User login
TOPLINE:
Individuals using contraceptive pills, patches, and rings must frequently interact with the healthcare system for continued use. More than half of US contraceptive users prefer alternative sources over traditional in-person care. Only 35.6% of respondents selected in-person care as their most preferred source.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers conducted a cross-sectional nationally representative survey in the United States in 2022 through NORC’s AmeriSpeak panel.
- A total of 3059 eligible panelists, aged 15-44 years, completed the survey, with 595 individuals currently using a pill, patch, or ring contraceptive included in the analysis.
- Primary outcomes measured were the use of any preferred source and the most preferred source when obtaining contraception.
- Sources included in-person care, telehealth, pharmacist-prescribed, online service, and over the counter.
- Data were analyzed from January 25, 2023, to August 15, 2024.
TAKEAWAY:
- Only 35.6% of respondents selected in-person care as their most preferred source of contraception.
- Only 49.7% of respondents obtained their method from a preferred source, while 39.8% received it from their most preferred source.
- Respondents who previously reported being unable to get their method on time had higher odds of preferring an alternative source (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.36-4.87).
- Those who recently received person-centered contraceptive counseling had lower odds of preferring an alternative source (AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.98).
IN PRACTICE:
“The low level of preference for in-person care suggests that expanding contraceptive sources outside of traditional healthcare settings has a role in ameliorating barriers to access and can promote reproductive autonomy,” wrote the authors of the study.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Anu Manchikanti Gómez, PhD, Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. It was published online in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
The study’s cross-sectional design limited the ability to establish causality. The sample was limited to individuals aged 15-44 years, which may not represent all contraceptive users. Self-reported data may be subject to recall bias. The study did not distinguish between synchronous and asynchronous telehealth preferences.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by Arnold Ventures. Gómez disclosed receiving personal fees from various organizations outside the submitted work. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Individuals using contraceptive pills, patches, and rings must frequently interact with the healthcare system for continued use. More than half of US contraceptive users prefer alternative sources over traditional in-person care. Only 35.6% of respondents selected in-person care as their most preferred source.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers conducted a cross-sectional nationally representative survey in the United States in 2022 through NORC’s AmeriSpeak panel.
- A total of 3059 eligible panelists, aged 15-44 years, completed the survey, with 595 individuals currently using a pill, patch, or ring contraceptive included in the analysis.
- Primary outcomes measured were the use of any preferred source and the most preferred source when obtaining contraception.
- Sources included in-person care, telehealth, pharmacist-prescribed, online service, and over the counter.
- Data were analyzed from January 25, 2023, to August 15, 2024.
TAKEAWAY:
- Only 35.6% of respondents selected in-person care as their most preferred source of contraception.
- Only 49.7% of respondents obtained their method from a preferred source, while 39.8% received it from their most preferred source.
- Respondents who previously reported being unable to get their method on time had higher odds of preferring an alternative source (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.36-4.87).
- Those who recently received person-centered contraceptive counseling had lower odds of preferring an alternative source (AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.98).
IN PRACTICE:
“The low level of preference for in-person care suggests that expanding contraceptive sources outside of traditional healthcare settings has a role in ameliorating barriers to access and can promote reproductive autonomy,” wrote the authors of the study.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Anu Manchikanti Gómez, PhD, Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. It was published online in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
The study’s cross-sectional design limited the ability to establish causality. The sample was limited to individuals aged 15-44 years, which may not represent all contraceptive users. Self-reported data may be subject to recall bias. The study did not distinguish between synchronous and asynchronous telehealth preferences.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by Arnold Ventures. Gómez disclosed receiving personal fees from various organizations outside the submitted work. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Individuals using contraceptive pills, patches, and rings must frequently interact with the healthcare system for continued use. More than half of US contraceptive users prefer alternative sources over traditional in-person care. Only 35.6% of respondents selected in-person care as their most preferred source.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers conducted a cross-sectional nationally representative survey in the United States in 2022 through NORC’s AmeriSpeak panel.
- A total of 3059 eligible panelists, aged 15-44 years, completed the survey, with 595 individuals currently using a pill, patch, or ring contraceptive included in the analysis.
- Primary outcomes measured were the use of any preferred source and the most preferred source when obtaining contraception.
- Sources included in-person care, telehealth, pharmacist-prescribed, online service, and over the counter.
- Data were analyzed from January 25, 2023, to August 15, 2024.
TAKEAWAY:
- Only 35.6% of respondents selected in-person care as their most preferred source of contraception.
- Only 49.7% of respondents obtained their method from a preferred source, while 39.8% received it from their most preferred source.
- Respondents who previously reported being unable to get their method on time had higher odds of preferring an alternative source (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.36-4.87).
- Those who recently received person-centered contraceptive counseling had lower odds of preferring an alternative source (AOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.98).
IN PRACTICE:
“The low level of preference for in-person care suggests that expanding contraceptive sources outside of traditional healthcare settings has a role in ameliorating barriers to access and can promote reproductive autonomy,” wrote the authors of the study.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Anu Manchikanti Gómez, PhD, Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. It was published online in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
The study’s cross-sectional design limited the ability to establish causality. The sample was limited to individuals aged 15-44 years, which may not represent all contraceptive users. Self-reported data may be subject to recall bias. The study did not distinguish between synchronous and asynchronous telehealth preferences.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by Arnold Ventures. Gómez disclosed receiving personal fees from various organizations outside the submitted work. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.