Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/24/2022 - 22:29
Display Headline
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Isotopic Response to Herpes Zoster Infection

To the Editor:

Wolf isotopic response describes the development of a skin disorder at the site of another healed and unrelated skin disease. Skin disorders presenting as isotopic responses have included inflammatory, malignant, granulomatous, and infectious processes. Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a rare isotopic response. We report a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like isotopic response that presented at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection in a liver transplant recipient.

A 74-year-old immunocompromised woman was referred to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of a rash on the right leg. She was being treated with maintenance valganciclovir due to cytomegalovirus viremia, as well as tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisone following liver transplantation due to autoimmune hepatitis for 8 months prior to presentation. Eighteen days prior to the current presentation, she was clinically diagnosed with herpes zoster. As the grouped vesicles from the herpes zoster resolved, she developed pink scaly papules in the same distribution as the original vesicular eruption.

Dermatomal distribution of grouped erythematous papules (2 to 3 mm in size) at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection on the right leg.
FIGURE 1. A–D, Dermatomal distribution of grouped erythematous papules (2 to 3 mm in size) at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection on the right leg.

Physical examination revealed numerous erythematous, 2- to 3-mm, scaly papules that coalesced into small plaques with serous crusts; they originated above the supragluteal cleft and extended rightward in the L3 and L4 dermatomes to the right knee (Figure 1). A 3-mm punch biopsy specimen was obtained from the right anterior thigh. Histologic analysis revealed interface lymphocytic inflammation with squamatization of basal keratinocytes, basement membrane thickening, and follicular plugging by keratin (Figure 2). There was a moderately intense perivascular and periadnexal inflammatory infiltrate of mature lymphocytes with rare eosinophils within the papillary and superficial reticular dermis. There was no evidence of a viral cytopathic effect, and an immunohistochemical stain for varicella-zoster virus protein was negative. The histologic findings were suggestive of cutaneous involvement by DLE. A diagnosis of a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like Wolf isotopic response was made, and the patient’s rash resolved with the use of triamcinolone cream 0.1% applied twice daily for 2 weeks. At 6-week follow-up, there were postinflammatory pigmentation changes at the sites of the prior rash and persistent postherpetic neuralgia. Recent antinuclear antibody screening was negative, coupled with the patient’s lack of systemic symptoms and quick resolution of rash, indicating that additional testing for systemic lupus was not warranted.

A punch biopsy showed interface, perivascular, and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation and follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×40).
FIGURE 2. A, A punch biopsy showed interface, perivascular, and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation and follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Interface lymphocytic inflammation with squamatization of basal keratinocytes and basement membrane thickening (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Wolf isotopic response describes the occurrence of a new skin disorder at the site of a previously healed and unrelated skin disorder. The second disease may appear within days to years after the primary disease subsides and is clearly differentiated from the isomorphic response of the Koebner phenomenon, which describes an established skin disorder appearing at a previously uninvolved anatomic site following trauma.1 As in our case, the initial cutaneous eruption resulting in a subsequent Wolf isotopic response frequently is herpes zoster and less commonly is herpes simplex virus.2 The most common reported isotopic response is a granulomatous reaction.2 Rare reports of leukemic infiltration, lymphoma, lichen planus, morphea, reactive perforating collagenosis, psoriasis, discoid lupus, lichen simplex chronicus, contact dermatitis, xanthomatous changes, malignant tumors, cutaneous graft-vs-host disease, pityriasis rosea, erythema annulare centrifugum, and other infectious-based isotopic responses exist.2-6

Our patient presented with Wolf isotopic response that histologically mimicked DLE. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms isotopic response and lupus revealed only 3 cases of cutaneous lupus erythematosus presenting as an isotopic response in the English-language literature. One of those cases occurred in a patient with preexisting systemic lupus erythematosus, making a diagnosis of Koebner isomorphic phenomenon more appropriate than an isotopic response at the site of prior herpes zoster infection.7 The remaining 2 cases were clinically defined DLE lesions occurring at sites of prior infection—cutaneous leishmaniasis and herpes zoster—in patients without a prior history of cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus.8,9 The latter case of DLE-like isotopic response occurring after herpes zoster infection was further complicated by local injections at the zoster site for herpes-related local pain. Injection sites are reported as a distinct nidus for Wolf isotopic response.9

The pathogenesis of Wolf isotopic response is unclear. Possible explanations include local interactions between persistent viral particles at prior herpes infection sites, vascular injury, neural injury, and an altered immune response.1,5,6,10 The destruction of sensory nerve fibers by herpesviruses cause the release of neuropeptides that then modulate the local immune system and angiogenic responses.5,6 Our patient’s immunocompromised state may have further propagated a local altered immune cell infiltrate at the site of the isotopic response. Despite its unclear etiology, Wolf isotopic response should be considered in the differential diagnosis for any patient who presents with a dermatomal eruption at the site of a prior cutaneous infection, particularly after infection with herpes zoster. Treatment with topical or intralesional corticosteroids usually suffices for inflammatory-based isotopic responses with an excellent prognosis.11

We present a case of a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like isotopic response that occurred at the site of a recent herpes zoster eruption in an immunocompromised patient without prior history of systemic or cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clinical recognition of Wolf isotopic response is important for accurate histopathologic diagnosis and management. Continued investigation into the underlying pathogenesis should be performed to fully understand and better treat this process.

References
  1. Sharma RC, Sharma NL, Mahajan V, et al. Wolf’s isotopic response: herpes simplex appearing on scrofuloderma scar. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:664-666.
  2. Wolf R, Wolf D, Ruocco E, et al. Wolf’s isotopic response. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:237-240.
  3. Wyburn-Mason R. Malignant change arising in tissues affected by herpes. Br Med J. 1955;2:1106-1109.
  4. Wolf R, Wolf D. “Wolf’s isotopic response”: the originators speak their mind and set the record straight. Clin Dermatol. 2017;35:416-418.
  5. Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Ghersetich I, et al. Isotopic response after herpesvirus infection: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:90-94.
  6. Wolf R, Brenner S, Ruocco V, et al. Isotopic response. Int J Dermatol. 1995;34:341-348.
  7. Lee NY, Daniel AS, Dasher DA, et al. Cutaneous lupus after herpes zoster: isomorphic, isotopic, or both? Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30:110-113.

  8. Bardazzi F, Giacomini F, Savoia F, et al. Discoid chronic lupus erythematosus at the site of a previously healed cutaneous leishmaniasis: an example of isotopic response. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23:44-46.
  9. Parimalam K, Kumar D, Thomas J. Discoid lupus erythematosis occurring as an isotopic response. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6:50-51.
  10. Wolf R, Lotti T, Ruocco V. Isomorphic versus isotopic response: data and hypotheses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;17:123-125.
  11. James W, Elston D, Treat J, et al. Viral diseases. In: James W, Elston D, Treat J, et al, eds. Andrew’s Diseases of the Skin. 13th ed. Elsevier; 2020:362-420.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Samaan is from the Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Dr. Rohr is from the Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Ohio. Drs. Maroon and Chandler are from Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania. Dr. Maroon is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Chandler is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Christen Botros Samaan, MD, Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 200 Campus Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 (csamaan@pennstatehealth.psu.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 109(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E22-E24
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Samaan is from the Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Dr. Rohr is from the Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Ohio. Drs. Maroon and Chandler are from Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania. Dr. Maroon is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Chandler is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Christen Botros Samaan, MD, Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 200 Campus Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 (csamaan@pennstatehealth.psu.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Samaan is from the Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania. Dr. Rohr is from the Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Ohio. Drs. Maroon and Chandler are from Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania. Dr. Maroon is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Chandler is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Christen Botros Samaan, MD, Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 200 Campus Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 (csamaan@pennstatehealth.psu.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

Wolf isotopic response describes the development of a skin disorder at the site of another healed and unrelated skin disease. Skin disorders presenting as isotopic responses have included inflammatory, malignant, granulomatous, and infectious processes. Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a rare isotopic response. We report a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like isotopic response that presented at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection in a liver transplant recipient.

A 74-year-old immunocompromised woman was referred to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of a rash on the right leg. She was being treated with maintenance valganciclovir due to cytomegalovirus viremia, as well as tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisone following liver transplantation due to autoimmune hepatitis for 8 months prior to presentation. Eighteen days prior to the current presentation, she was clinically diagnosed with herpes zoster. As the grouped vesicles from the herpes zoster resolved, she developed pink scaly papules in the same distribution as the original vesicular eruption.

Dermatomal distribution of grouped erythematous papules (2 to 3 mm in size) at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection on the right leg.
FIGURE 1. A–D, Dermatomal distribution of grouped erythematous papules (2 to 3 mm in size) at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection on the right leg.

Physical examination revealed numerous erythematous, 2- to 3-mm, scaly papules that coalesced into small plaques with serous crusts; they originated above the supragluteal cleft and extended rightward in the L3 and L4 dermatomes to the right knee (Figure 1). A 3-mm punch biopsy specimen was obtained from the right anterior thigh. Histologic analysis revealed interface lymphocytic inflammation with squamatization of basal keratinocytes, basement membrane thickening, and follicular plugging by keratin (Figure 2). There was a moderately intense perivascular and periadnexal inflammatory infiltrate of mature lymphocytes with rare eosinophils within the papillary and superficial reticular dermis. There was no evidence of a viral cytopathic effect, and an immunohistochemical stain for varicella-zoster virus protein was negative. The histologic findings were suggestive of cutaneous involvement by DLE. A diagnosis of a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like Wolf isotopic response was made, and the patient’s rash resolved with the use of triamcinolone cream 0.1% applied twice daily for 2 weeks. At 6-week follow-up, there were postinflammatory pigmentation changes at the sites of the prior rash and persistent postherpetic neuralgia. Recent antinuclear antibody screening was negative, coupled with the patient’s lack of systemic symptoms and quick resolution of rash, indicating that additional testing for systemic lupus was not warranted.

A punch biopsy showed interface, perivascular, and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation and follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×40).
FIGURE 2. A, A punch biopsy showed interface, perivascular, and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation and follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Interface lymphocytic inflammation with squamatization of basal keratinocytes and basement membrane thickening (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Wolf isotopic response describes the occurrence of a new skin disorder at the site of a previously healed and unrelated skin disorder. The second disease may appear within days to years after the primary disease subsides and is clearly differentiated from the isomorphic response of the Koebner phenomenon, which describes an established skin disorder appearing at a previously uninvolved anatomic site following trauma.1 As in our case, the initial cutaneous eruption resulting in a subsequent Wolf isotopic response frequently is herpes zoster and less commonly is herpes simplex virus.2 The most common reported isotopic response is a granulomatous reaction.2 Rare reports of leukemic infiltration, lymphoma, lichen planus, morphea, reactive perforating collagenosis, psoriasis, discoid lupus, lichen simplex chronicus, contact dermatitis, xanthomatous changes, malignant tumors, cutaneous graft-vs-host disease, pityriasis rosea, erythema annulare centrifugum, and other infectious-based isotopic responses exist.2-6

Our patient presented with Wolf isotopic response that histologically mimicked DLE. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms isotopic response and lupus revealed only 3 cases of cutaneous lupus erythematosus presenting as an isotopic response in the English-language literature. One of those cases occurred in a patient with preexisting systemic lupus erythematosus, making a diagnosis of Koebner isomorphic phenomenon more appropriate than an isotopic response at the site of prior herpes zoster infection.7 The remaining 2 cases were clinically defined DLE lesions occurring at sites of prior infection—cutaneous leishmaniasis and herpes zoster—in patients without a prior history of cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus.8,9 The latter case of DLE-like isotopic response occurring after herpes zoster infection was further complicated by local injections at the zoster site for herpes-related local pain. Injection sites are reported as a distinct nidus for Wolf isotopic response.9

The pathogenesis of Wolf isotopic response is unclear. Possible explanations include local interactions between persistent viral particles at prior herpes infection sites, vascular injury, neural injury, and an altered immune response.1,5,6,10 The destruction of sensory nerve fibers by herpesviruses cause the release of neuropeptides that then modulate the local immune system and angiogenic responses.5,6 Our patient’s immunocompromised state may have further propagated a local altered immune cell infiltrate at the site of the isotopic response. Despite its unclear etiology, Wolf isotopic response should be considered in the differential diagnosis for any patient who presents with a dermatomal eruption at the site of a prior cutaneous infection, particularly after infection with herpes zoster. Treatment with topical or intralesional corticosteroids usually suffices for inflammatory-based isotopic responses with an excellent prognosis.11

We present a case of a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like isotopic response that occurred at the site of a recent herpes zoster eruption in an immunocompromised patient without prior history of systemic or cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clinical recognition of Wolf isotopic response is important for accurate histopathologic diagnosis and management. Continued investigation into the underlying pathogenesis should be performed to fully understand and better treat this process.

To the Editor:

Wolf isotopic response describes the development of a skin disorder at the site of another healed and unrelated skin disease. Skin disorders presenting as isotopic responses have included inflammatory, malignant, granulomatous, and infectious processes. Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a rare isotopic response. We report a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like isotopic response that presented at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection in a liver transplant recipient.

A 74-year-old immunocompromised woman was referred to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of a rash on the right leg. She was being treated with maintenance valganciclovir due to cytomegalovirus viremia, as well as tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisone following liver transplantation due to autoimmune hepatitis for 8 months prior to presentation. Eighteen days prior to the current presentation, she was clinically diagnosed with herpes zoster. As the grouped vesicles from the herpes zoster resolved, she developed pink scaly papules in the same distribution as the original vesicular eruption.

Dermatomal distribution of grouped erythematous papules (2 to 3 mm in size) at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection on the right leg.
FIGURE 1. A–D, Dermatomal distribution of grouped erythematous papules (2 to 3 mm in size) at the site of a recent herpes zoster infection on the right leg.

Physical examination revealed numerous erythematous, 2- to 3-mm, scaly papules that coalesced into small plaques with serous crusts; they originated above the supragluteal cleft and extended rightward in the L3 and L4 dermatomes to the right knee (Figure 1). A 3-mm punch biopsy specimen was obtained from the right anterior thigh. Histologic analysis revealed interface lymphocytic inflammation with squamatization of basal keratinocytes, basement membrane thickening, and follicular plugging by keratin (Figure 2). There was a moderately intense perivascular and periadnexal inflammatory infiltrate of mature lymphocytes with rare eosinophils within the papillary and superficial reticular dermis. There was no evidence of a viral cytopathic effect, and an immunohistochemical stain for varicella-zoster virus protein was negative. The histologic findings were suggestive of cutaneous involvement by DLE. A diagnosis of a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like Wolf isotopic response was made, and the patient’s rash resolved with the use of triamcinolone cream 0.1% applied twice daily for 2 weeks. At 6-week follow-up, there were postinflammatory pigmentation changes at the sites of the prior rash and persistent postherpetic neuralgia. Recent antinuclear antibody screening was negative, coupled with the patient’s lack of systemic symptoms and quick resolution of rash, indicating that additional testing for systemic lupus was not warranted.

A punch biopsy showed interface, perivascular, and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation and follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×40).
FIGURE 2. A, A punch biopsy showed interface, perivascular, and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation and follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Interface lymphocytic inflammation with squamatization of basal keratinocytes and basement membrane thickening (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Wolf isotopic response describes the occurrence of a new skin disorder at the site of a previously healed and unrelated skin disorder. The second disease may appear within days to years after the primary disease subsides and is clearly differentiated from the isomorphic response of the Koebner phenomenon, which describes an established skin disorder appearing at a previously uninvolved anatomic site following trauma.1 As in our case, the initial cutaneous eruption resulting in a subsequent Wolf isotopic response frequently is herpes zoster and less commonly is herpes simplex virus.2 The most common reported isotopic response is a granulomatous reaction.2 Rare reports of leukemic infiltration, lymphoma, lichen planus, morphea, reactive perforating collagenosis, psoriasis, discoid lupus, lichen simplex chronicus, contact dermatitis, xanthomatous changes, malignant tumors, cutaneous graft-vs-host disease, pityriasis rosea, erythema annulare centrifugum, and other infectious-based isotopic responses exist.2-6

Our patient presented with Wolf isotopic response that histologically mimicked DLE. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms isotopic response and lupus revealed only 3 cases of cutaneous lupus erythematosus presenting as an isotopic response in the English-language literature. One of those cases occurred in a patient with preexisting systemic lupus erythematosus, making a diagnosis of Koebner isomorphic phenomenon more appropriate than an isotopic response at the site of prior herpes zoster infection.7 The remaining 2 cases were clinically defined DLE lesions occurring at sites of prior infection—cutaneous leishmaniasis and herpes zoster—in patients without a prior history of cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus.8,9 The latter case of DLE-like isotopic response occurring after herpes zoster infection was further complicated by local injections at the zoster site for herpes-related local pain. Injection sites are reported as a distinct nidus for Wolf isotopic response.9

The pathogenesis of Wolf isotopic response is unclear. Possible explanations include local interactions between persistent viral particles at prior herpes infection sites, vascular injury, neural injury, and an altered immune response.1,5,6,10 The destruction of sensory nerve fibers by herpesviruses cause the release of neuropeptides that then modulate the local immune system and angiogenic responses.5,6 Our patient’s immunocompromised state may have further propagated a local altered immune cell infiltrate at the site of the isotopic response. Despite its unclear etiology, Wolf isotopic response should be considered in the differential diagnosis for any patient who presents with a dermatomal eruption at the site of a prior cutaneous infection, particularly after infection with herpes zoster. Treatment with topical or intralesional corticosteroids usually suffices for inflammatory-based isotopic responses with an excellent prognosis.11

We present a case of a cutaneous lupus erythematosus–like isotopic response that occurred at the site of a recent herpes zoster eruption in an immunocompromised patient without prior history of systemic or cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clinical recognition of Wolf isotopic response is important for accurate histopathologic diagnosis and management. Continued investigation into the underlying pathogenesis should be performed to fully understand and better treat this process.

References
  1. Sharma RC, Sharma NL, Mahajan V, et al. Wolf’s isotopic response: herpes simplex appearing on scrofuloderma scar. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:664-666.
  2. Wolf R, Wolf D, Ruocco E, et al. Wolf’s isotopic response. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:237-240.
  3. Wyburn-Mason R. Malignant change arising in tissues affected by herpes. Br Med J. 1955;2:1106-1109.
  4. Wolf R, Wolf D. “Wolf’s isotopic response”: the originators speak their mind and set the record straight. Clin Dermatol. 2017;35:416-418.
  5. Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Ghersetich I, et al. Isotopic response after herpesvirus infection: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:90-94.
  6. Wolf R, Brenner S, Ruocco V, et al. Isotopic response. Int J Dermatol. 1995;34:341-348.
  7. Lee NY, Daniel AS, Dasher DA, et al. Cutaneous lupus after herpes zoster: isomorphic, isotopic, or both? Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30:110-113.

  8. Bardazzi F, Giacomini F, Savoia F, et al. Discoid chronic lupus erythematosus at the site of a previously healed cutaneous leishmaniasis: an example of isotopic response. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23:44-46.
  9. Parimalam K, Kumar D, Thomas J. Discoid lupus erythematosis occurring as an isotopic response. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6:50-51.
  10. Wolf R, Lotti T, Ruocco V. Isomorphic versus isotopic response: data and hypotheses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;17:123-125.
  11. James W, Elston D, Treat J, et al. Viral diseases. In: James W, Elston D, Treat J, et al, eds. Andrew’s Diseases of the Skin. 13th ed. Elsevier; 2020:362-420.
References
  1. Sharma RC, Sharma NL, Mahajan V, et al. Wolf’s isotopic response: herpes simplex appearing on scrofuloderma scar. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:664-666.
  2. Wolf R, Wolf D, Ruocco E, et al. Wolf’s isotopic response. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:237-240.
  3. Wyburn-Mason R. Malignant change arising in tissues affected by herpes. Br Med J. 1955;2:1106-1109.
  4. Wolf R, Wolf D. “Wolf’s isotopic response”: the originators speak their mind and set the record straight. Clin Dermatol. 2017;35:416-418.
  5. Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Ghersetich I, et al. Isotopic response after herpesvirus infection: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:90-94.
  6. Wolf R, Brenner S, Ruocco V, et al. Isotopic response. Int J Dermatol. 1995;34:341-348.
  7. Lee NY, Daniel AS, Dasher DA, et al. Cutaneous lupus after herpes zoster: isomorphic, isotopic, or both? Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30:110-113.

  8. Bardazzi F, Giacomini F, Savoia F, et al. Discoid chronic lupus erythematosus at the site of a previously healed cutaneous leishmaniasis: an example of isotopic response. Dermatol Ther. 2010;23:44-46.
  9. Parimalam K, Kumar D, Thomas J. Discoid lupus erythematosis occurring as an isotopic response. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6:50-51.
  10. Wolf R, Lotti T, Ruocco V. Isomorphic versus isotopic response: data and hypotheses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;17:123-125.
  11. James W, Elston D, Treat J, et al. Viral diseases. In: James W, Elston D, Treat J, et al, eds. Andrew’s Diseases of the Skin. 13th ed. Elsevier; 2020:362-420.
Issue
Cutis - 109(5)
Issue
Cutis - 109(5)
Page Number
E22-E24
Page Number
E22-E24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Isotopic Response to Herpes Zoster Infection
Display Headline
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Isotopic Response to Herpes Zoster Infection
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Wolf isotopic response describes the occurrence of a new skin condition at the site of a previously healed and unrelated skin disorder; a granulomatous reaction is a commonly reported isotopic response.
  • Treatment with topical or intralesional corticosteroids usually suffices for inflammatory-based isotopic responses.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media