Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/14/2024 - 07:52
Display Headline
Brown Plaque in the Axilla Following Immobilization of the Arm

The Diagnosis: Granular Parakeratosis

Histopathology demonstrated diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (Figure), a rare benign cutaneous condition that is thought to occur due to a defect in epidermal differentiation. The lesion resolved without additional treatment.

Histopathology revealed diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).
Histopathology revealed diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The pathogenesis of granular parakeratosis is unclear, but a reactive process in which locoregional irritation or occlusion prompts increased cell turnover and prevention of profilaggrin breakdown has been proposed.1,2 The diagnosis is linked to various precipitating agents, most commonly topical products (eg, zinc oxide, antiperspirants) and products with benzalkonium chloride (eg, laundry rinses). These agents are thought to cause retention of keratohyalin granules in the stratum corneum during epidermal differentiation.1,2

Most affected patients are middle-aged women (mean age at diagnosis, 37.8 years).2 Patients present with eruptions of erythematous, brown, hyperkeratotic patches and papules that coalesce into plaques.1,2 These lesions can be pruritic and painful or asymptomatic. They often manifest bilaterally in intertriginous sites, most commonly the axillae, groin, or inguinal folds.1,2

Treatment involves identification and removal of potential triggers including changing antiperspirants, limiting use of irritating agents (eg, topical products with strong fragrances), and reducing heat and moisture in the affected areas. If the lesion persists, stepwise treatment can be initiated with topical agents (eg, corticosteroids, vitamin D analogues, retinoids, keratolytics, calcineurin inhibitors) followed by systemic medications (eg, antibiotics, isotretinoin, antifungals, dexamethasone) and procedures (eg, botulinum toxin injections, surgery, laser, cryotherapy).1,2

Unilateral granular parakeratosis, as seen in our patient, is an uncommon manifestation. Our case supports the theory that occlusion is a precipitating factor for this condition, given persistent axillary exposure to heat, sweat, and friction in the setting of limb immobilization.3

Granular parakeratosis is a challenge to diagnose due to clinical overlap with several other cutaneous conditions; histopathologic confirmation is required. Fox- Fordyce disease is a rare condition that is thought to result from keratin buildup or occlusion of apocrine or apoeccrine sweat ducts leading to duct rupture and surrounding inflammation.4 Common triggers include laser hair removal, hormonal changes, and living conditions that promote hot and humid environments.5 It can manifest similarly to granular parakeratosis, with eruptions of multiple red-violet papules that appear bilaterally in aprocine gland–rich areas, including the axillae and less commonly the genital, periareolar, thoracic, abdominal, and facial areas.4,5 However, most patients with Fox-Fordyce disease tend to be younger females (aged 13–35 years) with severely pruritic lesions,4,5 unlike our patient. In addition, histopathology shows hyperkeratosis, hair follicle plugging, and sweat gland and duct dilation.4

Seborrheic keratoses are common benign epidermal tumors caused by an overproliferation of immature keratinocytes.6,7 Similar to granular parakeratosis, they commonly manifest in older adults as hyperpigmented, well-demarcated, verrucous plaques with a hyperkeratotic surface.6 However, they are more common on the face, neck, trunk, and extremities, and they tend to be asymptomatic, differentiating them from granular parakerosis.6 Histopathology demonstrates a papillomatous epidermal surface, large capillaries in the dermal papillae, and intraepidermal and pseudohorn epidermal cysts.7

Inverse lichen planus, a variant of lichen planus, is a rare inflammatory condition that involves the lysis of basal keratinocytes by CD8+ lymphocytes.8 Similar to granular parakeratosis, lichen planus commonly affects middle-aged women (aged 30–60 years), and this particular variant manifests with asymptomatic or mildly pruritic, hyperpigmented patches and plaques in intertriginous areas. Although it also shows hyperkeratosis on histopathology, it can be differentiated from granular parakeratosis by the additional findings of epidermal hypergranulosis, sawtooth acanthosis of rete ridges, apoptotic keratinocytes in the dermoepidermal junction, and lymphocytic infiltrate in the upper dermis.8

Hailey-Hailey disease (also known as familial benign pemphigus) is a rare condition caused by an autosomaldominant mutation affecting intracellular calcium signaling that impairs keratinocyte adhesion.9 Similar to granular parakeratosis, it is most common in middle-aged adults (aged 30–40 years) and manifests as pruritic and burning lesions in symmetric intertriginous areas that also can be triggered by heat and sweating. However, patients present with recurrent blistering and vesicular lesions that may lead to erosions and secondary infections, which reduced clinical suspicion for this diagnosis in our patient. Histopathology shows suprabasilar and intraepidermal clefts, full-thickness acantholysis, protruding dermal papillae, and a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the superficial dermis.9

References
  1. Ding CY, Liu H, Khachemoune A. Granular parakeratosis: a comprehensive review and a critical reappraisal. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16:495-500. doi:10.1007/s40257-015-0148-2
  2. Ip KH, Li A. Clinical features, histology, and treatment outcomes of granular parakeratosis: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61:973-978. doi:10.1111/ijd.16107
  3. Mehregan DA, Thomas JE, Mehregan DR. Intertriginous granular parakeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39:495-496. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70333-0
  4. Kamada A, Saga K, Jimbow K. Apoeccrine sweat duct obstruction as a cause for Fox-Fordyce disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:453-455. doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.93
  5. Salloum A, Bouferraa Y, Bazzi N, et al. Pathophysiology, clinical findings, and management of Fox-Fordyce disease: a systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21:482-500. doi:10.1111/jocd.14135
  6. Sun MD, Halpern AC. Advances in the etiology, detection, and clinical management of seborrheic keratoses. Dermatology. 2022;238:205-217. doi:10.1159/000517070
  7. Minagawa A. Dermoscopy-pathology relationship in seborrheic keratosis. J Dermatol. 2017;44:518-524. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.13657
  8. Weston G, Payette M. Update on lichen planus and its clinical variants [published online September 16, 2015]. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2015;1:140-149. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2015.04.001
  9. Ben Lagha I, Ashack K, Khachemoune A. Hailey-Hailey disease: an update review with a focus on treatment data. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:49-68. doi:10.1007/s40257-019-00477-z
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Rebecca K. Yamamoto and Dr. Stringer are from the Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Rogers is from and Dr. Stringer also is from MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Thomas P. Stringer, MD, MS, 5530 Wisconsin Ave, Ste 730, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 (Thomas.P.Stringer@medstar.net).

Issue
Cutis - 113(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
132,135-136
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Rebecca K. Yamamoto and Dr. Stringer are from the Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Rogers is from and Dr. Stringer also is from MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Thomas P. Stringer, MD, MS, 5530 Wisconsin Ave, Ste 730, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 (Thomas.P.Stringer@medstar.net).

Author and Disclosure Information

Rebecca K. Yamamoto and Dr. Stringer are from the Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Rogers is from and Dr. Stringer also is from MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Thomas P. Stringer, MD, MS, 5530 Wisconsin Ave, Ste 730, Chevy Chase, MD 20815 (Thomas.P.Stringer@medstar.net).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Granular Parakeratosis

Histopathology demonstrated diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (Figure), a rare benign cutaneous condition that is thought to occur due to a defect in epidermal differentiation. The lesion resolved without additional treatment.

Histopathology revealed diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).
Histopathology revealed diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The pathogenesis of granular parakeratosis is unclear, but a reactive process in which locoregional irritation or occlusion prompts increased cell turnover and prevention of profilaggrin breakdown has been proposed.1,2 The diagnosis is linked to various precipitating agents, most commonly topical products (eg, zinc oxide, antiperspirants) and products with benzalkonium chloride (eg, laundry rinses). These agents are thought to cause retention of keratohyalin granules in the stratum corneum during epidermal differentiation.1,2

Most affected patients are middle-aged women (mean age at diagnosis, 37.8 years).2 Patients present with eruptions of erythematous, brown, hyperkeratotic patches and papules that coalesce into plaques.1,2 These lesions can be pruritic and painful or asymptomatic. They often manifest bilaterally in intertriginous sites, most commonly the axillae, groin, or inguinal folds.1,2

Treatment involves identification and removal of potential triggers including changing antiperspirants, limiting use of irritating agents (eg, topical products with strong fragrances), and reducing heat and moisture in the affected areas. If the lesion persists, stepwise treatment can be initiated with topical agents (eg, corticosteroids, vitamin D analogues, retinoids, keratolytics, calcineurin inhibitors) followed by systemic medications (eg, antibiotics, isotretinoin, antifungals, dexamethasone) and procedures (eg, botulinum toxin injections, surgery, laser, cryotherapy).1,2

Unilateral granular parakeratosis, as seen in our patient, is an uncommon manifestation. Our case supports the theory that occlusion is a precipitating factor for this condition, given persistent axillary exposure to heat, sweat, and friction in the setting of limb immobilization.3

Granular parakeratosis is a challenge to diagnose due to clinical overlap with several other cutaneous conditions; histopathologic confirmation is required. Fox- Fordyce disease is a rare condition that is thought to result from keratin buildup or occlusion of apocrine or apoeccrine sweat ducts leading to duct rupture and surrounding inflammation.4 Common triggers include laser hair removal, hormonal changes, and living conditions that promote hot and humid environments.5 It can manifest similarly to granular parakeratosis, with eruptions of multiple red-violet papules that appear bilaterally in aprocine gland–rich areas, including the axillae and less commonly the genital, periareolar, thoracic, abdominal, and facial areas.4,5 However, most patients with Fox-Fordyce disease tend to be younger females (aged 13–35 years) with severely pruritic lesions,4,5 unlike our patient. In addition, histopathology shows hyperkeratosis, hair follicle plugging, and sweat gland and duct dilation.4

Seborrheic keratoses are common benign epidermal tumors caused by an overproliferation of immature keratinocytes.6,7 Similar to granular parakeratosis, they commonly manifest in older adults as hyperpigmented, well-demarcated, verrucous plaques with a hyperkeratotic surface.6 However, they are more common on the face, neck, trunk, and extremities, and they tend to be asymptomatic, differentiating them from granular parakerosis.6 Histopathology demonstrates a papillomatous epidermal surface, large capillaries in the dermal papillae, and intraepidermal and pseudohorn epidermal cysts.7

Inverse lichen planus, a variant of lichen planus, is a rare inflammatory condition that involves the lysis of basal keratinocytes by CD8+ lymphocytes.8 Similar to granular parakeratosis, lichen planus commonly affects middle-aged women (aged 30–60 years), and this particular variant manifests with asymptomatic or mildly pruritic, hyperpigmented patches and plaques in intertriginous areas. Although it also shows hyperkeratosis on histopathology, it can be differentiated from granular parakeratosis by the additional findings of epidermal hypergranulosis, sawtooth acanthosis of rete ridges, apoptotic keratinocytes in the dermoepidermal junction, and lymphocytic infiltrate in the upper dermis.8

Hailey-Hailey disease (also known as familial benign pemphigus) is a rare condition caused by an autosomaldominant mutation affecting intracellular calcium signaling that impairs keratinocyte adhesion.9 Similar to granular parakeratosis, it is most common in middle-aged adults (aged 30–40 years) and manifests as pruritic and burning lesions in symmetric intertriginous areas that also can be triggered by heat and sweating. However, patients present with recurrent blistering and vesicular lesions that may lead to erosions and secondary infections, which reduced clinical suspicion for this diagnosis in our patient. Histopathology shows suprabasilar and intraepidermal clefts, full-thickness acantholysis, protruding dermal papillae, and a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the superficial dermis.9

The Diagnosis: Granular Parakeratosis

Histopathology demonstrated diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (Figure), a rare benign cutaneous condition that is thought to occur due to a defect in epidermal differentiation. The lesion resolved without additional treatment.

Histopathology revealed diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).
Histopathology revealed diffuse parakeratosis with retention of keratohyalin granules throughout the stratum corneum consistent with a diagnosis of granular parakeratosis (H&E, original magnification ×100).

The pathogenesis of granular parakeratosis is unclear, but a reactive process in which locoregional irritation or occlusion prompts increased cell turnover and prevention of profilaggrin breakdown has been proposed.1,2 The diagnosis is linked to various precipitating agents, most commonly topical products (eg, zinc oxide, antiperspirants) and products with benzalkonium chloride (eg, laundry rinses). These agents are thought to cause retention of keratohyalin granules in the stratum corneum during epidermal differentiation.1,2

Most affected patients are middle-aged women (mean age at diagnosis, 37.8 years).2 Patients present with eruptions of erythematous, brown, hyperkeratotic patches and papules that coalesce into plaques.1,2 These lesions can be pruritic and painful or asymptomatic. They often manifest bilaterally in intertriginous sites, most commonly the axillae, groin, or inguinal folds.1,2

Treatment involves identification and removal of potential triggers including changing antiperspirants, limiting use of irritating agents (eg, topical products with strong fragrances), and reducing heat and moisture in the affected areas. If the lesion persists, stepwise treatment can be initiated with topical agents (eg, corticosteroids, vitamin D analogues, retinoids, keratolytics, calcineurin inhibitors) followed by systemic medications (eg, antibiotics, isotretinoin, antifungals, dexamethasone) and procedures (eg, botulinum toxin injections, surgery, laser, cryotherapy).1,2

Unilateral granular parakeratosis, as seen in our patient, is an uncommon manifestation. Our case supports the theory that occlusion is a precipitating factor for this condition, given persistent axillary exposure to heat, sweat, and friction in the setting of limb immobilization.3

Granular parakeratosis is a challenge to diagnose due to clinical overlap with several other cutaneous conditions; histopathologic confirmation is required. Fox- Fordyce disease is a rare condition that is thought to result from keratin buildup or occlusion of apocrine or apoeccrine sweat ducts leading to duct rupture and surrounding inflammation.4 Common triggers include laser hair removal, hormonal changes, and living conditions that promote hot and humid environments.5 It can manifest similarly to granular parakeratosis, with eruptions of multiple red-violet papules that appear bilaterally in aprocine gland–rich areas, including the axillae and less commonly the genital, periareolar, thoracic, abdominal, and facial areas.4,5 However, most patients with Fox-Fordyce disease tend to be younger females (aged 13–35 years) with severely pruritic lesions,4,5 unlike our patient. In addition, histopathology shows hyperkeratosis, hair follicle plugging, and sweat gland and duct dilation.4

Seborrheic keratoses are common benign epidermal tumors caused by an overproliferation of immature keratinocytes.6,7 Similar to granular parakeratosis, they commonly manifest in older adults as hyperpigmented, well-demarcated, verrucous plaques with a hyperkeratotic surface.6 However, they are more common on the face, neck, trunk, and extremities, and they tend to be asymptomatic, differentiating them from granular parakerosis.6 Histopathology demonstrates a papillomatous epidermal surface, large capillaries in the dermal papillae, and intraepidermal and pseudohorn epidermal cysts.7

Inverse lichen planus, a variant of lichen planus, is a rare inflammatory condition that involves the lysis of basal keratinocytes by CD8+ lymphocytes.8 Similar to granular parakeratosis, lichen planus commonly affects middle-aged women (aged 30–60 years), and this particular variant manifests with asymptomatic or mildly pruritic, hyperpigmented patches and plaques in intertriginous areas. Although it also shows hyperkeratosis on histopathology, it can be differentiated from granular parakeratosis by the additional findings of epidermal hypergranulosis, sawtooth acanthosis of rete ridges, apoptotic keratinocytes in the dermoepidermal junction, and lymphocytic infiltrate in the upper dermis.8

Hailey-Hailey disease (also known as familial benign pemphigus) is a rare condition caused by an autosomaldominant mutation affecting intracellular calcium signaling that impairs keratinocyte adhesion.9 Similar to granular parakeratosis, it is most common in middle-aged adults (aged 30–40 years) and manifests as pruritic and burning lesions in symmetric intertriginous areas that also can be triggered by heat and sweating. However, patients present with recurrent blistering and vesicular lesions that may lead to erosions and secondary infections, which reduced clinical suspicion for this diagnosis in our patient. Histopathology shows suprabasilar and intraepidermal clefts, full-thickness acantholysis, protruding dermal papillae, and a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the superficial dermis.9

References
  1. Ding CY, Liu H, Khachemoune A. Granular parakeratosis: a comprehensive review and a critical reappraisal. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16:495-500. doi:10.1007/s40257-015-0148-2
  2. Ip KH, Li A. Clinical features, histology, and treatment outcomes of granular parakeratosis: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61:973-978. doi:10.1111/ijd.16107
  3. Mehregan DA, Thomas JE, Mehregan DR. Intertriginous granular parakeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39:495-496. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70333-0
  4. Kamada A, Saga K, Jimbow K. Apoeccrine sweat duct obstruction as a cause for Fox-Fordyce disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:453-455. doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.93
  5. Salloum A, Bouferraa Y, Bazzi N, et al. Pathophysiology, clinical findings, and management of Fox-Fordyce disease: a systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21:482-500. doi:10.1111/jocd.14135
  6. Sun MD, Halpern AC. Advances in the etiology, detection, and clinical management of seborrheic keratoses. Dermatology. 2022;238:205-217. doi:10.1159/000517070
  7. Minagawa A. Dermoscopy-pathology relationship in seborrheic keratosis. J Dermatol. 2017;44:518-524. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.13657
  8. Weston G, Payette M. Update on lichen planus and its clinical variants [published online September 16, 2015]. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2015;1:140-149. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2015.04.001
  9. Ben Lagha I, Ashack K, Khachemoune A. Hailey-Hailey disease: an update review with a focus on treatment data. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:49-68. doi:10.1007/s40257-019-00477-z
References
  1. Ding CY, Liu H, Khachemoune A. Granular parakeratosis: a comprehensive review and a critical reappraisal. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16:495-500. doi:10.1007/s40257-015-0148-2
  2. Ip KH, Li A. Clinical features, histology, and treatment outcomes of granular parakeratosis: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61:973-978. doi:10.1111/ijd.16107
  3. Mehregan DA, Thomas JE, Mehregan DR. Intertriginous granular parakeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39:495-496. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70333-0
  4. Kamada A, Saga K, Jimbow K. Apoeccrine sweat duct obstruction as a cause for Fox-Fordyce disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:453-455. doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.93
  5. Salloum A, Bouferraa Y, Bazzi N, et al. Pathophysiology, clinical findings, and management of Fox-Fordyce disease: a systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21:482-500. doi:10.1111/jocd.14135
  6. Sun MD, Halpern AC. Advances in the etiology, detection, and clinical management of seborrheic keratoses. Dermatology. 2022;238:205-217. doi:10.1159/000517070
  7. Minagawa A. Dermoscopy-pathology relationship in seborrheic keratosis. J Dermatol. 2017;44:518-524. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.13657
  8. Weston G, Payette M. Update on lichen planus and its clinical variants [published online September 16, 2015]. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2015;1:140-149. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2015.04.001
  9. Ben Lagha I, Ashack K, Khachemoune A. Hailey-Hailey disease: an update review with a focus on treatment data. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21:49-68. doi:10.1007/s40257-019-00477-z
Issue
Cutis - 113(3)
Issue
Cutis - 113(3)
Page Number
132,135-136
Page Number
132,135-136
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Brown Plaque in the Axilla Following Immobilization of the Arm
Display Headline
Brown Plaque in the Axilla Following Immobilization of the Arm
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 62-year-old woman presented to our clinic for evaluation of a brown plaque in the left axilla of 2 weeks’ duration. She had a history of a rotator cuff injury and adhesive capsulitis several months prior that required immobilization of the left arm in a shoulder orthosis for several months. After the sling was removed, she noticed the lesion and reported mild cutaneous pain. Physical examination revealed a 1.5-cm, verrucous, red-brown plaque in the left axillary vault. A shave biopsy of the plaque was performed.

Brown plaque in the axilla

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 03/05/2024 - 08:00
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 03/05/2024 - 08:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 03/05/2024 - 08:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media