Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 11:19

Key clinical point: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) that did vs did not contain cisplatin improved survival in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially those with residual cancer burden (RCB) class II/III, a group that is typically associated with worse prognosis.

Major finding: Patients who did vs did not receive cisplatin-based regimens in the overall population reported significantly improved distant disease-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.127; P < .001), especially those in the RCB class II/III group (HR 0.192; P = .013).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study including 138 previously untreated patients with stage I-III TNBC who received NAC with (n = 52) or without (n = 86) cisplatin.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Japan Society for Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant. Several authors declared receiving grants, consulting fees, or honoraria from, or serving as a members of advisory boards, boards of directors, or as an associate editor for various sources.

Source: Yamaguchi A et al. Comparison of cisplatin-based versus standard preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer: Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 (Dec 21). doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07163-z

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) that did vs did not contain cisplatin improved survival in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially those with residual cancer burden (RCB) class II/III, a group that is typically associated with worse prognosis.

Major finding: Patients who did vs did not receive cisplatin-based regimens in the overall population reported significantly improved distant disease-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.127; P < .001), especially those in the RCB class II/III group (HR 0.192; P = .013).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study including 138 previously untreated patients with stage I-III TNBC who received NAC with (n = 52) or without (n = 86) cisplatin.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Japan Society for Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant. Several authors declared receiving grants, consulting fees, or honoraria from, or serving as a members of advisory boards, boards of directors, or as an associate editor for various sources.

Source: Yamaguchi A et al. Comparison of cisplatin-based versus standard preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer: Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 (Dec 21). doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07163-z

 

Key clinical point: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) that did vs did not contain cisplatin improved survival in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially those with residual cancer burden (RCB) class II/III, a group that is typically associated with worse prognosis.

Major finding: Patients who did vs did not receive cisplatin-based regimens in the overall population reported significantly improved distant disease-free survival (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.127; P < .001), especially those in the RCB class II/III group (HR 0.192; P = .013).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study including 138 previously untreated patients with stage I-III TNBC who received NAC with (n = 52) or without (n = 86) cisplatin.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a Japan Society for Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant. Several authors declared receiving grants, consulting fees, or honoraria from, or serving as a members of advisory boards, boards of directors, or as an associate editor for various sources.

Source: Yamaguchi A et al. Comparison of cisplatin-based versus standard preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer: Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 (Dec 21). doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07163-z

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer February 2024
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/22/2021 - 11:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article