User login
TOPLINE:
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is more cost-effective, and achieves and sustains greater weight loss, than semaglutide over a 5-year period in patients with class II obesity.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers used a Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide vs ESG over 5 years in people with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI], 35-39.9), with the model costs based on the US healthcare system.
- A 45-year-old patient with a BMI of 37 was included as the base case in this study.
- The model simulated hypothetical patients with class II obesity who received ESG, semaglutide, or no treatment (reference group with zero treatment costs).
- The model derived clinical data for the first year from two randomized clinical trials, STEP 1 (semaglutide) and MERIT (ESG); for the following years, data were derived from published studies and publicly available data sources.
- Study outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
TAKEAWAY:
- ESG led to better weight loss outcomes (BMI, 31.7 vs 33.0) and added 0.06 more QALYs relative to semaglutide in the modelled patients over the 5-year time horizon; about 20% of the patients receiving semaglutide dropped out owing to medication intolerance or other reasons.
- The semaglutide treatment was $33,583 more expensive than the ESG treatment over the 5-year period.
- The annual price of semaglutide would need to be reduced from $13,618 to $3591 to achieve nondominance compared with ESG.
IN PRACTICE:
“The strategic choice of cost saving yet effective treatment such as ESG compared with semaglutide for specific patient groups could help alleviate the potential budget strain expected from the use of semaglutide,” the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
Muhammad Haseeb, MD, MSc, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, led this study, which was published online on April 12, 2024, in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
The study did not look at benefits associated with improvements in comorbidities from either treatment strategy, and the model used did not account for any microlevel follow-up costs such as routine clinic visits. The authors acknowledged that semaglutide’s prices may fall in the future when more anti-obesity drugs get approved.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, royalty payments, and/or grants and having other ties with several sources.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is more cost-effective, and achieves and sustains greater weight loss, than semaglutide over a 5-year period in patients with class II obesity.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers used a Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide vs ESG over 5 years in people with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI], 35-39.9), with the model costs based on the US healthcare system.
- A 45-year-old patient with a BMI of 37 was included as the base case in this study.
- The model simulated hypothetical patients with class II obesity who received ESG, semaglutide, or no treatment (reference group with zero treatment costs).
- The model derived clinical data for the first year from two randomized clinical trials, STEP 1 (semaglutide) and MERIT (ESG); for the following years, data were derived from published studies and publicly available data sources.
- Study outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
TAKEAWAY:
- ESG led to better weight loss outcomes (BMI, 31.7 vs 33.0) and added 0.06 more QALYs relative to semaglutide in the modelled patients over the 5-year time horizon; about 20% of the patients receiving semaglutide dropped out owing to medication intolerance or other reasons.
- The semaglutide treatment was $33,583 more expensive than the ESG treatment over the 5-year period.
- The annual price of semaglutide would need to be reduced from $13,618 to $3591 to achieve nondominance compared with ESG.
IN PRACTICE:
“The strategic choice of cost saving yet effective treatment such as ESG compared with semaglutide for specific patient groups could help alleviate the potential budget strain expected from the use of semaglutide,” the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
Muhammad Haseeb, MD, MSc, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, led this study, which was published online on April 12, 2024, in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
The study did not look at benefits associated with improvements in comorbidities from either treatment strategy, and the model used did not account for any microlevel follow-up costs such as routine clinic visits. The authors acknowledged that semaglutide’s prices may fall in the future when more anti-obesity drugs get approved.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, royalty payments, and/or grants and having other ties with several sources.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is more cost-effective, and achieves and sustains greater weight loss, than semaglutide over a 5-year period in patients with class II obesity.
METHODOLOGY:
- Researchers used a Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide vs ESG over 5 years in people with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI], 35-39.9), with the model costs based on the US healthcare system.
- A 45-year-old patient with a BMI of 37 was included as the base case in this study.
- The model simulated hypothetical patients with class II obesity who received ESG, semaglutide, or no treatment (reference group with zero treatment costs).
- The model derived clinical data for the first year from two randomized clinical trials, STEP 1 (semaglutide) and MERIT (ESG); for the following years, data were derived from published studies and publicly available data sources.
- Study outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
TAKEAWAY:
- ESG led to better weight loss outcomes (BMI, 31.7 vs 33.0) and added 0.06 more QALYs relative to semaglutide in the modelled patients over the 5-year time horizon; about 20% of the patients receiving semaglutide dropped out owing to medication intolerance or other reasons.
- The semaglutide treatment was $33,583 more expensive than the ESG treatment over the 5-year period.
- The annual price of semaglutide would need to be reduced from $13,618 to $3591 to achieve nondominance compared with ESG.
IN PRACTICE:
“The strategic choice of cost saving yet effective treatment such as ESG compared with semaglutide for specific patient groups could help alleviate the potential budget strain expected from the use of semaglutide,” the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
Muhammad Haseeb, MD, MSc, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, led this study, which was published online on April 12, 2024, in JAMA Network Open.
LIMITATIONS:
The study did not look at benefits associated with improvements in comorbidities from either treatment strategy, and the model used did not account for any microlevel follow-up costs such as routine clinic visits. The authors acknowledged that semaglutide’s prices may fall in the future when more anti-obesity drugs get approved.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, royalty payments, and/or grants and having other ties with several sources.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>167696</fileName> <TBEID>0C04F8D1.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>MD_0C04F8D1</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>News</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>2</articleType> <TBLocation>QC Done-All Pubs</TBLocation> <QCDate>20240415T134027</QCDate> <firstPublished>20240415T135911</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240415T135911</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240415T135911</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>Shrabasti Bhattacharya</byline> <bylineText>SHRABASTI BHATTACHARYA</bylineText> <bylineFull>SHRABASTI BHATTACHARYA</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType>News</newsDocType> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:imng"> <name>IMNG Medical Media</name> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name>Frontline Medical News</name> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice>Copyright (c) 2015 Frontline Medical News, a Frontline Medical Communications Inc. company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, copied, or otherwise reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</copyrightNotice> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>ESG became more cost-effective than semaglutide at 2 years and remained so over a 5-year time horizon, with an ICER of — $595,532 per QALY for the base case.</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <teaser>In a long-term study, ESG was less expensive and showed increased, sustained weight loss compared with semaglutide.</teaser> <title>Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty More Cost-Effective Long Term Than Semaglutide for Treating Obesity</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear/> <pubPubdateMonth/> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume/> <pubNumber/> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs/> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>endo</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>fp</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>im</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">34</term> <term>15</term> <term>21</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">39313</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">261</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty More Cost-Effective Long Term Than Semaglutide for Treating Obesity</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <h2>TOPLINE:</h2> <p>Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is more cost-effective, and achieves and sustains greater weight loss, than <a href="https://reference.medscape.com/drug/ozempic-rybelsus-wegovy-semaglutide-1000174">semaglutide</a> over a 5-year period in patients with class II <a href="https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/123702-overview">obesity</a>.</p> <h2>METHODOLOGY:</h2> <ul class="body"> <li>Researchers used a Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of semaglutide vs ESG over 5 years in people with class II obesity (body mass index [BMI], 35-39.9), with the model costs based on the US healthcare system.</li> <li>A 45-year-old patient with a BMI of 37 was included as the base case in this study.</li> <li>The model simulated hypothetical patients with class II obesity who received ESG, semaglutide, or no treatment (reference group with zero treatment costs).</li> <li>The model derived clinical data for the first year from two randomized clinical trials, STEP 1 (semaglutide) and MERIT (ESG); for the following years, data were derived from published studies and publicly available data sources.</li> <li>Study outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).</li> </ul> <h2>TAKEAWAY:</h2> <ul class="body"> <li>ESG led to better weight loss outcomes (BMI, 31.7 vs 33.0) and added 0.06 more QALYs relative to semaglutide in the modelled patients over the 5-year time horizon; about 20% of the patients receiving semaglutide dropped out owing to medication intolerance or other reasons.</li> <li>The semaglutide treatment was $33,583 more expensive than the ESG treatment over the 5-year period.</li> <li> <span class="tag metaDescription">ESG became more cost-effective than semaglutide at 2 years and remained so over a 5-year time horizon, with an ICER of — $595,532 per QALY for the base case.</span> </li> <li>The annual price of semaglutide would need to be reduced from $13,618 to $3591 to achieve nondominance compared with ESG.</li> </ul> <h2>IN PRACTICE:</h2> <p>“The strategic choice of cost saving yet effective treatment such as ESG compared with semaglutide for specific patient groups could help alleviate the potential budget strain expected from the use of semaglutide,” the authors wrote.</p> <h2>SOURCE:</h2> <p>Muhammad Haseeb, MD, MSc, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, led this study, which was <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2817480">published online</a></span> on April 12, 2024, in<em> JAMA Network Open</em>.</p> <h2>LIMITATIONS:</h2> <p>The study did not look at benefits associated with improvements in comorbidities from either treatment strategy, and the model used did not account for any microlevel follow-up costs such as routine clinic visits. The authors acknowledged that semaglutide’s prices may fall in the future when more anti-obesity drugs get approved.</p> <h2>DISCLOSURES:</h2> <p>This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, royalty payments, and/or grants and having other ties with several sources.<span class="end"/></p> <p> <em>A version of this article appeared on <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/endoscopic-sleeve-gastroplasty-more-cost-effective-long-term-2024a10006zo">Medscape.com</a></span>.</em> </p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>teaser</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>