Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/28/2023 - 09:09

 

TOPLINE:

Ultrasonography may serve as an alternative to radiography for diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures, thus reducing the number of children undergoing radiography at initial emergency department presentation, as well as their waiting time in ED.

METHODOLOGY:

  • After the World Health Organization reported a lack of access to any diagnostic imaging in approximately two-thirds of the world population in 2010, ultrasonography has gained popularity in low- and middle-income countries.
  • The initial use of ultrasonography is in accordance with the principle of maintaining radiation levels as low as reasonably achievable.
  • The BUCKLED trial was conducted, including 270 pediatric patients (age, 5-15 years) who presented to the ED with isolated, acute, clinically nondeformed distal forearm fractures.
  • The participants were randomly assigned to receive initial point-of-care ultrasonography (n = 135) or radiography (n = 135) in the ED.
  • The primary outcome was the physical function of the affected arm at 4 weeks evaluated using the Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tool.

TAKEAWAY:

  • At 4 weeks, mean PROMIS scores were 36.4 and 36.3 points in ultrasonography and radiography groups, respectively (mean difference, 0.1 point; 95% confidence interval, − 1.3 to 1.4), indicating noninferiority of ultrasonography over radiography.
  • Ultrasonography and radiography groups showed similar efficacy in terms of PROMIS scores at 1 week (MD, 0.7 points; 95% CI, − 1.4 to 2.8) and 8 weeks (MD, 0.1 points; 95% CI, − 0.5 to 0.7).
  • Participants in the ultrasonography group had a shorter length of stay in the ED (median difference, 15 minutes; 95% CI, 1-29) and a shorter treatment time (median difference, 28 minutes; 95% CI, 17-40) than those in the radiography group.
  • No important fractures were missed with ultrasonography, and no significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse events or unplanned returns to the ED between the two groups.

IN PRACTICE:

Noting the benefit-risk profile of an ultrasound-first approach in an ED setting, the lead author, Peter J. Snelling, MB, BS, MPH&TM, from Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia, said: “It is highly unlikely that any important fractures would be missed using the protocol that we trained clinicians. The risk is low and the benefit is moderate, such as reducing length of stay and increased level of patient satisfaction.”

He further added that, “with an ultrasound-first approach, clinicians can scan the patient at time of review and may even be able to discharge them immediately (two-thirds of instances in our NEJM trial). This places the patient at the center of care being provided.”
 

SOURCE: 

Authors from the BUCKLED Trial Group published their study in the New England Journal of Medicine.

LIMITATIONS:

PROMIS scores may have been affected by variations in subsequent therapeutic interventions rather than the initial diagnostic method. PROMIS tool was not validated in children younger than 5 years of age.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by the Emergency Medicine Foundation and others. The authors have declared no relevant interests to disclose.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

TOPLINE:

Ultrasonography may serve as an alternative to radiography for diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures, thus reducing the number of children undergoing radiography at initial emergency department presentation, as well as their waiting time in ED.

METHODOLOGY:

  • After the World Health Organization reported a lack of access to any diagnostic imaging in approximately two-thirds of the world population in 2010, ultrasonography has gained popularity in low- and middle-income countries.
  • The initial use of ultrasonography is in accordance with the principle of maintaining radiation levels as low as reasonably achievable.
  • The BUCKLED trial was conducted, including 270 pediatric patients (age, 5-15 years) who presented to the ED with isolated, acute, clinically nondeformed distal forearm fractures.
  • The participants were randomly assigned to receive initial point-of-care ultrasonography (n = 135) or radiography (n = 135) in the ED.
  • The primary outcome was the physical function of the affected arm at 4 weeks evaluated using the Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tool.

TAKEAWAY:

  • At 4 weeks, mean PROMIS scores were 36.4 and 36.3 points in ultrasonography and radiography groups, respectively (mean difference, 0.1 point; 95% confidence interval, − 1.3 to 1.4), indicating noninferiority of ultrasonography over radiography.
  • Ultrasonography and radiography groups showed similar efficacy in terms of PROMIS scores at 1 week (MD, 0.7 points; 95% CI, − 1.4 to 2.8) and 8 weeks (MD, 0.1 points; 95% CI, − 0.5 to 0.7).
  • Participants in the ultrasonography group had a shorter length of stay in the ED (median difference, 15 minutes; 95% CI, 1-29) and a shorter treatment time (median difference, 28 minutes; 95% CI, 17-40) than those in the radiography group.
  • No important fractures were missed with ultrasonography, and no significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse events or unplanned returns to the ED between the two groups.

IN PRACTICE:

Noting the benefit-risk profile of an ultrasound-first approach in an ED setting, the lead author, Peter J. Snelling, MB, BS, MPH&TM, from Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia, said: “It is highly unlikely that any important fractures would be missed using the protocol that we trained clinicians. The risk is low and the benefit is moderate, such as reducing length of stay and increased level of patient satisfaction.”

He further added that, “with an ultrasound-first approach, clinicians can scan the patient at time of review and may even be able to discharge them immediately (two-thirds of instances in our NEJM trial). This places the patient at the center of care being provided.”
 

SOURCE: 

Authors from the BUCKLED Trial Group published their study in the New England Journal of Medicine.

LIMITATIONS:

PROMIS scores may have been affected by variations in subsequent therapeutic interventions rather than the initial diagnostic method. PROMIS tool was not validated in children younger than 5 years of age.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by the Emergency Medicine Foundation and others. The authors have declared no relevant interests to disclose.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

 

TOPLINE:

Ultrasonography may serve as an alternative to radiography for diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures, thus reducing the number of children undergoing radiography at initial emergency department presentation, as well as their waiting time in ED.

METHODOLOGY:

  • After the World Health Organization reported a lack of access to any diagnostic imaging in approximately two-thirds of the world population in 2010, ultrasonography has gained popularity in low- and middle-income countries.
  • The initial use of ultrasonography is in accordance with the principle of maintaining radiation levels as low as reasonably achievable.
  • The BUCKLED trial was conducted, including 270 pediatric patients (age, 5-15 years) who presented to the ED with isolated, acute, clinically nondeformed distal forearm fractures.
  • The participants were randomly assigned to receive initial point-of-care ultrasonography (n = 135) or radiography (n = 135) in the ED.
  • The primary outcome was the physical function of the affected arm at 4 weeks evaluated using the Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tool.

TAKEAWAY:

  • At 4 weeks, mean PROMIS scores were 36.4 and 36.3 points in ultrasonography and radiography groups, respectively (mean difference, 0.1 point; 95% confidence interval, − 1.3 to 1.4), indicating noninferiority of ultrasonography over radiography.
  • Ultrasonography and radiography groups showed similar efficacy in terms of PROMIS scores at 1 week (MD, 0.7 points; 95% CI, − 1.4 to 2.8) and 8 weeks (MD, 0.1 points; 95% CI, − 0.5 to 0.7).
  • Participants in the ultrasonography group had a shorter length of stay in the ED (median difference, 15 minutes; 95% CI, 1-29) and a shorter treatment time (median difference, 28 minutes; 95% CI, 17-40) than those in the radiography group.
  • No important fractures were missed with ultrasonography, and no significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse events or unplanned returns to the ED between the two groups.

IN PRACTICE:

Noting the benefit-risk profile of an ultrasound-first approach in an ED setting, the lead author, Peter J. Snelling, MB, BS, MPH&TM, from Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia, said: “It is highly unlikely that any important fractures would be missed using the protocol that we trained clinicians. The risk is low and the benefit is moderate, such as reducing length of stay and increased level of patient satisfaction.”

He further added that, “with an ultrasound-first approach, clinicians can scan the patient at time of review and may even be able to discharge them immediately (two-thirds of instances in our NEJM trial). This places the patient at the center of care being provided.”
 

SOURCE: 

Authors from the BUCKLED Trial Group published their study in the New England Journal of Medicine.

LIMITATIONS:

PROMIS scores may have been affected by variations in subsequent therapeutic interventions rather than the initial diagnostic method. PROMIS tool was not validated in children younger than 5 years of age.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by the Emergency Medicine Foundation and others. The authors have declared no relevant interests to disclose.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>165270</fileName> <TBEID>0C04C679.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>MD_0C04C679</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>News</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>2</articleType> <TBLocation>QC Done-All Pubs</TBLocation> <QCDate>20230928T080610</QCDate> <firstPublished>20230928T090254</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20230928T090254</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20230928T090254</CMSDate> <articleSource>FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE</articleSource> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>Vinrod Rane</byline> <bylineText>VINROD RANE, BS PHARM</bylineText> <bylineFull>VINROD RANE, BS PHARM</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType>News</newsDocType> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:imng"> <name>IMNG Medical Media</name> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name>Frontline Medical News</name> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice>Copyright (c) 2015 Frontline Medical News, a Frontline Medical Communications Inc. company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, copied, or otherwise reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</copyrightNotice> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Ultrasonography may serve as an alternative to radiography for diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures, thus reducing the number of children undergoing radiograp</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <teaser>“With an ultrasound-first approach, clinicians can scan the patient at time of review and may even be able to discharge them immediately (2/3 of instances in our NEJM trial).”</teaser> <title>Diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures: Radiograph or ultrasound?</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear/> <pubPubdateMonth/> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume/> <pubNumber/> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs/> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>pn</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>mdemed</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> <journalTitle/> <journalFullTitle/> <copyrightStatement/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>fp</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">25</term> <term>58877</term> <term>15</term> </publications> <sections> <term>39313</term> <term canonical="true">27970</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">235</term> <term>271</term> <term>308</term> <term>230</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures: Radiograph or ultrasound?</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <h2>TOPLINE: </h2> <p><span class="tag metaDescription">Ultrasonography may serve as an alternative to radiography for diagnosing pediatric forearm fractures, thus reducing the number of children undergoing radiography at initial emergency department presentation,</span> as well as their waiting time in ED.</p> <h2>METHODOLOGY:</h2> <ul class="body"> <li>After the World Health Organization reported a lack of access to any diagnostic imaging in approximately two-thirds of the world population in 2010, ultrasonography has gained popularity in low- and middle-income countries.</li> <li>The initial use of ultrasonography is in accordance with the principle of maintaining radiation levels as low as reasonably achievable.</li> <li>The BUCKLED trial was conducted, including 270 pediatric patients (age, 5-15 years) who presented to the ED with isolated, acute, clinically nondeformed distal forearm fractures.</li> <li>The participants were randomly assigned to receive initial point-of-care ultrasonography (n = 135) or radiography (n = 135) in the ED.</li> <li>The primary outcome was the physical function of the affected arm at 4 weeks evaluated using the Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tool.</li> </ul> <h2>TAKEAWAY:</h2> <ul class="body"> <li>At 4 weeks, mean PROMIS scores were 36.4 and 36.3 points in ultrasonography and radiography groups, respectively (mean difference, 0.1 point; 95% confidence interval, − 1.3 to 1.4), indicating noninferiority of ultrasonography over radiography.</li> <li>Ultrasonography and radiography groups showed similar efficacy in terms of PROMIS scores at 1 week (MD, 0.7 points; 95% CI, − 1.4 to 2.8) and 8 weeks (MD, 0.1 points; 95% CI, − 0.5 to 0.7).</li> <li>Participants in the ultrasonography group had a shorter length of stay in the ED (median difference, 15 minutes; 95% CI, 1-29) and a shorter treatment time (median difference, 28 minutes; 95% CI, 17-40) than those in the radiography group.</li> <li>No important fractures were missed with ultrasonography, and no significant difference was observed in the frequency of adverse events or unplanned returns to the ED between the two groups.</li> </ul> <h2>IN PRACTICE:</h2> <p>Noting the benefit-risk profile of an ultrasound-first approach in an ED setting, the lead author, Peter J. Snelling, MB, BS, MPH&amp;TM, from Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia, said: “It is highly unlikely that any important fractures would be missed using the protocol that we trained clinicians. The risk is low and the benefit is moderate, such as reducing length of stay and increased level of patient satisfaction.”</p> <p>He further added that, “with an ultrasound-first approach, clinicians can scan the patient at time of review and may even be able to discharge them immediately (two-thirds of instances in our NEJM trial). This places the patient at the center of care being provided.”<br/><br/></p> <h2>SOURCE: </h2> <p>Authors from the BUCKLED Trial Group published their study in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2213883">New England Journal of Medicine</a>.</p> <h2>LIMITATIONS:</h2> <p>PROMIS scores may have been affected by variations in subsequent therapeutic interventions rather than the initial diagnostic method. PROMIS tool was not validated in children younger than 5 years of age.</p> <h2>DISCLOSURES:</h2> <p>The study was funded by the Emergency Medicine Foundation and others. The authors have declared no relevant interests to disclose.</p> <p> <em>A version of this article first appeared on <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/diagnosing-pediatric-forearm-fractures-radiograph-or-2023a1000n0c">Medscape.com</a></span>.</em> </p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>teaser</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Article Source

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article