User login
CHICAGO – Drug-coated balloons show promise of being a long-sought major advance in the endovascular treatment of stenotic arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for hemodialysis access, Syed M. Hussain, MD, said at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
Something significantly better than today’s standard treatment options is needed, according to Dr. Hussain. Medicare pays out more than $50 billion annually for the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease, and a hefty chunk of that money goes for oft-repeated procedures aimed at preserving the patency of the access sites.
“Primary patency rates leave much room for improvement,” observed Dr. Hussain, a vascular surgeon at the Christie Clinic in Champaign, Ill.
Indeed, the 50% primary patency rate at 6 months that was optimistically declared a “reasonable goal” in the 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative is actually far-fetched using the conventional tools.
“That 50% patency at 6 months would be a tall order to try to meet. Anybody in this room that does fistulography and angioplasty knows the numbers are actually a lot lower than 50%,” said Dr. Hussain.
Plain old balloon angioplasty, the standard first-line intervention for stenotic hemodialysis access sites, has a 6-month patency rate of about 30%. Bare metal stents push the rate up to about 39%. Covered stent grafts are the most effective of the conventional treatment modalities, with a 6-month patency of 51%-53%; however, they are widely considered too expensive for routine use.
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been available for close to 3 years for treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease, where they have achieved considerable success. The Food and Drug Administration has approved three commercially available DCBs for this purpose: Bard’s Lutonix 035 AV, Medtronic’s IN.PACT Admiral, and most recently the Stellarex DCB.
In addition, the Lutonix DCB is approved for treatment of dysfunctional or stenotic arteriovenous (AV) fistulae on the strength of the positive results of the first prospective randomized multicenter trial of a DCB versus balloon angioplasty for AV access stenosis as reported at a conference in Leipzig, Germany, in 2017 and summarized by Dr. Hussain.
The pathophysiology of arterial atherosclerotic stenosis is very different from the stenosis that plagues AV access for dialysis. Arterial atherosclerotic stenosis is due to neointimal hyperplasia caused by inflammation and barotrauma secondary to angioplasty. In contrast, the neointimal hyperplasia in AV access stenosis is due to smooth muscle cell proliferation in response to nonphysiologic blood flow dynamics and shear forces between a high-pressure arterial system and the low-pressure venous system to which it has been connected, with resultant stenosis at the venous outflow anastomosis and often at the cephalic arch, Dr. Hussain explained.
Other contributors to the high rate of early stenosis in AV fistulae and grafts include traumatic balloon dilation, uremia, and repetitive traumatic needle insertion.
The breakthrough for DCBs as a potential game changer in dialysis access stenosis came with the discovery that venous smooth muscle cells are much more sensitive to paclitaxel and other antiproliferative drugs than are arterial smooth muscle cells. All three commercially available DCBs utilize paclitaxel as their active agent.
Multiple small single-center studies involving off-label use of the DCBs for dialysis access stenosis strongly suggested 6-month patency rates were higher than with balloon angioplasty. Then came the core lab-adjudicated Lutonix multicenter trial, in which 285 hemodialysis patients at 23 sites were randomized to the DCB or balloon angioplasty. Participants had to have a target lesion less than 10 cm long and had to undergo successful predilatation with high-pressure balloon angioplasty.
“The key thing to remember when we talk about dialysis grafts or fistulae is that we have to look at patency in periods of months. We can’t look at years because it’s pretty unusual to see a fistula stay open that long. So most of the time we’re trying to achieve extra months on these types of circuits,” noted Dr. Hussain.
That being said, the 8-month target lesion primary patency rate was 61.6% in the Lutonix DCB group, compared with 49.4% for percutaneous angioplasty, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference. Moreover, 66 interventions were required to maintain target lesion patency during that time frame in the DCB group, versus 94 in the angioplasty group; that translated to a 30% reduction in repeat interventions.
“This clearly has the potential to save a lot of money for the health care system,” he said.
The two forms of treatment were equally safe.
The expanded indication for the Lutonix DCB that resulted from this large randomized trial has triggered considerable research interest in DCBs for AV access stenosis around the world. Major ongoing randomized trials include the PAVE trial in the United Kingdom, the Spanish FISBOL trial, the APERTO trial in the Netherlands, and an Israeli randomized trial restricted to patients with cephalic arch stenosis.
Dr. Hussain is particularly excited about the ongoing 330-patient, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB versus plain balloon angioplasty. The Medtronic DCB employs a higher dosage of paclitaxel: 3.5 mcg/mm2, compared with 2.0 mcg/mm2 for the Lutonix DCB. Also, due to differences in the excipients used in the two DCBs, the paclitaxel from the IN.PACT device stays in the media of blood vessels for up to 180 days, compared with 60 days following drug delivery with the Lutonix balloon. Whether this longer period of close range antiproliferative activity will translate into a higher patency rate remains to be seen.
Dr. Hussain reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
Costs associated with the management of patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly those with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, is a huge component of the Medicare budget. The maintenance of functional vascular access in these patients remains an ongoing challenge and reduction of costs related to access failure is critical to the continued funding of the program. Traditional methods of maintaining access patency such as balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents have poor long-term outcomes, and moderate improvement is seen with the use of covered stents.
Dr. Hussain reviews the current status of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts. Safety and efficacy data from a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing the Bard Lutonix DCB and plain old balloon angioplasty demonstrated a significant improvement in primary patency and a 30% reduction in repeat interventions with the DCB. This led to FDA approval for the Lutonix DCB in the treatment of dysfunctional or stenotic arteriovenous fistulas. Encouraged by these results, researchers conducting ongoing international randomized trials are attempting to clarify the potential expanded indications for DCB in access stenosis. Of particular interest is the ongoing 330-patient prospective, multicenter IN-PACT trial comparing Admiral DCB to balloon angioplasty in failing arteriovenous fistulas. Both the Admiral DCB and Lutonix DCB utilize paclitaxel as the antiproliferative agent. Dr. Hussain describes the increased sensitivity of venous smooth muscle cells to paclitaxel and other antiproliferative drugs when compared with arterial smooth muscle cells. This exciting finding may explain the improved outcomes in the treatment of dialysis access lesions where pathology frequently occurs at the venous anastomosis or in the venous conduit.
Although early results with the use of DCBs are promising, ongoing clinical trials and careful analysis of data and cost effectiveness are critical to optimize outcomes in treating dialysis access dysfunction. Dr. Hussain appropriately expresses cautious optimism regarding the future of hemodialysis access with this new tool available to interventionists treating these complex patients.
Larry A. Scher, MD, is a vascular surgeon at Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, New York, and an associate medical editor for Vascular Specialist.
Costs associated with the management of patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly those with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, is a huge component of the Medicare budget. The maintenance of functional vascular access in these patients remains an ongoing challenge and reduction of costs related to access failure is critical to the continued funding of the program. Traditional methods of maintaining access patency such as balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents have poor long-term outcomes, and moderate improvement is seen with the use of covered stents.
Dr. Hussain reviews the current status of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts. Safety and efficacy data from a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing the Bard Lutonix DCB and plain old balloon angioplasty demonstrated a significant improvement in primary patency and a 30% reduction in repeat interventions with the DCB. This led to FDA approval for the Lutonix DCB in the treatment of dysfunctional or stenotic arteriovenous fistulas. Encouraged by these results, researchers conducting ongoing international randomized trials are attempting to clarify the potential expanded indications for DCB in access stenosis. Of particular interest is the ongoing 330-patient prospective, multicenter IN-PACT trial comparing Admiral DCB to balloon angioplasty in failing arteriovenous fistulas. Both the Admiral DCB and Lutonix DCB utilize paclitaxel as the antiproliferative agent. Dr. Hussain describes the increased sensitivity of venous smooth muscle cells to paclitaxel and other antiproliferative drugs when compared with arterial smooth muscle cells. This exciting finding may explain the improved outcomes in the treatment of dialysis access lesions where pathology frequently occurs at the venous anastomosis or in the venous conduit.
Although early results with the use of DCBs are promising, ongoing clinical trials and careful analysis of data and cost effectiveness are critical to optimize outcomes in treating dialysis access dysfunction. Dr. Hussain appropriately expresses cautious optimism regarding the future of hemodialysis access with this new tool available to interventionists treating these complex patients.
Larry A. Scher, MD, is a vascular surgeon at Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, New York, and an associate medical editor for Vascular Specialist.
Costs associated with the management of patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly those with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, is a huge component of the Medicare budget. The maintenance of functional vascular access in these patients remains an ongoing challenge and reduction of costs related to access failure is critical to the continued funding of the program. Traditional methods of maintaining access patency such as balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents have poor long-term outcomes, and moderate improvement is seen with the use of covered stents.
Dr. Hussain reviews the current status of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts. Safety and efficacy data from a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing the Bard Lutonix DCB and plain old balloon angioplasty demonstrated a significant improvement in primary patency and a 30% reduction in repeat interventions with the DCB. This led to FDA approval for the Lutonix DCB in the treatment of dysfunctional or stenotic arteriovenous fistulas. Encouraged by these results, researchers conducting ongoing international randomized trials are attempting to clarify the potential expanded indications for DCB in access stenosis. Of particular interest is the ongoing 330-patient prospective, multicenter IN-PACT trial comparing Admiral DCB to balloon angioplasty in failing arteriovenous fistulas. Both the Admiral DCB and Lutonix DCB utilize paclitaxel as the antiproliferative agent. Dr. Hussain describes the increased sensitivity of venous smooth muscle cells to paclitaxel and other antiproliferative drugs when compared with arterial smooth muscle cells. This exciting finding may explain the improved outcomes in the treatment of dialysis access lesions where pathology frequently occurs at the venous anastomosis or in the venous conduit.
Although early results with the use of DCBs are promising, ongoing clinical trials and careful analysis of data and cost effectiveness are critical to optimize outcomes in treating dialysis access dysfunction. Dr. Hussain appropriately expresses cautious optimism regarding the future of hemodialysis access with this new tool available to interventionists treating these complex patients.
Larry A. Scher, MD, is a vascular surgeon at Montefiore Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, New York, and an associate medical editor for Vascular Specialist.
CHICAGO – Drug-coated balloons show promise of being a long-sought major advance in the endovascular treatment of stenotic arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for hemodialysis access, Syed M. Hussain, MD, said at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
Something significantly better than today’s standard treatment options is needed, according to Dr. Hussain. Medicare pays out more than $50 billion annually for the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease, and a hefty chunk of that money goes for oft-repeated procedures aimed at preserving the patency of the access sites.
“Primary patency rates leave much room for improvement,” observed Dr. Hussain, a vascular surgeon at the Christie Clinic in Champaign, Ill.
Indeed, the 50% primary patency rate at 6 months that was optimistically declared a “reasonable goal” in the 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative is actually far-fetched using the conventional tools.
“That 50% patency at 6 months would be a tall order to try to meet. Anybody in this room that does fistulography and angioplasty knows the numbers are actually a lot lower than 50%,” said Dr. Hussain.
Plain old balloon angioplasty, the standard first-line intervention for stenotic hemodialysis access sites, has a 6-month patency rate of about 30%. Bare metal stents push the rate up to about 39%. Covered stent grafts are the most effective of the conventional treatment modalities, with a 6-month patency of 51%-53%; however, they are widely considered too expensive for routine use.
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been available for close to 3 years for treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease, where they have achieved considerable success. The Food and Drug Administration has approved three commercially available DCBs for this purpose: Bard’s Lutonix 035 AV, Medtronic’s IN.PACT Admiral, and most recently the Stellarex DCB.
In addition, the Lutonix DCB is approved for treatment of dysfunctional or stenotic arteriovenous (AV) fistulae on the strength of the positive results of the first prospective randomized multicenter trial of a DCB versus balloon angioplasty for AV access stenosis as reported at a conference in Leipzig, Germany, in 2017 and summarized by Dr. Hussain.
The pathophysiology of arterial atherosclerotic stenosis is very different from the stenosis that plagues AV access for dialysis. Arterial atherosclerotic stenosis is due to neointimal hyperplasia caused by inflammation and barotrauma secondary to angioplasty. In contrast, the neointimal hyperplasia in AV access stenosis is due to smooth muscle cell proliferation in response to nonphysiologic blood flow dynamics and shear forces between a high-pressure arterial system and the low-pressure venous system to which it has been connected, with resultant stenosis at the venous outflow anastomosis and often at the cephalic arch, Dr. Hussain explained.
Other contributors to the high rate of early stenosis in AV fistulae and grafts include traumatic balloon dilation, uremia, and repetitive traumatic needle insertion.
The breakthrough for DCBs as a potential game changer in dialysis access stenosis came with the discovery that venous smooth muscle cells are much more sensitive to paclitaxel and other antiproliferative drugs than are arterial smooth muscle cells. All three commercially available DCBs utilize paclitaxel as their active agent.
Multiple small single-center studies involving off-label use of the DCBs for dialysis access stenosis strongly suggested 6-month patency rates were higher than with balloon angioplasty. Then came the core lab-adjudicated Lutonix multicenter trial, in which 285 hemodialysis patients at 23 sites were randomized to the DCB or balloon angioplasty. Participants had to have a target lesion less than 10 cm long and had to undergo successful predilatation with high-pressure balloon angioplasty.
“The key thing to remember when we talk about dialysis grafts or fistulae is that we have to look at patency in periods of months. We can’t look at years because it’s pretty unusual to see a fistula stay open that long. So most of the time we’re trying to achieve extra months on these types of circuits,” noted Dr. Hussain.
That being said, the 8-month target lesion primary patency rate was 61.6% in the Lutonix DCB group, compared with 49.4% for percutaneous angioplasty, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference. Moreover, 66 interventions were required to maintain target lesion patency during that time frame in the DCB group, versus 94 in the angioplasty group; that translated to a 30% reduction in repeat interventions.
“This clearly has the potential to save a lot of money for the health care system,” he said.
The two forms of treatment were equally safe.
The expanded indication for the Lutonix DCB that resulted from this large randomized trial has triggered considerable research interest in DCBs for AV access stenosis around the world. Major ongoing randomized trials include the PAVE trial in the United Kingdom, the Spanish FISBOL trial, the APERTO trial in the Netherlands, and an Israeli randomized trial restricted to patients with cephalic arch stenosis.
Dr. Hussain is particularly excited about the ongoing 330-patient, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB versus plain balloon angioplasty. The Medtronic DCB employs a higher dosage of paclitaxel: 3.5 mcg/mm2, compared with 2.0 mcg/mm2 for the Lutonix DCB. Also, due to differences in the excipients used in the two DCBs, the paclitaxel from the IN.PACT device stays in the media of blood vessels for up to 180 days, compared with 60 days following drug delivery with the Lutonix balloon. Whether this longer period of close range antiproliferative activity will translate into a higher patency rate remains to be seen.
Dr. Hussain reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
CHICAGO – Drug-coated balloons show promise of being a long-sought major advance in the endovascular treatment of stenotic arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for hemodialysis access, Syed M. Hussain, MD, said at a symposium on vascular surgery sponsored by Northwestern University.
Something significantly better than today’s standard treatment options is needed, according to Dr. Hussain. Medicare pays out more than $50 billion annually for the treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease, and a hefty chunk of that money goes for oft-repeated procedures aimed at preserving the patency of the access sites.
“Primary patency rates leave much room for improvement,” observed Dr. Hussain, a vascular surgeon at the Christie Clinic in Champaign, Ill.
Indeed, the 50% primary patency rate at 6 months that was optimistically declared a “reasonable goal” in the 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative is actually far-fetched using the conventional tools.
“That 50% patency at 6 months would be a tall order to try to meet. Anybody in this room that does fistulography and angioplasty knows the numbers are actually a lot lower than 50%,” said Dr. Hussain.
Plain old balloon angioplasty, the standard first-line intervention for stenotic hemodialysis access sites, has a 6-month patency rate of about 30%. Bare metal stents push the rate up to about 39%. Covered stent grafts are the most effective of the conventional treatment modalities, with a 6-month patency of 51%-53%; however, they are widely considered too expensive for routine use.
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been available for close to 3 years for treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease, where they have achieved considerable success. The Food and Drug Administration has approved three commercially available DCBs for this purpose: Bard’s Lutonix 035 AV, Medtronic’s IN.PACT Admiral, and most recently the Stellarex DCB.
In addition, the Lutonix DCB is approved for treatment of dysfunctional or stenotic arteriovenous (AV) fistulae on the strength of the positive results of the first prospective randomized multicenter trial of a DCB versus balloon angioplasty for AV access stenosis as reported at a conference in Leipzig, Germany, in 2017 and summarized by Dr. Hussain.
The pathophysiology of arterial atherosclerotic stenosis is very different from the stenosis that plagues AV access for dialysis. Arterial atherosclerotic stenosis is due to neointimal hyperplasia caused by inflammation and barotrauma secondary to angioplasty. In contrast, the neointimal hyperplasia in AV access stenosis is due to smooth muscle cell proliferation in response to nonphysiologic blood flow dynamics and shear forces between a high-pressure arterial system and the low-pressure venous system to which it has been connected, with resultant stenosis at the venous outflow anastomosis and often at the cephalic arch, Dr. Hussain explained.
Other contributors to the high rate of early stenosis in AV fistulae and grafts include traumatic balloon dilation, uremia, and repetitive traumatic needle insertion.
The breakthrough for DCBs as a potential game changer in dialysis access stenosis came with the discovery that venous smooth muscle cells are much more sensitive to paclitaxel and other antiproliferative drugs than are arterial smooth muscle cells. All three commercially available DCBs utilize paclitaxel as their active agent.
Multiple small single-center studies involving off-label use of the DCBs for dialysis access stenosis strongly suggested 6-month patency rates were higher than with balloon angioplasty. Then came the core lab-adjudicated Lutonix multicenter trial, in which 285 hemodialysis patients at 23 sites were randomized to the DCB or balloon angioplasty. Participants had to have a target lesion less than 10 cm long and had to undergo successful predilatation with high-pressure balloon angioplasty.
“The key thing to remember when we talk about dialysis grafts or fistulae is that we have to look at patency in periods of months. We can’t look at years because it’s pretty unusual to see a fistula stay open that long. So most of the time we’re trying to achieve extra months on these types of circuits,” noted Dr. Hussain.
That being said, the 8-month target lesion primary patency rate was 61.6% in the Lutonix DCB group, compared with 49.4% for percutaneous angioplasty, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful difference. Moreover, 66 interventions were required to maintain target lesion patency during that time frame in the DCB group, versus 94 in the angioplasty group; that translated to a 30% reduction in repeat interventions.
“This clearly has the potential to save a lot of money for the health care system,” he said.
The two forms of treatment were equally safe.
The expanded indication for the Lutonix DCB that resulted from this large randomized trial has triggered considerable research interest in DCBs for AV access stenosis around the world. Major ongoing randomized trials include the PAVE trial in the United Kingdom, the Spanish FISBOL trial, the APERTO trial in the Netherlands, and an Israeli randomized trial restricted to patients with cephalic arch stenosis.
Dr. Hussain is particularly excited about the ongoing 330-patient, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB versus plain balloon angioplasty. The Medtronic DCB employs a higher dosage of paclitaxel: 3.5 mcg/mm2, compared with 2.0 mcg/mm2 for the Lutonix DCB. Also, due to differences in the excipients used in the two DCBs, the paclitaxel from the IN.PACT device stays in the media of blood vessels for up to 180 days, compared with 60 days following drug delivery with the Lutonix balloon. Whether this longer period of close range antiproliferative activity will translate into a higher patency rate remains to be seen.
Dr. Hussain reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE NORTHWESTERN VASCULAR SYMPOSIUM