and the Center to Advance Palliative Care have a proven track record in helping hospitals establish a PCS through mentored training,[9] and the End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium has demonstrated effectiveness with nursing education.[10] These programs could provide the resources that many hospitals seek. Educating hospital leaders and clinicians about the evidence for PCSs improving care for patients with serious illness may further help to engender support for PCSs. One barrier that may be more difficult to overcome is the lack of trained PC clinicians. Efforts to educate and train generalist clinicians in primary PC may mitigate this shortfall.[1] Increasing the number of trained primary PC clinicians may also reduce fragmentation in patient care and reduce burden on specialist PC clinicians.[11] Specialty PC clinicians can also lend their expertise to hospitals seeking to start a PCS to achieve the goal of universal access to PCS.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Hospital Council of Northern and Central California, the Hospital Council of Southern California, and the Hospital Council of San Diego and Imperial Counties for their support in encouraging their members to participate. The authors also thank all of the respondents for their diligence and care in responding to the survey.
Disclosures
The California HealthCare Foundation provided funding to support the administration of the survey and analysis of findings, as well as limited dissemination of results though the foundation's communication venues. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
- Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(2):180–190. , , , et al.
- A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):124–129. , , , , .
- Health care system factors affecting end‐of‐life care. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(suppl 1):S79–S87. .
- Impact of palliative care case management on resource use by patients dying of cancer at a Veterans Affairs medical center. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):26–35. , , .
- Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1783–1790. , , , et al.
- Two steps forward, one step back: changes in palliative care consultation services in California hospitals from 2007 to 2011. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(11):1214–1220. , , .
- Using qualitative methods to explore key questions in palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(8):725–730. , .
- Center to Advance Palliative Care palliative care consultation service metrics: consensus recommendations. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(10):1294–1298. , , .
- Evaluation of the End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium undergraduate faculty training program. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):107–114. , , , et al.
- Generalist plus specialist palliative care–creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1173–1175. , .
Palliative care (PC) focuses on relieving distressing symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, fatigue, and depression; providing psychological, social, emotional, and spiritual support; and helping patients choose treatments consistent with their values.[1] Palliative care consultation services (PCSs) increase patient and family satisfaction,[2, 3] improve quality of life,[4] reduce resource utilization,[5] and decrease hospital expenditure.[2, 6] Hospitals that fund a PCS typically realize a sizable return on investment and good value, as these services provide better care at lower cost.[7] These benefits provide a strong rationale for all hospitals to establish a PCS. However, only 53% of acute care hospitals in California offer PC services, and only 37% have a hospital‐based PCS.[7] To increase access for patients with serious illness, it is necessary to understand the barriers that hinder the development of PCS. In this study, we asked leaders from hospitals without a PCS to describe these barriers and identify strategies that could overcome them and promote PCSs.
METHODS
In 2011, we surveyed all acute care hospitals in California to assess the prevalence of PCSs in the state. We defined a PCS as an interdisciplinary team that sees patients, identifies needs, makes treatment recommendations, facilitates patient and/or family decision making, and/or directly provides palliative care for patients with life‐threatening illness and their families. Hospitals that did not have a PCS were asked questions regarding plans to establish one (Is there an effort underway to establish a palliative care program in your hospital?), perceived barriers to starting one (What are 3 significant barriers or circumstances that have prevented your hospital from creating a palliative care program?), and ideas for overcoming barriers (What resources, training, policy changes would be most helpful in overcoming those barriers?). Questions that allowed for open‐ended responses were analyzed using a thematic approach.[8] Themes were initially reviewed by 1 researcher (C.J.B.), then refined and confirmed at each stage using an iterative process with other research team members (D.L.O., S.Z.P.) to reduce potential biases. Questions assessing hospital characteristics and status toward establishing a PCS provided a list of possible answers. Frequencies to these responses are reported accordingly.
RESULTS
Surveys were distributed to 376 acute care hospitals in California, of which 360 responded to the survey, resulting in a 96% response rate. Of the 360 hospitals surveyed, 46% (n=166) reported not offering any PCS. Out of the 166 that did not have PCS, 7 stated they had a PCS at some point in the last 5 years, but the program was discontinued. Hospitals without a PCS were largely for profit (75%, n=125), small with <150 beds (72%, n=120), and not affiliated with a system (63%, n=105). Overall, 34% (43/128) of hospitals reported that they had efforts underway to establish one, with 21% (9/43) expecting to start seeing patients within a year. Seventy‐two hospitals (56%, 72/128) reported that providers from local hospices aided them in providing their patients with PC, and that this approach met the needs of their patients. A total of 93 hospitals identified multiple barriers (n=186) to establishing a PCS, of which 162 responses could be categorized into 5 meaningful themes. Regarding strategies to overcome these barriers, 65 hospitals provided 72 responses that could be categorized into 5 meaningful themes (Table 1).
Barriers and Strategies | Responses, % (n) |
---|---|
| |
Main barriers to establishing a PCS | 93 hospitals provided 186 barriers |
Insufficient funding and/or resources | 31 (58) |
Insufficient staff to support a PCS | 20 (37) |
Perceived lack of need for a PCS | 14 (27) |
Lack of support among nonpalliative care physicians | 13 (25) |
Competing priorities | 8 (15) |
Don't know/unsure | 14 (24) |
Main strategies to overcome barriers to establishing a PCS | 65 hospitals provided 72 strategies |
Reroute funding to establish a PCS | 28 (20) |
Explain benefits of PCS to staff and community | 24 (17) |
Provide a framework for how to establish a PCS | 21 (15) |
Staff for a PCS | 18 (13) |
Physician support | 10 (7) |
DISCUSSION
Despite citing obstacles to providing PCSs, one‐third of hospitals surveyed report that they are planning to establish a program. As an alternative, many hospitals without a PCS reported that they provide their patients with PC through partnerships with local hospice services. This approach may provide some hospitals with a practical alternative to having a PCS, especially in smaller institutions where budgets and the need for PC are proportionally small. Future surveys should account for this approach to providing PCS to patients. Sharing the strong evidence of return on investment from PCS[6, 7] with hospital leaders could help overcome the perceived barrier of cost and garner financial support. Training programs and technical assistance provided by the Palliative Care Leadership Center initiative and the Center to Advance Palliative Care have a proven track record in helping hospitals establish a PCS through mentored training,[9] and the End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium has demonstrated effectiveness with nursing education.[10] These programs could provide the resources that many hospitals seek. Educating hospital leaders and clinicians about the evidence for PCSs improving care for patients with serious illness may further help to engender support for PCSs. One barrier that may be more difficult to overcome is the lack of trained PC clinicians. Efforts to educate and train generalist clinicians in primary PC may mitigate this shortfall.[1] Increasing the number of trained primary PC clinicians may also reduce fragmentation in patient care and reduce burden on specialist PC clinicians.[11] Specialty PC clinicians can also lend their expertise to hospitals seeking to start a PCS to achieve the goal of universal access to PCS.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Hospital Council of Northern and Central California, the Hospital Council of Southern California, and the Hospital Council of San Diego and Imperial Counties for their support in encouraging their members to participate. The authors also thank all of the respondents for their diligence and care in responding to the survey.
Disclosures
The California HealthCare Foundation provided funding to support the administration of the survey and analysis of findings, as well as limited dissemination of results though the foundation's communication venues. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Palliative care (PC) focuses on relieving distressing symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, fatigue, and depression; providing psychological, social, emotional, and spiritual support; and helping patients choose treatments consistent with their values.[1] Palliative care consultation services (PCSs) increase patient and family satisfaction,[2, 3] improve quality of life,[4] reduce resource utilization,[5] and decrease hospital expenditure.[2, 6] Hospitals that fund a PCS typically realize a sizable return on investment and good value, as these services provide better care at lower cost.[7] These benefits provide a strong rationale for all hospitals to establish a PCS. However, only 53% of acute care hospitals in California offer PC services, and only 37% have a hospital‐based PCS.[7] To increase access for patients with serious illness, it is necessary to understand the barriers that hinder the development of PCS. In this study, we asked leaders from hospitals without a PCS to describe these barriers and identify strategies that could overcome them and promote PCSs.
METHODS
In 2011, we surveyed all acute care hospitals in California to assess the prevalence of PCSs in the state. We defined a PCS as an interdisciplinary team that sees patients, identifies needs, makes treatment recommendations, facilitates patient and/or family decision making, and/or directly provides palliative care for patients with life‐threatening illness and their families. Hospitals that did not have a PCS were asked questions regarding plans to establish one (Is there an effort underway to establish a palliative care program in your hospital?), perceived barriers to starting one (What are 3 significant barriers or circumstances that have prevented your hospital from creating a palliative care program?), and ideas for overcoming barriers (What resources, training, policy changes would be most helpful in overcoming those barriers?). Questions that allowed for open‐ended responses were analyzed using a thematic approach.[8] Themes were initially reviewed by 1 researcher (C.J.B.), then refined and confirmed at each stage using an iterative process with other research team members (D.L.O., S.Z.P.) to reduce potential biases. Questions assessing hospital characteristics and status toward establishing a PCS provided a list of possible answers. Frequencies to these responses are reported accordingly.
RESULTS
Surveys were distributed to 376 acute care hospitals in California, of which 360 responded to the survey, resulting in a 96% response rate. Of the 360 hospitals surveyed, 46% (n=166) reported not offering any PCS. Out of the 166 that did not have PCS, 7 stated they had a PCS at some point in the last 5 years, but the program was discontinued. Hospitals without a PCS were largely for profit (75%, n=125), small with <150 beds (72%, n=120), and not affiliated with a system (63%, n=105). Overall, 34% (43/128) of hospitals reported that they had efforts underway to establish one, with 21% (9/43) expecting to start seeing patients within a year. Seventy‐two hospitals (56%, 72/128) reported that providers from local hospices aided them in providing their patients with PC, and that this approach met the needs of their patients. A total of 93 hospitals identified multiple barriers (n=186) to establishing a PCS, of which 162 responses could be categorized into 5 meaningful themes. Regarding strategies to overcome these barriers, 65 hospitals provided 72 responses that could be categorized into 5 meaningful themes (Table 1).
Barriers and Strategies | Responses, % (n) |
---|---|
| |
Main barriers to establishing a PCS | 93 hospitals provided 186 barriers |
Insufficient funding and/or resources | 31 (58) |
Insufficient staff to support a PCS | 20 (37) |
Perceived lack of need for a PCS | 14 (27) |
Lack of support among nonpalliative care physicians | 13 (25) |
Competing priorities | 8 (15) |
Don't know/unsure | 14 (24) |
Main strategies to overcome barriers to establishing a PCS | 65 hospitals provided 72 strategies |
Reroute funding to establish a PCS | 28 (20) |
Explain benefits of PCS to staff and community | 24 (17) |
Provide a framework for how to establish a PCS | 21 (15) |
Staff for a PCS | 18 (13) |
Physician support | 10 (7) |
DISCUSSION
Despite citing obstacles to providing PCSs, one‐third of hospitals surveyed report that they are planning to establish a program. As an alternative, many hospitals without a PCS reported that they provide their patients with PC through partnerships with local hospice services. This approach may provide some hospitals with a practical alternative to having a PCS, especially in smaller institutions where budgets and the need for PC are proportionally small. Future surveys should account for this approach to providing PCS to patients. Sharing the strong evidence of return on investment from PCS[6, 7] with hospital leaders could help overcome the perceived barrier of cost and garner financial support. Training programs and technical assistance provided by the Palliative Care Leadership Center initiative and the Center to Advance Palliative Care have a proven track record in helping hospitals establish a PCS through mentored training,[9] and the End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium has demonstrated effectiveness with nursing education.[10] These programs could provide the resources that many hospitals seek. Educating hospital leaders and clinicians about the evidence for PCSs improving care for patients with serious illness may further help to engender support for PCSs. One barrier that may be more difficult to overcome is the lack of trained PC clinicians. Efforts to educate and train generalist clinicians in primary PC may mitigate this shortfall.[1] Increasing the number of trained primary PC clinicians may also reduce fragmentation in patient care and reduce burden on specialist PC clinicians.[11] Specialty PC clinicians can also lend their expertise to hospitals seeking to start a PCS to achieve the goal of universal access to PCS.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Hospital Council of Northern and Central California, the Hospital Council of Southern California, and the Hospital Council of San Diego and Imperial Counties for their support in encouraging their members to participate. The authors also thank all of the respondents for their diligence and care in responding to the survey.
Disclosures
The California HealthCare Foundation provided funding to support the administration of the survey and analysis of findings, as well as limited dissemination of results though the foundation's communication venues. The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
- Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(2):180–190. , , , et al.
- A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):124–129. , , , , .
- Health care system factors affecting end‐of‐life care. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(suppl 1):S79–S87. .
- Impact of palliative care case management on resource use by patients dying of cancer at a Veterans Affairs medical center. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):26–35. , , .
- Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1783–1790. , , , et al.
- Two steps forward, one step back: changes in palliative care consultation services in California hospitals from 2007 to 2011. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(11):1214–1220. , , .
- Using qualitative methods to explore key questions in palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(8):725–730. , .
- Center to Advance Palliative Care palliative care consultation service metrics: consensus recommendations. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(10):1294–1298. , , .
- Evaluation of the End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium undergraduate faculty training program. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):107–114. , , , et al.
- Generalist plus specialist palliative care–creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1173–1175. , .
- Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014.
- Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(2):180–190. , , , et al.
- A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):124–129. , , , , .
- Health care system factors affecting end‐of‐life care. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(suppl 1):S79–S87. .
- Impact of palliative care case management on resource use by patients dying of cancer at a Veterans Affairs medical center. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):26–35. , , .
- Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1783–1790. , , , et al.
- Two steps forward, one step back: changes in palliative care consultation services in California hospitals from 2007 to 2011. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(11):1214–1220. , , .
- Using qualitative methods to explore key questions in palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(8):725–730. , .
- Center to Advance Palliative Care palliative care consultation service metrics: consensus recommendations. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(10):1294–1298. , , .
- Evaluation of the End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium undergraduate faculty training program. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(1):107–114. , , , et al.
- Generalist plus specialist palliative care–creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1173–1175. , .